Through malice or carelessness, AstraLocker breaks the "circle of trust".
The post AstraLocker 2.0 ransomware isn’t going to give you your files back appeared first on Malwarebytes Labs.

Reversing Labs reports that the latest verison of AstraLocker ransomware is engaged in a a so-called “smash and grab” ransomware operation.

Smash and grab is all about maxing out profit in the fastest time. It works on the assumption by malware authors that security software or victims will find the malware quickly, so it’s better to get right to the end-game as quickly as possible. Adware bundles in the early 2000s capitalised on this approach, with revenue paid for dozens of adverts popping on desktops in as short a time as possible.

That smash and grab spirit lives on.

In a ransomware attack, criminals typically break into a victim’s network via a trojan that has already infected a computer, by exploiting a software vulnerability on an Internet-facing server, or with stolen Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) credentials. They then make their way silently to devices and servers where important data is stored. Anything of value is stolen and sent outside of the network. When the attacker is good and ready, ransomware is deployed, encrypting the files on the machines and rendering them useless. From here, double or even triple threat extortion (blackmail and the threat of data leakage) is deployed. This careful approach, which can sometimes take weeks, allows attackers to stop organisations dead in their tracks and demand multi-million dollar ransoms.

It is so successful that almost all major ransomware families are used in this way.

But AstraLocker is not a major ransomware family, and it doesn’t do this. (These two things may be connected.)

**Click to run**

In the attacks observed by Reversing Labs, AstraLocker just arrives and encrypts.

It starts life as a rogue Word document attachmed to an email. The payload lurking in the document is an embedded OLE object. Triggering the ransomware requires the victim to double click the icon within the document, which comes with a security warning. As researchers note, this isn’t as slick a process as the recent Follina vulnerability (which requires no user interaction), or even misusing macros (which some user interaction).

In its rush to encrypt, AstraLocker still manages to do some standard ransomware things: It tries to disable security programs; it also stops applications running that might prevent encryption from taking place; and it avoids virtual machines, which might indicate it’s being run by researchers in a lab.

The sense of this being a rushed job doesn’t stop there.

**Reaffirming (and then breaking) the circle of trust**

When decryption doesn’t happen, either because of a poor quality decryptor, or because no decryption process actually exists, the ransomware author’s so-called circle of trust is broken. Too many decryption misfires is bad for business. After all, why would victims pay up if there’s no chance of file recovery?

It’s interesting, then, that the following text is in AstraLocker 2.0’s ransom note:

> **What guarantees?**  
> I value my reputation. If I do not do my work and liabilities, nobody will pay me. This is not in my interests. All my decryption software is perfectly tested and will decrypt your data.

So far, so good…you would think. Unfortunately, there’s a sting in the tail.

The cost of their decryption software is “about $50 USD”, payable via Monero or Bitcoin. There is some question as to who the author of this version of AstraLocker is, as the email addresses tied to the original campaign have been replaced. Unfortunately, this is where the circle of trust falls apart.

You can certainly pay the ransom with no problem whatsoever. That side of things, the making money side, works perfectly. The getting your files back side of things? Not so much. The new contact email address mentioned above is only partially included.

There is currently no way to ask the ransomware author for the decryption tool. Unless some sort of update is forthcoming, this is the quickest way you’ll ever lose both your files and $50.

Whether this is by accident or design, the circle of trust here is more of a downward curve.

AstraLocker 2.0 ransomware isn’t going to give you your files back

We take a look at reports of scammers targeting Youtuber's channels with malware called YTStealer, that eats authentication cookies.
The post YTStealer targets YouTube content creators appeared first on Malwarebytes Labs.

Researchers are reporting the discovery of malware targeting YouTub content creators. The aim is to compromise accounts and then take over the victims’ channels completely.

The malware, dubbed YTStealer, has one game plan: Grabbing authentication cookies. A site gives you an authentication cookie when you log in, and your browser then uses it in place of a password until you log out. If somebody can steal the authentication cookie from your browser they can use it log into whatever website you’re using, as if they are you.

