The prominent state-sponsored advanced persistent threat (APT), aka Jumpy Pisces, appears to be moving away from its primary cyber-espionage motives and toward wreaking widespread disruption and damage.

Source: DD Images via Shutterstock

One of North Korea's most prominent state-sponsored threat groups has pivoted to using Play ransomware in recent attacks, signifying the first time the group has partnered up with an underground ransomware network. Worryingly, it sets the stage for future high-impact attacks, researchers surmise.

According to Palo Alto Networks' Unit 42, which tracks the advanced persistent threat (APT) as Jumpy Pisces (aka Nickel Hyatt, Onyx Sleet, Silent Chollima, Stonefly, and TDrop2), Andariel is now working with the Play ransomware gang, but whether it's as an initial access broker (IAB) or affiliate of the ransomware group is not clear, the researchers observed in a blog post on Oct. 31. Previously, Andariel was associated with a ransomware strain called "Maui" that's been active since at least 2022.

Unit 42 researchers believe the group is responsible for a Play ransomware attack discovered last month in which attackers gained initial access to a network via a compromised user account several months before, in May. Andariel moved laterally after its initial network breach and maintained persistence by spreading the open source tool Sliver and its unique custom malware, DTrack, to other hosts via the Server Message Block (SMB) protocol, according to Unit 42. Months later, in early September, it deployed the Play payload.

Related:Cybersecurity Training Resources Often Limited to Developers

"This shift in their tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) signals deeper involvement in the broader ransomware threat landscape," Unit 42 researchers wrote in the post. "This development could indicate a future trend where North Korean threat groups will increasingly participate in broader ransomware campaigns, potentially leading to more widespread and damaging attacks globally."

**Ransomware in Transition?**

Play ransomware, maintained and deployed by a group tracked as Fiddling Scorpius, made its claim to fame by targeting the city of Oakland, Calif., in February 2023 with a crippling attack. It then quickly rose up the threat ranks to become a major player in the game.

Some researchers have suggested that Fiddling Scorpius has transitioned from mounting its own attacks to a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) model, according to Unit 42. However, the group itself has announced on its Play ransomware leak site that it does not provide a RaaS ecosystem, according to the researchers. If this is true, then Andariel most likely acted as an IAB in the attack rather than an affiliate, they said.

Either way, "network defenders should view … \[the\] activity as a potential precursor to ransomware attacks, not just espionage, underscoring the need for heightened vigilance," according to Unit 42.

Related:Codasip Donates Tools to Develop Memory-Safe Chips

There were several clues in the attack sequence that point to collaboration between Andariel and the Play ransomware. For one, the compromised account that attackers used for initial access and subsequent spreading of Andariel's signature tools, including Silver and Dtrack, was the same one used prior to ransomware deployment.

"The ransomware actor leveraged the account to abuse Windows access tokens, move laterally and escalate to SYSTEM privileges via PsExec," according to the post. "This eventually led to the mass uninstallation of endpoint detection and response (EDR) sensors and the onset of Play ransomware activity."

The researchers also observed command-and-control (C2) communication with the Silver malware the day before Play ransomware was deployed. Moreover, Play ransomware attacks are known for leaving tools in the in the folder C:\\Users\\Public\\Music, and some tools used prior to ransomware deployment in the Andariel attack also were located there, the researchers noted.

**Defenders Beware Rising North Korean Ransomware Threat**

Andariel has been active for several years and has mounted a number of high-profile attacks that have targeted critical defense, aerospace, nuclear, and engineering companies as well as global managed service providers.

Related:Samsung Zero-Day Vuln Under Active Exploit, Google Warns

Andariel is controlled by North Korea's military intelligence agency, the Reconnaissance General Bureau, which is involved in the nation's illicit arms trade and responsible for its malicious cyber activity. The group's antics already have drawn the attention of international law enforcement, including the US National Security Agency (NSA), which considers the group an ongoing threat to various industry sectors, particularly in the US, South Korea, Japan, and India.

The US Department of State's Rewards for Justice (RFJ) is even offering a reward of up to $10 million for information that could lead it to Rim Jong Hyok, a key player in Andariel's management structure, or any co-conspirators in the group.

