#vulnerability

June 2025 Patch Tuesday fixes 66 bugs, including a zero-day in WebDAV. Update Windows, Office, and more now to block active threats.

The bug is one of 66 disclosed and patched today by Microsoft as part of its June 2025 Patch Tuesday set of security vulnerability fixes.

June Microsoft Patch Tuesday. A total of 81 vulnerabilities, roughly the same as in May. Among them, 15 vulnerabilities were added between the May and June MSPT. There are 3 vulnerabilities with signs of exploitation in the wild: 🔻 RCE – WEBDAV (CVE-2025-33053). The vulnerability is related to Internet Explorer mode in Microsoft Edge and […]

Microsoft has released its monthly security update for June 2025, which includes 66 vulnerabilities affecting a range of products, including 10 that Microsoft marked as “critical.”

Akamai's latest report reveals two Mirai botnets exploiting the critical CVE-2025-24016 flaw in Wazuh. Learn about these fast-spreading IoT threats and urgent patching advice.

### Impact _What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_ All users of Nautobot versions prior to 2.4.10 or prior to 1.6.32 are potentially affected. Due to insufficient security configuration of the Jinja2 templating feature used in computed fields, custom links, etc. in Nautobot: 1. A malicious user could configure this feature set in ways that could expose the value of Secrets defined in Nautobot when the templated content is rendered. 2. A malicious user could configure this feature set in ways that could call Python APIs to modify data within Nautobot when the templated content is rendered, bypassing the object permissions assigned to the viewing user. ### Patches _Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_ Nautobot versions 1.6.32 and 2.4.10 will include fixes for the vulnerability. ### Workarounds _Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_ The vulnerability can be partially mitigated by configuring ...

### Summary matrix-sdk-crypto since version 0.8.0 up to 0.11.0 does not correctly validate the sender of an encrypted event. Accordingly, a malicious homeserver operator can modify events served to clients, making those events appear to the recipient as if they were sent by another user. Although the CVSS score is 4.9 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N), we consider this a High Severity security issue. ### Details The Matrix specification [requires](https://spec.matrix.org/v1.14/client-server-api/#mmegolmv1aes-sha2) that clients ensure that "the event’s `sender`, `room_id`, and the recorded `session_id` match a trusted session". The vulnerable matrix-sdk-crypto versions check that the `room_id` matches that of the session denoted by `session_id`, but do not check the `sender`. ### Patches The issue is resolved by [13c1d20](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-rust-sdk/commit/13c1d2048286bbabf5e7bc6b015aafee98f04d55), included in versions 0.11.1 and 0.12.0 of matrix-sdk-crypto. ...

### Impact OctoPrint versions up until and including 1.11.1 contain a vulnerability that allows any unauthenticated attacker to send a manipulated broken `multipart/form-data` request to OctoPrint and through that make the web server component become unresponsive. This could be used to effectively run a denial of service attack on the OctoPrint server. ### Patches The vulnerability has been patched in version 1.11.2. ### Workaround OctoPrint administrators are once more reminded to not make OctoPrint available on hostile networks (e.g. the internet), regardless of whether this vulnerability is patched or not. ### Details The issue can be triggered by a broken `multipart/form-data` request lacking an end boundary to any of OctoPrint's endpoints implemented through the `octoprint.server.util.tornado.UploadStorageFallbackHandler` request handler. The request handler will get stuck in an endless busy loop, looking for a part of the request that will never come. As Tornado is single-...

### Impact OctoPrint versions up until and including 1.11.1 contain a vulnerability that allows an attacker with the `FILE_UPLOAD` permission to exfiltrate files from the host that OctoPrint has read access to, by moving them into the upload folder where they then can be downloaded from. The primary risk lies in the potential exfiltration of secrets stored inside OctoPrint's config, or further system files. By removing important runtime files, this could also be used to impact the availability of the host. Given that the attacker requires a user account with file upload permissions, the actual impact of this should however hopefully be minimal in most cases. ### Patches The vulnerability has been patched in version 1.11.2. ### Details A specially crafted HTTP Request to an affected upload endpoint that contains some form inputs only supposed to be used internally can be used to make OctoPrint move a file that it thinks is a freshly uploaded temporary one into its upload folder. ...

### Impact GeoNetwork WFS Index functionality is affected by GeoTools XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability during schema validation. This vulnerability is particularly severe as the REST API endpoint was not secured, potentially allowing unauthenticated attackers to read sensitive files ### Patches GeoNetwork 4.4.8 / 4.2.13. ### Workarounds Remove the ``gn-wfsfeature-harvester`` and ``gn-camelPeriodicProducer`` jars, disabling the WFS Index functionality. ### References - [GHSA-826p-4gcg-35vw](https://github.com/geotools/geotools/security/advisories/GHSA-826p-4gcg-35vw) - https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/8757 - https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/8803 - https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/8812