Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Tag

#php

GHSA-3c5g-73f7-grvm: Neos Information Disclosure Security Note

Due to reports it has been validated that internal workspaces in Neos are accessible without authentication. Some users assumed this is a planned feature but it is not. A workspace preview should be an additional feature with respective security measures in place. Note that this only allows reading of internal workspaces not writing. And for clarification, an internal workspace is a workspace that is non public and doesn't have an owner. Given that an internal workspace exists in your installation, it is possible to view a page in context of that workspace by opening a link in this format: https://domain/path/to/page.html@workspace-name The issue is quite problematic when exploited but at the same time slightly less impactful than it sounds. First of all there is no default internal workspace, so the issue affects only workspaces created by users. That also means the workspace-name, which will also always include a hash is individual to a project and an exploiter must get hold of t...

ghsa
#git#php#auth
GHSA-9cw3-j7wg-jwj8: Neos Flow Information disclosure in entity security

If you had used entity security and wanted to secure entities not just based on the user's role, but on some property of the user (like the company he belongs to), entity security did not work properly together with the doctrine query cache. This could lead to other users re-using SQL queries from the cache which were built for other users; and thus users could see entities which were not destined for them. ### Am I affected? - Do you use Entity Security? if no, you are not affected. - You disabled the Doctrine Cache (Flow_Persistence_Doctrine)? If this is the case, you are not affected. - You use Entity Security in custom Flow or Neos applications. Read on. - If you only used Entity Security based on roles (i.e. role A was allowed to see entities, but role B was denied): In this case, you are not affected. - If you did more advanced stuff using Entity Security (like checking that a customer only sees his own orders; or a hotel only sees its own bookings), you very likely needed ...

GHSA-5vv7-j593-mgjc: Neos Flow Arbitrary file upload and XML External Entity processing

It has been discovered that Flow 3.0.0 allows arbitrary file uploads, inlcuding server-side scripts, posing the risk of attacks. If those scripts are executed by the server when accessed through their public URL, anything not blocked through other means is possible (information disclosure, placement of backdoors, data removal, …). Note: The upload of files is only possible if the application built on Flow provides means to do so, and whether or not the upload of files poses a risk is dependent on the system setup. If uploaded script files are not executed by the server, there is no risk. In versions prior to 3.0.0 the upload of files with the extension php was blocked. In Flow 2.3.0 to 2.3.6 a potential XML External Entity processing vulnerability has been discovered in the MediaTypeConverter.

GHSA-4rr6-gf59-ggw5: namshi/jose - Verification bypass

Several widely-used JSON Web Token (JWT) libraries, including node-jsonwebtoken, pyjwt, namshi/jose, php-jwt, and jsjwt, are affected by critical vulnerabilities that could allow attackers to bypass the verification step when using asymmetric keys (RS256, RS384, RS512, ES256, ES384, ES512).

GHSA-cv25-3pxr-4q7x: Magento Open Source Security Advisory: Patch SUPEE-10975

Magento Commerce 1.14.4.0 and Open Source 1.9.4.0 have been enhanced with critical security updates to address multiple vulnerabilities, including remote code execution (RCE), cross-site scripting (XSS), cross-site request forgery (CSRF), and more. The following issues have been identified and remediated: - PRODSECBUG-1589: Stops Brute Force Requests via basic RSS authentication - MAG-23: M1 Credit Card Storage Capability - PRODSECBUG-2149: Authenticated RCE using customer import - PRODSECBUG-2159: API Based RCE Vulnerability - PRODSECBUG-2156: RCE Via Unauthorized Upload - PRODSECBUG-2155: Authenticated RCE using dataflow - PRODSECBUG-2053: Prevents XSS in Newsletter Template - PRODSECBUG-2142: XSS in CMS Preview - PRODSECBUG-1860: Admin Account XSS Attack Cessation via Filename - PRODSECBUG-2119: EE Patch to include names in templates - PRODSECBUG-2129: XSS in Google Analytics Vulnerability - PRODSECBUG-2019: Merchant Wishlist Security Strengthening - PRODSECBUG-2104: Send to a Frie...

GHSA-prpf-cj87-hwvr: Magento Patch SUPEE-10752 - Multiple security enhancements vulnerabilities

Magento Commerce 1.14.3.9 and Open Source 1.9.3.9 bring essential security enhancements with Patch SUPEE-10752. These updates address various vulnerabilities, including authenticated Admin user remote code execution (RCE), cross-site request forgery (CSRF), and more. Key Security Improvements: - APPSEC-2001: Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) using custom layout XML - APPSEC-2015: Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) through the Create New Order feature (Commerce only) - APPSEC-2042: PHP Object Injection and RCE in the Magento admin panel (Commerce Target Rule module) - APPSEC-2029: PHP Object Injection and Remote Code Execution (RCE) in the Admin panel (Commerce) - APPSEC-2007: Authenticated SQL Injection when saving a category - APPSEC-2027: CSRF is possible against Web sites, Stores, and Store Views - APPSEC-1882: The cron.php file can leak database credentials - APPSEC-2006: Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) through the Enterprise Logging extension - APPSEC-2005: Pers...

GHSA-wq8p-mqvg-2p5h: laravel framework SQL Injection via limit and offset functions

### Impact Those using SQL Server with Laravel and allowing user input to be passed directly to the limit and offset functions are vulnerable to SQL injection. Other database drivers such as MySQL and Postgres are not affected by this vulnerability. ### Patches This problem has been patched on Laravel versions 6.20.26, 7.30.5, and 8.40.0. ### Workarounds You may workaround this vulnerability by ensuring that only integers are passed to the limit and offset functions, as well as the skip and take functions.

GHSA-jwvj-pwww-3mj5: laravel framework Unexpected database bindings via requests

This is a follow-up to the security advisory https://github.com/laravel/framework/security/advisories/GHSA-3p32-j457-pg5x which addresses a few additional edge cases. If a request is crafted where a field that is normally a non-array value is an array, and that input is not validated or cast to its expected type before being passed to the query builder, an unexpected number of query bindings can be added to the query. In some situations, this will simply lead to no results being returned by the query builder; however, it is possible certain queries could be affected in a way that causes the query to return unexpected results.

GHSA-44pg-c29v-hp6r: Laravel Guard bypass in Eloquent models

In laravel releases before 6.18.34 and 7.23.2. It was possible to mass assign Eloquent attributes that included the model's table name: ``` $model->fill(['users.name' => 'Taylor']); ``` When doing so, Eloquent would remove the table name from the attribute for you. This was a "convenience" feature of Eloquent and was not documented. However, when paired with validation, this can lead to unexpected and unvalidated values being saved to the database. For this reason, we have removed the automatic stripping of table names from mass-asignment operations so that the attributes go through the typical "fillable" / "guarded" logic. Any attributes containing table names that are not explicitly declared as fillable will be discarded. This security release will be a breaking change for applications that were relying on the undocumented table name stripping during mass assignment. Since this feature was relatively unknown and undocumented, we expect the vast majority of Laravel applications to b...

GHSA-7852-w36x-6mf6: Laravel Encrypter Component Potential Decryption Failure Leading to Unintended Behavior

The Laravel Encrypter component is susceptible to a vulnerability that may result in decryption failure, leading to an unexpected return of `false`. Exploiting this issue requires the attacker to manipulate the encrypted payload before decryption. When combined with weak type comparisons in the application's code, such as the example below: ``` <?php $decyptedValue = decrypt($secret); if ($decryptedValue == '') { // Code is run even though decrypted value is false... } ```