#vulnerability

### Impact For users with the following configuration: * An allow policy that selects a [Layer 3 destination](https://docs.cilium.io/en/v1.14/security/policy/language/#layer-3-examples) and a [port range](https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/security/policy/language/#example-port-ranges) **AND** * A [Layer 7 allow policy](https://docs.cilium.io/en/latest/security/policy/language/#layer-7-examples) that selects a specific port within the first policy's range then Layer 7 enforcement would not occur for the traffic selected by the Layer 7 policy. This issue only affects users who use Cilium's port range functionality, which was introduced in Cilium v1.16. For reference, an example of a pair of policies that would trigger this issue is: ``` apiVersion: "cilium.io/v2" kind: CiliumNetworkPolicy metadata: name: "l3-port-range-rule" spec: endpointSelector: matchLabels: app: service ingress: - fromCIDR: - 192.168.60.0/24 toPorts: - ports: - port...

### Summary Several cross-site scripting vulnerabilities existed in the `deno_doc` crate which lead to Self-XSS with `deno doc --html`. ### Details & PoC 1.) XSS in generated `search_index.js` `deno_doc` outputed a JavaScript file for searching. However, the generated file used `innerHTML` on unsanitzed HTML input. https://github.com/denoland/deno_doc/blob/dc556c848831d7ae48f3eff2ababc6e75eb6b73e/src/html/templates/pages/search.js#L120-L144 2.) XSS via property, method and enum names `deno_doc` did not sanitize property names, method names and enum names. ### Impact The first XSS most likely didn't have an impact since `deno doc --html` is expected to be used locally with own packages.

Digital networks are the backbone of global business and communication, making cyber resiliency essential for organizations to thrive.…

A flaw was found in Keycloak. This issue occurs because sensitive runtime values, such as passwords, may be captured during the Keycloak build process and embedded as default values in bytecode, leading to unintended information disclosure. In Keycloak 26, sensitive data specified directly in environment variables during the build process is also stored as a default values, making it accessible during runtime. Indirect usage of environment variables for SPI options and Quarkus properties is also vulnerable due to unconditional expansion by PropertyMapper logic, capturing sensitive data as default values in all Keycloak versions up to 26.0.2.

A vulnerability was found in Keycloak. A user with high privileges could read sensitive information from a Vault file that is not within the expected context. This attacker must have previous high access to the Keycloak server in order to perform resource creation, for example, an LDAP provider configuration and set up a Vault read file, which will only inform whether that file exists or not.

Excessive directory permissions in MLflow leads to local privilege escalation when using spark_udf. This behavior can be exploited by a local attacker to gain elevated permissions by using a ToCToU attack. The issue is only relevant when the spark_udf() MLflow API is called.

An issue in the upload_documents method of libre-chat v0.0.6 allows attackers to execute a path traversal via supplying a crafted filename in an uploaded file.

A vulnerability was found in the Keycloak-services package. If untrusted data is passed to the SearchQueryUtils method, it could lead to a denial of service (DoS) scenario by exhausting system resources due to a Regex complexity.

A bug introduced in rustls 0.23.13 leads to a panic if the received TLS ClientHello is fragmented. Only servers that use `rustls::server::Acceptor::accept()` are affected. Servers that use `tokio-rustls`'s `LazyConfigAcceptor` API are affected. Servers that use `tokio-rustls`'s `TlsAcceptor` API are not affected. Servers that use `rustls-ffi`'s `rustls_acceptor_accept` API are affected.

How well do you know your smart contracts’ health? This article highlights the top five platforms that DeFi…