Armed with YouTube cookies, YTStealer plunders YouTube accounts, and their real owners have some customer support chats waiting in their immediate future.

**Targeting interests**

How do malware distributors reel in YouTube channel owners in the first place? Like so many of these scams, they promote a variety of bogus applications designed to lure victims. The rogue apps don’t just install YTStealer though, they also drop several other malicious files, depending on which installer is used. Vidar and RedLine may also be present.

Several popular (fake) versions of editing and design tools, which would naturally appeal to people in video circles, are on offer. Adobe Premiere Pro, HitFilm Express, and Filmora are some of the fake installers mentioned.

Games, too, are a popular revenue stream on YouTube with game streamers and reviewers galore. No surprise, then, that fake installers and cheats for titles like Call of Duty and Grand Theft Auto are along for the ride.

The final group of bogus files relate to imitation security products and supposed cracks for Discord Nitro and Spotify Premium.

**System checks and balances**

Once installed on a target machine, YTStealer performs some checks to see if its running inside of a virtual machine. This is to see if the malware is being analysed by security researchers. If detection takes place, files like YTStealer will typically terminate or become incredibly stubborn.

With this out of the way, YTStealer proceeds to harvest authentication cookies and fire up a browser in “headless” mode (a browser with no windows to look at). In other words: A silent, invisible browser. The victim is completely unaware of what’s happening. Swiped cookies are loaded into the phantom browser, which can now log in to YouTube as the victim.

The malware harvests the victim’s subscriber count, channel name, age of channel, verification status, and whether or not the channel is monetised. The data is collected, encrypted, and sent to the Command and Control (C2) server tied to the malware.

**How to avoid malware aimed at Youtubers**

*   Scammers will target your interests, and try to interest you in cheap / free copies of software related to the content you create. Is a stranger really going to give you free editing tools worth a few hundred dollars? Almost certainly not. “If it sounds too good to be true,” and all that.
*   Many of these files insist you turn off security protection prior to installing. Ask yourself why they’d want you to do this, and then make a sharp exit.
*   Are they directing you to a YouTube channel of their own for the download links? Check the comments. Are they disabled? Is every single comment positive, and posted from new / low quality accounts? There’s a reason for that…
*   Free cheat tools advertised on YouTube are not going to work. Bypassing anti-cheat protection in major video game titles is big business, and people pay to use these tools. Anything given away for free in this manner will do little beyond infect your system.

YTStealer targets YouTube content creators

Researchers have analyzed a long running campaign that compromises SOHO routers to further penetrate and eavesdrop on networks.
The post ZuoRAT is a sophisticated malware that mainly targets SOHO routers appeared first on Malwarebytes Labs.

Researchers have analysed a campaign leveraging infected SOHO routers to target predominantly North American and European networks of interest.

The so-called ZuoRAT campaign, which very likely started in 2020, is so sophisticated that the researchers suspect that there is a state sponsored threat actor behind it.

**SOHO routers**

SOHO is short for small office/home office and SOHO routers are hardware devices that route data from a local area network (LAN) to another network connection. Modern SOHO routers have almost the same functions as home broadband routers, and small businesses tend to use the same models. Some vendors also sell routers with advanced security and manageability features, but most SOHO devices are only monitored in exceptional cases.

Which is probably the reason why the ZuoRAT managed to fly under the radar for so long.

**Compromise the router**

The first step in the campaign is to take control of the router. The researchers identified infected routers of several manufacturers including popular brands like ASUS, Cisco, DrayTek, and NETGEAR. It is likely that the threat actor used unpatched vulnerabilities to steal credentials from the targeted routers. Although patches for these vulnerabilities exist, it is not uncommon for device administrators never to apply these patches.

This lack of security is often caused by lack of awareness. And the lack of awareness starts by small business owners not knowing which type or model of router they have exactly. So even if they read about a vulnerability in their router, it may not sink in that it applies to them. The rebranding of routers by providers is another contributing factor to the owners’ ignorance.

**Drop the RAT**

The vulnerability or chain of vulnerabilities allow the threat actor to download a binary, then execute it on the host. Once installed, ZuoRAT enumerates the devices connected to the infected router. The threat actor can then use DNS hijacking and HTTP hijacking to cause the connected devices to install other malware.

