A report from Edinburgh University warns that child abusers are using dating apps to find single parents with vulnerable children.

Using a dating app? Beware of your potential partner’s motives. A report from Edinburgh University warns that child abusers are using these apps to find single parents with vulnerable children.

The Searchlight 2025 report, from the University’s Childlight Global Child Safety Institute, analyses the tools and techniques that child abusers use to reach their prey. It found that more than one in five (22%) of male abusers use dating apps daily, compared to 8.1% of other men.

With this in mind, the report suggests increasing safeguards such as ID verification on dating apps, along with developing tools such as automated recognition of grooming language and more reporting of suspicious behavior by the app companies.

**A network of child abusers**

While child abuse is often purely for the abuser’s own gratification, the Institute also documented how abusers frequently profit from their crimes by producing child sexual abuse material (CSAM).

“They groom single parents via dating apps to access their children. They target displaced children in conflict zones like Ukraine. And they trade images using sophisticated payment methods, including cryptocurrencies, to evade detection,” warned Paul Stanfield, CEO of Childlight, in the report.

Alongside the use of dating apps, the report also points to the growing humanitarian crisis around the world as an opportunity for abusers. As millions of children are displaced, it cites growing searches for content involving displaced women and children, along with increased trafficker activity targeting displaced victims in Ukraine and Turkey, which hosts Syrian refugees.

**The path to illicit profit**

One way that abusers profit is by sharing images and video of the abuse. Networks for the exchange and sale of these materials are rife, and abusers have taken to producing specific CSAM content on demand to fit a buyer’s requirements. Files of this type can fetch up to $1,200, the report found. Abusers will also often livestream their abuse sessions for money.

Some organizations that create CSAM are often relatively small, with individuals in single figures, according to the report. They operate on a traditional corporate model, dividing responsibilities between specific people. Individuals will specialize in recruitment, control of the children, finding locations for the abuse, marketing the material, and financial management.

**Children producing CSAM**

Children themselves are now becoming more involved in the provision of CSAM. In some cases, they will gather images and video of their peers for sale, the report said. In others, children are recruited to provide images of themselves – sometimes willingly for money, and sometimes via sextortion.

Late last month the UK’s National Crime Agency warned about a surge in online networks of mostly teenaged boys that are procuring and sharing CSAM. Reports of these networks, often known collectively as the Com, increased sixfold between 2022 and 2024, the NCA said. They often groom their peers online and then extort them after persuading them to send compromising images of themselves.

While the Com’s members will sell such material, the abuses are also often for their own gratification. Members have been arrested for encouraging victims to commit suicide.

Teenaged boys themselves can also be victims of sextortion, alongside girls. The NCA launched an awareness campaign last month for boys between 15 and 17, whom it says are frequently targeted. It warned that sextortion is often perpetrated by gangs in West Africa or South East Asia, and are purely money-motivated.

The NCA’s CEOP Safety Centre received 380 reports of sextortion in 2024, while the the US National Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) has documented 28,000 global cases per year.

**What can you do?**

Parents can take action to help protect their children.

**Vet potential dates.** While the majority of online dating app users are legitimate, it pays to be extra vigilant when forming a relationship – especially when introducing new romantic partners to your family.

**Talk to your children.** You might think your children understand sextortion, but they might not. The NCA found that 74% of boys did not fully understand what sextortion was, and didn’t see requests for nude images as a warning sign. Educating both girls and boys on the risks is crucial. That in turn takes a relationship built on trust. Explain that if they are in trouble they can tell you anything and they are not to blame.

**Get help.** The NCA operates a site offering more resources and education for parents, children, and professionals.

**We don’t just report on threats—we remove them**

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices by downloading Malwarebytes today.

 Child predators are lurking on dating apps, warns report 

US senator Cassidy is afraid that Chinese companies will jump at the opportunity to buy the genetic data of 15 million 23andMe customers.

Senator Cassidy, the chair of the US Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee has expressed concerns about foreign adversaries, including the Chinese Communist Party, acquiring the sensitive genetic data of millions of Americans through 23andMe. 

The risk is considered real because of the impending takeover of the genetic database that belongs to 23andMe. Since the DNA testing company 23andMe filed for bankruptcy it has been looking for a new owner, and views its genetic data as an asset in the possible sale.

