Headline

GHSA-5fm9-h728-fwpj: trust-dns vulnerable to Remote Attackers causing Denial-of-Service (packet loops) with crafted DNS packets

trust-dns and trust-dns-server are vulnerable to remotely triggered denial-of-service attacks, consuming both network and CPU resources. DNS messages with the QR=1 bit set are responded to with a FormErr response. This allows creating a traffic loop, in which these FormErr responses are sent nonstop between vulnerable servers.

There are two scenarios how this can be exploited: 1) Create a loop between two instances of trust-dns, consuming network resources, or 2) consuming the CPU of a single instance.

With two instances A and B an attacker sends a DNS query with a spoofed source IP address to A. A replies with a FormErr to B. Now both servers with ping-pong the message back and forth until by chance the packet is dropped in the network. Multiple spoofed packets can be sent by the attacker, increasing resource consumption.

A single server can get locked up replying to itself. Same setup as above, but now A sends the reply to itself. The packet is sent out as fast as the CPU and network stack manage. This locks up a CPU core. Multiple packets from the attacker consume multiple CPU cores.

1 year ago

ghsa

Open in Source

#ios #dos

trust-dns and trust-dns-server are vulnerable to remotely triggered denial-of-service attacks, consuming both network and CPU resources.
DNS messages with the QR=1 bit set are responded to with a FormErr response.
This allows creating a traffic loop, in which these FormErr responses are sent nonstop between vulnerable servers.

There are two scenarios how this can be exploited: 1) Create a loop between two instances of trust-dns, consuming network resources, or 2) consuming the CPU of a single instance.

With two instances A and B an attacker sends a DNS query with a spoofed source IP address to A.
A replies with a FormErr to B.
Now both servers with ping-pong the message back and forth until by chance the packet is dropped in the network.
Multiple spoofed packets can be sent by the attacker, increasing resource consumption.

A single server can get locked up replying to itself.
Same setup as above, but now A sends the reply to itself.
The packet is sent out as fast as the CPU and network stack manage.
This locks up a CPU core.
Multiple packets from the attacker consume multiple CPU cores.

References