#rce

The ABB BMS/BAS controller suffers from an authenticated blind OS command injection vulnerability. This can be exploited to inject and execute arbitrary shell commands through the 'instance' HTTP POST parameter called by the productRemovalUpdate.php script. The token (key POST param) needs to be set to 159 to trigger the command execution.

The ABB BMS/BAS controller is vulnerable to code execution and sudo misconfiguration flaws. An authenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the firmware update mechanism allows an attacker with valid credentials to escalate privileges and execute commands as root. The process involves uploading a crafted .bsx file through projectUpdateBSXFileProcess.php, which is then moved to htmlroot and executed by projectUpdateBSXExecute.php. This script leverages sudo to run the uploaded bsx file, enabling the attacker to bypass input validation checks and execute arbitrary code, leading to full system compromise and unauthorized root access.

A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the mstp.ko kernel module, responsible for processing BACnet MS/TP frames over serial (RS485). The SendFrame() function writes directly into a statically sized kernel buffer (alloc_entry(0x1f5)) without validating the length of attacker-controlled data (param_5). If an MS/TP frame contains a crafted payload exceeding 492 bytes, the function performs out-of-bounds writes beyond the allocated 501-byte buffer, corrupting kernel memory. This flaw allows local or physically connected attackers to trigger denial-of-service or achieve remote code execution in kernel space. Tested against version 3.08.03 with a custom BACnet frame over /dev/ttyS0.

Hazel observes that cybercriminals often fumble teamwork, with fragile alliances crumbling over missed messages. Plus, how UAT-6382 is exploiting Cityworks and what you can do to stay secure.

The sr_feuser_register extension through 12.4.8 for TYPO3 allows Remote Code Execution via unsafe deserialization.

### Impact In XWiki 16.10.0, required rights were introduced as a way to limit which rights a document can have. Part of the security model of required rights is that a user who doesn't have a right also cannot define that right as required right. That way, users who are editing documents on which required rights are enforced can be sure that they're not giving a right to a script or object that it didn't have before. A bug in the implementation of the enforcement of this rule means that in fact, it was possible for any user with edit right on a document to set programming right as required right. If then a user with programming right edited that document, the content of that document would gain programming right, allowing remote code execution. This thereby defeats most of the security benefits of required rights. As XWiki still performs the required rights analysis when a user edits a page even when required rights are enforced, the user with programming right would still be warned a...

May “In the Trend of VM” (#15): vulnerabilities in Microsoft Windows and the Erlang/OTP framework. A traditional monthly vulnerability roundup. 🙂 🗞 Post on Habr (rus)🗒 Digest on the PT website (rus) A total of 4 trending vulnerabilities: 🔻 Elevation of Privilege – Windows Common Log File System Driver (CVE-2025-29824)🔻 Elevation of Privilege – Windows […]

About Remote Code Execution – 7-Zip (BDU:2025-01793) vulnerability. It’s about the fact that files unpacked using 7-Zip don’t get the Mark-of-the-Web. As a result, Windows security mechanisms don’t block the execution of the unpacked malware. If you remember, there was a similar vulnerability in January – CVE-2025-0411. The problem was with running files from the […]

### Impacted Environments This issue ONLY impacts environments using the `PyNcclPipe` KV cache transfer integration with the V0 engine. No other configurations are affected. ### Summary vLLM supports the use of the `PyNcclPipe` class to establish a peer-to-peer communication domain for data transmission between distributed nodes. The GPU-side KV-Cache transmission is implemented through the `PyNcclCommunicator` class, while CPU-side control message passing is handled via the `send_obj` and `recv_obj` methods on the CPU side.​ A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the `PyNcclPipe` service. Attackers can exploit this by sending malicious serialized data to gain server control privileges. The intention was that this interface should only be exposed to a private network using the IP address specified by the `--kv-ip` CLI parameter. The vLLM documentation covers how this must be limited to a secured network: https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/deployment/security.html Unfortunat...

View CSAF 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v4 9.3 ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity Vendor: Vertiv Equipment: Liebert RDU101 and Liebert UNITY Vulnerabilities: Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel, Stack-based Buffer Overflow 2. RISK EVALUATION Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to cause a denial-of-service condition or achieve remote code execution 3. TECHNICAL DETAILS 3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS The following Vertiv products are affected: Liebert RDU101: Versions 1.9.0.0 and prior Liebert IS-UNITY: Versions 8.4.1.0 and prior 3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW 3.2.1 AUTHENTICATION BYPASS USING AN ALTERNATE PATH OR CHANNEL CWE-288 Affected Vertiv products do not properly protect webserver functions that could allow an attacker to bypass authentication. CVE-2025-46412 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). A CVSS v...