An asset that Senator Cassidy fears could do a lot of harm in the wrong hands, as he wrote in a letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent:

> “The recent bankruptcy filing by 23andMe raises questions about potential buyers of its genetic database that contains the information of approximately 15 million customers. Chinese companies have already taken steps to collect genetic data across the world that could be used for adverse purposes.”

The Department of the Treasury, through the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), has broad authority to review transactions that may impact the national security of the United States.

23andMe tried to reassure customers that:

> “Any buyer of 23andMe will be required to agree to comply with our privacy policy and with all applicable law with respect to the treatment of customer data.”

However, the senator fears that the company and its assets will be sold to the highest bidder which will put the information of its approximately 15 million customers at risk of falling into the wrong hands. For this reason he has asked 23andMe to answer a number of questions about the sales process, the supervision of the transfer, the ability of customers to delete their data, and the effect of the bankruptcy on 23andMe’s cybersecurity infrastructure.

For those that missed our tips the last time, I’ll repeat them here.

**How to delete your 23andMe data**

For 23andMe customers who want to delete their data from 23andMe:

*   Log into your account and navigate to **Settings**.
*   Under **Settings**, scroll to the section titled **23andMe data**. Select **View**.
*   You will be asked to enter your date of birth for extra security. 
*   In the next section, you’ll be asked which, if there is any, personal data you’d like to download from the company (onto a personal, not public, computer). Once you’re finished, scroll to the bottom and select **Permanently delete data**.
*   You should then receive an email from 23andMe detailing its account deletion policy and requesting that you confirm your request. Once you confirm you’d like your data to be deleted, the deletion will begin automatically, and you’ll immediately lose access to your account. 

**Check if your 23andMe data was part of the 2023 breach**

In 2023, 23andMe suffered a data breach that impacted up to seven million people. Found being sold on the dark web, the data reportedly included “profile and account ID numbers, names, gender, birth year, maternal and paternal genetic markers, ancestral heritage results, and data on whether or not each user has opted into 23AndMe’s health data.”

With the data, cybercriminals could learn about a person’s genealogy and potentially use some of the information to aid them in committing identity fraud.

There is no meaningful way to _remove_ this data from the dark web. Instead, we recommend that you run a scan using our free Digital Footprint Portal to see if your data was exposed in the 2023 breach, and then to take additional steps to protect yourself.

**We don’t just report on threats – we help safeguard your entire digital identity**

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your—and your family’s—personal information by using identity protection.

 Your 23andMe genetic data could be bought by China, senator warns 

If you use WhatsApp for Windows, you'll want to make sure you're on the latest version.

In a security advisory, Meta has disclosed a vulnerability that allowed an attacker to run arbitrary code on a user’s system that existed in all WhatsApp versions before 2.2450.6.

WhatsApp offers a desktop application for Windows and macOS, which users can synchronize with their mobile devices. Desktop versions of WhatsApp are generally used as extensions of mobile apps rather than primary platforms. So, while wide usage of these apps exists, their adoption rate lies likely significantly lower when compared to mobile platforms.

WhatsApp has over 3.14 billion monthly active users as of January 2025, with 73% using Android and 22% using iOS. Using WhatsApp on your desktop offers some advantages that users might appreciate. My excuse is that I can type faster on my laptop and I can make better screenshots of my conversations.

If you use WhatsApp for Windows, you should update as soon as you can.

You can find the current version of your WhatsApp for Windows by clicking on the **Settings** (gear symbol) > **Help**.

If your version number is lower than 2.2450.6, install a new version by following these steps:

1.  Click the **Start** menu and search for **Microsoft Store** to open it.
2.  In the Microsoft Store, click on **Library** located at the bottom left corner.
3.  Scroll through the list or use the search bar to find **WhatsApp Desktop**.
4.  Click on **Get Updates** or look for an **Update** button next to WhatsApp Desktop. If an update is available, it will appear here.
5.  Click the **Update** button to download and install the latest version of WhatsApp Desktop.
6.  Once the update is complete, restart the application to ensure all changes are applied.