Given the need for worldwide organizations to be on alert, Unit 42 included a list of indicators of compromise (IoCs) in its blog post. The researchers advised that defenders leverage the latest threat intelligence to identify malware on networks, and advanced URL filtering and DNS security products to spot known URLs and domains associated with Andariel's malicious activity.

**About the Author**

Elizabeth Montalbano is a freelance writer, journalist, and therapeutic writing mentor with more than 25 years of professional experience. Her areas of expertise include technology, business, and culture. Elizabeth previously lived and worked as a full-time journalist in Phoenix, San Francisco, and New York City; she currently resides in a village on the southwest coast of Portugal. In her free time, she enjoys surfing, hiking with her dogs, traveling, playing music, yoga, and cooking.

North Korea's Andariel Pivots to 'Play' Ransomware Games

Application security teams from Fortune 500 companies are already using Noma's life cycle platform, which offers organizations data and AI supply chain security, AI security posture management, and AI threat detection and response.

Source: BillionPhotos.com via Adobe Stock Photo

The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) tools in enterprises has put the pressure on security teams to secure the data and AI life cycle. Organizations can be compromised via misconfigured data pipelines, insecure MLOps tools, and vulnerable and malicious open source models.

Noma emerged from stealth today with a platform to help organizations manage the risks around AI applications. The platform offers organizations with end-to-end AI discovery, security, protection, and compliance. Noma deploys across any cloud-based, software-as-a-service, or self-hosted environment, and does not require agents or code changes, the company said.

Noma protects against supply chain risks, such as vulnerable data pipelines, unscanned code in data science environments, misconfigured MLOps tools, and sensitive data used for model training. The platform also protects organizations vulnerable and malicious models, runtime prompt injection, and other threats.

The Noma platform is already in use by paying customers, including Fortune 500 companies.

As part of the launch, Noma announced $32 million in series A funding from Ballistic Ventures and "dozens of strategic angel investors." The company had a previously undisclosed seed round less than a year ago. Noma's co-founders, Niv Braun and Alon Tron, have experience leading security and data science teams, the company said.

Noma Launches With Plans to Secure Data, AI Life Cycle

Knee-jerk reactions to major vendor outages could do more harm than good.

Source: SOPA Images Limited

COMMENTARY

The now-infamous July CrowdStrike outage sparked global chaos and countless conversations about vendor security. Despite the industry noise and myriad headlines about the outage — and its potential cost of more than $5 billion to Fortune 500 companies alone — there is a bigger picture we must consider. And that is how, as an industry, we understand the risks involved and respond to major outages and other cybersecurity crises. 

While the CrowdStrike outage was a freak accident, it's likely not the last time we'll witness this kind of meltdown from a major technology provider. As our digital ecosystems become further interconnected and enterprises increasingly put their trust in singular vendors, business leaders will have to grapple with the inevitability of similar events, whether from a simple outage or a malicious hack. In every case along that spectrum, however, these leaders must avoid knee-jerk reactions that could ultimately do more harm than good. Blindly switching to a new vendor or making drastic changes to IT and security processes could introduce security holes that exacerbate vulnerabilities in an organization's overall security posture, rather than improving it.  

Instead of immediately jumping ship, here are the three things companies should do in the wake of a CrowdStrike-like event to ensure business continuity and high operational standards.  

**1\. Assess Vendors' Overall Reliability and Risk**

Switching vendors after an incident isn't as simple — or as beneficial — as it may seem. Before switching, businesses must evaluate both the existing and potential vendor, and assess each vendor's overall reliability and risk. For instance, Resilience customer data shows that despite the July incident, CrowdStrike Falcon is highly effective. It has the lowest percentage of material claims of endpoint detection and response (EDR) vendors in Resilience's portfolio, with fewer than 3% of clients with Falcon experiencing a cyber-insurance claim with losses. Of course, no company can — or should — claim the ability to avoid 100% of incidents, but in these kinds of deliberations, it's critical to put a vendor's long-term track record into perspective. On the flip side, however, if a vendor shows a consistent history of outages or vulnerabilities (as has VPN provider Ivanti, of late), poor performance or communication, and long delays in remediation, an incident could be the helpful forcing factor in considering the benefits of trying something new.  

It's also important to note the costs of switching vendors that go beyond sticker price, such as implementation time, staff training costs, and adjusting workflows to incorporate the new system and meet business needs. These third-party risk considerations must be considered, with leadership weighing the business interruption costs of an outage with the existing vendor against the total costs that come with making a switch.  

