Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Tag

#jira

CVE-2023-2079: Changeset 2935565 for buymeacoffee – WordPress Plugin Repository

The "Buy Me a Coffee – Button and Widget Plugin" plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery due to missing nonce validation on the recieve_post, bmc_disconnect, name_post, and widget_post functions in versions up to, and including, 3.7. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugins settings, via a forged request granted the attacker can trick a site's administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

CVE
#sql#xss#web#ios#mac#nodejs#js#git#java#kubernetes#wordpress#php#c++#ssrf#pdf#auth#ssh#i2p#ibm#dell#ruby#jira#sap#ssl
GHSA-6xxr-648m-gch6: XWiki Platform vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) via the REST API

### Impact The REST API allows executing all actions via POST requests and accepts `text/plain`, `multipart/form-data` or `application/www-form-urlencoded` as content types which can be sent via regular HTML forms, thus allowing cross-site request forgery. With the interaction of a user with programming rights, this allows remote code execution through script macros and thus impacts the integrity, availability and confidentiality of the whole XWiki installation. For regular cookie-based authentication, the vulnerability is mitigated by SameSite cookie restrictions but as of March 2023, these are not enabled by default in Firefox and Safari. ### Patches The vulnerability has been patched in XWiki 14.10.8 and 15.2 by requiring a CSRF token header for certain request types that are susceptible to CSRF attacks. ### Workarounds It is possible to check for the `Origin` header in a reverse proxy to protect the REST endpoint from CSRF attacks, see [the Jira issue](https://jira.xwiki.org/b...

GHSA-6g2w-257v-3c9f: Apache Camel information exposure vulnerability

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel. This issue affects Apache Camel from 3.X through <=3.14.8, from 3.18.X through <=3.18.7, from 3.20.X through <= 3.20.5, from 4.X through <= 4.0.0-M3. Users should upgrade to 3.14.9, 3.18.8, 3.20.6 or 3.21.0 and for users on Camel 4.x update to 4.0.0-RC1

Red Hat Security Advisory 2023-3925-01

Red Hat Security Advisory 2023-3925-01 - Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is Red Hat's cloud computing Kubernetes application platform solution designed for on-premise or private cloud deployments. This advisory contains the container images for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12.23.

Red Hat Security Advisory 2023-3924-01

Red Hat Security Advisory 2023-3924-01 - Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is Red Hat's cloud computing Kubernetes application platform solution designed for on-premise or private cloud deployments. This advisory contains the RPM packages for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12.23.

Red Hat Security Advisory 2023-3915-01

Red Hat Security Advisory 2023-3915-01 - Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is Red Hat's cloud computing Kubernetes application platform solution designed for on-premise or private cloud deployments. This advisory contains the container images for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.11.44.

Red Hat Security Advisory 2023-3911-01

Red Hat Security Advisory 2023-3911-01 - Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is Red Hat's cloud computing Kubernetes application platform solution designed for on-premise or private cloud deployments. This advisory contains the container images for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.63.

CVE-2023-30607: Do not perform deletion before user input is validated in `FieldConfi… · Icinga/icingaweb2-module-jira@7f0c53b

icingaweb2-module-jira provides integration with Atlassian Jira. Starting in version 1.3.0 and prior to version 1.3.2, template and field configuration forms perform the deletion action before user input is validated, including the cross site request forgery token. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.2. There are no known workarounds.

A CISO's Guide to Paying Down Software Supply Chain Security Debt

When you just keep filing it away to handle "someday," security debt typically rears its head when you are most vulnerable and can least afford to pay it.

GHSA-8q9q-r9v2-644m: Upgrading doesn't prevent exploiting vulnerable XWiki documents

### Impact When an XWiki installation is upgraded and that upgrade contains a fix for a bug in a document, just a new version of that document is added. In some cases, it's still possible to exploit the vulnerability that was fixed in the new version. The severity of this depends on the fixed vulnerability, for the purpose of this advisory take [CVE-2022-36100](https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/security/advisories/GHSA-2g5c-228j-p52x) as example - it is easily exploitable with just view rights and critical. When XWiki is upgraded from a version before the fix for it (e.g., 14.3) to a version including the fix (e.g., 14.4), the vulnerability can still be reproduced by adding `rev=1.1` to the URL used in the reproduction steps so remote code execution is possible even after upgrading. Therefore, this affects the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the whole XWiki installation. This vulnerability also affects manually added script macros that contained security vulnerabi...