The ZuoRAT agent framework enables in-depth reconnaissance of target networks, traffic collection and network communication hijacking. Some of the functions will run by default, while others might be intended to be called by additional commands.

**Mirai**

ZuoRAT looks like a heavily modified version of the Mirai malware. The authorities may have caught the Mirai creators, but the spirit of their botnet lives on. Numerous groups took advantage of the open-source code to create mini variants. But the command and control infrastructure used in this campaign is intentionally complex in an attempt to conceal what’s happening.

**Attribution**

While attribution is always hard, the researchers listed several indications that the group behind this campaign might be of Chinese origin. One set of C2 infrastructure controlled by this threat actor and used to interact with the Windows RATs was found to be hosted on internet services from China-based organizations. Also, some of the program database paths contained Chinese characters, while others referenced “sxiancheng”, a possible name or Chinese locality.

China is a likely candidate even if it seems they have already bitten off more than they can chew. According to an article in the Financial Times Chinese university students have been lured to work as translators to help identify hacking targets, and to analyze stolen material.

**DNS hijacking**

Using the gathered information about the DNS settings and the internal host in the adjacent LAN, there were several functions designed to perform DNS hijacking. Some functions allowed the threat actor to update DNS hijacking rules specifying which domains to hijack, the malicious IP address resulting from the hijack and the number of times to trigger the rule.

**HTTP hijacking**

Another noteworthy function enabled the actor to specify which client or subnet to hijack. It hijacked the process so that it could match the traffic pattern. If the pattern matched one of the rules, it displayed a 302 error that redirected the client’s browser to another location where the threat actor could manipulate the connection.

**Mitigation**

If you fear that your router has been compromised, simply restarting an infected device will remove the initial ZuoRAT exploit. To fully recover, however, a factory reset clears infected devices.

To avoid your router from getting infected, find the most recent firmware and install it so you have all the latest patches.

Systems that used an infected route for their internet access and used no block lists that included the C2 infrastructure of ZuoRAT may be infected. This is not only true for Windows systems. The researchers found samples written in GO, which is a cross-platform language.  

IoCs associated with this campaign for threat hunting can be found on the Black Lotus Labs GitHub page.

Stay safe, everyone!

ZuoRAT is a sophisticated malware that mainly targets SOHO routers

The retail giant patched a serious flaw in its Amazon Photos app that left user access token exposed to potential attackers.
The post Amazon Photos vulnerability could have given attackers access to user files and data appeared first on Malwarebytes Labs.

Amazon has patched a flaw in the Amazon Photos app which could have allowed an attacker to steal and use a user’s unique access token that verifies their identity across multiple Amazon APIs.

That would give attackers access to a trove of information, since many of these APIs contain personal data, such as names, email addresses, and home addresses.

Amazon Photos, previously known as Prime Photos, is a service related to Amazon Drive, the company’s cloud storage application. To date, it has been downloaded more than 50 million times from the Play Store. The Photos app is geared towards the storing, organizing, and sharing photos and videos.

Due to a misconfiguration of a component in the app, rendering a client’s access token severely unprotected, a third-party malicious app could access and use this token. In a ransomware scenario, threat actors could steal, delete, and encrypt files and leave affected users with no means to restore them.

To put it plainly, it’s like sending a password over to another app in plain text, the researchers who found the bug explained.

The researchers from Checkmarx informed Amazon in November 2021. The following month, the company issued a patch for the vulnerability.

Because this flaw also affects Amazon Drive, threat actors could theoretically modify files while erasing a user’s history, effectively rendering original content irrecoverable.

Erez Yalon, Checkmarx’s vice president of security research, was quoted in an interview with The Record:

> “We know there is nothing completely secure in the software world. But seeing that kind of vulnerability in the software of Amazon, one of the leading companies in the world when it comes to security practices, means that it can happen to every software company.”

An Amazon spokesperson also told The Record they found “no evidence that sensitive customer information was exposed as a result of this issue.”

