#csrf

Dotclear version 2.29 suffers from a remote code execution vulnerability.

Serendipity version 2.5.0 suffers from a remote code execution vulnerability.

Yii2 supports attaching Behaviors to Components by setting properties having the format `'as <behaviour-name>'`. Internally this is done using the `__set()` magic method. If the value passed to this method is not an instance of the `Behavior` class, a new object is instantiated using `Yii::createObject($value)`. However, there is no validation check that verifies that `$value` is a valid `Behavior` class name or configuration. An attacker that can control the content of the $value variable can then instantiate arbitrary classes, passing parameters to their constructors and then invoking setter methods. ### Impact With some effort malicious code can be injected executed which might be anything ranging from deleting files to dropping database tables ### Patches Not yet patched. ### Workarounds No Work around available ### References Reported [Here](https://huntr.com/bounties/4fbdd965-02b6-42e4-b57b-f98f93415b8f?token=3bcfc5266870680af19a26170b8dbf3750e3b593ce192da8eaa6a03f96b99b52c4...

Actions in the admin management of analytics models did not include the necessary token to prevent a CSRF risk.

Actions in the admin preset tool did not include the necessary token to prevent a CSRF risk.

changedetection versions 0.45.20 and below suffer from a remote code execution vulnerability.

All 2.0.X, 2.1.X, 2.2.X, 2.3.X, 2.4.X, and 2.5.X versions of the Symfony WebProfiler bundle are affected by this security issue. This issue has been fixed in Symfony 2.3.19, 2.4.9, and 2.5.4. Note that no fixes are provided for Symfony 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 as they are not maintained anymore. ### Description The Symfony Web Profiler is a great development tool, but it should not be enabled on production servers. If it is enabled in production, it must be properly secured so that only authorized people have access to it. Developers must be very cautious about this as the Web Profiler gives many sensitive information about a Symfony project and any attackers can exploit many of them. Just to name a few sensitive information: user logins, user cookies, executed SQL statements, ... That being said, the import/export feature of the web profiler is exploitable even if the Web Profiler is secured as the form to import a profiler is not protected against CSRF attacks. Combined with the fact tha...

Sylius 1.0.0 to 1.0.16, 1.1.0 to 1.1.8, 1.2.0 to 1.2.1 versions of AdminBundle and ResourceBundle are affected by this security issue. This issue has been fixed in Sylius 1.0.17, 1.1.9 and 1.2.2. Development branch for 1.3 release has also been fixed. ### Description The following actions in the admin panel did not require a CSRF token: - marking order’s payment as completed - marking order’s payment as refunded - marking product review as accepted - marking product review as rejected ### Resolution The issue is fixed by adding a required CSRF token to those actions. We also fixed `ResourceController`‘s `applyStateMachineTransitionAction` method by adding a CSRF token check. If you use that action in the API context, you can disable it by adding `csrf_protection:` false to its routing configuration

Sylius 1.0.0 to 1.0.16, 1.1.0 to 1.1.8, 1.2.0 to 1.2.1 versions of AdminBundle and ResourceBundle are affected by this security issue. This issue has been fixed in Sylius 1.0.17, 1.1.9 and 1.2.2. Development branch for 1.3 release has also been fixed. ### Description The following actions in the admin panel did not require a CSRF token: - marking order’s payment as completed - marking order’s payment as refunded - marking product review as accepted - marking product review as rejected ### Resolution The issue is fixed by adding a required CSRF token to those actions. We also fixed `ResourceController`‘s `applyStateMachineTransitionAction` method by adding a CSRF token check. If you use that action in the API context, you can disable it by adding `csrf_protection:` false to its routing configuration

The GraphQL controller lacked any CSRF protection, meaning authenticated users could be forced or tricked into visiting a URL that would send a GET request to the affected web server that could mutate or destroy data without the user knowing.