Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Headline

GHSA-wrxv-2j5q-m38w: NULL Pointer Dereference in lxml

NULL Pointer Dereference allows attackers to cause a denial of service (or application crash). This only applies when lxml is used together with libxml2 2.9.10 through 2.9.14. libxml2 2.9.9 and earlier are not affected. It allows triggering crashes through forged input data, given a vulnerable code sequence in the application. The vulnerability is caused by the iterwalk function (also used by the canonicalize function). Such code shouldn’t be in wide-spread use, given that parsing + iterwalk would usually be replaced with the more efficient iterparse function. However, an XML converter that serialises to C14N would also be vulnerable, for example, and there are legitimate use cases for this code sequence. If untrusted input is received (also remotely) and processed via iterwalk function, a crash can be triggered.

ghsa
#vulnerability#dos#git

NULL Pointer Dereference allows attackers to cause a denial of service (or application crash). This only applies when lxml is used together with libxml2 2.9.10 through 2.9.14. libxml2 2.9.9 and earlier are not affected. It allows triggering crashes through forged input data, given a vulnerable code sequence in the application. The vulnerability is caused by the iterwalk function (also used by the canonicalize function). Such code shouldn’t be in wide-spread use, given that parsing + iterwalk would usually be replaced with the more efficient iterparse function. However, an XML converter that serialises to C14N would also be vulnerable, for example, and there are legitimate use cases for this code sequence. If untrusted input is received (also remotely) and processed via iterwalk function, a crash can be triggered.

References

  • https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2309
  • lxml/lxml@86368e9
  • https://huntr.dev/bounties/8264e74f-edda-4c40-9956-49de635105ba
  • https://github.com/lxml/lxml/blob/master/CHANGES.txt

Related news

Red Hat Security Advisory 2023-3742-02

Red Hat Security Advisory 2023-3742-02 - Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation is software-defined storage integrated with and optimized for the Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform. Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation is a highly scalable, production-grade persistent storage for stateful applications running in the Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform. Issues addressed include bypass, denial of service, and remote SQL injection vulnerabilities.

RHSA-2023:3742: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.13.0 security and bug fix update

Updated images that include numerous enhancements, security, and bug fixes are now available in Red Hat Container Registry for Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.13.0 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original. Related CVEs: * CVE-2020-16250: A flaw was found in Vault and Vault Enterprise (“Vault”). In the affected versions of Vault, with the AWS Auth Method configured and under certain circumstances, the values relied upon by Vault to validate AWS IAM ident...

Ubuntu Security Notice USN-6028-2

Ubuntu Security Notice 6028-2 - USN-6028-1 fixed vulnerabilities in libxml2. This update provides the corresponding updates for Ubuntu 23.04. It was discovered that libxml2 incorrectly handled certain XML files. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a crash.

Ubuntu Security Notice USN-5760-1

Ubuntu Security Notice 5760-1 - It was discovered that libxml2 incorrectly handled certain XML files. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a crash. It was discovered that libxml2 incorrectly handled certain XML files. An attacker could possibly use this issue to expose sensitive information or cause a crash. It was discovered that libxml2 incorrectly handled certain XML files. An attacker could possibly use this issue to execute arbitrary code.

RHSA-2022:8226: Red Hat Security Advisory: python-lxml security update

An update for python-lxml is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Moderate. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original. Related CVEs: * CVE-2022-2309: lxml: NULL Pointer Dereference in lxml

Gentoo Linux Security Advisory 202208-06

Gentoo Linux Security Advisory 202208-6 - Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in lxml, the worst of which could result in denial of service. Versions less than 4.9.1 are affected.

CVE-2022-2309: NULL Pointer Dereference in function _appendStartNsEvents in lxml

NULL Pointer Dereference allows attackers to cause a denial of service (or application crash). This only applies when lxml is used together with libxml2 2.9.10 through 2.9.14. libxml2 2.9.9 and earlier are not affected. It allows triggering crashes through forged input data, given a vulnerable code sequence in the application. The vulnerability is caused by the iterwalk function (also used by the canonicalize function). Such code shouldn't be in wide-spread use, given that parsing + iterwalk would usually be replaced with the more efficient iterparse function. However, an XML converter that serialises to C14N would also be vulnerable, for example, and there are legitimate use cases for this code sequence. If untrusted input is received (also remotely) and processed via iterwalk function, a crash can be triggered.