My WhatsApp was already up to date because I have automatic updates turned on. This is how Microsoft Store on Windows can automatically install app updates.

1.  Select **Start**, then search for and select **Microsoft Store**.
2.  In the Microsoft Store app, select **Profile** (your account picture) > **Settings**.
3.  Make sure **App updates** is turned **On**.

**The vulnerability**

The vulnerability tracked as CVE-2025-30401 is described by Meta as:

> “A spoofing issue in WhatsApp for Windows prior to version 2.2450.6 displayed attachments according to their MIME type but selected the file opening handler based on the attachment’s filename extension. A maliciously crafted mismatch could have caused the recipient to inadvertently execute arbitrary code rather than view the attachment when manually opening the attachment inside WhatsApp.”

In other words, it was possible for a sender to disguise the true nature of their attachment by changing the file extension to something harmless, like a jpeg, when in reality it was a malicious file that would be opened with the program the receiver had set as default for such a file.

In the past we’ve seen this used against users that have Python installed on their systems. People were sent a python or php script as an attachment which would get executed without any warning if the receiver opened them.

**We don’t just report on threats—we remove them**

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices by downloading Malwarebytes today.

 WhatsApp for Windows vulnerable to attacks. Update now! 

A recent case of alleged cyber-voyeurism shows how important it is to secure your computer against unwanted eavesdroppers using malware.

When you next type something sensitive on your computer keyboard, be sure that no-one else is watching. A recent case of alleged cyber-voyeurism shows how important it is to secure your computer against unwanted eavesdroppers using malwareware.

In a class action lawsuit, six women have accused pharmacist Matthew Bathula of invading their privacy by spying on them at work and at home.

According to the lawsuit, Bathula is alleged to have planted spyware on at least 400 computers in clinics, treatment rooms, and labs at the University of Maryland Medical Center where he worked. Bathula is said to have installed a keylogger. This software monitors what a user types on a keyboard without their knowledge, relaying it back to the keylogger’s owner.

The lawsuit claims that this gave Bathula login credentials for the victims’ personal accounts and systems, including bank accounts, emails, home surveillance systems, Dropbox accounts, Google Drives, dating applications, Google Nests, and iCloud accounts.

This access enabled Bathula to download the victims’ personal information, including their private photographs and videos, the class action asserts, adding that he also used his access to systems both at home and at work to spy on the victims in real time.

He used webcams installed on work computers for telehealth sessions to spy on new mothers pumping milk at work, and did the same through their home webcams.

Bathula allegedly spied on victims with their children at home, and also watched them undressing and being intimate with partners. He is said to have disabled the cameras’ operating lights so that victims could not see they were being viewed.

**How to protect yourself**

Bathula has not thus far been charged with a crime. The anonymous women, who first became aware of the issue when the FBI contacted them, are suing their employer, University of Maryland Medical Systems, for “failure to take reasonable, readily available measures to protect its employees.”

But spyware is a threat for people outside the workplace too. What should you do to protect yourself from someone logging your keystrokes? Here are some tips.

**Keep your software up to date.** Some spies manually install keyloggers on target computers, but others use malware to install it remotely. Malware droppers frequently take advantage of known vulnerabilities in older versions of operating system and application software. They exploit these security holes to install their malware. You can minimize these loopholes by constantly keeping your software up to date.

**Install anti-malware protection.** Anti-malware protection works at the lowest level of the operating system to check on the software applications that it’s running and watch for suspicious or known malicious activity.

**Watch where you download from.** Software downloaded from unofficial sites – especially pirated software – often comes with unwelcome additions including keyloggers and other spyware.

**Don’t reuse passwords.** People often use the same password across multiple accounts for convenience. This is not a good idea. If a keylogger reads one password, its owner can try the same credentials on your other accounts. According to the lawsuit, Bathula harvested passwords from the workplace keylogger and used them to hijack personal accounts that victims hadn’t accessed at work.

**Use a password manager.** Another way to prevent a keylogger from reading your passwords is not to type them in. Instead, you can use a trusted password manager that will auto-fill password fields on login pages for you.

