#web

RuoYi v4.8.0 was discovered to allow unauthorized attackers to view the session ID of the admin in the system monitoring. This issue can allow attackers to impersonate Admin users via using a crafted cookie.

Insecure permissions in RuoYi v4.8.0 allows authenticated attackers to escalate privileges by assigning themselves higher level roles.

Curious about the buzz around AI in cybersecurity? Wonder if it's just a shiny new toy in the tech world or a serious game changer? Let's unpack this together in a not-to-be-missed webinar that goes beyond the hype to explore the real impact of AI on cybersecurity. Join Ravid Circus, a seasoned pro in cybersecurity and AI, as we peel back the layers of AI in cybersecurity through a revealing

A team of security researchers from Georgia Institute of Technology and Ruhr University Bochum has demonstrated two new side-channel attacks targeting Apple silicon that could be exploited to leak sensitive information from web browsers like Safari and Google Chrome. The attacks have been codenamed Data Speculation Attacks via Load Address Prediction on Apple Silicon (SLAP) and Breaking the

The now-fixed vulnerability involved a major travel services company that's integrated with dozens of airline websites worldwide.

In their discovery, researchers found 31 PDF files linking to these phishing websites, none of which have been yet submitted to VirusTotal.

An SQL injection vulnerability allows any authenticated user to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the server. This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, data modification, or even complete control over the server. Details The vulnerability is found in the URL parameters of the following endpoint: `GET /admin/customermanagementframework/customers/list?add-new-customer=1&apply-segment-selection=Apply&filterDefinition[allowedRoleIds][]=1&filterDefinition[allowedUserIds][]=2&filterDefinition[id]=0&filterDefinition[name]=RDFYjolf&filterDefinition[readOnly]=on&filterDefinition[shortcutAvailable]=on&filter[active]=1&filter[email]=testing%40example.com&filter[firstname]=RDFYjolf&filter[id]=1&filter[lastname]=RDFYjolf&filter[operator-customer]=AND&filter[operator-segments]=%40%40dz1Uu&filter[search]=the&filter[segments][832][]=847&filter[segments][833][]=835&filter[segments][874][]=876&filter[showSegments][]=832 HTTP/1.1` The parameters filterDefinition and filter are vulnerable...

### Summary A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in PIMCORE allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the PDF upload functionality. This can result in the execution of malicious scripts in the context of the user's browser when the PDF is viewed, leading to potential session hijacking, defacement of web pages, or unauthorized access to sensitive information. ### Details The vulnerability is present in the PDF upload functionality of the PIM Core Upload module. When a user uploads a PDF file, the application fails to properly sanitize the content, allowing embedded scripts to be executed when the PDF is viewed. The affected code is located in the file handling and rendering logic of the PDF upload feature. ### PoC 1. Log in as Administrator  2. Hover to Assets ...

A critical vulnerability was discovered in the `ismp-grandpa` crate, that allowed a malicious prover easily convince the verifier of the finality of arbitrary headers. ### Description The vulnerability manifests as a verifer that only accepts incorrect signatures of Grandpa precommits and was introduced in this [specific commit](https://github.com/polytope-labs/ismp-substrate/pull/64/commits/5ca3351a19151f1a439c30d5cbdbfdc72a11f1a8#diff-3835cc24fb2011b3e8246036059acd8c2c2a9a869eedf7a210d18edb6543318dL262). Perhaps due to unfamiliarity with core substrate APIs. The `if` statement should have included a negation check, similar to the previous code, but this was omitted. Causing the verifier to **only** accept invalid signatures. This vulnerability remained undetected even with [integration tests](https://github.com/polytope-labs/ismp-substrate/pull/64/commits/04d5be207b082eb61d586d52e1685e2e060347e6#diff-4aedbca82d26bebc03f274e23fd5697c3346ffff54405c87af9018f3aef708b2R1-R160), as the...

When logs are written to a widely-writable directory (the default), an unprivileged attacker may predict a privileged process's log file path and pre-create a symbolic link to a sensitive file in its place. When that privileged process runs, it will follow the planted symlink and overwrite that sensitive file. To fix that, glog now causes the program to exit (with status code 2) when it finds that the configured log file already exists.