Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Headline

GHSA-gjv3-89hh-9xq2: RISC Zero Ethereum invalid commitment with digest value of zero accepted by Steel.validateCommitment

Impact

Prior to 2.1.1 and 2.2.0, the Steel.validateCommitment Solidity library function will return true for a crafted commitment with a digest value of zero.

This violates the semantics of validateCommitment, as this does not commitment to a block that is in the current chain. Because the digest is zero, it does not correspond to any block and there exist no known openings. As a result, this commitment will never be produced by a correct zkVM guest using Steel. Leveraging this bug to compromise the soundness of an application using Steel would require a separate bug or misuse of the Steel library, which is expected to be used to validate the root of state opening proofs (e.g. having the guest commit to a digest of zero, or failing to check the zkVM proof).

Because this bug does not risk application integrity, correctly written applications are not at risk.

Fix

Please see #605 for a full description of the bug, and the fix. This fix has been released as part of risc0-ethereum 2.1.1 and 2.2.0.

Recommended actions

Users for the Steel Solidity library versions 2.1.0 or earlier should ensure they are using Steel.validateCommitment in tandem with zkVM proof verification of a Steel program, as shown in the ERC-20 counter example, and documentation. This is the correct usage of Steel, and users following this pattern are not at risk, and do not need to take action.

Users not verifying a zkVM proof of a Steel program should update their application to do so, as this is incorrect usage of Steel.

Credit

A thank you to Daniel526 on HackenProof for reporting this issue

ghsa
#git
  1. GitHub Advisory Database
  2. GitHub Reviewed
  3. CVE-2025-52884

RISC Zero Ethereum invalid commitment with digest value of zero accepted by Steel.validateCommitment

Low severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 24, 2025 in risc0/risc0-ethereum • Updated Jun 25, 2025

Package

cargo risc0-ethereum-contracts (Rust)

Affected versions

< 2.1.1

Impact

Prior to 2.1.1 and 2.2.0, the Steel.validateCommitment Solidity library function will return true for a crafted commitment with a digest value of zero.

This violates the semantics of validateCommitment, as this does not commitment to a block that is in the current chain. Because the digest is zero, it does not correspond to any block and there exist no known openings. As a result, this commitment will never be produced by a correct zkVM guest using Steel. Leveraging this bug to compromise the soundness of an application using Steel would require a separate bug or misuse of the Steel library, which is expected to be used to validate the root of state opening proofs (e.g. having the guest commit to a digest of zero, or failing to check the zkVM proof).

Because this bug does not risk application integrity, correctly written applications are not at risk.

Fix

Please see #605 for a full description of the bug, and the fix. This fix has been released as part of risc0-ethereum 2.1.1 and 2.2.0.

Recommended actions

Users for the Steel Solidity library versions 2.1.0 or earlier should ensure they are using Steel.validateCommitment in tandem with zkVM proof verification of a Steel program, as shown in the ERC-20 counter example, and documentation. This is the correct usage of Steel, and users following this pattern are not at risk, and do not need to take action.

Users not verifying a zkVM proof of a Steel program should update their application to do so, as this is incorrect usage of Steel.

Credit

A thank you to Daniel526 on HackenProof for reporting this issue

References

  • GHSA-gjv3-89hh-9xq2
  • https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-52884
  • risc0/risc0-ethereum#605
  • risc0/risc0-ethereum@3bbac85
  • https://docs.beboundless.xyz/developers/steel/how-it-works#verifying-the-proof-onchain
  • https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/blob/ff0cb9253a87945b653b825711b8b5075f8b7545/examples/erc20-counter/contracts/src/Counter.sol#L56-L63
  • https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/releases/tag/v2.1.1
  • https://github.com/risc0/risc0-ethereum/releases/tag/v2.2.0

Published to the GitHub Advisory Database

Jun 25, 2025

Last updated

Jun 25, 2025

ghsa: Latest News

GHSA-65gg-3w2w-hr4h: Podman Improper Certificate Validation; machine missing TLS verification