Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Tag

#mac

Gentoo Linux Security Advisory 202401-03

Gentoo Linux Security Advisory 202401-3 - Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Bluez, the worst of which can lead to privilege escalation. Versions greater than or equal to 5.70-r1 are affected.

Packet Storm
#vulnerability#web#mac#linux#dos#auth
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory 202401-02

Gentoo Linux Security Advisory 202401-2 - Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in c-ares, the worst of which could result in the loss of confidentiality or integrity. Versions greater than or equal to 1.19.0 are affected.

Orange Spain Faces BGP Traffic Hijack After RIPE Account Hacked by Malware

Mobile network operator Orange Spain suffered an internet outage for several hours on January 3 after a threat actor used administrator credentials captured by means of stealer malware to hijack the border gateway protocol (BGP) traffic. "The Orange account in the IP network coordination center (RIPE) has suffered improper access that has affected the browsing of some of our customers," the

Alert: Ivanti Releases Patch for Critical Vulnerability in Endpoint Manager Solution

Ivanti has released security updates to address a critical flaw impacting its Endpoint Manager (EPM) solution that, if successfully exploited, could result in remote code execution (RCE) on susceptible servers. Tracked as CVE-2023-39336, the vulnerability has been rated 9.6 out of 10 on the CVSS scoring system. The shortcoming impacts EPM 2021 and EPM 2022 prior to SU5. “If exploited, an

New Bandook RAT Variant Resurfaces, Targeting Windows Machines

A new variant of remote access trojan called Bandook has been observed being propagated via phishing attacks with an aim to infiltrate Windows machines, underscoring the continuous evolution of the malware. Fortinet FortiGuard Labs, which identified the activity in October 2023, said the malware is distributed via a PDF file that embeds a link to a password-protected .7z archive. “

Ubuntu Security Notice USN-6565-1

Ubuntu Security Notice 6565-1 - It was discovered that OpenSSH incorrectly handled supplemental groups when running helper programs for AuthorizedKeysCommand and AuthorizedPrincipalsCommand as a different user. An attacker could possibly use this issue to escalate privileges. This issue only affected Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. It was discovered that OpenSSH incorrectly added destination constraints when PKCS#11 token keys were added to ssh-agent, contrary to expectations. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 23.04.

Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-0033-03

Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-0033-03 - An update for redhat-release-virtualization-host and redhat-virtualization-host is now available for Red Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.

GHSA-5g66-628f-7cvj: Omniauth::MicrosoftGraph Account takeover (nOAuth)

### Summary The implementation did not validate the legitimacy of the `email` attribute of the user nor did it give/document an option to do so, making it susceptible to [nOAuth](https://www.descope.com/blog/post/noauth) misconfiguration in cases when the `email` is used as a trusted user identifier

GHSA-vfxf-76hv-v4w4: User-provided environment values allow execution on macOS agents

### Impact Agents running on macOS could be susceptible to unexpected code execution through user supplied environment variables. ### Patches Fixed in versions 14.2.4, 13.4.13 and 12.4.31. ### References * Fix PR: https://github.com/gravitational/teleport/pull/36132

GHSA-qc6v-g3xw-grmx: Authenticated users can crash the CubeFS servers with maliciously crafted requests

A security vulnerability was found in CubeFS HandlerNode that could allow authenticated users to send maliciously-crafted requests that would crash the ObjectNode and deny other users from using it. The root cause was improper handling of incoming HTTP requests that could allow an attacker to control the ammount of memory that the ObjectNode would allocate. A malicious request could make the ObjectNode allocate more memory that the machine had available, and the attacker could exhaust memory by way of a single malicious request. An attacker would need to be authenticated in order to invoke the vulnerable code with their malicious request and have permissions to delete objects. In addition, the attacker would need to know the names of existing buckets of the CubeFS deployment - otherwise the request would be rejected before it reached the vulnerable code. As such, the most likely attacker is an inside user or an attacker that has breached the account of an existing user in the cluster....