Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Headline

GHSA-5fp6-4xw3-xqq3: @keystone-6/core's bundled cuid package known to be insecure

Summary

The cuid package used by @keystone-6/* and upstream dependencies is deprecated and marked as insecure by the author.

As reported by the author

Cuid and other k-sortable and non-cryptographic ids (Ulid, ObjectId, KSUID, all UUIDs) are all insecure. Use @paralleldrive/cuid2 instead.

What are doing about this?

What if I need a cuid?

The features marked as a security vulnerability by @paralleldrive are sometimes actually needed (as written in the README of cuid) - the problem is the inherent risks that features like this can have.

You might actually want the features of a monotonically increasing (auto-increment, k-sortable), and timestamp-based id as part of your application, and keystone should support that - but you might not want them by default. This is why this security advisory has been accepted by me (@dcousens), we currently use cuid identifiers by default, and that should change.

Impact

I have accepted this security advisory on the basis that we don’t need this kind of identifier typically, and the need for them should be driven by an application’s requirements, not a convenient default.

ghsa
#vulnerability#nodejs#js#git#auth
  1. GitHub Advisory Database
  2. GitHub Reviewed
  3. GHSA-5fp6-4xw3-xqq3

@keystone-6/core’s bundled cuid package known to be insecure

Low severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 11, 2023 in keystonejs/keystone • Updated Jun 12, 2023

Package

npm @keystone-6/core (npm)

Affected versions

<= 5.3.1

Summary

The cuid package used by @keystone-6/* and upstream dependencies is deprecated and marked as insecure by the author.

As reported by the author

Cuid and other k-sortable and non-cryptographic ids (Ulid, ObjectId, KSUID, all UUIDs) are all insecure. Use @paralleldrive/cuid2 instead.

What are doing about this?

  • We are waiting on Prisma to add support for cuid2
  • Alternatively, we might default to a random string ourselves

What if I need a cuid?

The features marked as a security vulnerability by @paralleldrive are sometimes actually needed (as written in the README of cuid) - the problem is the inherent risks that features like this can have.

You might actually want the features of a monotonically increasing (auto-increment, k-sortable), and timestamp-based id as part of your application, and keystone should support that - but you might not want them by default.
This is why this security advisory has been accepted by me (@dcousens), we currently use cuid identifiers by default, and that should change.

Impact

I have accepted this security advisory on the basis that we don’t need this kind of identifier typically, and the need for them should be driven by an application’s requirements, not a convenient default.

References

  • GHSA-5fp6-4xw3-xqq3
  • keystonejs/keystone#8282 (comment)
  • https://github.com/paralleldrive/cuid#status-deprecated-due-to-security-use-cuid2-instead

Published to the GitHub Advisory Database

Jun 12, 2023

Last updated

Jun 12, 2023

ghsa: Latest News

GHSA-pf5v-pqfv-x8jj: OpenCanary Executes Commands From Potentially Writable Config File