Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Headline

GHSA-7x45-phmr-9wqp: Arbitrary file write in mindsdb when Extracting Tarballs retrieved from a remote location

Summary

An unsafe extraction is being performed using shutil.unpack_archive() from a remotely retrieved tarball. Which may lead to the writing of the extracted files to an unintended location. This vulnerability is sometimes called a TarSlip or a ZipSlip variant.

Details

Unpacking files using the high-level function shutil.unpack_archive() from a potentially malicious tarball without validating that the destination file path remained within the intended destination directory may cause files to be overwritten outside the destination directory.

As can be seen in the vulnerable snippet code source, an archive is being retrieved using the download_file() function from a remote location which is a user-provided permanent storage bucket s3. Immediately after being retrieved, the tarball is unsafely unpacked using the function shutil.unpack_archive().

The vulnerable code is L128…L129 in fs.py file.

    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__()
        if 's3_credentials' in self.config['permanent_storage']:
            self.s3 = boto3.client('s3', **self.config['permanent_storage']['s3_credentials'])
        else:
            self.s3 = boto3.client('s3')
       
        # User provided remote storage!
        self.bucket = self.config['permanent_storage']['bucket'] 

    def get(self, local_name, base_dir):
        remote_name = local_name
        remote_ziped_name = f'{remote_name}.tar.gz'
        local_ziped_name = f'{local_name}.tar.gz'
        local_ziped_path = os.path.join(base_dir, local_ziped_name)
        os.makedirs(base_dir, exist_ok=True)
        
        # Retrieve a potentially malicious tarball
        self.s3.download_file(self.bucket, remote_ziped_name, local_ziped_path)

        # Perform an unsafe extraction
        shutil.unpack_archive(local_ziped_path, base_dir)

        os.system(f'chmod -R 777 {base_dir}')
        os.remove(local_ziped_path)

PoC

The following PoC is provided for illustration purposes only. It showcases the risk of extracting a non-harmless text file sim4n6.txt to one of the parent locations rather than the intended current folder.

> tar --list -f archive.tar
tar: Removing leading "../../../" from member names
../../../sim4n6.txt

> python3 
Python 3.10.6 (main, Nov  2 2022, 18:53:38) [GCC 11.3.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import shutil
>>> shutil.unpack_archive("archive.tar")
>>> exit()

> test -f ../../../sim4n6.txt && echo "sim4n6.txt exists"
sim4n6.txt exists

Attack Scenario

An attacker could craft a malicious tarball with a filename path, such as ../../../../../../../../etc/passwd, and then serve the archive remotely using a personal bucket s3, thus, retrieve the tarball through mindsdb and overwrite the system files of the hosting server.

Mitigation

Potential mitigation could be to:

  • Use a safer module, like zipfile.
  • Validate the location of the extracted files and discard those with malicious paths such as relative path .. or absolute path such as /etc/password.
  • Perform a checksum verification for the retrieved archive, but hard-coding the hashes may be cumbersome and difficult to manage.
ghsa
#vulnerability#linux#git#c++

Summary

An unsafe extraction is being performed using shutil.unpack_archive() from a remotely retrieved tarball. Which may lead to the writing of the extracted files to an unintended location. This vulnerability is sometimes called a TarSlip or a ZipSlip variant.

Details

Unpacking files using the high-level function shutil.unpack_archive() from a potentially malicious tarball without validating that the destination file path remained within the intended destination directory may cause files to be overwritten outside the destination directory.

As can be seen in the vulnerable snippet code source, an archive is being retrieved using the download_file() function from a remote location which is a user-provided permanent storage bucket s3. Immediately after being retrieved, the tarball is unsafely unpacked using the function shutil.unpack_archive().

The vulnerable code is L128…L129 in fs.py file.

def \_\_init\_\_(self):
    super().\_\_init\_\_()
    if 's3\_credentials' in self.config\['permanent\_storage'\]:
        self.s3 \= boto3.client('s3', \*\*self.config\['permanent\_storage'\]\['s3\_credentials'\])
    else:
        self.s3 \= boto3.client('s3')
   
    \# User provided remote storage!
    self.bucket \= self.config\['permanent\_storage'\]\['bucket'\] 

def get(self, local\_name, base\_dir):
    remote\_name \= local\_name
    remote\_ziped\_name \= f'{remote\_name}.tar.gz'
    local\_ziped\_name \= f'{local\_name}.tar.gz'
    local\_ziped\_path \= os.path.join(base\_dir, local\_ziped\_name)
    os.makedirs(base\_dir, exist\_ok\=True)
    
    \# Retrieve a potentially malicious tarball
    self.s3.download\_file(self.bucket, remote\_ziped\_name, local\_ziped\_path)

    \# Perform an unsafe extraction
    shutil.unpack\_archive(local\_ziped\_path, base\_dir)

    os.system(f'chmod -R 777 {base\_dir}')
    os.remove(local\_ziped\_path)

PoC

The following PoC is provided for illustration purposes only. It showcases the risk of extracting a non-harmless text file sim4n6.txt to one of the parent locations rather than the intended current folder.

> tar --list -f archive.tar tar: Removing leading “…/…/…/” from member names …/…/…/sim4n6.txt

> python3 Python 3.10.6 (main, Nov 2 2022, 18:53:38) [GCC 11.3.0] on linux Type "help", "copyright", “credits” or “license” for more information.

import shutil shutil.unpack_archive(“archive.tar”) exit()

> test -f …/…/…/sim4n6.txt && echo “sim4n6.txt exists” sim4n6.txt exists

Attack Scenario

An attacker could craft a malicious tarball with a filename path, such as …/…/…/…/…/…/…/…/etc/passwd, and then serve the archive remotely using a personal bucket s3, thus, retrieve the tarball through mindsdb and overwrite the system files of the hosting server.

Mitigation

Potential mitigation could be to:

  • Use a safer module, like zipfile.
  • Validate the location of the extracted files and discard those with malicious paths such as relative path … or absolute path such as /etc/password.
  • Perform a checksum verification for the retrieved archive, but hard-coding the hashes may be cumbersome and difficult to manage.

References

  • GHSA-7x45-phmr-9wqp
  • https://github.com/mindsdb/mindsdb/blob/69c76e727b8067f32b06ab83bb835a8c416c4f21/mindsdb/interfaces/storage/fs.py
  • https://github.com/mindsdb/mindsdb/blob/69c76e727b8067f32b06ab83bb835a8c416c4f21/mindsdb/interfaces/storage/fs.py#L128…L129
  • https://github.com/mindsdb/mindsdb/releases/tag/v22.11.4.3

Related news

CVE-2022-23522: Arbitrary File Write when Extracting Tarballs retrieved from a remote location using `shutil.unpack_archive()`

MindsDB is an open source machine learning platform. An unsafe extraction is being performed using `shutil.unpack_archive()` from a remotely retrieved tarball. Which may lead to the writing of the extracted files to an unintended location. This vulnerability is sometimes called a **TarSlip** or a **ZipSlip variant**. Unpacking files using the high-level function `shutil.unpack_archive()` from a potentially malicious tarball without validating that the destination file path remained within the intended destination directory may cause files to be overwritten outside the destination directory. An attacker could craft a malicious tarball with a filename path, such as `../../../../../../../../etc/passwd`, and then serve the archive remotely using a personal bucket `s3`, thus, retrieve the tarball through **mindsdb** and overwrite the system files of the hosting server. This issue has been addressed in version 22.11.4.3. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should avoid inge...