**2\. Avoid Radical Changes to the Update Process**

This particular outage raised the issue of update cadence and testing frequency, with many arguing that the affected organizations should have taken a more cautious, thorough approach to testing the update before rolling it out. But delaying updates is a calculated risk, and not necessarily one that most companies should be taking. Antivirus and EDR signatures are designed to counter quick-breaking, emerging threats toward existing systems, so while you can decide to wait to allow the days or weeks it may take to fully test the update, you may be leaving your systems vulnerable to new exploits in the process. Threat actors only grow faster and more sophisticated in their approaches, so quick security updates are more crucial than ever. The risk of taking additional precautions in testing may not be worth it for every company, especially since most updates happen seamlessly. After all, part of the reason CrowdStrike made headlines was because the outage was so out of the ordinary. 

In a perfect world, where bad actors weren't a consistent threat and update processes took no extra time, following the typical best practice of testing each and every update that comes from each and every vendor might be feasible. But in the real world, changes to the update process are likely to slow down your defenses. Ultimately, there is no one-size-fits-all answer, and the best approach will depend on the specific organization and its risk tolerance.  

**3\. Don't Panic**

It's tempting to liken incidents like CrowdStrike to natural disasters (such as catastrophic hurricanes), but that oversimplification distracts from the heart of the issue. While many insurers use this analogy to describe cyber events, it's neither accurate nor useful, as it becomes an apples-to-oranges comparison that frames cyber incidents or outages as one-sided and world-ending. But the reality is far different. There's no tangible way for individuals to prevent or mitigate the intensity of category hurricanes or tornadoes, but there are certainly simple, actionable steps we can take to mitigate the financial impact of an outage or counteract the negative effects of a potential attack. This includes implementing proper cyber hygiene, transferring financial risk through cyber insurance, and having a detailed cybersecurity action plan in the event of an attack or outage. It's not only feasible but essential that companies take these steps to remain operable and functioning in the midst of an incident.  

In short, decision-makers across the board can't allow themselves to make reactive or fear-based decisions on their security posture directly following a cyber incident. These knee-jerk reactions could lead to greater complications and introduce a host of new vulnerabilities just waiting to be exploited. Instead, leaders must focus on understanding the root cause of the incident, learning from it, and making risk-driven decisions that mitigate the greatest financial loss and improve their organization's overall cyber resilience. This includes taking a proactive approach and incorporating third-party risk management into business continuity planning. That way, you'll be able to avoid catastrophic interruptions to your day-to-day business and maintain continuity and resilience in the face of a cyber incident. 

**About the Author**

CEO & Co-Founder, Resilience

Vishaal Hariprasad, best known as "V8," co-founded what is now known as Resilience in 2016 to bridge the divide between cyber insurance and cybersecurity. As a licensed insurance broker and producer, as well as a veteran of both the US Air Force and the cybersecurity industry, Vishaal brings the leadership skills he honed in his years with the military to his position as CEO for Resilience. After graduating from the United States Air Force Academy, V8 was commissioned to military service as a Cyber Operations Officer for the Air Force. Hariprasad is an Iraq War veteran and a recipient of a Bronze Star Medal. In 2012, he co-founded Morta Security, which was acquired by Palo Alto Networks, where he then served as a threat intelligence architect. In 2015, V8 was tapped to serve as a founding partner at the Pentagon's newly established Defense Innovation Unit Experimental (DIUx) in Mountain View, California, an office under the Secretary of Defense charged with leveraging commercial technology to solve defense challenges. V8 holds a B.A. in Mathematics from the US Air Force Academy and an M.S. in Information Technology from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech).

The Case Against Abandoning CrowdStrike Post-Outage

On the heels of a Chinese APT eavesdropping on phone calls made by Trump and Harris campaign staffers, Beijing says foreign nations have mounted an extensive seafaring espionage effort.

Source: US Navy Photo via Alamy Stock Photo

Just days after Chinese state-sponsored hackers attacked the presidential campaigns of both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, Beijing is leveling accusations at unnamed foreign entities, accusing them of using secret maritime buoys and seabed equipment to spy on its naval activities.

