Tag
#csrf
Today we are releasing Grafana 8.3.5 and 7.5.15. This patch release includes MEDIUM severity security fix for Cross Site Request Forgery for Grafana. Release v.8.3.5, only containing security fixes: - [Download Grafana 8.3.5](https://grafana.com/grafana/download/8.3.5) - [Release notes](https://grafana.com/docs/grafana/latest/release-notes/release-notes-8-3-5/) Release v.7.5.15, only containing security fixes: - [Download Grafana 7.5.15](https://grafana.com/grafana/download/7.5.15) - [Release notes](https://grafana.com/docs/grafana/latest/release-notes/release-notes-7-5-15/) ## CSRF ([CVE-2022-21703](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-21703)) ### Summary On Jan. 18, security researchers [jub0bs](https://twitter.com/jub0bs) and [abrahack](https://twitter.com/theabrahack) contacted Grafana to disclose a CSRF vulnerability which allows anonymous attackers to elevate their privileges by mounting cross-origin attacks against authenticated high-privilege Grafana us...
By Deeba Ahmed The vulnerabilities stem from the way Jenkins handles user-supplied data. This is a post from HackRead.com Read the original post: Excessive Expansion Vulnerabilities Leave Jenkins Servers Open to Attacks
## Summary PKCE is a very important countermeasure in OAuth2 , both for public and confidential clients. It protects against CSRF attacks and code injection attacks. Because of this bug, an attacker can circumvent the protection PKCE offers. ## Patches authentik 2023.8.7 and 2023.10.7 fix this issue. ## Details There is a bug in our implementation of PKCE that allows an attacker to circumvent the protection that PKCE offers. PKCE adds the `code_challenge’ parameter to the authorization request and adds the `code_verifier’ parameter to the token request. We recently fixed a downgrade attack (in v2023.8.5 and 2023.10.4) where if the attacker removed the `code_verifier’ parameter in the token request, authentik would allow the request to pass, thus circumventing PKCE’s protection. However, in the latest version of the software, another downgrade scenario is still possible: if the attacker removes the `code_challenge’ parameter from the authorization request, authentik will also not d...
MiniZinc version 2.7.6 suffers from a null pointer vulnerability.
The maintainers of the open-source continuous integration/continuous delivery and deployment (CI/CD) automation software Jenkins have resolved nine security flaws, including a critical bug that, if successfully exploited, could result in remote code execution (RCE). The issue, assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-23897, has been described as an arbitrary file read vulnerability through the
### Summary The application allows to create zip files from available files on the site. The parameter "selectedIds", is susceptible to SQL Injection. ### Details [downloadAsZipJobsAction](https://github.com/pimcore/admin-ui-classic-bundle/blob/1.x/src/Controller/Admin/Asset/AssetController.php#L2006) escape parameters, but [downloadAsZipAddFilesAction](https://github.com/pimcore/admin-ui-classic-bundle/blob/1.x/src/Controller/Admin/Asset/AssetController.php#L2087) not. The following code should be added: ``` foreach ($selectedIds as $selectedId) { if ($selectedId) { $quotedSelectedIds[] = $db->quote($selectedId); } } ``` ### PoC - Set up an example project as described on https://github.com/pimcore/demon (demo package with example content) - Log In. Grab the `X-pimcore-csrf-token` header from any request to the backend, as well as the `PHPSESSID` cookie. - Run the following script, substituting the values accordingly: ``` #!/bin/bash BASE_URL=http://local...
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins GitLab Branch Source Plugin 684.vea_fa_7c1e2fe3 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL.
This Metasploit module exploits an authenticated remote code execution vulnerability in PRTG.
View CSAF 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v3 8.0 ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity Vendor: Westermo Equipment: Lynx 206-F2G Vulnerabilities: Cross-site Scripting, Code Injection, Cross-Origin Resource Sharing, Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information, Cross-Site Request Forgery 2. RISK EVALUATION Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to access the web application, inject arbitrary code, execute malicious code, obtain sensitive information, or execute a malicious request. 3. TECHNICAL DETAILS 3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS The following versions of Lynx 206-F2G, a layer three industrial Ethernet switch, are affected: Lynx: Model Version L206-F2G1 Lynx: Firmware Version 4.24. 3.2 Vulnerability Overview 3.2.1 IMPROPER NEUTRALIZATION OF INPUT DURING WEB PAGE GENERATION ('CROSS-SITE SCRIPTING') CWE-79 An attacker with access to the web application that has the vulnerable software could introduce arbitrary JavaScript by injecting a cross-site sc...
### Impact The Argo CD API prior to versions 2.10-rc2, 2.9.4, 2.8.8, and 2.7.16 are vulnerable to a cross-server request forgery (CSRF) attack when the attacker has the ability to write HTML to a page on the same parent domain as Argo CD. A CSRF attack works by tricking an authenticated Argo CD user into loading a web page which contains code to call Argo CD API endpoints on the victim’s behalf. For example, an attacker could send an Argo CD user a link to a page which looks harmless but in the background calls an Argo CD API endpoint to create an application running malicious code. Argo CD uses the “Lax” SameSite cookie policy to prevent CSRF attacks where the attacker controls an external domain. The malicious external website can attempt to call the Argo CD API, but the web browser will refuse to send the Argo CD auth token with the request. Many companies host Argo CD on an internal subdomain, such as [https://argo-cd.internal.example.com](https://argo-cd.example.com/). If an a...