“We appreciate the work of independent security researchers who help bring potential issues to our attention,” the spokesperson said.

Amazon Photos vulnerability could have given attackers access to user files and data

The FBI has warned businesses of an uptick in reports of criminals applying for remote work using deepfake and stolen PII.
The post Criminals are applying for remote work using deepfake and stolen identities, says FBI appeared first on Malwarebytes Labs.

The FBI has warned businesses of an uptick in reports of criminals applying for remote work using deepfake and stolen PII (personally identifiable information).

A deepfake is essentially created or modified media (image, video, or audio), often with the help of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). Deepfake creations are designed to appear and sound as authentic as possible. Because of this, they’re difficult to spot unless you know what to look for.

Years of data breaches made millions of Americans’ identities available for anyone with ill intent to gather and use for personal gains. This time, criminals seem confident about pulling off a scheme that fully intends to sabotage or steal from companies that hire them while keeping their true identities intact.

Armed with compelling synthetic images and videos with legitimate PII, we can imagine criminals likely getting the job before pulling the wool over their employer’s eyes.

Most open positions identified in the report were in the technology field, such as IT (information technology), computer programming, database, and software. The FBI has also noted that some positions criminals are trying to fill would grant them access to PII, financial data, corporate databases, and proprietary information.

Fortunately for organizations, there is a glaring flaw to an otherwise masterful execution of deceit: the deepfakes the criminals use suffer from sync issues.

> “Complaints report the use of voice spoofing, or potentially voice deepfakes, during online interviews of the potential applicants. In these interviews, the actions and lip movement of the person seen interviewed on-camera do not completely coordinate with the audio of the person speaking. At times, actions such as coughing, sneezing, or other auditory actions are not aligned with what is presented visually.”
> 
> ~ FBI, PSA number I-062822-PSA

Misuse of stolen PII is spotted with a pre-employment background check. So even if an interviewer puts the desyncs in a deepfake video down to a dodgy connection, criminals won’t be able to escape findings from a standard background check.

TechCrunch said the most at-risk businesses from criminals entering the job market this way are startups and SaaS (software as a service) companies. This is because these potentially hold lots of data or access to it “but comparatively little security infrastructure compared with the enterprises they serve or are attempting to displace.”

If you’re worried that your data might be used to get criminals into the same sector as you are, there’s not much to do apart from remaining alert and keeping an eye out for strange emails or phone calls.

Stay safe!

Criminals are applying for remote work using deepfake and stolen identities, says FBI

Immigration organisations are being targeted by the APT group Evilnum, using spear phishing to send malicious Word documents.
The post Immigration organisations targeted by APT group Evilnum appeared first on Malwarebytes Labs.

Organisations working in the immigration sector are advised to be on high alert for Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) attacks. Bleeping Computer reports that European organisations, specifically, are under threat from the Evilnum hacking group.

Evilnum, on the APT scene since 2018 at the earliest and perhaps most well known for targeting the financial sector, appears to have switched gears.

**In times of conflict**

The observed attacks seem to have sprung into life on or around the beginning of the invasion of Ukraine. This is quite worrying for several reasons:

*   Immigration organisations in Europe are still impacted by the fallout from COVID-19. Additionally, Government immigration services continue to be non-functional or afflicted with severe delays in processing. The UK, which set up a dedicated visa for Ukrainian refugees, has experienced processing delays for unrelated visas of up to 6 months as a result of this project. Being targeted with malware could impact crucial services still further, putting people at risk.
*   Huge amounts of sensitive data is passing to and from independent immigration organisations related to the invasion of Ukraine. Exfiltration of this data could put people both outside Ukraine and those still there at risk of significant harm.
*   Many volunteer organisations have sprung up to support efforts related to Ukraine. Many of these have little to no funding and are being run by random groups of immigration lawyers with minimal experience of cybersecurity issues. This is, unfortunately, an area of potential rich pickings for attackers.

**Important attack details**

The APT group targeted an Intergovernmental organisation (IGO), an entity created via treaty which involves two or more nations to work on issues of common interest. This attack, then, is at the highest level in terms of immigration related impact.