In a message on WeChat — China's biggest social media app — the country's Ministry of State Security (MSS) claimed it has discovered devices designed for "reconnaissance and monitoring of our country's waters" and "intelligence collection and technical theft activities."

It went on to allege that foreign "secret guards" are lurking as drifting "spies" and acting as "lighthouses" to guide outsider submarines.

"Faced with the severe and complex situation of covert struggle in the deep-sea security field and the real threat of foreign espionage intelligence agencies, the national security agencies will ... firmly defend our sovereignty," the MSS reportedly said. 

"It’s highly unlikely we will ever find out for definite if these claims are accurate, but when it comes to the culprits, suspicion will definitely land on the West," says Ryan McConechy, chief technology officer at Barrier Networks. "The key lesson here is that the online world has become the preferred playing field for all adversaries today. Nation-states and criminals can operate much stealthier, they can often get deeper into networks and secrets than physical access would allow, and it is much safer for the troops who can physically distance themselves from targets."

Related:Dark Reading Confidential: Meet the Ransomware Negotiators

William Wright, CEO of Closed Door Security, noted that at-sea ships do make for juicy espionage targets.

"Few people fully understand the importance of the maritime industry today, but vessels are like floating computers, and they often contain highly sensitive information," he explains. "Whether the information relates to China's rapidly growing navy, or information on trading, it could prove to be very valuable to another nation-state and China is clearly concerned."

**Tit for Tat? News Follows Reported Chinese Campaign Hacks**

The claims from Beijing come on the heels of reports from the Washington Post and Reuters last weekend that an unnamed advanced persistent threat (APT) infiltrated the Verizon Communications telecom network and intercepted phone calls and texts made by campaign staffers for both Trump and Harris.

In addition, the eavesdroppers also reportedly targeted Trump's own phone calls, along with those of his running mate JD Vance — though how successful these latter attempts were is unknown.

Related:Facebook Businesses Targeted in Infostealer Phishing Campaign

Following the reports, the FBI and the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) confirmed they were investigating "unauthorized access to commercial telecommunications infrastructure by actors affiliated with the People's Republic of China," and acknowledged they were seeing "specific malicious activity targeting the sector," though they did not name victims or mention the candidates.

Verizon told Reuters meanwhile that it was "aware of a sophisticated attempt to target US telecoms and gather intelligence."

**China-US Tensions: Time to Up Critical Infrastructure Cyber Defense**

The activity aligns with prior attacks from the now-infamous Chinese state-sponsored APT Volt Typhoon, which first came to light in March 2023 after compromising telecom networks in Guam. It has since consistently targeted critical infrastructure in the US, with the observed purpose of espionage — and, potentially, the ability down the line to disrupt communications in the event of military conflict in the South China Sea and across the Pacific.

Similarly, another Chinese APT known as Salt Typhoon attacked US ISPs last month. The focus on high-value communications service provider networks in the US likely indicates a similar dual set of goals, researchers said at the time — to steal information and set up a launchpad for disruptive attacks.

Related:Canada Grapples With 'Second-to-None' PRC-Backed Threat Actors

"While it's alarming, the recent campaign targeting is also pretty unsurprising," says Casey Ellis, founder and adviser at Bugcrowd. "Given the US election season, and the access that Salt Typhoon had, I'd be surprised if they didn't target the elected officials and candidates for the presidential election."

All industries should learn from these types of campaigns, says Barrier Networks' McConechy, who notes that the seafaring espionage might be in retaliation for Volt Typhoon's assaults.

"Whether it's spyware implanted into routers, snooping hot air balloons, or spying submersibles, nation-states are getting increasingly creative when it comes to eavesdropping on other countries, so critical industries must be prepared for these assaults," he stresses. "In the digital world, these types of cyber-physical espionage campaigns have become the norm. Most countries will deny they conduct them, but they will be, they just won't want to publicly announce it, or let their target know."

He adds, "All systems must be scanned regularly for malware, and the locations close to where critical infrastructure resides must be continuously monitored for intruders, whether human or robotic. Improving defenses both physically and digitally must be a priority.”

