Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Source

ghsa

GHSA-c459-2m73-67hj: SOFA Hessian Remote Command Execution (RCE) Vulnerability

### Impact SOFA Hessian protocol uses a blacklist mechanism to restrict deserialization of potentially dangerous classes for security protection. But there is a gadget chain that can bypass the SOFA Hessian blacklist protection mechanism, and this gadget chain only relies on JDK and does not rely on any third-party components. ### Patches Fixed this issue by update blacklist, users can upgrade to sofahessian version 3.5.5 to avoid this issue. ### Workarounds You can maintain a blacklist yourself in this directory `external/serialize.blacklist`.

ghsa
#vulnerability#git#java#maven
GHSA-62c8-mh53-4cqv: HTTP client can manipulate custom HTTP headers that are added by Traefik

### Impact There is a vulnerability in Traefik that allows the client to remove the X-Forwarded headers (except the header X-Forwarded-For). ### Patches - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.9 - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.1.3 ### Workarounds No workaround. ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please [open an issue](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues). <details> <summary>Original Description</summary> ### Summary When a HTTP request is processed by Traefik, certain HTTP headers such as X-Forwarded-Host or X-Forwarded-Port are added by Traefik before the request is routed to the application. For a HTTP client, it should not be possible to remove or modify these headers. Since the application trusts the value of these headers, security implications might arise, if they can be modified. For HTTP/1.1, however, it was found that some of theses custom headers can indeed be removed and in ...

GHSA-hpc8-7wpm-889w: Dragonfly2 has hard coded cyptographic key

### Summary Hello dragonfly maintainer team, I would like to report a security issue concerning your JWT feature. ### Details Dragonfly uses [JWT](https://github.com/dragonflyoss/Dragonfly2/blob/cddcac7e3bdb010811e2b62b3c71d9d5c6749011/manager/middlewares/jwt.go) to verify user. However, the secret key for JWT, "Secret Key", is hard coded, which leads to authentication bypass ```go authMiddleware, err := jwt.New(&jwt.GinJWTMiddleware{ Realm: "Dragonfly", Key: []byte("Secret Key"), Timeout: 2 * 24 * time.Hour, MaxRefresh: 2 * 24 * time.Hour, IdentityKey: identityKey, IdentityHandler: func(c *gin.Context) any { claims := jwt.ExtractClaims(c) id, ok := claims[identityKey] if !ok { c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{ "message": "Unavailable token: require user id", }) c.Abort() return nil } c.Set("id", id) return id }) ``` ### PoC Use code below to generate a jwt token ```go package main import ( "errors" ...

GHSA-xxxw-3j6h-q7h6: Grafana plugin SDK Information Leakage

The grafana plugin SDK bundles build metadata into the binaries it compiles; this metadata includes the repository URI for the plugin being built, as retrieved by running `git remote get-url origin`. If credentials are included in the repository URI (for instance, to allow for fetching of private dependencies), the final binary will contain the full URI, including said credentials.

GHSA-p2qj-r53j-h3xj: LangChain Experimental Eval Injection vulnerability

langchain_experimental (aka LangChain Experimental) 0.1.17 through 0.3.0 for LangChain allows attackers to execute arbitrary code through sympy.sympify (which uses eval) in LLMSymbolicMathChain. LLMSymbolicMathChain was introduced in fcccde406dd9e9b05fc9babcbeb9ff527b0ec0c6 (2023-10-05).

GHSA-5hc5-fxr9-5frc: Mautic has insufficient authentication in upgrade flow

Mautic allows you to update the application via an upgrade script. The upgrade logic isn't shielded off correctly, which may lead to vulnerable situation. This vulnerability is mitigated by the fact that Mautic needs to be installed in a certain way to be vulnerable.

GHSA-8vff-35qm-qjvv: Mautic allows users enumeration due to weak password login

### Summary When logging in with the correct username and incorrect weak password, the user receives the notification, that their password is too weak. However when an incorrect username is provided along side with weak password, the application responds with ’Invalid credentials’ notification. This difference could be used to perform username enumeration. ### Patches Update to 5.1.1 or later. If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: Email us at [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])

GHSA-qf6m-6m4g-rmrc: Mautic has insufficient authentication in upgrade flow

### Impact Mautic allows you to update the application via an upgrade script. The upgrade logic isn't shielded off correctly, which may lead to vulnerable situation. This vulnerability is mitigated by the fact that Mautic needs to be installed in a certain way to be vulnerable ### Patches Please upgrade to 4.4.1 or 5.1.1 or later. ### Workarounds None. ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Email us at [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])

GHSA-xpc5-rr39-v8v2: Mautic has an XSS in contact tracking and page hits report

### Summary Prior to this patch, a stored XSS vulnerability existed in the contact tracking and page hits report. ### Patches Please update to 4.4.13 or 5.1.1 or later. ### Workarounds None ### References https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/2017/A7_2017-Cross-Site_Scripting_(XSS) https://owasp.org/www-project-web-security-testing-guide/latest/4-Web_Application_Security_Testing/07-Input_Validation_Testing/02-Testing_for_Stored_Cross_Site_Scripting If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: Email us at [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])

GHSA-73gr-32wg-qhh7: Mautic vulnerable to XSS in contact/company tracking (no authentication)

## Summary Prior to this patch being applied, Mautic's tracking was vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting through the Page URL variable. ## Patches Please update to 4.4.13 or 5.1.1 or later. ## Workarounds None ## References https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/2017/A7_2017-Cross-Site_Scripting_(XSS) https://owasp.org/www-project-web-security-testing-guide/latest/4-Web_Application_Security_Testing/07-Input_Validation_Testing/02-Testing_for_Stored_Cross_Site_Scripting If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: Email us at [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])