Headline
GHSA-5fp6-4xw3-xqq3: @keystone-6/core's bundled cuid package known to be insecure
Summary
The cuid
package used by @keystone-6/*
and upstream dependencies is deprecated and marked as insecure by the author.
As reported by the author
Cuid and other k-sortable and non-cryptographic ids (Ulid, ObjectId, KSUID, all UUIDs) are all insecure. Use @paralleldrive/cuid2 instead.
What are doing about this?
- We are waiting on Prisma to add support for
cuid2
- Alternatively, we might default to a random string ourselves
What if I need a cuid
?
The features marked as a security vulnerability by @paralleldrive are sometimes actually needed (as written in the README of cuid
) - the problem is the inherent risks that features like this can have.
You might actually want the features of a monotonically increasing (auto-increment, k-sortable), and timestamp-based id as part of your application, and keystone should support that - but you might not want them by default. This is why this security advisory has been accepted by me (@dcousens), we currently use cuid identifiers by default, and that should change.
Impact
I have accepted this security advisory on the basis that we don’t need this kind of identifier typically, and the need for them should be driven by an application’s requirements, not a convenient default.
- GitHub Advisory Database
- GitHub Reviewed
- GHSA-5fp6-4xw3-xqq3
@keystone-6/core’s bundled cuid package known to be insecure
Low severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 11, 2023 in keystonejs/keystone • Updated Jun 12, 2023
Package
npm @keystone-6/core (npm)
Affected versions
<= 5.3.1
Summary
The cuid package used by @keystone-6/* and upstream dependencies is deprecated and marked as insecure by the author.
As reported by the author
Cuid and other k-sortable and non-cryptographic ids (Ulid, ObjectId, KSUID, all UUIDs) are all insecure. Use @paralleldrive/cuid2 instead.
What are doing about this?
- We are waiting on Prisma to add support for cuid2
- Alternatively, we might default to a random string ourselves
What if I need a cuid?
The features marked as a security vulnerability by @paralleldrive are sometimes actually needed (as written in the README of cuid) - the problem is the inherent risks that features like this can have.
You might actually want the features of a monotonically increasing (auto-increment, k-sortable), and timestamp-based id as part of your application, and keystone should support that - but you might not want them by default.
This is why this security advisory has been accepted by me (@dcousens), we currently use cuid identifiers by default, and that should change.
Impact
I have accepted this security advisory on the basis that we don’t need this kind of identifier typically, and the need for them should be driven by an application’s requirements, not a convenient default.
References
- GHSA-5fp6-4xw3-xqq3
- keystonejs/keystone#8282 (comment)
- https://github.com/paralleldrive/cuid#status-deprecated-due-to-security-use-cuid2-instead
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database
Jun 12, 2023
Last updated
Jun 12, 2023