**About the Author**

Tara Seals has 20+ years of experience as a journalist, analyst and editor in the cybersecurity, communications and technology space. Prior to Dark Reading, Tara was Editor in Chief at Threatpost, and prior to that, the North American news lead for Infosecurity Magazine. She also spent 13 years working for Informa (formerly Virgo Publishing), as executive editor and editor-in-chief at publications focused on both the service provider and the enterprise arenas. A Texas native, she holds a B.A. from Columbia University, lives in Western Massachusetts with her family and is on a never-ending quest for good Mexican food in the Northeast.

China Says Seabed Sentinels Are Spying, After Trump Taps

Sophos went so far as to plant surveillance “implants” on its own devices to catch the hackers at work—and in doing so, revealed a glimpse into China's R&D pipeline of intrusion techniques.

For years, it's been an inconvenient truth within the cybersecurity industry that the network security devices sold to protect customers from spies and cybercriminals are, themselves, often the machines those intruders hack to gain access to their targets. Again and again, vulnerabilities in “perimeter” devices like firewalls and VPN appliances have become footholds for sophisticated hackers trying to break into the very systems those appliances were designed to safeguard.

Now one cybersecurity vendor is revealing how intensely—and for how long—it has battled with one group of hackers that have sought to exploit its products to their own advantage. For more than five years, the UK cybersecurity firm Sophos engaged in a cat-and-mouse game with one loosely connected team of adversaries who targeted its firewalls. The company went so far as to track down and monitor the specific devices on which the hackers were testing their intrusion techniques, surveil the hackers at work, and ultimately trace that focused, years-long exploitation effort to a single network of vulnerability researchers in Chengdu, China.

On Thursday, Sophos chronicled that half-decade-long war with those Chinese hackers in a report that details its escalating tit-for-tat. The company went as far as discreetly installing its own “implants” on the Chinese hackers' Sophos devices to monitor and preempt their attempts at exploiting its firewalls. Sophos researchers even eventually obtained from the hackers' test machines a specimen of “bootkit” malware designed to hide undetectably in the firewalls' low-level code used to boot up the devices, a trick that has never been seen in the wild.

In the process, Sophos analysts identified a series of hacking campaigns that had started with indiscriminate mass exploitation of its products but eventually became more stealthy and targeted, hitting nuclear energy suppliers and regulators, military targets including a military hospital, telecoms, government and intelligence agencies, and the airport of one national capital. While most of the targets—which Sophos declined to identify in greater detail—were in South and Southeast Asia, a smaller number were in Europe, the Middle East, and the United States.

Sophos' report ties those multiple hacking campaigns—with varying levels of confidence—to Chinese state-sponsored hacking groups including those known as APT41, APT31, and Volt Typhoon, the latter of which is a particularly aggressive team that has sought the ability to disrupt critical infrastructure in the US, including power grids. But the common thread throughout those efforts to hack Sophos' devices, the company says, is not one of those previously identified hackers groups but instead a broader network of researchers that appears to have developed hacking techniques and supplied them to the Chinese government. Sophos' analysts tie that exploit development to an academic institute and a contractor, both around Chengdu: Sichuan Silence Information Technology—a firm previously tied by Meta to Chinese state-run disinformation efforts—and the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China.

Sophos says it’s telling that story now not just to share a glimpse of China's pipeline of hacking research and development, but also to break the cybersecurity industry's awkward silence around the larger issue of vulnerabilities in security appliances serving as entry points for hackers. In just the past year, for instance, flaws in security products from other vendors including Ivanti, Fortinet, Cisco, and Palo Alto have all been exploited in mass hacking or targeted intrusion campaigns. “This is becoming a bit of an open secret. People understand this is happening, but unfortunately everyone is _zip,_” says Sophos chief information security officer Ross McKerchar, miming pulling a zipper across his lips. “We're taking a different approach, trying to be very transparent, to address this head-on and meet our adversary on the battlefield.”

**From One Hacked Display to Waves of Mass Intrusion**

As Sophos tells it, the company's long-running battle with the Chinese hackers began in 2018 with a breach of Sophos itself. The company discovered a malware infection on a computer running a display screen in the Ahmedabad office of its India-based subsidiary Cyberoam. The malware had gotten Sophos' attention due to its noisy scanning of the network. But when the company's analysts looked more closely, they found that the hackers behind it had already compromised other machines on the Cyberoam network with a more sophisticated rootkit they identified as CloudSnooper. In retrospect, the company believes that initial intrusion was designed to gain intelligence about Sophos products that would enable follow-on attacks on its customers.