It begins, as so many attacks do, with a targeted email containing a rogue attachment. Opening the attached Word document fires up a message which claims that the document was created in a later version of Microsoft Word. It explains how to enable editing in order to view the supposed content, typically called “Compliance” but also “Complaint” or “Proof of ownership”, among others.

Heavily obfuscated JavaScript decrypts and deposits an encrypted binary and a malware loader (which loads up the binary), and creates a scheduled task to keep things constantly ticking over. File system artefacts created during execution are designed to imitate legitimate Windows binary names, to assist in detection avoidance.

The aim here is to create a backdoor on infected systems. Machine snapshots are taken and sent back to base via POST requests, with exfiltrated data in encrypted form.

**Cybersecurity, just from a different point of view**

Refugees from Ukraine are being assisted by multiple organisations that were set up after the initial invasion. Lawyers helping to run these groups may not be fully immersed in cybersecurity. However, they follow strict rules and regulations with regard to client data by default. As a result, they’re often doing security-centric things to keep client data secure without perhaps noticing the crossover.

For example: Most immigration lawyer/client interactions in the UK currently are remote, partly due to COVID-19 and partly because the UK’s visa system is now almost entirely online. As a result, pretty much everything involving sensitive documentation begins life in the form of an email. This sounds bad at first glance; however, this isn’t the case. Lawyers and clients aren’t emailing important documents in plaintext. Instead, they’re making use of encrypted documents, secure file uploads, and deleting data as and when required.

**Tips for immigration orgs**

If you’re a small organisation looking to help with visa or refugee processes for Ukrainians fleeing the invasion, here’s some of the things you can make a start on now to help keep things secure:

*   Ensure your website is HTTPs. Most sites I’ve seen in this realm use a combination of contact email and/or web form. You don’t want sensitive information intercepted because of insecure websites. As few people as possible should have admin access to the site, and anything related to publishing. Use as few extensions and plugins as possible. Paying for domain anonymity services is useful if required.
*   Consider using an alias for public facing email addresses. Additionally, lock down all email addresses with multifactor authentication (MFA). The same goes for backup/recovery emails tied to the main account(s).
*   If you have the choice of SMS codes or authentication apps/hardware based security keys for 2FA, choose the latter. SMS won’t work with no signal reception, and fraudsters may divert your SMS codes via SIM swapping.
*   Consider using a password manager for organization-specific passwords. If you need to share logins, use a management tool which allows you to share logins without revealing the password itself. Should you land on a phishing site, your password manager won’t pre-fill your details into the bogus portal.

I’ve spoken to individuals from several UK-based immigration organisations, including those focused on helping Ukrainians. At this point, none of them report having been targeted by attacks similar to the above. However, those organisations are absolutely in the spotlight for anyone potentially up to no good. If you’re in this line of work, or you’re just getting started, consider where and how you can begin to get things locked down right now.

Immigration organisations targeted by APT group Evilnum

Mozilla has released Firefox updates to the Release Channel that fix several security vulnerabilities and introduce a new privacy feature called Query Parameter Stripping.
The post Update now! Mozilla fixes security vulnerabilities and introduces a new privacy feature for Firefox appeared first on Malwarebytes Labs.

Mozilla released version 102.0 of the Firefox browser to Release channel users on June 28, 2022.

The new version fixes 20 security vulnerabilities, five of which are classified as “High”. The new version also comes with a new privacy feature that strips parameters from URLs that track you around the web.

**Vulnerabilities**

Publicly disclosed computer security flaws are listed in the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) database. Its goal is to make it easier to share data across separate vulnerability capabilities (tools, databases, and services). These are the CVEs we think you should know:

**High**

CVE-2022-34479: A malicious website that could create a popup could have resized the popup to overlay the address bar with its own content, resulting in potential user confusion or spoofing attacks. This bug only affects Firefox for Linux. It does not apply to other operating systems.

CVE-2022-34470: Use-after-free in nsSHistory. Use after free (UAF) is a vulnerability caused by incorrect use of dynamic memory during a program’s operation. If after freeing a memory location, a program does not clear the pointer to that memory, an attacker can use the error to manipulate the program. Navigations between XML documents may have led to a use-after-free and potentially exploitable crash.

