Fuji Electric Tellus Lite V-Simulator

View CSAF

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v4 8.5 ATTENTION: Low attack complexity Vendor: Fuji Electric Equipment: Tellus Lite V-Simulator Vulnerabilities: Out-of-Bound Write, Stack-based Buffer Overflow
2. RISK EVALUATION Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow a local attacker to perform code execution.
3. TECHNICAL DETAILS 3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS The following versions of Fuji Electric Tellus Lite V-Simulator, a remote monitoring and operation software, are affected: Tellus Lite V-Simulator: Versions prior to v4.0.20.0 3.2 Vulnerability Overview 3.2.1 OUT-OF-BOUNDS WRITE CWE-787 The affected product is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds write, which could allow an attacker to manipulate memory, resulting in execution of arbitrary code. CVE-2024-37022 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). A CVSS v4 score has also been calculated for CVE-2024-37022. A base score of 8.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). 3.2.2 STACK-BASED BUFFER OVERFLOW CWE-121 The affected product is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow, which could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. CVE-2024-37029 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). A CVSS v4 score has also been calculated for CVE-2024-37029. A base score of 8.5 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (CVSS4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). 3.3 BACKGROUND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS: Critical Manufacturing COUNTRIES/AREAS DEPLOYED: Worldwide COMPANY HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: Japan 3.4 RESEARCHER kimya, working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative, reported these vulnerabilities to CISA.
4. MITIGATIONS Fuji Electric recommends users update to v4.0.20.0 CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of these vulnerabilities, such as: Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, ensuring they are not accessible from the internet. Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolating them from business networks. When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most current version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as the connected devices. CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures. CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov/ics. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies. CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets. Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov/ics in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B–Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies. Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents. No known public exploitation specifically targeting these vulnerabilities has been reported to CISA at this time. These vulnerabilities are not exploitable remotely.
5. UPDATE HISTORY June 13, 2024: Initial Publication