**Use multi-factor authentication.** Where online accounts support it, use two authentication methods to log in. Your password is one such method, but many use an authenticator app on their phone that provides an extra code to type in. Because that code changes all the time, an attacker won’t be able to use it to enter your account in future. For even more security against keyloggers, some accounts now support the use of hardware-based passkeys that don’t require you to type in a code at all.

**Protect your webcam.** Another layer of defense is to protect your webcam and microphone. Some come with security shutters, while for others, a Post-It will do. If Mark Zuckerberg covers up his camera, it’s probably a good sign that we should too, while using a microphone with a physical off switch – or at least covering your laptop one tightly with tape – can protect your audio. If someone does gain access to your webcam, at least it won’t reveal your secrets.

As with all layers of protection, these defensive measures are best used in conjunction with each other. The more difficult you make it for an attacker to spy on you, the less likely they are to succeed.

**We don’t just report on threats—we remove them**

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices by downloading Malwarebytes today.

 Man accused of using keylogger to spy on colleagues, log in to their personal accounts and watch them at home 

Our privacy is most at risk from companies, governments, and AI models, according to a new public survey from Malwarebytes.

Bad vibes are big news in privacy right now, with the public feeling isolated in securing their sensitive information from companies, governments, AI models, and scammers.

That’s the latest from Malwarebytes research conducted this month, which revealed that the vast majority of people are concerned about wrongful data access from nearly every corner of their lives. For example, 89% of people “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that they are “concerned about my personal data being used inappropriately by corporations,” and another 72% agreed or strongly agreed that they are “concerned about my personal data being accessed and used inappropriately by the government.”

The anxieties are easy to trace.

In just the first three months of 2025, the UK government asked Apple for access to encrypted cloud storage for users across the _globe_, the US government exposed active Social Security Numbers in releasing files related to the assassination of former President John F. Kennedy, and the announced bankruptcy of genetic testing company 23andMe prompted many customers to delete their data.

Against this backdrop, many users are taking privacy into their own hands. More than 40% of people have stopped using either TikTok, Instagram, or X (formerly Twitter), and 26% stopped using a fertility or period tracking app. A robust 75% said they “opt out of data collection, as possible,” and 23% have gone a step further, using a data removal service to help clean up any personal information that is easily found online.

These findings come from a pulse survey that Malwarebytes conducted of its newsletter readers in March via the Alchemer Survey Platform.

Broadly, Malwarebytes found that:

*   89% of people are “concerned about my data being used by AI tools without my consent.”
*   70% of people “feel resigned that my personal data is already out there, and I can’t get it back.”
*   77% of people said that “many online transactions today, from purchases to downloads to creating new accounts, feel like ploys to take my data.”
*   While 87% of people “support national laws regulating how companies can collect, store, share, or use our personal data,” 60% feel that “we will never have simple, meaningful ways to protect our data.”
*   To protect their personal information and that of their family, at least 40% of people have stopped using Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).
*   26% of people stopped using a fertility app or period tracking app.

****Institutional distrust****

The public believe that the biggest threats to their privacy right now are AI models, companies, governments, and, well, pretty much every single interaction they have with the internet at large.

Aside from the 89% of people concerned about their data being “accessed and used inappropriately by the government,” another 50% said they were concerned about wrongful government access of their “private conversations.”

Elsewhere, an astounding 89% of people said that they are “concerned about my data being used by AI tools without my consent.” It is unclear exactly where these fears lie. People may be concerned that AI tools are scraping public websites for their information—like the facial recognition company ClearView AI does by scouring articles, mugshot websites, and publicly listed social media profiles—or they may fear that tools like ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini are recording “conversations” or questions for future use.

Exacerbating these concerns is, likely, the current murkiness around AI technology and what it requires to function. The New York Times is currently suing OpenAI for allegations that its large language model wrongfully ingested the outlet’s copyrighted articles as training data, human contractors that helped train the AI recognition systems for Roomba vacuums mistakenly leaked sensitive photos on Facebook, and a national mental health support chatline siphoned off some of its users’ conversations to train an AI-powered customer support chatbot in an effort to boost funding.

But it isn’t just AI that the public distrust, it’s also the many ways they’re forced to engage with the internet, overall, as 77% agreed or strongly agreed that “many online transactions today, from purchases to downloads to creating new accounts, feel like ploys to take my data.”

