CVE-2019-20637: VSV00004 Workspace information leak — Varnish HTTP Cache

CVE-2019-20637

Date: 2019-10-21

A bug has been discovered in Varnish Cache where we fail to clear a pointer between the handling of one client requests and the next on the same connection. This can under specific circumstances lead to information being leaked from the connection workspace.

The impact is an information leak, limited to the data in the workspace used for handling the connection. This will typically be data structures and stale header data from previous requests on the same connection, but could also be temporary headers set during processing of VCL.

For the leak to occur, Varnish needs to switch to synthetic handling due to an internal error, in order to generate an error response to the client request. Note that it will not be a problem when synthetic response handling is reached explicitly through VCL statements.

The leaked data will be pre populated in the resp.reason variable on entering vcl_synth, and will unless overridden show up in the response field of the HTTP response sent.

The following error situations will cause Varnish to go directly to synthetic handling for the current client request, and can cause data to be leaked:

• Reaching max_restarts. There is a maximum limit on how many times the VCL is allowed to do a return(restart), and when this limit is reached the request is forced to synthetic handling to send an error response.

• Requests initiating backend fetches, there is no grace candidate, and the backend responds, but fails to send valid HTTP headers in return. In this situation, specifically for the single request initiating the backend fetch, the request is forced to synthetic handling to send an error response.

• Attempting to switch to another VCL label after a restart. Switching to another VCL is only allowed on the first run through vcl_recv, and attempts to do it later will force the request to synthetic handling to send an error response.

To successfully attack a vulnerable Varnish server, the system must either be vulnerable from its VCL configuration (max restarts or erroneous VCL switching), or the attacker must be able to cause backend response issues.

Mitigation is possible from VCL or by updating to a fixed version of Varnish Cache.

Versions affected¶

• 5.0 and forward

• 6.0 LTS by Varnish Software up to and including 6.0.4

Fixed in¶

• 6.3.1

• 6.2.2

• 6.0.5 LTS by Varnish Software

• GitHub Varnish Cache master branch at commit bd7b3d6d47ccbb5e1747126f8e2a297f38e56b8c

Mitigation from VCL¶

It is possible to mitigate the problem through VCL, by making sure that the resp.reason field is overridden in the vcl_synth function. That will update the stale pointer value to a known value, eliminating the problem.

The following does this by setting resp.status to itself, updating resp.reason to the generic value for that status code in the process:

sub vcl_synth { # This line should be added last in vcl_synth, # or just before any return statements set resp.status = resp.status; }

Thankyous and credits¶

Trygve Tønnesland of VG/Schibsted for discovering the vulnerability, and responsible disclosure.

Varnish Software for handling this security incident.