Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Headline

CVE-2023-47128: SQL Injection via named transaction savepoints

Piccolo is an object-relational mapping and query builder which supports asyncio. Prior to version 1.1.1, the handling of named transaction savepoints in all database implementations is vulnerable to SQL Injection via f-strings. While the likelihood of an end developer exposing a savepoints name parameter to a user is highly unlikely, it would not be unheard of. If a malicious user was able to abuse this functionality they would have essentially direct access to the database and the ability to modify data to the level of permissions associated with the database user. A non exhaustive list of actions possible based on database permissions is: Read all data stored in the database, including usernames and password hashes; insert arbitrary data into the database, including modifying existing records; and gain a shell on the underlying server. Version 1.1.1 fixes this issue.

CVE
#sql#vulnerability#perl#postgres

Summary

The handling of named transaction savepoints in all database implementations is vulnerable to SQL Injection as user provided input is passed directly to connection.execute(…) via f-strings.

Details

An excerpt of the Postgres savepoint handling:

async def savepoint(self, name: t.Optional\[str\] \= None) \-> Savepoint:
    name \= name or f"savepoint\_{self.get\_savepoint\_id()}"
    await self.connection.execute(f"SAVEPOINT {name}")
    return Savepoint(name\=name, transaction\=self)

In this example, we can see user input is directly passed to connection.execute without being properly escaped.

All implementations of savepoints and savepoint methods directly pass this name parameter to connection.execute and are vulnerable to this. A non-exhaustive list can be found below:

  • Postgres
    • One
    • Two
    • Three
  • Sqlite
    • One
    • Two
    • Three

Care should be given to ensuring all strings passed to connection.execute are properly escaped, regardless of how end user facing they may be.

Further to this, the following method also passes user input directly to an execution context however I have been unable to abuse this functionality at the time of writing. This method also has a far lower chance of being exposed to an end user as it relates to database init functionality.

PoC

The following FastAPI route can be used in conjunction with sqlmap to easily demonstrate the SQL injection.

DB = …

@app.get(“/test”) async def test(name): async with DB.transaction() as transaction: await transaction.savepoint(name)

Steps

  1. Create a standard Piccolo application with Postgres as a database backend
  2. Add the route shown previously
  3. Run your application, making a note of the URL it is served on
  4. Install sqlmap
  5. In a terminal, run the following command substituting URL with your applications URL: sqlmap -u “http://URL/test?name=a” --batch
  6. Observe sqlmap identifying the vulnerability

For sqlmap help, this usage guide may be useful. The following commands may also be helpful to see the impact.

Dumping all tables

The --tables flag will enumerate all tables accessible from within the exposed database session.

sqlmap -u “http://URL/test?name=a” --batch --tables

An example output of this can be seen in the following screenshot.

OS Shell

The --os-shell will drop the user into an OS shell on the underlying system if permissions permit. This can be seen in the attached screenshot which prints the databases current working directory.

Impact

While the likelihood of an end developer exposing a savepoints name parameter to a user is highly unlikely, it would not be unheard of. If a malicious user was able to abuse this functionality they would have essentially direct access to the database and the ability to modify data to the level of permissions associated with the database user.

A non exhaustive list of actions possible based on database permissions is:

  • Read all data stored in the database, including usernames and password hashes
  • Insert arbitrary data into the database, including modifying existing records
  • Gain a shell on the underlying server

Related news

GHSA-xq59-7jf3-rjc6: piccolo SQL Injection via named transaction savepoints

### Summary The handling of named transaction savepoints in all database implementations is vulnerable to [SQL Injection](https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/SQL_Injection) as user provided input is passed directly to `connection.execute(...)` via f-strings. ### Details An excerpt of the Postgres savepoint handling: ```python async def savepoint(self, name: t.Optional[str] = None) -> Savepoint: name = name or f"savepoint_{self.get_savepoint_id()}" await self.connection.execute(f"SAVEPOINT {name}") return Savepoint(name=name, transaction=self) ``` In this example, we can see user input is directly passed to `connection.execute` without being properly escaped. All implementations of savepoints and savepoint methods directly pass this `name` parameter to `connection.execute` and are vulnerable to this. A non-exhaustive list can be found below: - Postgres - - [One](https://github.com/piccolo-orm/piccolo/blob/master/piccolo/engine/postgres.py#L239) - - [...

CVE: Latest News

CVE-2023-50976: Transactions API Authorization by oleiman · Pull Request #14969 · redpanda-data/redpanda
CVE-2023-6905
CVE-2023-6903
CVE-2023-6904
CVE-2023-3907