Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Source

ghsa

GHSA-9wqr-5jp4-mjmh: Dolibarr vulnerable to remote code execution via uppercase manipulation

Dolibarr before 17.0.1 allows remote code execution by an authenticated user via an uppercase manipulation: <?PHP instead of <?php in injected data.

ghsa
#git#php#rce#auth
GHSA-r364-2pj4-pf7f: ruby-saml vulnerable to XPath injection

xml_security.rb in the ruby-saml gem before 1.0.0 for Ruby allows XPath injection and code execution because prepared statements are not used.

GHSA-8vw3-vxmj-h43w: bwm-ng vulnerable to command injection

All versions of the package bwm-ng are vulnerable to Command Injection due to improper input sanitization in the 'check' function in the bwm-ng.js file. **Note:** To execute the code snippet and potentially exploit the vulnerability, the attacker needs to have the ability to run Node.js code within the target environment. This typically requires some level of access to the system or application hosting the Node.js environment.

GHSA-wxrx-pc44-rcgc: keep-module-latest vulnerable to Command Injection due to missing input sanitization

All versions of the package keep-module-latest are vulnerable to Command Injection due to missing input sanitization or other checks and sandboxes being employed to the installModule function. **Note:** To execute the code snippet and potentially exploit the vulnerability, the attacker needs to have the ability to run Node.js code within the target environment. This typically requires some level of access to the system or application hosting the Node.js environment.

GHSA-549h-r7g9-2qpf: n158 vulnerable to Command Injection due to improper input sanitization in the 'module.exports' function

All versions of the package n158 are vulnerable to Command Injection due to improper input sanitization in the 'module.exports' function. **Note:** To execute the code snippet and potentially exploit the vulnerability, the attacker needs to have the ability to run Node.js code within the target environment. This typically requires some level of access to the system or application hosting the Node.js environment.

GHSA-pvrc-wvj2-f59p: Pomerium vulnerable to Incorrect Authorization with specially crafted requests

### Impact With specially crafted requests, incorrect authorization decisions may be made by Pomerium. ### Patches We are releasing patch fixes to address this vulnerability going back to `v0.17.X`. Please upgrade to: - v0.22.2 - v0.21.4 - v0.20.1 - v0.19.2 - v0.18.1 - v0.17.4 ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: - Open an issue in [pomerium/pomerium](https://github.com/pomerium/pomerium/issues) - Email us at [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])

GHSA-frqx-jfcm-6jjr: malformed proposed intoto entries can cause a panic

### Impact A malformed proposed entry of the `intoto/v0.0.2` type can cause a panic on a thread within the Rekor process. The thread is recovered so the client receives a 500 error message and service still continues, so the availability impact of this is minimal. ### Patches This is fixed in v1.2.0 of Rekor. ### Workarounds No ### References Discovered by OSS-Fuzz

GHSA-xf96-w227-r7c4: Spring Boot Welcome Page Denial of Service

In Spring Boot versions 3.0.0 - 3.0.6, 2.7.0 - 2.7.11, 2.6.0 - 2.6.14, 2.5.0 - 2.5.14 and older unsupported versions, there is potential for a denial-of-service (DoS) attack if Spring MVC is used together with a reverse proxy cache. Specifically, an application is vulnerable if all of the conditions are true: * The application has Spring MVC auto-configuration enabled. This is the case by default if Spring MVC is on the classpath. * The application makes use of Spring Boot's welcome page support, either static or templated. * Your application is deployed behind a proxy which caches 404 responses. Your application is NOT vulnerable if any of the following are true: * Spring MVC auto-configuration is disabled. This is true if WebMvcAutoConfiguration is explicitly excluded, if Spring MVC is not on the classpath, or if spring.main.web-application-type is set to a value other than SERVLET. * The application does not use Spring Boot's welcome page support. * You do not have a proxy which...

GHSA-c892-cwq6-qrqf: Keycloak vulnerable to untrusted certificate validation

A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration "Revalidate Client Certificate" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of "Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available". This may not impact availability as the attacker would have no access to the server, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality may be impacted considering a possible access to them. Considering the environment is correctly set to use "Revalidate Client Certificate" this flaw is avoidable.

GHSA-9mmj-64jh-ph9c: Privilege escalation in XXL-Job

A lateral privilege escalation vulnerability in XXL-Job v2.4.1 allows users to execute arbitrary commands on another user's account via a crafted POST request to the component `/jobinfo/`.