Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Headline

CVE-2023-4265: Two potential buffer overflow vulnerabilities in Zephyr USB code

Potential buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the following locations: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/main/drivers/usb/device/usb_dc_native_posix.c#L359 https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/main/drivers/usb/device/usb_dc_native_posix.c#L359 https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/main/subsys/usb/device/class/netusb/function_rndis… https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/main/subsys/usb/device/class/netusb/function_rndis.c#L841

CVE
#vulnerability#dos#git#buffer_overflow

Summary

While reading the Zephyr code related to USB, I noticed a couple of potential buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the following locations:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/main/drivers/usb/device/usb_dc_native_posix.c#L359
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/main/subsys/usb/device/class/netusb/function_rndis.c#L841

Details

The first potential buffer overflow vulnerability is located in the following function:

int usb_dc_ep_write(const uint8_t ep, const uint8_t *const data, const uint32_t data_len, uint32_t * const ret_bytes) { LOG_DBG("ep %x len %u", ep, data_len);

if (!usbip\_ctrl.attached || !usbip\_ep\_is\_valid(ep)) {
    LOG\_ERR("Not attached / Invalid endpoint: EP 0x%x", ep);
    return \-EINVAL;
}

/\* Check if IN ep \*/
if (USB\_EP\_GET\_DIR(ep) != USB\_EP\_DIR\_IN) {
    return \-EINVAL;
}

/\* Check if ep enabled \*/
if (!usbip\_ep\_is\_enabled(ep)) {
    LOG\_WRN("ep %x disabled", ep);
    return \-EINVAL;
}

if (USB\_EP\_GET\_IDX(ep) \== 0) {
    if (!usbip\_send\_common(ep, data\_len)) {
        return \-EIO;
    }

    if (usbip\_send(ep, data, data\_len) != data\_len) {
        return \-EIO;
    }
} else {
    uint8\_t ep\_idx \= USB\_EP\_GET\_IDX(ep);
    struct usb\_ep\_ctrl\_prv \*ctrl \= &usbip\_ctrl.in\_ep\_ctrl\[ep\_idx\];

    memcpy(ctrl\->buf, data, data\_len); /\* VULN \*/
    ctrl\->buf\_len \= data\_len;
}

if (ret\_bytes) {
    \*ret\_bytes \= data\_len;
}

return 0;

}

A check on data_len is missing. If data and data_len are attacker-controlled, the fixed-size buffer buf in the following structure could overflow during memcpy(), thus potentially leading to denial of service or arbitrary code execution:

struct usb_ep_ctrl_prv { u8_t ep_ena; u16_t mps; usb_dc_ep_callback cb; u32_t data_len; u8_t buf[64]; u8_t buf_len; };

The second potential buffer overflow vulnerability is located in the following function:

static int handle_encapsulated_rsp(uint8_t **data, uint32_t *len) { struct net_buf *buf;

LOG\_DBG("");

buf \= net\_buf\_get(&rndis\_tx\_queue, K\_NO\_WAIT);
if (!buf) {
    LOG\_ERR("Error getting response buffer");
    \*len \= 0U;
    return \-ENODATA;
}

if (VERBOSE\_DEBUG) {
    net\_hexdump("RSP <", buf\->data, buf\->len);
}

memcpy(\*data, buf\->data, buf\->len); /\* VULN \*/
\*len \= buf\->len;

net\_buf\_unref(buf);

return 0;

}

A check on buf->len is missing. If buf->data and buf->len are attacker-controlled, the data buffer could overflow due to memcpy(), thus potentially leading to denial of service or arbitrary code execution.

PoC

I haven’t tried to reproduce these potential vulnerabilities against a live install of the Zephyr OS.

Impact

If the vulnerabilities are confirmed, their impact could range from denial of service to arbitrary code execution.

Related news

Zephyr RTOS 3.x.0 Buffer Overflows

Zephyr RTOS versions 3.5.0 and below suffer from a multitude of buffer overflow vulnerabilities.

CVE: Latest News

CVE-2023-50976: Transactions API Authorization by oleiman · Pull Request #14969 · redpanda-data/redpanda
CVE-2023-6905
CVE-2023-6903
CVE-2023-6904
CVE-2023-3907