Headline
GHSA-jp3w-3q88-34cf: Miscomputation when performing AES encryption in rust-crypto
The following Rust program demonstrates some strangeness in AES encryption - if you have an immutable key slice and then operate on that slice, you get different encryption output than if you operate on a copy of that key.
For these functions, we expect that extending a 16 byte key to a 32 byte key by repeating it gives the same encrypted data, because the underlying rust-crypto functions repeat key data up to the necessary key size for the cipher.
use crypto::{
aes, blockmodes, buffer,
buffer::{BufferResult, ReadBuffer, WriteBuffer},
symmetriccipher,
};
fn encrypt(
key: &[u8],
iv: &[u8],
data: &str,
) -> Result<String, symmetriccipher::SymmetricCipherError> {
let mut encryptor =
aes::cbc_encryptor(aes::KeySize::KeySize256, key, iv, blockmodes::PkcsPadding);
let mut encrypted_data = Vec::<u8>::new();
let mut read_buffer = buffer::RefReadBuffer::new(data.as_bytes());
let mut buffer = [0; 4096];
let mut write_buffer = buffer::RefWriteBuffer::new(&mut buffer);
loop {
let result = encryptor.encrypt(&mut read_buffer, &mut write_buffer, true)?;
encrypted_data.extend(
write_buffer
.take_read_buffer()
.take_remaining()
.iter()
.copied(),
);
match result {
BufferResult::BufferUnderflow => break,
BufferResult::BufferOverflow => {}
}
}
Ok(hex::encode(encrypted_data))
}
fn working() {
let data = "data";
let iv = [
0xF0, 0xF1, 0xF2, 0xF3, 0xF4, 0xF5, 0xF6, 0xF7, 0xF8, 0xF9, 0xFA, 0xFB, 0xFC, 0xFD, 0xFE,
0xFF,
];
let key = [
0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D, 0x0E,
0x0F,
];
// The copy here makes the code work.
let key_copy = key;
let key2: Vec<u8> = key_copy.iter().cycle().take(32).copied().collect();
println!("key1:{} key2: {}", hex::encode(&key), hex::encode(&key2));
let x1 = encrypt(&key, &iv, data).unwrap();
println!("X1: {}", x1);
let x2 = encrypt(&key2, &iv, data).unwrap();
println!("X2: {}", x2);
assert_eq!(x1, x2);
}
fn broken() {
let data = "data";
let iv = [
0xF0, 0xF1, 0xF2, 0xF3, 0xF4, 0xF5, 0xF6, 0xF7, 0xF8, 0xF9, 0xFA, 0xFB, 0xFC, 0xFD, 0xFE,
0xFF,
];
let key = [
0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D, 0x0E,
0x0F,
];
// This operation shouldn't affect the contents of key at all.
let key2: Vec<u8> = key.iter().cycle().take(32).copied().collect();
println!("key1:{} key2: {}", hex::encode(&key), hex::encode(&key2));
let x1 = encrypt(&key, &iv, data).unwrap();
println!("X1: {}", x1);
let x2 = encrypt(&key2, &iv, data).unwrap();
println!("X2: {}", x2);
assert_eq!(x1, x2);
}
fn main() {
working();
broken();
}
The output from this program:
Running `target/host/debug/rust-crypto-test`
key1:000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f key2: 000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f
X1: 90462bbe32965c8e7ea0addbbed4cddb
X2: 90462bbe32965c8e7ea0addbbed4cddb
key1:000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f key2: 000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f
X1: 26e847e5e7df1947bf82a650548a7d5b
X2: 90462bbe32965c8e7ea0addbbed4cddb
thread 'main' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`
left: `"26e847e5e7df1947bf82a650548a7d5b"`,
right: `"90462bbe32965c8e7ea0addbbed4cddb"`', src/main.rs:83:5
Notably, the X1 key in the broken()
test changes every time after rerunning the program.
The following Rust program demonstrates some strangeness in AES encryption - if you have an immutable key slice and then operate on that slice, you get different encryption output than if you operate on a copy of that key.
For these functions, we expect that extending a 16 byte key to a 32 byte key by repeating it gives the same encrypted data, because the underlying rust-crypto functions repeat key data up to the necessary key size for the cipher.
use crypto::{ aes, blockmodes, buffer, buffer::{BufferResult, ReadBuffer, WriteBuffer}, symmetriccipher, };
fn encrypt( key: &[u8], iv: &[u8], data: &str, ) -> Result<String, symmetriccipher::SymmetricCipherError> { let mut encryptor = aes::cbc_encryptor(aes::KeySize::KeySize256, key, iv, blockmodes::PkcsPadding);
let mut encrypted\_data \= Vec::<u8\>::new();
let mut read\_buffer \= buffer::RefReadBuffer::new(data.as\_bytes());
let mut buffer \= \[0; 4096\];
let mut write\_buffer \= buffer::RefWriteBuffer::new(&mut buffer);
loop {
let result \= encryptor.encrypt(&mut read\_buffer, &mut write\_buffer, true)?;
encrypted\_data.extend(
write\_buffer
.take\_read\_buffer()
.take\_remaining()
.iter()
.copied(),
);
match result {
BufferResult::BufferUnderflow \=> break,
BufferResult::BufferOverflow \=> {}
}
}
Ok(hex::encode(encrypted\_data))
}
fn working() { let data = "data"; let iv = [ 0xF0, 0xF1, 0xF2, 0xF3, 0xF4, 0xF5, 0xF6, 0xF7, 0xF8, 0xF9, 0xFA, 0xFB, 0xFC, 0xFD, 0xFE, 0xFF, ]; let key = [ 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D, 0x0E, 0x0F, ]; // The copy here makes the code work. let key_copy = key; let key2: Vec<u8> = key_copy.iter().cycle().take(32).copied().collect(); println!("key1:{} key2: {}", hex::encode(&key), hex::encode(&key2));
let x1 \= encrypt(&key, &iv, data).unwrap();
println!("X1: {}", x1);
let x2 \= encrypt(&key2, &iv, data).unwrap();
println!("X2: {}", x2);
assert\_eq!(x1, x2);
}
fn broken() { let data = "data"; let iv = [ 0xF0, 0xF1, 0xF2, 0xF3, 0xF4, 0xF5, 0xF6, 0xF7, 0xF8, 0xF9, 0xFA, 0xFB, 0xFC, 0xFD, 0xFE, 0xFF, ]; let key = [ 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0B, 0x0C, 0x0D, 0x0E, 0x0F, ]; // This operation shouldn’t affect the contents of key at all. let key2: Vec<u8> = key.iter().cycle().take(32).copied().collect(); println!("key1:{} key2: {}", hex::encode(&key), hex::encode(&key2));
let x1 \= encrypt(&key, &iv, data).unwrap();
println!("X1: {}", x1);
let x2 \= encrypt(&key2, &iv, data).unwrap();
println!("X2: {}", x2);
assert\_eq!(x1, x2);
}
fn main() { working(); broken(); }
Notably, the X1 key in the broken() test changes every time after rerunning the program.