Then in the spring of 2020, Sophos began to learn about a broad campaign of indiscriminate infections of tens of thousands of firewalls around the world in an apparent attempt to install a trojan called Asnarök and create what it calls “operational relay boxes” or ORBs—essentially a botnet of compromised machines the hackers could use as launching points for other operations. The campaign was surprisingly well resourced, exploiting multiple zero-day vulnerabilities the hackers appeared to have discovered in Sophos appliances. Only a bug in the malware's cleanup attempts on a small fraction of the affected machines allowed Sophos to analyze the intrusions and begin to study the hackers targeting its products.

Inside Sophos' 5-Year War With the Chinese Hackers Hijacking Its Devices

A successful CIA hack of Venezuela's military payroll system, insider fights for spy agency resources, and messy opposition politics: A WIRED investigation reveals a secret Trump-era attempt to oust autocratic ruler Nicolás Maduro.

The Untold Story of Trump's Failed Attempt to Overthrow Venezuela's President

Despite the absence of laws specifically covering AI-based attacks, regulators can use existing rules around fraud and deceptive business practices.

Source: mike via Adobe Stock Photo

As AI-generated deepfakes become more sophisticated, regulators are turning to existing fraud and deceptive practice rules to combat misuse. While no federal law specifically addresses deepfakes, agencies like the FTC and SEC are applying creative solutions to mitigate these risks.

The quality of AI-generated deepfakes is astounding. "We cannot believe our eyes anymore. What you see is not real," says Binghamton University professor Yu Chen. Tools are being developed in real time to distinguish between an authentic image and a deepfake. But even if a user knows an image isn't real, there are still challenges.

"Using AI tools to trick, mislead, or defraud people is illegal," Federal Trade Commission chair Lina M. Kahn said, back in September. AI tools used for fraud or deception are subject to existing laws, and Khan made it clear the FTC will be going after artificial intelligence fraudsters.

**Intent: Fraud and Deception**

Deepfakes can be used for other corporate unfair business practices, such as creating a false image of an executive who announces their company is taking an action that could cause stock prices to change. For example, a deepfake could declare a company is going out of business or make an acquisition. If stock trading stock is involved, the SEC could prosecute.

When a deepfake is created with the intent to deceive, "that is a classic element of fraud," says Joanna Forster, a partner at the law firm Crowell & Morning and the former deputy attorney general, Corporate Fraud Section, for the State of California

"We've all seen the past four years a very activist FTC on areas of antitrust and competition, on consumer protection, on privacy," Forster says.

In fact, an FTC official, speaking on background, says the agency is aggressively addressing the issue. In April, a rule on government or business impersonation went into effect. The agency also is continuing its efforts on voice clones designed to deceive and defraud victims. The agency has a business guidance blog that tracks many of these efforts.

Several state and local laws address deepfakes and privacy, but there is no federal legislation or clear rules defining which agency takes the lead on enforcement. In early October, U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez granted a preliminary injunction blocking a California law against election-related deepfakes. Even though the judge acknowledged AI and deepfakes pose significant risks, California's law likely violated the First Amendment, Mendez said. Currently, 45 states plus the District of Columbia have laws prohibiting using deepfakes in elections.

**Privacy and Accountability Challenges**

There are few laws that protect non-celebrities or politicians from a deepfake violating their privacy. The laws are written so that they protect the celebrity's trademarked face, voice and mannerisms. This differs from a comic impersonating a celebrity for entertainment's sake where there is no intent to deceive the audience. However, if a deepfake does try to deceive the audience, that crosses the line of intent to deceive.

In the case of a deepfake of a non-celebrity, there is no way to sue without first knowing who created the deepfake, which is not always possible on the internet, says Debbie Reynolds, privacy expert and CEO of Debbie Reynolds Consulting. Identity theft laws might apply in some cases, but internet anonymity is difficult to overcome. "You may never know who created this thing, but that harm still exists," Reynolds says.

While some states are looking at laws specifically focusing on the use of AI and deepfakes, the tool used for the fraud or deception is not significant, says Edward Lewis, CEO of CyXcel, a consulting firm specializing in cybersecurity law and risk management.  Many corporate executives do not realize how easy deepfakes and other AI-generated content are to create and distribute.