CVE-2022-34468: CSP sandbox header without ‘allow-scripts’ can be bypassed via retargeted javascript: URI. An iframe that was not permitted to run scripts could do so if the user clicked on a javascript: link.

CVE-2022-34484: Memory safety bugs fixed in Firefox 102 and Firefox ESR 91.11. Some of these bugs showed evidence of JavaScript prototype or memory corruption, and with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code.

**Moderate**

CVE-2022-34482 and CVE-2022-34483: Two separate issues with the same effect. Drag and drop of malicious image could have led to malicious executable and potential code execution. An attacker who could have convinced a user to drag and drop an image to a filesystem could have manipulated the resulting filename to contain an executable extension.

CVE-2022-34478: The ms-msdt, search, and search-ms protocols deliver content to Microsoft applications, bypassing the browser when a user accepts a prompt. These applications have had known vulnerabilities, exploited in the wild, so in this release Firefox has blocked these protocols from prompting the user to open them.

**New privacy feature**

Many companies involved in advertising use custom URL query parameters that enable them to track clicks on links. The most well-known example is probably the ?fbclid= parameter that Facebook adds to outbound links.

With the release of Firefox 102, Mozilla has added the new “Query Parameter Stripping” feature that automatically strips some of these query parameters. It does not matter whether you clicked on a link or pasted the URL into the address bar.

To enable Query Parameter Stripping, go into the Firefox Settings, click on **Privacy & Security**, and then change **Enhanced Tracking Protection** to **Strict**.

You will need to click **Reload All Tabs** to apply the changes. If you find that setting **Enhanced Tracking Protection** to **Strict** could causes issues with certain sites, you can use the Manage Exceptions option to add these websites, or use the “Custom” setting to choose which trackers and scripts to block.

**Updating**

Under normal circumstances, updates will be applied without user intervention. You can check for the version number in the products’ menu under **Help** > **About**

Should you not be using the latest version for some reason, e.g. automatic updates are disabled, then this screen will inform you that a new version is available and will start downloading it.

When it’s done, you’ll see a prompt to restart the browser. This will apply the update.

Stay safe, everyone!

Update now! Mozilla fixes security vulnerabilities and introduces a new privacy feature for Firefox

Infamous malware Raccoon Stealer is reportedly back in business after a break.
The post Raccoon Stealer returns with a new bag of tricks appeared first on Malwarebytes Labs.

The popular malware Raccoon stealer, which suspended operations after a developer allegedly died in the Ukraine invasion, has returned.

Raccoon stealer is malware as a service, with the developers selling it to would-be users. The operation is a tightly-run ship, to the extent that customers have digital signatures tied to their executables. If files end up on malware scanning services, the malware authors know exactly who the leak has come from.

**So much data, so little time**

The popular tool, used for data theft, is ubiquitous where stealing credentials is concerned. Cryptocurrency wallets, cookies, passwords, browser autofill data, and credit card data: pretty much anything is up for grabs.

Since 2019, Raccoon stealer has been lifting data from the unwary. Cheap to purchase and packing a large range of features, it is able to steal from as many as 60 different applications including:

**Email**: Outlook, Thunderbird, Thunderbird  
**Browsers**: Firefox, Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Internet Explorer, Vivaldi, SeaMonkey, Vivaldi  
**Cryptocurrency app**s: Exodus, Monero, Electrum, Jaxx

Raccoon’s two most popular delivery methods are phishing campaigns (the tried and tested malicious Word document/Macro combination) and exploit kits. Once data is located on the target system, it is eventually placed into a .zip file and sent to the malware Command and Control (C&C) server.

Its operators are constantly innovating, for example making use of Telegram to operate C&C. This is one malware project which wasn’t going to stay gone for long.

**An all new raccoon rampage**

The new version, Raccoon Stealer 2.0, was claimed as being sold on Telegram and in circulation since May 17. However, these claims related to Telegram have since been shown to be fake.

