#git

Hello everyone! In this episode, I will talk about the February updates of my open source projects, also about projects at my main job at Positive Technologies and interesting vulnerabilities. Alternative video link (for Russia): https://vk.com/video-149273431_456239140 Let’s start with my open source projects. Vulremi A simple vulnerability remediation utility, Vulremi, now has a logo and […]

Researchers have uncovered thousands of "subdomailing" campaigns.

### Impact A heap-use-after-free flaw was found in ImageSharp's InitializeImage() function of PngDecoderCore.cs file. This vulnerability is triggered when an attacker passes a specially crafted PNG image file to ImageSharp for conversion, potentially leading to information disclosure. ### Patches The problem has been patched. All users are advised to upgrade to v3.1.3 ### Workarounds None ### References None

### Summary A Minder user can use the endpoints listed in the issue title to access any repository in the DB, irrespective of who owns the repo and any permissions that user may have. ### Details https://github.com/stacklok/minder/blob/e88e4b286e4bc04c03b0332a77961f085e1aa77f/database/query/repositories.sql#L22-L23 https://github.com/stacklok/minder/blob/a115c8524fbd582b2b277eaadce024bebbded508/internal/controlplane/handlers_repositories.go#L277-L278 The DB query used here checks by repo owner, repo name and provider name (which is always "github"). These query values are not distinct for the particular user - as long as the user has valid credentials and a provider, they can set the repo owner/name to any value they want and the server will return information on this repo. `DeleteRepositoryByName` uses the same query and I have been able to delete another user's repo using this technique. The `GetArtifactByName` endpoint also uses this DB query. I have not reproduced the behaviou...

RT-Thread RTOS versions 5.0.2 and below suffer from multiple buffer overflows, a weak random source in rt_random driver, and various other vulnerabilities.

This is related to recent ZST stuff (https://github.com/ethereum/eth-abi/security/advisories/GHSA-rqr8-pxh7-cq3g), but it's a different one. Basically a recursive pointer issue ```py from eth_abi import decode payload = "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000020000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000a0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000020000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000020000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000020000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000020" # Ove...

KK Star Ratings versions prior to 5.4.6 suffer from rate tampering via a race condition vulnerability.

American Express has warned affected customers about a breach at a merchant process that leaked account numbers, names, and card expiration dates.

Cisco Talos observed a surge in GhostSec, a hacking group’s malicious activities since this past year. GhostSec has evolved with a new GhostLocker 2.0 ransomware, a Golang variant of the GhostLocker ransomware.

By Waqas Researchers have created computer worms with self-propagation capabilities that target GenAI applications. This is a post from HackRead.com Read the original post: Researchers Test Zero-click Worms that Exploit Generative AI Apps