Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Headline

CVE-2023-40303: setuid/setgid return values not checked in rlogin, rsh, rshd and uucpd

GNU inetutils through 2.4 may allow privilege escalation because of unchecked return values of set*id() family functions in ftpd, rcp, rlogin, rsh, rshd, and uucpd. This is, for example, relevant if the setuid system call fails when a process is trying to drop privileges before letting an ordinary user control the activities of the process.

CVE
#ios#git#sap

Hi,

Several setuid(), setgid(), seteuid() and setguid() return values are not checked in rlogin/rsh/rshd/uucpd code:

rlogin.c:

647   /\* Now change to the real user ID.  We have to be set-user-ID root

648      to get the privileged port that rcmd () uses.  We now want, however,

649      to run as the real user who invoked us.  \*/

650   seteuid (uid);

651   setuid (uid);

652 

653   doit (&osmask);       /\* The old mask will activate SIGURG and SIGUSR1!  \*/

rsh.c:

274   /\* If no further arguments, must have been called as rlogin. \*/

275   if (!argv\[index\])

276     {

277       if (asrsh)

278         \*argv = (char \*) "rlogin";

279       seteuid (getuid ());

280       setuid (getuid ());

281       execv (PATH\_RLOGIN, argv);

282       error (EXIT\_FAILURE, errno, "cannot execute %s", PATH\_RLOGIN);

283     }

[…]

541         error (0, errno, "setsockopt DEBUG (ignored)");

542     }

543 

544   seteuid (uid);

545   setuid (uid);

546 #ifdef HAVE\_SIGACTION

547   sigemptyset (&sigs);

rshd.c:

1846 if (*pwd->pw_shell == ‘\0’)

1847 pwd->pw_shell = PATH_BSHELL;

1848

1849 /* Set the gid, then uid to become the user specified by “locuser” */

1850 setegid ((gid_t) pwd->pw_gid);

1851 setgid ((gid_t) pwd->pw_gid);

1852 #ifdef HAVE_INITGROUPS

1853 initgroups (pwd->pw_name, pwd->pw_gid); /* BSD groups */

[…]

1871 #endif /* WITH_PAM */

1872

1873 setuid ((uid_t) pwd->pw_uid);

1874

1875 /* We’ll execute the client’s command in the home directory

1876 * of locuser. Note, that the chdir must be executed after

1877 * setuid(), otherwise it may fail on NFS mounted directories

1878 * (root mapped to nobody).

1879 */

1880 if (chdir (pwd->pw_dir) < 0)

uucpd.c:

252   snprintf (Username, sizeof (Username), "USER=%s", user);

253   snprintf (Logname, sizeof (Logname), "LOGNAME=%s", user);

254   dologin (pw, sap, salen);

255   setgid (pw->pw\_gid); <=========

256 #ifdef HAVE\_INITGROUPS

257   initgroups (pw->pw\_name, pw->pw\_gid);

258 #endif

259   if (chdir (pw->pw\_dir) < 0)

260     {

261       fprintf (stderr, "Login incorrect.");

262       return;

263     }

264   setuid (pw->pw\_uid); <=========

265   execl (uucico\_location, "uucico", NULL);

266   perror ("uucico server: execl");

There are cases where set*id() functions can fail, for example multiple calls to the clone() function can cause setuid() to fail when the user process limit is reached.

man 2 setuid():

RETURN VALUE

   On success, zero is returned.  On error, -1 is returned, and errno is set to indicate the error.

   Note: there are cases where setuid() can fail even when the caller is UID 0; it is a grave security error to omit checking for a failure return from setuid().

The above code could be abused in different ways to trigger such failures, potentially remotely in the case of rshd and uucpd.

Here are some example scenarios:

* rshd: if daemon run as root, privilege escalation is possible as any user logging in after a set*id() failure would have its session started as root.

* rlogin: potential local privilege escalation as the binary is setUID root

* uucpd: potential remote privilege escalation to root for already valid users

I believe the below patch mitigates the issue, let me know if that suits you.

Regards,

Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:02:45 +0200

Subject: [PATCH] rlogin,rsh,rshd,uucpd: fix: check set*id() return values

Several setuid(), setgid(), seteuid() and setguid() return values

were not checked in rlogin/rsh/rshd/uucpd code potentially

leading to security issues.

src/rlogin.c | 11 ++++++++±-

src/rsh.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++±—

src/rshd.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++±–

src/uucpd.c | 15 ++++++++++++±-

4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/rlogin.c b/src/rlogin.c

index aa6426f…c543de0 100644

— a/src/rlogin.c

+++ b/src/rlogin.c

@@ -647,8 +647,15 @@ try_connect:

/* Now change to the real user ID. We have to be set-user-ID root

  to get the privileged port that rcmd () uses.  We now want, however,

  to run as the real user who invoked us.  \*/

- seteuid (uid);

- setuid (uid);

  • if (seteuid (uid) == -1)

  • {

  • error (EXIT_FAILURE, 0, "Could not drop privileges (seteuid() failed)");

  • }

  • if (setuid (uid) == -1)