While functionality appears to be mostly similar to the original version, there are some notable differences. The creators claim to have improved the software and resurrected their malware antics to “honour” the legacy of the teammate who died:

> _After our teammate loss we made a decision that we can not leave our project and we will continue our work in his honour. Raccoon Stealer 2.0 was totally coded from the very beginning. New back-end, new front-end, absolutely new stealer software._

**Smash and grab**

Credit card data, autofill, browser passwords, and a big slice of cryptocurrency wallets are once more targets for Raccoon Stealer. The big change up seems to be related to how data is exfiltrated. This new version doesn’t appear to be particularly stealthy.

The name of the game in data exfiltration is to make as few moves as possible to help evade detection. Sneaky malware will collect data as it goes, before eventually sending the whole lot in a zip in one go. If an infection is constantly pinging away, the chances of it being caught by security tools increases dramatically.

Here, Racoon Stealer seems to be throwing a little caution to the wind. The stealer sends data every single time it adds to its exfiltrated data collection. Researchers note that Raccoon Stealer 2.0 possesses no obfuscation or anti-analysis techniques.

I’d love to know if some sort of data driven analysis led developers to the conclusion that smash and grab is ultimately more suited to their business model than waiting it out. Ultimately, this may be the one bright note for embattled IT admins in the wake of everyone’s least favourite raccoon’s re-emergence onto the malware scene.

Raccoon Stealer returns with a new bag of tricks

Extortion group RansomHouse has revealed its latest victim: semiconductor giant AMD. The company was breached due to weak passwords.
The post RansomHouse claims to have stolen at least 450GB of AMD’s data appeared first on Malwarebytes Labs.

AMD is investigating the claim that the RansomHouse extortion group has its hands on more than 450GB of the company’s data.

AMD’s breach revelation came to light after RansomHouse teased on Telegram about selling data belonging to a popular ‘three-letter company that starts with the letter ‘A’. The event crescendoed with the addition of AMD to the group’s data leak site.

RansomHouse’s leak pages for AMD. (Source: Marcelo Rivero | Malwarebytes)

RansomHouse didn’t breach AMD, although it was once linked to such activity. The group revealed to BleepingComputer that its “partners” breached AMD’s network a year ago. Those partners are said to no longer have access to AMD’s network.

The extortion group didn’t bother informing the graphics drive company, thinking it was a “waste of time.”

> “\[I\]t will be more worth it to sell the data rather then wait for AMD representatives to react with a lot of bureaucracy involved.”

The group hasn’t provided any substantial evidence of files belonging to AMD. Still, it claims the stolen data contains research, financial information, a list of 70,000 devices in AMD’s internal network, and alleged employee credentials, showcasing a collection of embarrassingly weak passwords. Some of these are ‘password’, ‘P@ssw0rd’, ‘amd!23’, and ‘Welcome1.’

The use of bad passwords is the reason why AMD got compromised, the extortion group said.

RansomHouse is a group-on-a-mission. As long as businesses have weaknesses in places—may these be passwords or in the software they use—expect a very quiet knock on the door when everyone is paying the slightest attention.

It’s never too late to extinguish weak passwords and tighten up the perimeter around accounts. Companies can start off by:

*   Using a password manager. This tool creates complicated passwords and remembers them for you as well.
*   Requiring two-factor authentication (2FA) for highly sensitive resource repositories and administrator accounts.
*   Stressing the importance of not reusing a password. It’s so easy for an attacker to use a password breached on one site to get in to another, if the login credentials are the same. Stopping password reuse makes things much more difficult for them.

Good luck!

RansomHouse claims to have stolen at least 450GB of AMD’s data

Malwarebytes found a family of forced Chrome extensions that can't be removed because of a policy change that tells users "Your browser is managed".
The post Forced Chrome extensions get removed, keep reappearing appeared first on Malwarebytes Labs.

In the continued saga of annoying search extensions we have a new end-of-level boss.

Victims have been reporting browser extensions that were removed by Malwarebytes, but “magically” came back later. Since the victims also complained about the message saying their browser was “managed”, we had a pretty good idea where to look.