They may have a point. Downloading a mobile game can reveal your location data to countless ad companies, searching for airline tickets on a Mac device can force you into paying higher prices, and buying a car can subject your sex life—seriously—to data collection. And these are the largely _legal_ consequences of everyday life! Real-deal cybercriminal campaigns like “malvertising,” that abuse Google search results to direct victims to malicious websites, only make matters worse.

Amidst this landscape, the public broadly agreed that they wanted privacy protections that, unfortunately, they feel no one is going to grant them.

A full 87% of people “support national laws regulating how companies can collect, store, share, or use our personal data,” while 70% also believe “we will never have simple, meaningful ways to protect our data.”

So, in the absence of legal or corporate protections, the public are taking matters into their own hands.

****Individual action****

The dire privacy concerns shared by many respondents have, for the most part, not resulted in privacy nihilism. In fact, a heartening 60% of respondents did _not_ agree that they have “become less vigilant about my data privacy and security because there is little I can do these days.”

Instead, as Malwarebytes found, many people have started disengaging from major online platforms and adding privacy-conscious tools and habits to their daily regimen.

For instance, to protect their and their family’s personal information, 47% of people said they “stopped using TikTok,” 45% said they “stopped using X” (formerly Twitter), 44% said they “stopped using Instagram,” and 37% said they “stopped using Facebook.” Another 26% said they “stopped using a fertility/period tracking app.”

Elsewhere, 69% of people said they “use an ad blocker for online browsing,” and 75% of people “opt out of data collection, as possible.” Another 42% said they use a VPN, which can provide an extra level of comfort by encrypting all web traffic when connecting to public or unknown Wi-Fi networks.

Malwarebytes also found that 69% of respondents said they use “multifactor authentication,” or MFA. MFA is one of the strongest security protections against account takeovers and hacking, requiring that login attempts aren’t approved with _just_ a username and password, but with a separate piece of information, like a one-time passcode that is texted to a user’s device. Though understood as a cybersecurity best practice, MFA also strengthens a user’s privacy. After all, thieves don’t hack into accounts just for fun—they hack into accounts to sometimes steal any sensitive information stored within.

Finally, a smaller percentage of people said they use identity theft protection solutions (43%) and personal data removal services (23%). These are critical tools for catching and stopping identity theft, and for making it harder for scammers to find and target victims.

Malwarebytes understand that privacy isn’t “easy” right now—it never necessarily has been—but that doesn’t mean it’s time to give up. Thankfully, many people responded that, despite their serious concerns, they aren’t about to take corporate and government privacy invasions willingly. That’s the type of attitude that the public needs more than ever, and we’re grateful to see it.

**We don’t just report on threats—we remove them**

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices by downloading Malwarebytes today.

 72% of people are worried their data is being misused by the government, and that&#8217;s not all&#8230; 

Beware of deceptive Google Ads targeting QuickBooks and always confirm the website URL before logging in, as fake sites can bypass even 2FA.

The pressure of the looming tax filing deadline (April 15th in the US) can make anyone rush online tasks. Cybercriminals are acutely aware of this increased activity and are exploiting trusted platforms like Google to target Intuit QuickBooks users.

By purchasing prominent Google Ads, they are creating highly convincing fake login pages designed to pilfer sensitive information, including usernames, passwords, and even one-time passcodes (OTPs) – the keys to someone’s financial data needed for tax compliance.

Understanding this deceptive tactic is the first step in protecting yourself from falling victim.

**Brand impersonation: from Google ad to phishing page**

Accounting and tax preparation software has traditionally been a common lure for scammers, particularly those related to online support operating out of large call centres in India and surrounding areas.

Late last year, we documented a fraudulent QuickBooks installer that was laced with malware and generated a fake pop up to trick users into calling for assistance.

This time, the attack is even more dangerous as it goes after victims’ login credentials for QuickBooks. It starts from a Google search, showing an ad that impersonates Intuit’s branding for “QuickBooks Online”.

This leads to a fraudulent website that is essentially a lookalike.

Domain Name: QUICCKBOORKS-ACCCOUNTING .COM  
Registrar URL: https://www.hostinger.com  
Creation Date: 2025-04-07T01:44:46Z

Unbeknownst to victims, the sign-in page is actually a phishing portal that will steal account credentials in real-time and leak them to the criminals behind this scheme.

