Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Tag

#xss

GHSA-vf6x-59hh-332f: Formwork has a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Site title

### Summary The site title field at /panel/options/site/allows embedding JS tags, which can be used to attack all members of the system. This is a widespread attack and can cause significant damage if there is a considerable number of users. ### Impact The attack is widespread, leveraging what XSS can do. This will undoubtedly impact system availability. ### Patches - [**Formwork 2.x** (aa3e9c6)](https://github.com/getformwork/formwork/commit/aa3e9c684035d9e8495169fde7c57d97faa3f9a2) escapes site title from panel header navigation. ### Details By embedding "<!--", the source code can be rendered non-functional, significantly impacting system availability. However, the attacker would need admin privileges, making the attack more difficult to execute. ### PoC ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8fc68f6f-8bc4-4b97-8b93-dee5b88a3fcf) 1. The page where the vulnerability was found, and the attack surface is the Title field. ![image](https://github.com/user-attachment...

ghsa
#xss#vulnerability#js#git#firefox
Over 350 High-Profile Websites Hit by 360XSS Attack

360XSS campaign exploits Krpano XSS to hijack search results & distribute spam ads on 350+ sites, including government,…

GHSA-m2jw-cj8v-937r: copyparty renders unsanitized filenames as HTML when user uploads empty files

## Summary A [DOM-Based XSS](https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/588.html) was discovered in [copyparty](https://github.com/9001/copyparty), a portable fileserver. The vulnerability is considered low-risk. ## Details By handing someone a maliciously-named file, and then tricking them into dragging the file into copyparty's Web-UI, an attacker could execute arbitrary javascript with the same privileges as that user. For example, this could give unintended read-access to files owned by that user. The bug is triggered by the drag-drop action itself; it is not necessary to actually initiate the upload. The file must be empty (zero bytes). Note: As a general-purpose webserver, it is intentionally possible to upload HTML-files with arbitrary javascript in `<script>` tags, which will execute when the file is opened. The difference is that this vulnerability would trigger execution of javascript during the act of uploading, and not when the uploaded file was opened. ## Proof of Conce...

Hackers Exploited Krpano Framework Flaw to Inject Spam Ads on 350+ Websites

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in a virtual tour framework has been weaponized by malicious actors to inject malicious scripts across hundreds of websites with the goal of manipulating search results and fueling a spam ads campaign at scale. Security researcher Oleg Zaytsev, in a report shared with The Hacker News, said the campaign – dubbed 360XSS – affected over 350 websites,

GHSA-hw62-58pr-7wc5: DOM Expressions has a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability due to improper use of string.replace

> [!NOTE] > This advisory was originally emailed to [email protected] by @nsysean. To sum it up, the use of javascript's `.replace()` opens up to potential XSS vulnerabilities with the special replacement patterns beginning with `$`. Particularly, when the attributes of `Meta` tag from solid-meta are user-defined, attackers can utilise the special replacement patterns, either `$'` or `$\`` to achieve XSS. The solid-meta package has this issue since it uses `useAffect` and context providers, which injects the used assets in the html header. "dom-expressions" uses `.replace()` to insert the assets, which is vulnerable to the special replacement patterns listed above. This effectively means that if the attributes of an asset tag contained user-controlled data, it would be vulnerable to XSS. For instance, there might be meta tags for the open graph protocol in a user profile page, but if attackers set the user query to some payload abusing `.replace()`, then they could execute a...

GHSA-3qxh-p7jc-5xh6: Solid Lacks Escaping of HTML in JSX Fragments allows for Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

Inserts/JSX expressions inside illegal inlined JSX fragments lacked escaping, allowing user input to be rendered as HTML when put directly inside JSX fragments. For instance, `?text=<svg/onload=alert(1)>` would trigger XSS here. ```js const [text] = createResource(() => { return new URL(getRequestEvent().request.url).searchParams.get("text"); }); return ( <> Text: {text()} </> ); ```

GHSA-h697-w4ph-7pcx: Moodle has a stored XSS in ddimageortext question type

The drag-and-drop onto image (ddimageortext) question type required additional sanitizing to prevent a stored XSS risk.

GHSA-wr88-x8cm-7cgq: Moodle has a stored XSS risk in admin live log

Description information displayed in the site administration live log required additional sanitizing to prevent a stored XSS risk.

GHSA-4w32-c9g7-27qx: Moodle allows reflected XSS via question bank filter

The question bank filter required additional sanitizing to prevent a reflected XSS risk.

GHSA-8wp9-x25p-8794: tarteaucitron Cross-site Scripting (XSS)

Versions of the package tarteaucitronjs before 1.17.0 are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the getElemWidth() and getElemHeight(). This is related to [SNYK-JS-TARTEAUCITRONJS-8366541](https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-TARTEAUCITRONJS-8366541)