  • {

  • error (EXIT_FAILURE, 0, "Could not drop privileges (setuid() failed)");

  • }

    doit (&osmask); /* The old mask will activate SIGURG and SIGUSR1! */

diff --git a/src/rsh.c b/src/rsh.c

index 2d622ca…6f60667 100644

— a/src/rsh.c

+++ b/src/rsh.c

@@ -276,8 +276,17 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)

 {

   if (asrsh)

*argv = (char *) "rlogin";

- seteuid (getuid ());

- setuid (getuid ());

  •  if (seteuid (getuid ()) == -1)
    
  •  {
    
  •    error (EXIT\_FAILURE, errno, "seteuid() failed");
    
  •  }
    
  •  if (setuid (getuid ()) == -1)
    
  •  {
    
  •    error (EXIT\_FAILURE, errno, "setuid() failed");
    
  •  }
    
  •  execv (PATH\_RLOGIN, argv);
    
     error (EXIT\_FAILURE, errno, "cannot execute %s", PATH\_RLOGIN);
    

    }

@@ -541,8 +550,16 @@ try_connect:

error (0, errno, "setsockopt DEBUG (ignored)");

 }

- seteuid (uid);

- setuid (uid);

  • if (seteuid (uid) == -1)

  • {

  • error (EXIT_FAILURE, errno, “seteuid() failed”);

  • }

  • if (setuid (uid) == -1)

  • {

  • error (EXIT_FAILURE, errno, “setuid() failed”);

  • }

#ifdef HAVE_SIGACTION

sigemptyset (&sigs);

sigaddset (&sigs, SIGINT);

diff --git a/src/rshd.c b/src/rshd.c

index d1c0d0c…707790e 100644

— a/src/rshd.c

+++ b/src/rshd.c

@@ -1847,8 +1847,18 @@ doit (int sockfd, struct sockaddr *fromp, socklen_t fromlen)

 pwd->pw\_shell = PATH\_BSHELL;

/* Set the gid, then uid to become the user specified by “locuser” */

- setegid ((gid_t) pwd->pw_gid);

- setgid ((gid_t) pwd->pw_gid);

  • if (setegid ((gid_t) pwd->pw_gid) == -1)

  • {

  • rshd_error (“Cannot drop privileges (setegid() failed)\n”);

  • exit (EXIT_FAILURE);

  • }

  • if (setgid ((gid_t) pwd->pw_gid) == -1)

  • {

  • rshd_error (“Cannot drop privileges (setgid() failed)\n”);

  • exit (EXIT_FAILURE);

  • }

#ifdef HAVE_INITGROUPS

initgroups (pwd->pw_name, pwd->pw_gid); /* BSD groups */

#endif

@@ -1870,7 +1880,11 @@ doit (int sockfd, struct sockaddr *fromp, socklen_t fromlen)

 }

#endif /* WITH_PAM */

- setuid ((uid_t) pwd->pw_uid);

  • if (setuid ((uid_t) pwd->pw_uid) == -1)

  • {

  • rshd_error (“Cannot drop privileges (setuid() failed)\n”);

  • exit (EXIT_FAILURE);

  • }

    /* We’ll execute the client’s command in the home directory

    * of locuser. Note, that the chdir must be executed after

diff --git a/src/uucpd.c b/src/uucpd.c

index 107589e…29cfce3 100644

— a/src/uucpd.c

+++ b/src/uucpd.c

@@ -252,7 +252,12 @@ doit (struct sockaddr *sap, socklen_t salen)

snprintf (Username, sizeof (Username), "USER=%s", user);

snprintf (Logname, sizeof (Logname), "LOGNAME=%s", user);

dologin (pw, sap, salen);

- setgid (pw->pw_gid);

  • if (setgid (pw->pw_gid) == -1)

  • {

  • fprintf (stderr, “setgid() failed”);

  • return;

  • }

#ifdef HAVE_INITGROUPS

initgroups (pw->pw_name, pw->pw_gid);

#endif

@@ -261,7 +266,13 @@ doit (struct sockaddr *sap, socklen_t salen)

   fprintf (stderr, "Login incorrect.");

   return;

 }

- setuid (pw->pw_uid);

  • if (setuid (pw->pw_uid) == -1)

  • {

  • fprintf (stderr, “setuid() failed”);

  • return;

  • }

  • execl (uucico_location, "uucico", NULL);

    perror (“uucico server: execl”);

}

2.35.1

Related news

Ubuntu Security Notice USN-6304-1

Ubuntu Security Notice 6304-1 - It was discovered that telnetd in GNU Inetutils incorrectly handled certain inputs. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a crash. This issue only affected Ubuntu 20.04 LTS and Ubuntu 22.04 LTS It was discovered that Inetutils incorrectly handled certain inputs. An attacker could possibly use this issue to expose sensitive information, or execute arbitrary code.

CVE: Latest News

CVE-2023-50976: Transactions API Authorization by oleiman · Pull Request #14969 · redpanda-data/redpanda
CVE-2023-6905
CVE-2023-6903
CVE-2023-6904
CVE-2023-3907