"It's not so much about what do I need to know about deepfakes; It's rather who has access, and how do we control that access in the workplace, because we wouldn't want our staff to be engaging for inappropriate reasons with any AI," Lewis says. "Secondly, what is our firm's policy on the use of AI? What context can or can't it be used for, and who actually do we grant access to AI so that they can carry out their jobs?"

Lewis notes, "It's much the same way as we have controls around other cyber security risks. The same controls need to be considered in the context of the use of AI."

As AI-generated deepfakes become more sophisticated, regulators are working to adapt by leveraging existing fraud and privacy laws. Without federal legislation specific to deepfakes, agencies like the FTC and SEC are actively enforcing rules against deception, impersonation, and identity misuse. But the challenges of accountability, privacy, and recognition persist, leaving gaps that both individuals and organizations need to navigate. As regulatory frameworks evolve, proactive measures—such as AI governance policies and continuous monitoring—will be essential in mitigating risks and safeguarding trust in the digital landscape.

**About the Author**

Stephen Lawton is a veteran journalist and cybersecurity subject matter expert who has been covering cybersecurity and business continuity for more than 30 years. He was named a Global Top 25 Data Expert for 2023 and a Global Top 20 Cybersecurity Expert for 2022. Stephen spent more than a decade with SC Magazine/SC Media/CyberRisk Alliance, where he served as editorial director of the content lab. Earlier he was chief editor for several national and regional award-winning publications, including MicroTimes and Digital News & Review. Stephen is the founder and senior consultant of the media and technology firm AFAB Consulting LLC. You can reach him at \[email protected\].

Regulators Combat Deepfakes With Anti-Fraud Rules

The company's data loss prevention platform helps customers identify and classify data across SaaS and GenAI applications, endpoints, and email.

Source: YAY Media AS via Alamy Stock Photo

Organizations have a lot of data  — application data, log files, personal information, source code, customer information, business collateral, and credentials, to name a few — and the volume continues to grow exponentially. But a lack of visibility across IT environments and difficulty with classifying data make it difficult to protect all of that data from falling into the wrong hands.

MIND emerged from stealth today with a data loss prevention (DLP) platform that promises both "visibility of data risks" and prevention of data leaks. The company said its platform discovers and classifies sensitive data across IT workloads, including software-as-a-service (SaaS) and generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) applications, endpoints, on-premises systems, and email.

An "intelligent" DLP platform integrates AI and smart automations to help customers identify, detect, and prevent data leaks, the company said.

"MIND AI is made of hundreds of tailored algorithms and a proprietary AI engine to classify and categorize sensitive unstructured data, understand context-aware business views to determine risk severity, and take automated prevention and remediation actions," the company said.

Founded in 2023, MIND was co-founded by Eran Barak, who previously founded Hexadite; Itai Schwartz, who previously worked at Torq and Axonius; and Hod Bin Noon, who specialized in real-time vulnerability detection and remediation at Dazz. As part of the launch, MIND announced it raised $11 million in seed round funding from YL Ventures and several individual investors.

MIND Launches 'Intelligent' DLP Platform

Vulcan collaborated with Red Hat to optimize Vulcan Cyber with Red Hat Insights and provide businesses with a holistic view of exposure risk across all attack surfaces and asset types.According to Vulcan, “By harnessing Red Hat Insights’ deep visibility into host vulnerabilities, paired with the Vulcan Cyber holistic view, intelligent risk scoring and automated workflows, your teams will be empowered to resolve issues faster, enhance collaboration between security and IT teams, and ultimately reduce the risk of security breaches.”Red Hat Insights can help you better understand your secur

Vulcan collaborated with Red Hat to optimize Vulcan Cyber with Red Hat Insights and provide businesses with a holistic view of exposure risk across all attack surfaces and asset types.

According to Vulcan, “By harnessing Red Hat Insights’ deep visibility into host vulnerabilities, paired with the Vulcan Cyber holistic view, intelligent risk scoring and automated workflows, your teams will be empowered to resolve issues faster, enhance collaboration between security and IT teams, and ultimately reduce the risk of security breaches.”

Red Hat Insights can help you better understand your security risk and exposure in the form of vulnerabilities, malware, and regulatory compliance.  Red Hat Insights is included with your existing Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Red Hat OpenShift, and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform subscriptions. To learn more about Insights visit our Red Hat Insights product page.

