Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Tag

#dell

RHSA-2023:0334: Red Hat Security Advisory: kernel security and bug fix update

An update for kernel is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original. Related CVEs: * CVE-2022-2959: kernel: watch queue race condition can lead to privilege escalation * CVE-2022-2964: kernel: memory corruption in AX88179_178A based USB ethernet device. * CVE-2022-3077: kernel: i2c: unbounded length leads to buffer overflow in ismt_access() * CVE-2022-4139: kernel: i915: Incorrect GPU TLB flush can lead to random memory access * CVE-2022-30594: ...

Red Hat Security Data
#vulnerability#ios#linux#red_hat#intel#perl#amd#bios#buffer_overflow#ibm#dell
CVE-2022-3918: CRLF injection vulnerability in swift-corelibs-foundation

A program using FoundationNetworking in swift-corelibs-foundation is potentially vulnerable to CRLF ( ) injection in URLRequest headers. In this vulnerability, a client can insert one or several CRLF sequences into a URLRequest header value. When that request is sent via URLSession to an HTTP server, the server may interpret the content after the CRLF as extra headers, or even a second request. For example, consider a URLRequest to http://example.com/ with the GET method. Suppose we set the URLRequest header "Foo" to the value "Bar Extra-Header: Added GET /other HTTP/1.1". When this request is sent, it will appear to the server as two requests: GET / HTTP/1.1 Foo: Bar Extra-Header: Added GET /other HTTP/1.1 In this manner, the client is able to inject extra headers and craft an entirely new request to a separate path, despite only making one API call in URLSession. If a developer has total control over the request and its headers, this vulnerability may not pose a threat. However, this...

CVE-2023-23691: DSA-2023-018: Dell PowerVault ME5 Security Update for a Client Desync Attack Vulnerability

Dell EMC PV ME5, versions ME5.1.0.0.0 and ME5.1.0.1.0, contains a Client-side desync Vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to force a victim's browser to desynchronize its connection with the website, typically leading to XSS and DoS.

CVE-2023-23690: DSA-2023-019: Dell Cloud Mobility Security Update for Certificate Revocation Vulnerability

Cloud Mobility for Dell EMC Storage, versions 1.3.0.X and below contains an Improper Check for Certificate Revocation vulnerability. A threat actor does not need any specific privileges to potentially exploit this vulnerability. An attacker could perform a man-in-the-middle attack and eavesdrop on encrypted communications from Cloud Mobility to Cloud Storage devices. Exploitation could lead to the compromise of secret and sensitive information, cloud storage connection downtime, and the integrity of the connection to the Cloud devices.

CVE-2023-0040: CRLF Injection in HTTP request headers

Versions of Async HTTP Client prior to 1.13.2 are vulnerable to a form of targeted request manipulation called CRLF injection. This vulnerability was the result of insufficient validation of HTTP header field values before sending them to the network. Users are vulnerable if they pass untrusted data into HTTP header field values without prior sanitisation. Common use-cases here might be to place usernames from a database into HTTP header fields. This vulnerability allows attackers to inject new HTTP header fields, or entirely new requests, into the data stream. This can cause requests to be understood very differently by the remote server than was intended. In general, this is unlikely to result in data disclosure, but it can result in a number of logical errors and other misbehaviours.

CVE-2022-45103: DSA-2022-340: Dell Unisphere for PowerMax, Dell Unisphere for PowerMax vApp, Dell Solutions Enabler vApp, Dell Unisphere 360, Dell VASA Provider vApp, and Dell PowerMax EMB Mgmt Security Update for Mu

Dell Unisphere for PowerMax vApp, VASA Provider vApp, and Solution Enabler vApp version 9.2.3.x contain an information disclosure vulnerability. A low privileged remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to read arbitrary files on the underlying file system.

CVE-2022-34457: DSA-2022-297: Dell Command | Configure Security Update for Multiple Vulnerabilities

Dell command configuration, version 4.8 and prior, contains improper folder permission when installed not to default path but to non-secured path which leads to privilege escalation. This is critical severity vulnerability as it allows non-admin to modify the files inside installed directory and able to make application unavailable for all users.

CVE-2022-34435: DSA-2022-265: Dell iDRAC8 and Dell iDRAC9 Security Update for a RACADM Vulnerability

Dell iDRAC9 version 6.00.02.00 and prior contain an improper input validation vulnerability in Racadm when the firmware lock-down configuration is set. A remote high privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass the firmware lock-down configuration and perform a firmware update.

CVE-2022-34436: DSA-2022-265: Dell iDRAC8 and Dell iDRAC9 Security Update for a RACADM Vulnerability

Dell iDRAC8 version 2.83.83.83 and prior contain an improper input validation vulnerability in Racadm when the firmware lock-down configuration is set. A remote high privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass the firmware lock-down configuration and perform a firmware update.

CVE-2022-34399: DSA-2022-317: Dell Client Security Update for Dell Client BIOS

Dell Alienware m17 R5 BIOS version prior to 1.2.2 contain a buffer access vulnerability. A malicious user with admin privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability by sending input larger than expected in order to leak certain sections of SMRAM.