**  
One-time passcode workaround**

Passwords alone offer a limited level of security because they can be easily guessed, stolen through phishing, or compromised in data breaches. It is highly recommended to enhance account protection by enabling a second form of authentication like one-time passcodes sent to your device or utilizing a 2FA app for an extra layer of verification.

Phishing kits have evolved to become increasingly sophisticated, with some now capable of circumventing one-time passcodes and 2FA. These kits often employ “man-in-the-middle” or “adversary-in-the-middle” (AiTM) techniques.

When a victim enters their credentials and the one-time passcode on a fake login page created by the phishing kit, this information is intercepted in real-time and relayed to the attacker. The attacker can then use these stolen credentials and the valid one-time passcode to log in to the victim’s account before the passcode expires.

**Conclusion**

Cybercriminals often intensify their efforts to target accounting software like QuickBooks during or around tax season, hoping to capitalize on the increased volume of financial transactions and the time-sensitive nature of tax preparations.

Deceptive Google ads can be designed to closely resemble legitimate QuickBooks search results, leading unsuspecting users to fake login pages that harvest their credentials, financial data, or even install malware.

OTP and 2FA still significantly increase security against a vast majority of attacks, especially automated attempts and less sophisticated phishing, making them essential layers of protection when used on authentic platforms.

However, even with the added security of one-time passcodes and 2FA, these measures are rendered ineffective if the initial login occurs through a malicious website reached via a deceptive ad.

Therefore, it is critical to access your QuickBooks account and conduct all sensitive activities directly through the official Intuit QuickBooks website or application, carefully verifying the URL.

**We don’t just report on threats – we help safeguard your entire digital identity**

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your—and your family’s—personal information by using identity protection.

**Malicious QuickBooks domains**

quicckboocks-accounting\[.\]com  
quicckbooks-accounting\[.\]com  
quicckrbooks-acccounting\[.\]com  
quicfkbooks-accounting\[.\]com  
quichkbooks-accounting\[.\]com  
quicjkbooks-accounting\[.\]com  
quickboorks-acccounting\[.\]com  
quickboorks-accountings\[.\]com  
quicnkbooks-accounting\[.\]com  
quicrkbookrs-accounting\[.\]com  
quicrkbooks-acccounting\[.\]com  
quicrkbooks-accountting\[.\]com  
quicrkboorks-accounnting\[.\]com  
quicrkboorks-accounting\[.\]com  
quicrkbrooks-online\[.\]com  
quicrkrbooks-accounting\[.\]com  
quictkbooks-accounting\[.\]com  
quicvkbooks-accounting\[.\]com  
quicxkbooks-accounting\[.\]com  
quirckbooks-accounting\[.\]com

 Tax deadline threat: QuickBooks phishing scam exploits Google Ads 

Cwmbran in Wales holds the Guinness World Record for the most roundabouts—at least according to Google AI Overviews. Except that's not actually true...

Cwmbran in Wales, a town with a population of just under 50,000, holds the Guinness World Record for the most roundabouts—at least according to Google AI Overviews.

Except that’s not actually true…

Ben Black has been publishing lighthearted fake stories on April Fools’ Day for his community news site Cwmbran Life since 2018. The April Fools include the erection of a Hollywood-style sign on a mountain, and the creation of a nudist cold-water swimming club at a lake.   

In 2020, Black published a fake story saying Cwmbran had been recognized by Guinness World Records for having the highest number of roundabouts per square kilometer.  

He fabricated a random number of roundabouts, added a quote from a fictitious resident, and clearly stated that the “news” was an April Fool’s Day joke several hours later. 

So it came as quite a surprise when Black discovered that Google AI Overviews picked up this story as real news recently.  

The thing about April Fools’ Day is that it is treated very differently to every other day online. Normal news outlets publish deliberately fake news stories and we, as people with knowledge of April Fools Day, can use that to assess if something is true. Google AI obviously didn’t get that memo.

