ghsa

If an issue references a note that belongs to another issue that the user doesn't have access to, then it gets hyperlinked. Clicking on the link gives an access denied error as expected, yet some information remains available via the link, link label, and tooltip. ### Impact Disclosure of the following information: - existence of the note - note author name - note creation timestamp - issue id the note belongs to ### Patches See PR https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/pull/2000 ### Workarounds None ### References https://mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=34434

Insufficient access control in the registration and password reset process allows an attacker to reset another user's password and takeover their account, if the victim has an incomplete request pending. The exploit is only possible while the verification token is valid, i.e for 5 minutes after the confirmation URL sent by e-mail has been opened, and the user did not complete the process by updating their password. A brute-force attack calling account_update.php with increasing user IDs is possible. ### Impact A successful takeover would grant the attacker full access to the compromised account, including sensitive information and functionalities associated with the account, the extent of which depends on its privileges and the data it has access to. ### Patches 92d11a01b195a1b6717a2f205218089158ea6d00 ### Workarounds Mitigate the risk by reducing the verification token's validity (change the value of the `TOKEN_EXPIRY_AUTHENTICATED` constant in *constants_inc.php*). ### Ref...

## Description `llama-cpp-python` depends on class `Llama` in `llama.py` to load `.gguf` llama.cpp or Latency Machine Learning Models. The `__init__` constructor built in the `Llama` takes several parameters to configure the loading and running of the model. Other than `NUMA, LoRa settings`, `loading tokenizers,` and `hardware settings`, `__init__` also loads the `chat template` from targeted `.gguf` 's Metadata and furtherly parses it to `llama_chat_format.Jinja2ChatFormatter.to_chat_handler()` to construct the `self.chat_handler` for this model. Nevertheless, `Jinja2ChatFormatter` parse the `chat template` within the Metadate with sandbox-less `jinja2.Environment`, which is furthermore rendered in `__call__` to construct the `prompt` of interaction. This allows `jinja2` Server Side Template Injection which leads to RCE by a carefully constructed payload. ## Source-to-Sink ### `llama.py` -> `class Llama` -> `__init__`: ```python class Llama: """High-level Python wrapper for a ...

### Impact This vulnerability can spike the resource utilization of the STS service, and combined with a significant traffic volume could potentially lead to a denial of service. ### Patches This vulnerability existed in the repository at HEAD, we will cut a 0.1.0 release with the fix. ### Workarounds None ### References None

### Impact Nodes can publish ATXs which reference the incorrect previous ATX of the Smesher that created the ATX. ATXs are expected to form a single chain from the newest to the first ATX ever published by an identity. Allowing Smeshers to reference an earlier (but not the latest) ATX as previous breaks this protocol rule and can serve as an attack vector where Nodes are rewarded for holding their PoST data for less than one epoch but still being eligible for rewards. ### Patches - API needs to be extended to be able to fetch events from a node that dected malicious behavior of this regard by the node - go-spacemesh needs to be patched to a) not allow publishing these ATXs any more and b) create malfeasance proofs for identities that published invalid ATXs in the past. ### Workarounds n/a ### References Spacemesh protocol whitepaper: https://spacemesh.io/blog/spacemesh-white-paper-1/, specifically sections 4.4.2 ("ATX Contents") and 4.4.3 ("ATX validity")

### Impact There is a possibility to save XSS code in province field in the Checkout and Address Book and then execute it on these pages. The problem occurs when you open the address step page in the checkout or edit the address in the address book. This only affects the base UI Shop provided by Sylius. ### Patches The issue is fixed in versions: 1.12.16, 1.13.1 and above. ### Workarounds 1. Create new file `assets/shop/sylius-province-field.js`: ```js // assets/shop/sylius-province-field.js function sanitizeInput(input) { const div = document.createElement('div'); div.textContent = input; return div.innerHTML; // Converts text content to plain HTML, stripping any scripts } const getProvinceInputValue = function getProvinceInputValue(valueSelector) { return valueSelector == undefined ? '' : `value="${sanitizeInput(valueSelector)}"`; }; $.fn.extend({ provinceField() { const countrySelect = $('select[name$="[countryCode]"]'); countrySelect.on('change', (event) ...

### Impact There is a possibility to execute javascript code in the Admin panel. In order to perform an XSS attack input a script into `Name` field in which of the resources: Taxons, Products, Product Options or Product Variants. The code will be executed while using an autocomplete field with one of the listed entities in the Admin Panel. Also for the taxons in the category tree on the product form. ### Patches The issue is fixed in versions: 1.12.16, 1.13.1 and above. ### Workarounds 1. Create new file `assets/admin/sylius-lazy-choice-tree.js`: ```js // assets/admin/sylius-lazy-choice-tree.js function sanitizeInput(input) { const div = document.createElement('div'); div.textContent = input; return div.innerHTML; // Converts text content to plain HTML, stripping any scripts } const createRootContainer = function createRootContainer() { return $('<div class="ui list"></div>'); }; const createLeafContainerElement = function createLeafContainerElement() { return $('<di...

### Description: A Stored Blind Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Failed Login Attempts Logging Feature of the Froxlor Application. Stored Blind XSS occurs when user input is not properly sanitized and is stored on the server, allowing an attacker to inject malicious scripts that will be executed when other users access the affected page. In this case, an unauthenticated User can inject malicious scripts in the loginname parameter on the Login attempt, which will then be executed when viewed by the Administrator in the System Logs. The application protects users against XSS attacks by utilizing an xss sanitization library. But the checks of the library were bypassed by crafting an XSS Payload using data binding and interpolation of Vue.js A working XSS payload was crafted which forces an administrator to add a new malicious attacker-controlled Administrator User. The Payload is: [payload.txt](https://github.com/froxlor/Froxlor/files/15142616/payload...

### Summary The latest version of lobe-chat(by now v0.141.2) has an unauthorized ssrf vulnerability. An attacker can construct malicious requests to cause SSRF without logging in, attack intranet services, and leak sensitive information. ### Details * visit https://chat-preview.lobehub.com/settings/agent * you can attack all internal services by /api/proxy and get the echo in http response :)    ### PoC ```http POST /api/proxy HTTP/2 Host: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cookie: LOBE_LOCALE=zh-CN; LOBE_THEME_PRIMARY_COLOR=undefined; LOBE_THEME_NEUTRAL_COLOR=undefined; _ga=GA1.1.86608329.1711346216; _ga_63LP1TV70T=GS1.1.1711346215.1.1.1711346846.0.0.0 Content-Length: 23 Sec-Ch-Ua: "Google Chrome";v=...

### Overview Path Traversal vulnerability via File Uploads in Genie ### Impact Any Genie OSS users running their own instance and relying on the filesystem to store file attachments submitted to the Genie application may be impacted. Using this technique, it is possible to write a file with any user-specified filename and file contents to any location on the file system that the Java process has write access - potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE). Genie users who do not store these attachments locally on the underlying file system are not vulnerable to this issue. ### Description Genie's API accepts a multipart/form-data file upload which can be saved to a location on disk. However, it takes a user-supplied filename as part of the request and uses this as the filename when writing the file to disk. Since this filename is user-controlled, it is possible for a malicious actor to manipulate the filename in order to break out of the default attachment storage path and p...