Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Headline

GHSA-vvmq-fwmg-2gjc: Improper kubeconfig validation allows arbitrary code execution

Flux2 can reconcile the state of a remote cluster when provided with a kubeconfig with the correct access rights. Kubeconfig files can define commands to be executed to generate on-demand authentication tokens. A malicious user with write access to a Flux source or direct access to the target cluster, could craft a kubeconfig to execute arbitrary code inside the controller’s container.

In multi-tenancy deployments this can also lead to privilege escalation if the controller’s service account has elevated permissions.

Impact

Within the affected versions range, one of the permissions set below would be required for the vulnerability to be exploited:

  • Direct access to the cluster to create Flux Kustomization or HelmRelease objects and Kubernetes Secrets.
  • Direct access to the cluster to modify existing Kubernetes secrets being used as kubeconfig in existing Flux Kustomization or HelmRelease objects.
  • Direct access to the cluster to modify existing Flux Kustomization or HelmRelease objects and access to create or modify existing Kubernetes secrets.
  • Access rights to make changes to a configured Flux Source (i.e. Git repository).

Patches

This vulnerability was fixed in kustomize-controller v0.23.0 and helm-controller v0.19.0, both included in flux2 v0.29.0. Starting from the fixed versions, both controllers disable the use of command execution from kubeconfig files by default, users have to opt-in by adding the flag --insecure-kubeconfig-exec to the controller’s command arguments. Users are no longer allowed to refer to files in the controller’s filesystem in the kubeconfig files provided for the remote apply feature.

Workarounds

  • The functionality can be disabled via Validating Admission webhooks (e.g. OPA Gatekeeper, Kyverno) by restricting users from being able to set the spec.kubeConfig field in Flux Kustomization and HelmRelease objects.
  • Applying restrictive AppArmor and SELinux profiles on the controller’s pod to limit what binaries can be executed.

Credits

The Flux engineering team found and patched this vulnerability.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory please open an issue in the flux2 repository.

ghsa
#vulnerability#web#linux#git#kubernetes#auth

Flux2 can reconcile the state of a remote cluster when provided with a kubeconfig with the correct access rights. Kubeconfig files can define commands to be executed to generate on-demand authentication tokens. A malicious user with write access to a Flux source or direct access to the target cluster, could craft a kubeconfig to execute arbitrary code inside the controller’s container.

In multi-tenancy deployments this can also lead to privilege escalation if the controller’s service account has elevated permissions.

Impact

Within the affected versions range, one of the permissions set below would be required for the vulnerability to be exploited:

  • Direct access to the cluster to create Flux Kustomization or HelmRelease objects and Kubernetes Secrets.
  • Direct access to the cluster to modify existing Kubernetes secrets being used as kubeconfig in existing Flux Kustomization or HelmRelease objects.
  • Direct access to the cluster to modify existing Flux Kustomization or HelmRelease objects and access to create or modify existing Kubernetes secrets.
  • Access rights to make changes to a configured Flux Source (i.e. Git repository).

Patches

This vulnerability was fixed in kustomize-controller v0.23.0 and helm-controller v0.19.0, both included in flux2 v0.29.0. Starting from the fixed versions, both controllers disable the use of command execution from kubeconfig files by default, users have to opt-in by adding the flag --insecure-kubeconfig-exec to the controller’s command arguments. Users are no longer allowed to refer to files in the controller’s filesystem in the kubeconfig files provided for the remote apply feature.

Workarounds

  • The functionality can be disabled via Validating Admission webhooks (e.g. OPA Gatekeeper, Kyverno) by restricting users from being able to set the spec.kubeConfig field in Flux Kustomization and HelmRelease objects.
  • Applying restrictive AppArmor and SELinux profiles on the controller’s pod to limit what binaries can be executed.

Credits

The Flux engineering team found and patched this vulnerability.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory please open an issue in the flux2 repository.

References

  • GHSA-vvmq-fwmg-2gjc
  • https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-24817

Related news

CVE-2022-24817

Flux2 is an open and extensible continuous delivery solution for Kubernetes. Flux2 versions between 0.1.0 and 0.29.0, helm-controller 0.1.0 to v0.19.0, and kustomize-controller 0.1.0 to v0.23.0 are vulnerable to Code Injection via malicious Kubeconfig. In multi-tenancy deployments this can also lead to privilege escalation if the controller's service account has elevated permissions. Workarounds include disabling functionality via Validating Admission webhooks by restricting users from setting the `spec.kubeConfig` field in Flux `Kustomization` and `HelmRelease` objects. Additional mitigations include applying restrictive AppArmor and SELinux profiles on the controller’s pod to limit what binaries can be executed. This vulnerability is fixed in kustomize-controller v0.23.0 and helm-controller v0.19.0, both included in flux2 v0.29.0

ghsa: Latest News

GHSA-49cc-xrjf-9qf7: SFTPGo allows administrators to restrict command execution from the EventManager