As Black said:

> _“It’s not a dangerous story, but it shows how fake news can easily spread even if it’s from a trusted news source.”_ 

Google AI Overviews has been under scrutiny since testing last year after generating false information, including advising people on the minimum required pebbles to eat in a day or using gasoline to cook spaghetti faster.

Black decided not to publish an April Fools’ prank this year due to his busy schedule and his recent experience with Google, which has made him hesitant about future pranks. 

We feel similar about online pranks coming from us, a cybersecurity company that you can trust, so we opted out of April Fools’ Day this year too.

 Google AI taken for a ride by April Fools’ Day joke 

Google has issued patches for 62 vulnerabilities in Android, including two actively exploited zero-days.

Google has patched 62 vulnerabilities in Android, including two actively exploited zero-days in its April 2025 Android Security Bulletin.

When we say “zero-day” we mean an exploitable software vulnerability for which there was no patch at the time of the vulnerability being exploited or published. The term reflects the amount of time that a vulnerable organization has to protect against the threat by patching—zero days.

The April updates are available for Android 13, 14, and 15. Android vendors are notified of all issues at least a month before publication, however, this doesn’t always mean that the patches are available for all devices immediately.

You can find your device’s Android version number, security update level, and Google Play system level in your Settings app. You’ll get notifications when updates are available for you, but you can also check for them yourself.

For most phones it works like this: Under **About phone** or **About device** you can tap on **Software updates** to check if there are new updates available for your device, although there may be slight differences based on the brand, type, and Android version of your device.

If your Android phone shows patch level 2025-04-05 or later then you can consider the issues as fixed. The difference with patch level 2025-04-01 is that the higher level provides all the fixes from the first batch and security patches for closed-source third-party and kernel subcomponents, which may not necessarily apply to all Android devices.

Keeping your device as up to date as possible protects you from known vulnerabilities and helps you to stay safe.

**Technical details**

The zero-days are both located in the kernel:

CVE-2024-53150: an out-of-bounds flaw in the USB sub-component of the Linux Kernel that could result in information disclosure. Local attackers can exploit this flaw to access sensitive information on vulnerable devices without user interaction.

The out of bounds vulnerability was caused by the USB-audio driver code which failed to check the length of each descriptor before passing it on.  There are currently no details on how CVE-2024-53150 has been exploited in real-world attacks, by whom, and who may have been targeted in those attacks.

CVE-2024-53197: a privilege escalation flaw in the USB audio sub-component of the Linux Kernel. Again, no user interaction is required.

This vulnerability is the missing link to CVE-2024-50302 and CVE-2024-53104 which put together were reportedly exploited in Serbia by law enforcement using Cellebrite forensic tools to unlock a student activist’s device and attempt spyware installation.

**We don’t just report on phone security—we provide it**

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your mobile devices by downloading Malwarebytes for iOS, and Malwarebytes for Android today.

 Google fixes two actively exploited zero-day vulnerabilities in Android 

This week on the Lock and Code podcast, we speak with Lena Cohen about whether our phones are really listening to us to deliver ads.

_This week on the Lock and Code podcast…_

It has probably happened to you before.

You and a friend are _talking_—not texting, not DMing, not FaceTiming—but _talking_, physically face-to-face, about, say, an upcoming vacation, a new music festival, or a job offer you just got.

And then, that same week, you start noticing some eerily specific ads. There’s the Instagram ad about carry-on luggage, the TikTok ad about earplugs, and the countless ads you encounter simply scrolling through the internet about laptop bags.

And so you think, “Is my phone listening to me?”

This question has been around for years and, today, it’s far from a conspiracy theory. Modern smartphones can and do listen to users for voice searches, smart assistant integration, and, obviously, phone calls. It’s not too outlandish to believe, then, that the microphones on smartphones could be used to listen to other conversations without users knowing about it.

Recent news stories don’t help, either.

In January, Apple agreed to pay $95 million to settle a lawsuit alleging that the company had eavesdropped on users’ conversations through its smart assistant Siri, and that it shared the recorded conversations with marketers for ad targeting. The lead plaintiff in the case specifically claimed that she and her daughter were recorded without their consent, which resulted in them receiving multiple ads for Air Jordans.

In agreeing to pay the settlement, though, Apple denied any wrongdoing, with a spokesperson telling the BBC:

“Siri data has never been used to build marketing profiles and it has never been sold to anyone for any purpose.”

