#buffer_overflow

A stack-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiWeb version 7.0.0 through 7.0.1, Fortinet FortiWeb version 6.3.6 through 6.3.19, Fortinet FortiWeb 6.4 all versions allows attacker to escalation of privilege via specifically crafted HTTP requests.

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] in FortiWeb version 7.0.1 and below, 6.4 all versions, version 6.3.19 and below SAML server configuration may allow an authenticated attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution via specifically crafted XML files.

A heap-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiWeb version 7.0.0 through 7.0.1, FortiWeb version 6.3.0 through 6.3.19, FortiWeb 6.4 all versions, FortiWeb 6.2 all versions, FortiWeb 6.1 all versions allows attacker to escalation of privilege via specifically crafted arguments to existing commands.

A stack-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiWeb 6.4 all versions, FortiWeb versions 6.3.17 and earlier, FortiWeb versions 6.2.6 and earlier, FortiWeb versions 6.1.2 and earlier, FortiWeb versions 6.0.7 and earlier, FortiWeb versions 5.9.1 and earlier, FortiWeb 5.8 all versions, FortiWeb 5.7 all versions, FortiWeb 5.6 all versions allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted command arguments.

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] in FortiWeb version 7.0.1 and earlier, 6.4 all versions, version 6.3.19 and earlier may allow a privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specifically crafted CLI `execute backup-local rename` and `execute backup-local show` operations.

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] in the CA sign functionality of FortiWeb version 7.0.1 and below, 6.4 all versions, version 6.3.19 and below may allow an authenticated attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution via specifically crafted password.

Ubuntu Security Notice 5879-1 - Kyle Zeng discovered that the sysctl implementation in the Linux kernel contained a stack-based buffer overflow. A local attacker could use this to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code. Tamás Koczka discovered that the Bluetooth L2CAP handshake implementation in the Linux kernel contained multiple use-after-free vulnerabilities. A physically proximate attacker could use this to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code.

Ubuntu Security Notice 5877-1 - Kyle Zeng discovered that the sysctl implementation in the Linux kernel contained a stack-based buffer overflow. A local attacker could use this to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code. Tamás Koczka discovered that the Bluetooth L2CAP handshake implementation in the Linux kernel contained multiple use-after-free vulnerabilities. A physically proximate attacker could use this to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code.

Ubuntu Security Notice 5875-1 - It was discovered that the NFSD implementation in the Linux kernel did not properly handle some RPC messages, leading to a buffer overflow. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code. Tamás Koczka discovered that the Bluetooth L2CAP handshake implementation in the Linux kernel contained multiple use-after-free vulnerabilities. A physically proximate attacker could use this to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code.

Thistle's technology will give device makers a way to easily integrate features for secure updates, memory management, and communications into their products, Snyder says.