Source
ghsa
### Summary Authenticated users can craft a filter string used to cause a SQL injection. ### Details _Give all details on the vulnerability. Pointing to the incriminated source code is very helpful for the maintainer._ This code does not look to sanitize inputs: https://github.com/pimcore/pimcore/blob/c721a42c23efffd4ca916511ddb969598d302396/models/DataObject/ClassDefinition/Data/Extension/RelationFilterConditionParser.php#L29-L47 c.f. with https://github.com/pimcore/pimcore/blob/c721a42c23efffd4ca916511ddb969598d302396/models/DataObject/ClassDefinition/Data/Multiselect.php#L332-L347 ### PoC _Complete instructions, including specific configuration details, to reproduce the vulnerability._ ### Impact _What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_
Rembg is a tool to remove images background. In Rembg 2.0.57 and earlier, the CORS middleware is setup incorrectly. All origins are reflected, which allows any website to send cross site requests to the rembg server and thus query any API. Even if authentication were to be enabled, allow_credentials is set to True, which would allow any website to send authenticated cross site requests.
Rembg is a tool to remove images background. In Rembg 2.0.57 and earlier, the /api/remove endpoint takes a URL query parameter that allows an image to be fetched, processed and returned. An attacker may be able to query this endpoint to view pictures hosted on the internal network of the rembg server. This issue may lead to Information Disclosure.
### Impact A privilege escalation vulnerability existed in the Below service prior to v0.9.0 due to the creation of a world-writable directory at /var/log/below. This could have allowed local unprivileged users to escalate to root privileges through symlink attacks that manipulate files such as /etc/shadow. ### Patches https://github.com/facebookincubator/below/commit/10e73a21d67baa2cd613ee92ce999cda145e1a83 This is included in version 0.9.0 ### Workarounds Change the permission on `/var/log/below` manually ### References https://www.facebook.com/security/advisories/cve-2025-27591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27591
### Summary _An HTML Injection vulnerability in the customer account portal allows an attacker to inject malicious HTML payloads in the email section. This can lead to phishing attacks, credential theft, and reputational damage by redirecting users to malicious external websites. The vulnerability has a medium severity, as it can be exploited through user input without authentication._ ### Observation _It is observed that in the portal of the customer account, there is a functionality in the email section to create an email address that accepts user input. By intercepting the request and modifying the "domain" field with an HTML injection payload containing an anchor tag, the injected payload is reflected on an error page. When clicked, it redirects users to an external website, confirming the presence of an HTML Injection vulnerability._ ### PoC 1. Navigate to the Email section in the Customer Account Portal and create a new email address. 2. Enter any garbage value in the required...
### Summary the vulnerability is that users (such as resellers or customers) are able to create accounts with the same email address as an existing account (e.g., if the admin has [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]), others can also create an account using the same email). This creates potential issues with account identification and security. ### Impact Local/Authenticated: This vulnerability can be exploited by authenticated users (e.g., reseller, customer) who can create accounts with the same email address that has already been used by another account, such as the admin. Email-based: The attack vector is email-based, as the system does not prevent multiple accounts from registering the same email address, leading to possible conflicts and security issues.
### Impact When using Babel to compile [regular expression named capturing groups](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Regular_expressions/Named_capturing_group), Babel will generate a polyfill for the `.replace` method that has quadratic complexity on some specific replacement pattern strings (i.e. the second argument passed to `.replace`). Your generated code is vulnerable if _all_ the following conditions are true: - You use Babel to compile [regular expression named capturing groups](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Regular_expressions/Named_capturing_group) or - You use the `.replace` method on a regular expression that contains named capturing groups - **Your code uses untrusted strings as the second argument of `.replace`** If you are using `@babel/preset-env` with the [`targets`](https://babeljs.io/docs/options#targets) option, the transform that injects the vulnerable code is automatically enabled if: - you use...
### Impact The Keras `Model.load_model` function permits arbitrary code execution, even with `safe_mode=True`, through a manually constructed, malicious `.keras` archive. By altering the `config.json` file within the archive, an attacker can specify arbitrary Python modules and functions, along with their arguments, to be loaded and executed during model loading. ### Patches This problem is fixed starting with version `3.9`. ### Workarounds Only load models from trusted sources and model archives created with Keras. ### References - https://www.cve.org/cverecord?id=CVE-2025-1550 - https://github.com/keras-team/keras/pull/20751
# Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2025-24070: .NET Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability ## <a name="executive-summary"></a>Executive summary Microsoft is releasing this security advisory to provide information about a vulnerability in ASP.NET Core 9.0 , ASP.NET Core 8.0, and ASP.NET Core 2.3. This advisory also provides guidance on what developers can do to update their applications to address this vulnerability. A vulnerability exists in ASP.NET Core applications calling RefreshSignInAsync with an improperly authenticated user parameter that could allow an attacker to sign into another user's account, resulting in Elevation of Privilege. ## Announcement Announcement for this issue can be found at https://github.com/dotnet/announcements/issues/348 ### <a name="mitigation-factors"></a>Mitigation factors Microsoft has not identified any mitigating factors for this vulnerability. ## <a name="affected-software"></a>Affected software * Any ASP.NET Core 9.0 application running on AS...
### Summary There's a signature confusion attack in the HTTPRedirect binding. An attacker with any signed SAMLResponse via the HTTP-Redirect binding can cause the application to accept an unsigned message. I believe that it exists for v4 only. I have not yet developed a PoC. V5 is well designed and instead builds the signed query from the same message that will be consumed. ### Details #### What is verified The data['SignedQuery'] is the string that will be verified by the public key. It is defined here: https://github.com/simplesamlphp/saml2/blob/9545abd0d9d48388f2fa00469c5c1e0294f0303e/src/SAML2/HTTPRedirect.php#L178-L217 THe code will iterate through each parameter name. Notably, sigQuery is overridden each time when processing, making the last of SAMLRequest/SAMLResponse used for sigQuery. For example, given: SAMLRequest=a&SAMLResponse=idpsigned SAMLResponse=idpsigned will be set as sigQuery, then later verified #### What is actually processed Processing uses SAMLReques...