_custom search bar_ is _one of the forced extensions_

**Search extensions**

The culprits turned out to be search extensions. Which is often the case when we spot potentially unwanted programs (PUPs) that use malware tactics to get installed and gain persistence.

The search hijackers “active search bar” and “custom search bar” were both available in the Chrome web store at the time of writing even though we reported them days ago.

_active search bar is also available in the webstore_

**PowerShell**

It took some digging to find the origin, since all we had were the extensions. And when the extensions were installed directly from the webstore, nothing happened out of the ordinary. However, some hunting on VirusTotal soon led me to a few recently uploaded PowerShell scripts that included the string “ExtensionInstallForcelist.” I looked for that string because we know from the past that these registry policies account for the “Your browser is managed” warnings.

$CPath = "HKLM:\SOFTWARE\\Policies\\Google\\Chrome\ExtensionInstallForcelist";

$EPath = "HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Edge\ExtensionInstallForcelist";

The description in the Chromium documentation about the ExtensionInstallForcelist states:

> “Specifies a list of apps and extensions that are installed silently, without user interaction, and which cannot be uninstalled nor disabled by the user.”

And to confirm this finding, the victims that provided logs all had one of these PowerShell script listed in their Scheduled Tasks.

_The Scheduled Task triggers the PowerShell script_

The Scheduled Task was set to run every four hours, which explained why the extensions kept coming back.

**Installer**

But Scheduled Tasks don’t install themselves either and dropping PowerShell scripts in the System32 folder requires Administrator privileges, so we needed to dig a little further to find an installer.

The domain wincloudservice.com was used as a download location in all the PowerShell scripts so we used that domain as a search parameter in our next stage of VirusTotal hunting. This search eventually returned three installers. What they had in common at first glance was that the filenames all ended with “\_x64LTS.exe” and that they were all signed by “Tommy Tech LTD.”

Upon further inspection we noticed that the installers all asked for Administrator privileges twice. The first part installs something that is called “Setup” and the second part installs an application that aligns with the name of the installer. So, it appears that the original installer files were “patched” to add the installer for our browser hijacker. It stands to reason that these installers are offered for download somewhere by the threat actors.

The EULA points to tommytechil.com which is unreachable. I was unable to find an installer that actually dropped an extension in Edge, but the “Your browser is managed by your organization” setting does get enforced.

_Edge managed by your organization_

**Javascripts**

Malwarebytes customers were protected against these extensions as Malwarebytes’ web protection module blocked the domain wincloudservice\[.\]com. On inspection, this domain hosted several javascripts including heavily obfuscated files called crypto.js and crypto-js.min.js.

**Detection and removal**

Malwarebytes detects these browser hijackers as PUP.Optional.ActiveSearchBar and PUP.Optional.CustomSearchBar. Included in the removal procedure are the extension, and the Scheduled Task, which is enough to permanently get rid of the extension.

Some Windows registry changes have been made that will take a system administrator to decide what they want to keep or not.

The registry keys to remove the “Your browser is managed” are:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Google\Chrome\ExtensionInstallForceList

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Edge\ExtensionInstallForceList

And another change made by the installer was the registry value:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\PowerShell\1\ShellIds\Microsoft.PowerShell\\\\ExecutionPolicy

The installer set that to “Unrestricted” which may not be your favorite setting. If you are not sure or you have never actively set that policy, the default is “Restricted”. Please note that in some organizations PowerShell is required to run.

**IOCs**

**Domains:**

activesearchbar\[.\]me

customsearchbar\[.\]me

optimizerupdate\[.\]com

securedatacorner\[.\]com

wincloudservice\[.\]com

**Installers:**

4kvideodownloader\_5.22.371\_x64LTS.exe

AutoClicker\_x64LTS.exe

FPSUnlocker\_4.1\_x64LTS.exe

**PowerShell scripts:**

PrintWorkflowService.ps1

WindowsUpdater1.ps1

OptimizerWindows.ps1

**Extensions:**

custom search bar nniikbbaboifhfjjkjekiamnfpkdieng

active search bar pkofdnfadkamabkgjdjcddeopopbdjhg