Headline
CVE-2023-30536: Improper header validation in slim/psr7
slim/psr7 is a PSR-7 implementation for use with Slim 4. In versions prior to 1.6.1 an attacker could sneak in a newline (\n) into both the header names and values. While the specification states that \r\n\r\n is used to terminate the header list, many servers in the wild will also accept \n\n. An attacker that is able to control the header names that are passed to Slilm-Psr7 would be able to intentionally craft invalid messages, possibly causing application errors or invalid HTTP requests being sent out with an PSR-18 HTTP client. The latter might present a denial of service vector if a remote service’s web application firewall bans the application due to the receipt of malformed requests. The issue has been patched in version 1.6.1. There are no known workarounds to this issue. Users are advised to upgrade.
Impact
An attacker could sneak in a newline (\n) into both the header names and values. While the specification states that \r\n\r\n is used to terminate the header list, many servers in the wild will also accept \n\n. An attacker that is able to control the header names that are passed to Slilm-Psr7 would be able to intentionally craft invalid messages, possibly causing application errors or invalid HTTP requests being sent out with an PSR-18 HTTP client. The latter might present a denial of service vector if a remote service’s web application firewall bans the application due to the receipt of malformed requests.
Patches
The issue is patched in 1.6.1
Workarounds
In Slim-Psr7 1.6.0 and below, validate HTTP header keys and/or values, and if using user-supplied values, filter them to strip off leading or trailing newline characters before calling withHeader().
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to and thank Graham Campbell for reporting and working with us on this issue.
References
- Guzzle: CVE-2023-29197, with advisory GHSA-wxmh-65f7-jcvw
- Laminas Diactoros: CVE-2023-29530, with advisory GHSA-xv3h-4844-9h36
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7230#section-3.2.4
Related news
Ubuntu Security Notice 6671-1 - It was discovered that php-nyholm-psr7 incorrectly parsed HTTP headers. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to perform an HTTP header injection attack.
Ubuntu Security Notice 6670-1 - It was discovered that php-guzzlehttp-psr7 incorrectly parsed HTTP headers. A remote attacker could possibly use these issues to perform an HTTP header injection attack.
Concrete CMS before 8.5.13 and 9.x before 9.2.2 allows stored XSS on the Admin page via an uploaded file name.
### Impact Affected versions of Laminas Diactoros accepted a single line feed (LF / `\n` ) character at the end of a header name. When serializing such a header name containing a line-feed into the on-the-wire representation of a HTTP/1.x message, the resulting message would be syntactically invalid, due to the header line being terminated too early. An attacker that is able to control the header names that are passed to Laminas Diactoros would be able to intentionally craft invalid messages, possibly causing application errors or invalid HTTP requests being sent out with an PSR-18 HTTP client. The latter might present a denial of service vector if a remote service’s web application firewall bans the application due to the receipt of malformed requests. ### Patches The problem has been patched in the following versions: - 2.18.1 - 2.19.1 - 2.20.1 - 2.21.1 - 2.22.1 - 2.23.1 - 2.24.2 - 2.25.2 ### Workarounds Validate HTTP header keys and/or values, and if using user-supplied values...
Laminas Diactoros provides PSR HTTP Message implementations. In versions 2.18.0 and prior, 2.19.0, 2.20.0, 2.21.0, 2.22.0, 2.23.0, 2.24.0, and 2.25.0, users who create HTTP requests or responses using laminas/laminas-diactoros, when providing a newline at the start or end of a header key or value, can cause an invalid message. This can lead to denial of service vectors or application errors. The problem has been patched in following versions 2.18.1, 2.19.1, 2.20.1, 2.21.1, 2.22.1, 2.23.1, 2.24.1, and 2.25.1. As a workaround, validate HTTP header keys and/or values, and if using user-supplied values, filter them to strip off leading or trailing newline characters before calling `withHeader()`.
### Impact Improper header parsing. An attacker could sneak in a newline (`\n`) into both the header names and values. While the specification states that `\r\n\r\n` is used to terminate the header list, many servers in the wild will also accept `\n\n`. ### Patches The issue is patched in 1.9.1 and 2.4.5. ### Workarounds There are no known workarounds. ### References * https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7230#section-3.2.4
### Impact An attacker could sneak in a newline (`\n`) into both the header names and values. While the specification states that `\r\n\r\n` is used to terminate the header list, many servers in the wild will also accept `\n\n`. An attacker that is able to control the header names that are passed to Slilm-Psr7 would be able to intentionally craft invalid messages, possibly causing application errors or invalid HTTP requests being sent out with an PSR-18 HTTP client. The latter might present a denial of service vector if a remote service’s web application firewall bans the application due to the receipt of malformed requests. ### Patches The issue is patched in 1.6.1 ### Workarounds In Slim-Psr7 1.6.0 and below, validate HTTP header keys and/or values, and if using user-supplied values, filter them to strip off leading or trailing newline characters before calling withHeader(). ### Acknowledgments We are very grateful to and thank <a href="https://gjcampbell.co.uk/">Graham Campbe...
guzzlehttp/psr7 is a PSR-7 HTTP message library implementation in PHP. Affected versions are subject to improper header parsing. An attacker could sneak in a newline (\n) into both the header names and values. While the specification states that \r\n\r\n is used to terminate the header list, many servers in the wild will also accept \n\n. This is a follow-up to CVE-2022-24775 where the fix was incomplete. The issue has been patched in versions 1.9.1 and 2.4.5. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. Users are advised to upgrade.