Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Source

ghsa

GHSA-8327-84cj-8xjm: Stack overflow when parsing specially crafted JSON ABI strings

Affected versions of the `alloy-json-abi` crate did not properly handle parsing of malformatted JSON ABI strings. The `JsonAbi::parse` method can be tricked into a stack overflow when processing specially crafted input. This stack overflow can lead to a crash of the application using this crate, potentially causing a denial of service. The flaw was corrected in commit [4790c47](https://github.com/alloy-rs/core/commit/4790c47518024bd391bbd6815b00f501bad76a15).

ghsa
#dos#js#git#perl
GHSA-qcm3-7879-xcww: Gateway API route matching order contradicts specification

### Impact Gateway API HTTPRoutes and GRPCRoutes do not follow the match precedence specified in the Gateway API specification. In particular, request headers are matched before request methods, when the specification describes that the request methods must be respected before headers are matched ([HTTPRouteRule](https://gateway-api.sigs.k8s.io/reference/spec/#gateway.networking.k8s.io/v1.HTTPRouteRule), [GRPCRouteRule](https://gateway-api.sigs.k8s.io/reference/spec/#gateway.networking.k8s.io%2fv1.GRPCRouteRule)). If users create Gateway API resources that use both request headers and request methods in order to route to different destinations, then traffic may be delivered to the incorrect backend. If the backend does not have Network Policy restricting acceptable traffic to receive, then requests may access information that you did not intend for them to access. ### Patches This issue was fixed in https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/34109. This issue affects: - Cilium v1.15 be...

GHSA-q7w8-72mr-vpgw: Policy bypass for Host Firewall policy due to race condition in Cilium agent

### Impact A race condition in the Cilium agent can cause the agent to ignore labels that should be applied to a node. This could in turn cause CiliumClusterwideNetworkPolicies intended for nodes with the ignored label to not apply, leading to policy bypass. ### Patches This issue was fixed in https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/33511. This issue affects: - All versions of Cilium before v1.14.14 - Cilium v1.15 between v1.15.0 and v1.15.7 inclusive This issue has been patched in: - Cilium v1.14.14 - Cilium v1.15.8 ### Workarounds As the underlying issue depends on a race condition, users unable to upgrade can restart the Cilium agent on affected nodes until the affected policies are confirmed to be working as expected. ### Acknowledgements The Cilium community has worked together with members of Google and Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @skmatti for raising and resolving this issue. ### For more information If you have any questions or comments ...

GHSA-75jf-52jg-qqh4: SQL injection in github.com/stashapp/stash

Stash up to v0.25.1 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the sort parameter.

GHSA-cpfp-m5qw-c4r3: Improper Preservation of Permissions in xxl-job

Insecure Permissions vulnerability in xxl-job v.2.4.1 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Sub-Task ID component.

GHSA-vwhg-jwr4-vxgg: gettext.js has a Cross-site Scripting injection

### Impact Possible vulnerability to XSS injection if .po dictionary definition files is corrupted ### Patches Update gettext.js to 2.0.3 ### Workarounds Make sure you control the origin of the definition catalog to prevent the use of this flaw in the definition of plural forms.

GHSA-q83v-hq3j-4pq3: Improper access control in Directus

Directus v10.13.0 allows an authenticated external attacker to modify presets created by the same user to assign them to another user. This is possible because the application only validates the user parameter in the 'POST /presets' request but not in the PATCH request. When chained with CVE-2024-6533, it could result in account takeover.

GHSA-qf6h-p3mr-vmh5: Code injection in Directus

Directus v10.13.0 allows an authenticated external attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript on the client. This is possible because the application injects an attacker-controlled parameter that will be stored in the server and used by the client into an unsanitized DOM element. When chained with CVE-2024-6534, it could result in account takeover.

GHSA-25qx-vfw2-fw8r: Nomad Vulnerable to Allocation Directory Escape On Non-Existing File Paths Through Archive Unpacking

In HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise from 0.6.1 up to 1.16.13, 1.7.10, and 1.8.2, the archive unpacking process is vulnerable to writes outside the allocation directory during migration of allocation directories when multiple archive headers target the same file. This vulnerability, CVE-2024-7625, is fixed in Nomad 1.6.14, 1.7.11, and 1.8.3. Access or compromise of the Nomad client agent at the source allocation first is a prerequisite for leveraging this vulnerability.

GHSA-vgvv-x7xg-6cqg: Russh has an OOM Denial of Service due to allocation of untrusted amount

### Summary Allocating an untrusted amount of memory allows any unauthenticated user to OOM a russh server. ### Details An SSH packet consists of a 4-byte big-endian length, followed by a byte stream of this length. After parsing and potentially decrypting the 4-byte length, russh allocates enough memory for this bytestream, as a performance optimization to avoid reallocations later. https://github.com/Eugeny/russh/blob/4eaa080e7532662023f75e8fff45b743fe607f8c/russh/src/cipher/mod.rs#L254 But this length is entirely untrusted and can be set to any value by the client, causing this much memory to be allocated, which will cause the process to OOM within a few such requests. RFC 4253 contains an explicit section on packet length limits: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4253#section-6.1 > However, implementations SHOULD check that the packet length is reasonable in order for the implementation to avoid denial of service and/or buffer overflow attacks. ### PoC Running the `...