#js

A user enumeration vulnerability exists in the login functionality of Ghost Foundation Ghost 5.9.4. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to a disclosure of sensitive information. An attacker can send a series of HTTP requests to trigger this vulnerability.

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the newsletter subscription functionality of Ghost Foundation Ghost 5.9.4. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to increased privileges. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.

The package liquidjs before 10.0.0 is vulnerable to Information Exposure when `ownPropertyOnly` parameter is set to `False`, which results in leaking properties of a prototype. Workaround For versions 9.34.0 and higher, an option to disable this functionality is provided.

The package liquidjs before 10.0.0 are vulnerable to Information Exposure when ownPropertyOnly parameter is set to False, which results in leaking properties of a prototype. Workaround For versions 9.34.0 and higher, an option to disable this functionality is provided.

# Overview Versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library can be misconfigured so that passing a poorly implemented key retrieval function (referring to the `secretOrPublicKey` argument from the [readme link](https://github.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken#jwtverifytoken-secretorpublickey-options-callback)) will result in incorrect verification of tokens. There is a possibility of using a different algorithm and key combination in verification than the one that was used to sign the tokens. Specifically, tokens signed with an asymmetric public key could be verified with a symmetric HS256 algorithm. This can lead to successful validation of forged tokens. # Am I affected? You will be affected if your application is supporting usage of both symmetric key and asymmetric key in jwt.verify() implementation with the same key retrieval function. # How do I fix it? Update to version 9.0.0 # Will the fix impact my users? There is no impact for end users

# Overview In versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library, lack of algorithm definition in the `jwt.verify()` function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the `none` algorithm for signature verification. # Am I affected? You will be affected if you do not specify algorithms in the `jwt.verify()` function # How do I fix it? Update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the `jwt.verify()` method. # Will the fix impact my users? There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the `none` algorithm. If you need 'none' algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that in `jwt.verify()` options.

# Overview Versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library could be misconfigured so that legacy, insecure key types are used for signature verification. For example, DSA keys could be used with the RS256 algorithm. # Am I affected? You are affected if you are using an algorithm and a key type other than the combinations mentioned below | Key type | algorithm | |----------|------------------------------------------| | ec | ES256, ES384, ES512 | | rsa | RS256, RS384, RS512, PS256, PS384, PS512 | | rsa-pss | PS256, PS384, PS512 | And for Elliptic Curve algorithms: | `alg` | Curve | |-------|------------| | ES256 | prime256v1 | | ES384 | secp384r1 | | ES512 | secp521r1 | # How do I fix it? Update to version 9.0.0. This version validates for asymmetric key type and algorithm combinations. Please refer to the above mentioned algorithm / key type combinations for the valid secure co...

# Overview For versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library, if a malicious actor has the ability to modify the key retrieval parameter (referring to the `secretOrPublicKey` argument from the [readme link](https://github.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken#jwtverifytoken-secretorpublickey-options-callback)) of the `jwt.verify()` function, they can gain remote code execution (RCE). # Am I affected? You are affected only if you allow untrusted entities to modify the key retrieval parameter of the `jwt.verify()` on a host that you control. # How do I fix it? Update to version 9.0.0 # Will the fix impact my users? The fix has no impact on end users. # Credits [Palo Alto Networks](https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/)

Eclipse Business Intelligence Reporting Tool versions 4.11.0 and below suffer from a bypass vulnerability that allows for remote code execution.

Debian Linux Security Advisory 5305-1 - An integer overflow flaw was discovered in the CRL signature parser in libksba, an X.509 and CMS support library, which could result in denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code.