Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Source

ghsa

GHSA-9w72-2f23-57gm: DNN vulnerable to Relative Path Traversal

DNN (GitHub repository dnnsoftware/dnn.platform) prior to 9.11.0 is vulnerable to Relative Path Traversal. Version 9.11.0 contains a patch for this issue.

ghsa
#git
GHSA-p28h-cc7q-c4fg: css-what vulnerable to ReDoS due to use of insecure regular expression

The package css-what before 2.1.3 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) due to the use of insecure regular expression in the `re_attr` variable of index.js. The exploitation of this vulnerability could be triggered via the parse function.

GHSA-2j79-8pqc-r7x6: react-native-reanimated vulnerable to ReDoS

The package react-native-reanimated before 3.0.0-rc.1 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) due to improper usage of regular expression in the parser of Colors.js.

GHSA-3fhq-72hw-jqwv: rdiffweb's lack of token name length limit can result in DoS or memory corruption

rdiffweb prior to 2.5.0a3 is vulnerable to Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling. A lack of limit in the length of the `Token name` parameter can result in denial of service or memory corruption. Version 2.5.0a3 fixes this issue.

GHSA-rm2x-hgr8-w343: LIEF vulnerable to denial of service through segmentation fault

A vulnerability in the LIEF::MachO::SegmentCommand::virtual_address function of LIEF v0.12.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (DOS) through a segmentation fault via a crafted MachO file. A [patch](https://github.com/lief-project/LIEF/commit/24935f654f6df700a9a062298258b9485f584502) is available at commit number 24935f654f6df700a9a062298258b9485f584502.

GHSA-2jjq-x548-rhpv: isolated-vm has vulnerable CachedDataOptions in API

### Impact If the untrusted v8 cached data is passed to the API through CachedDataOptions, the attackers can bypass the sandbox and run arbitrary code in the nodejs process. There are currently no known fixed versions or workarounds.

GHSA-w4pr-4vjg-hffh: When matrix-nio receives forwarded room keys, the receiver doesn't check if it requested the key from the forwarder

When matrix-nio before 0.20 requests a room key from our devices, it correctly accepts key forwards only if they are a response to a previous request. However, it doesn't check that the device that responded matches the device the key was requested from. This allows a malicious homeserver to insert room keys of questionable validity into the key store in some situations, potentially assisting in an impersonation attack. ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, e-mail us at [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]).

GHSA-vp68-2wrm-69qm: matrix-sdk-crypto contains potential impersonation via room key forward responses

### Impact When matrix-rust-sdk before 0.6 requests a room key from our devices, it correctly accepts key forwards only if they are a response to a previous request. However, it doesn't check that the device that responded matches the device the key was requested from. This allows a malicious homeserver to insert room keys of questionable validity into the key store in some situations, potentially assisting in an impersonation attack. Note that even if key injection succeeds in this way, all forwarded keys have the `imported` flag set, which is used as an indicator that such keys have lesser authentication properties (and should be marked as such in clients, e.g. with a grey shield besides the message). ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, e-mail us at [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]).

GHSA-5w8r-8pgj-5jmf: matrix-js-sdk subject to user impersonation due to key/device identifier confusion in SAS verification

## Impact An attacker cooperating with a malicious homeserver could interfere with the verification flow between two users, injecting its own cross-signing user identity in place of one of the users’ identities, leading to the other device trusting/verifying the user identity under the control of the homeserver instead of the intended one. The vulnerability is a bug in the matrix-js-sdk, caused by checking and signing user identities and devices in two separate steps, and inadequately fixing the keys to be signed between those steps. Even though the attack is partly made possible due to the design decision of treating cross-signing user identities as Matrix devices on the server side (with their device ID set to the public part of the user identity key), no other examined implementations were vulnerable. ## Patches The matrix-js-sdk has been modified to double check that the key signed is the one that was verified instead of just referencing the key by ID. An additional check has ...

GHSA-4rxr-27mm-mxq9: Upstash Adapter missing token verification

### Impact Applications that use `next-auth` Email Provider and `@next-auth/upstash-redis-adapter` before v3.0.2 are affected. ### Description The Upstash Redis adapter implementation did not check for both the identifier (email) and the token, but only checking for the identifier when verifying the token in the email callback flow. An attacker who knows about the victim's email could easily sign in as the victim, given the attacker also knows about the verification token's expired duration. ### Patches The vulnerability is patched in v3.0.2. To upgrade, run one of the following: ``` npm i @next-auth/upstash-redis-adapter@latest ``` ``` yarn add @next-auth/upstash-redis-adapter@latest ``` ``` pnpm add @next-auth/upstash-redis-adapter@latest ``` ### Workarounds Using Advanced Initialization, developers can check the requests and compare the query's token and identifier before proceeding. Below is an example of how to do this: (Upgrading is still strongly recommended) ```js import {...