Tag
#java
Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-1490-03 - An update for firefox is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Telecommunications Update Service, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions. Issues addressed include integer overflow, out of bounds write, and use-after-free vulnerabilities.
LimeSurvey Community version 5.3.32 suffers from a persistent cross site scripting vulnerability.
Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-1489-03 - An update for firefox is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support. Issues addressed include integer overflow, out of bounds write, and use-after-free vulnerabilities.
Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-1488-03 - An update for firefox is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support. Issues addressed include integer overflow, out of bounds write, and use-after-free vulnerabilities.
Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-1487-03 - An update for firefox is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Extended Update Support. Issues addressed include integer overflow, out of bounds write, and use-after-free vulnerabilities.
Mozilla released an update of Firefox to fix two critical security vulnerabilities that together allowed an attacker to escape the sandbox.
By Uzair Amir With the increasing popularity of Apache Kafka as a distributed streaming platform, ensuring its high availability has become… This is a post from HackRead.com Read the original post: Best Practices for Kafka Management to Ensure High Availability
### Summary The `email` field in phpMyFAQ's user control panel page is vulnerable to stored XSS attacks due to the inadequacy of PHP's `FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL` function, which only validates the email format, not its content. This vulnerability enables an attacker to execute arbitrary client-side JavaScript within the context of another user's phpMyFAQ session. ### Details Despite using PHP's `FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL` function, the email field does not adequately validate the content of the email address. This means that malicious input, such as JavaScript code, can be accepted and stored in the database without being detected. When the stored data is retrieved and displayed on web pages, it is not properly sanitized to remove or neutralize any potentially harmful content, such as JavaScript code which leads to Stored XSS. ### PoC 1. Login as any user, go to the user control panel, change email to any valid email and intercept the request. 2. Modify the request’s email parameter to t...
### Summary By manipulating the news parameter in a POST request, an attacker can inject malicious JavaScript code. Upon browsing to the compromised news page, the XSS payload triggers. ### PoC 1. Edit a FAQ news, intercept the request and modify the `news` parameter in the POST body with the following payload: `%3cscript%3ealert('xssContent')%3c%2fscript%3e` 2. Browse to the particular news page and the XSS should pop up. ![image](https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/assets/63487456/01312703-c54c-4ee6-9f2c-0dd1bf1b23cf) ### Impact This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary client side JavaScript within the context of another user's phpMyFAQ session
### Summary An attacker with admin privileges can upload an attachment containing JS code without extension and the application will render it as HTML which allows for XSS attacks. ### Details When attachments are uploaded without an extension, the application renders it as HTML by default. Therefore allowing attackers to upload .html files containing javascript code to perform XSS attacks. The direct file path to the uploaded attachment is also easily obtainable as it is made up of substrings of the file's MD5 hashes. ### PoC 1. Admin users can upload attachments containing XSS payloads in files without extensions to bypass the .html extension check. ![image](https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/assets/63487456/5c3c4222-550e-44c7-95ee-fd85562fffd5) 2. Since the path of the uploaded file is built entirely on the file’s MD5 hash and the attachment directory, it is possible for an attacker to know the direct path of the uploaded file. E.g file MD5 hash: 38fff51cb7248a06d6142c6bdf84...