To learn more from Vulcan, navigate to these key links:

Read the blog

Download the PDF

Enter keywords here to search blogs

UI\_Icon-Red\_Hat-Close-A-Black-RGB

**Browse by channel**

**Automation**

The latest on IT automation for tech, teams, and environments

**Security**

The latest on how we reduce risks across environments and technologies

**Edge computing**

Updates on the platforms that simplify operations at the edge

**Infrastructure**

The latest on the world’s leading enterprise Linux platform

**Applications**

Inside our solutions to the toughest application challenges

**Original shows**

Entertaining stories from the makers and leaders in enterprise tech

Red Hat Insights collaborated with Vulcan Cyber to provide a seamless integration for effective exposure management 

A national security memorandum on artificial intelligence tasks various federal agencies with securing the AI supply chain from potential cyberattacks and disseminating timely threat information about them.

Source: Marcos Alvarado via Alamy Stock Photo

President Joe Biden issued the first national security memorandum on artificial intelligence (AI), recognizing that advances in the field will have significant implications for national security and foreign policy. The memorandum builds on the administration's policies to drive the safe, secure, and trustworthy development of AI. 

The White House directed the US government to create systems that ensure the country will lead in the global race to develop AI technology for national security purposes and to advance international regulations and governance. The memorandum also seeks to ensure that AI adoption reflects democratic values and protects human rights, civil rights, civil liberties, and privacy while encouraging the international community to adhere to the same values. 

"While the memorandum holds broader implications for AI governance, cybersecurity-related measures are particularly noteworthy and essential to advancing AI resilience in national security applications," wrote R Street cybersecurity fellow Haiman Wong in an analysis of the memorandum. 

The memorandum, issued last week, tasks the National Security Council and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) with reviewing national intelligence priorities to improve the identification and assessment of foreign intelligence threats targeting the US AI ecosystem, Wong noted. A group of agencies, including ODNI, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Justice, are responsible for identifying critical nodes in the AI supply chain that could be disrupted or compromised by foreign actors, ensuring that proactive and coordinated measures are in place to mitigate such risks.

The memorandum tasks the Department of Energy with launching a pilot project to evaluate the performance and efficiency of federated AI and data sources in order to refine AI capabilities that could improve cyber threat detection, response, and offensive operations against potential adversaries, Wong said. The Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, the National Security Agency, and the Department of Defense are tasked with publishing unclassified guidance on known AI cybersecurity vulnerabilities, threats, and best practices for avoiding, detecting, and mitigating these risks during AI model training and deployment, as well.

"Our competitors want to upend U.S. AI leadership and have employed economic and technological espionage in efforts to steal U.S. technology," the White House said in a statement. "This NSM makes collection on our competitors' operations against our AI sector a top-tier intelligence priority, and directs relevant U.S. Government entities to provide AI developers with the timely cybersecurity and counterintelligence information necessary to keep their inventions secure." 

These guidelines are an important step in making sure that AI is leveraged in safe, thoughtful ways for both industry and national security, stated Jeffrey Zampieron, distinguished software engineer at defense technology firm Raft, in an email to Dark Reading.

"Fundamentally, this is quality control," he said. "We want to ensure that AI behaves in a manner that is safe and efficacious for the application of interest. Guidelines provide creators with structured consistent ways to evaluate their work and provide consumers with confidence that the AI will work as intended."

The risks of unregulated AI technologies could be severe, he said. 

"Risks lead to hazards and hazards lead to harms," he said. "The primary risk is that we give AI control of some critical behavior and it acts in a way that causes harm: physical, property, financial. It's very application-specific. What's the risk of using AI to tell jokes? Not much. What's the risk of using AI to fire ordinance? Quite high."

**About the Author**

Jennifer Lawinski is a writer and editor with more than 20 years experience in media, covering a wide range of topics including business, news, culture, science, technology and cybersecurity. After earning a Master's degree in Journalism from Boston University, she started her career as a beat reporter for The Daily News of Newburyport. She has since written for a variety of publications including CNN, Fox News, Tech Target, CRN, CIO Insight, MSN News and Live Science. She lives in Brooklyn with her partner and two cats.

Tag

#intel