But statements like this have done little to ease public anxiety. Tech companies have been caught in multiple lies in the past, privacy invasions happen thousands of times a day, and ad targeting feels extreme entirely because it is.

Where, then, does the truth lie?

Today, on the Lock and Code podcast with David Ruiz, we speak with Electronic Frontier Foundation Staff Technologist Lena Cohen about the most mind-boggling forms of corporate surveillance—including an experimental ad-tracking technology that emitted ultrasonic sound waves—specific audience segments that marketing companies make when targeting people with ads, and, of course, whether our phones are really listening to us.

> “Companies are collecting so much information about us and in such covert ways that it really feels like they’re listening to us.”

Tune in today to listen to the full conversation.

**Listen up—Malwarebytes doesn’t just talk cybersecurity, we provide it.**

Protect yourself from online attacks that threaten your identity, your files, your system, and your financial well-being with our exclusive offer for Malwarebytes Premium for Lock and Code listeners.

 Is your phone listening to you? (Lock and Code S06E07) 

Heavy incoming traffic: A new wave of toll fee scams are sweeping America.

Back in August 2024, we warned about a relatively new type of SMS phishing (or smishing) scam that was doing the rounds.

Now a new wave of toll fee scams are working their way round the US. These attempts come as an unexpected text message linking to a website pretending to belong to one of the US toll authorities, like E-ZPass, The Toll Roads, SunPass, or TxTag.

The texts usually create a sense of urgency—a common tactic of scammers, by telling you there is only a limited time left to act or there will be dire consequences.

The phishing sites are typically out to steal personal information and/or payment details. Reportedly, some users get up to 7 such messages in a day.

Many state departments are issuing warnings. For example, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) recently warned consumers of reported phishing attempts via text, and the Arizona Department of Transportation even published a reminder that the state highway system doesn’t have toll roads, because of these scams.

A typical text message might look like this:

> “Your toll payment for E-ZPass Lane must be settled by {a date in the very near future}. To avoid fines and the suspension of your driving privileges, kindly pay by the due date.
> 
> Pay here: {malicious link}
> 
> (Please reply with “Y”, then exit the text message. Open it again, click the link, or copy it into your browser and open it.)”

 The malicious links are often fabricated to look legitimate by including an existing domain name before the actual domain name. E.g. e-zpass.com- roadioe\[.\]cc.

**How to avoid falling for toll fee scams**

*   Check the phone number that the text message comes from. Some of the scams we saw were easy to dismiss because they came from telephone numbers outside the US.
*   Look for the actual site that handles the alleged toll fees and compare the domain name. Sometimes there is only a small difference, so inspect it carefully.
*   If you decided to pay, make sure you receive confirmation of payment. Official toll agencies will send confirmation after collecting payments. If you don’t receive that, call the toll service to check.
*   Never interact with the scammer in any way. Every reaction provides them with information, even if it’s only that the phone number is in use.
*   If you think the toll fee is feasible because you have indeed travelled in that area, check on the official toll service’s website or call their customer service number.
*   The FBI asks that if you receive a suspicious message, contact the FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center at ic3.gov. Be sure to include the phone number from where the text originated, and the website listed within the text.

**Indicators of Compromise (IoCs)**

Domains involved in toll fee scams:

com-roadioe\[.\]cc

uoshxkdhkz\[.\]top

com-zgoupbb\[.\]top

forfeitzm\[.\]top

sunpass-verification\[.\]top

com-tollbilljhy\[.\]top

com-etc-bbzj\[.\]vip

com-tollbilltid\[.\]vip

com-tollbilltwd\[.\]vip

paytollrbzx\[.\]vip

com-ticketvb\[.\]xin

com-emzwepr\[.\]xin

com-ustolls\[.\]xin

com-tollbilaz\[.\]xin

etc-tollad\[.\]xin

roadetctre\[.\]xin

Did you know that Malwarebytes for mobile scans your texts for scams and blocks known malicious sites?

**We don’t just report on phone security—we provide it**

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your mobile devices by downloading Malwarebytes for iOS, and Malwarebytes for Android today.

Source

Malwarebytes