#vulnerability

This bug bypassed the validation of TSL certificates on all none web HTTP clients in the `serverpod_client` package. Making them susceptible to a man in the middle attack against encrypted traffic between the client device and the server. An attacker would need to be able to intercept the traffic and highjack the connection to the server for this vulnerability to be used. ### Impact All versions of `serverpod_client` pre `1.2.6` ### Patches Upgrading to version `1.2.6` resolves this issue.

### Summary Using `Pickup: Local stock only` as a click-and-collect points could cause a leak of customer addresses ### Details When using `Pickup: Local stock only` click-and-collect as a delivery method in specific conditions the customer could overwrite the warehouse address with its own, which exposes its address as click-and-collect address. ### Impact The vulnerability can cause the leak of customer's address when using click-and-collect delivery option marked as `Local stock only`. It has impact on all orders with click-and-collect delivery method marked as `Pickup:Local stock only` The affected versions: `>=3.14.56 <3.14.61`, `>=3.15.31 <3.15.37`, `>=3.16.27 <3.16.34`, `>=3.17.25 <3.17.32`, `>=3.18.19 <3.18.28`, `>=3.19.5 <3.19.15` This issue has been patched in versions: `3.14.61`, `3.15.37`, `3.16.34`, `3.17.32`, `3.18.28`, `3.19.15` ### Workaround We strongly recommend upgrading to the latest versions, in case of inability to upgrade straight away, possible workarounds a...

### Impact Users of [IPsec transparent encryption](https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/security/network/encryption-ipsec/) in Cilium may be vulnerable to cryptographic attacks that render the transparent encryption ineffective. In particular, Cilium is vulnerable to the following attacks by a man-in-the-middle attacker: - Chosen plaintext attacks - Key recovery attacks - Replay attacks These attacks are possible due to an ESP sequence number collision when multiple nodes are configured with the same key. Fixed versions of Cilium use unique keys for each IPsec tunnel established between nodes, resolving all of the above attacks. **Important:** After upgrading, users must perform a key rotation using the instructions [here](https://docs.cilium.io/en/latest/security/network/encryption-ipsec/#key-rotation) to ensure that they are no longer vulnerable to this issue. Please note that the key rotation instructions have recently been updated, and users must use the new instructions to proper...

By Deeba Ahmed Critical Microsoft SharePoint Flaw Exploited: Patch Now, CISA Urges! This is a post from HackRead.com Read the original post: CISA Urges Patching Microsoft SharePoint Vulnerability (CVE-2023-24955)

### Impact ZITADEL users can upload their own avatar image and various image types are allowed. Due to a missing check, an attacker could upload HTML and pretend it is an image to gain access to the victim's account in certain scenarios. A possible victim would need to directly open the supposed image in the browser, where a session in ZITADEL needs to be active for this exploit to work. The exploit could only be reproduced if the victim was using Firefox. Chrome, Safari as well as Edge did not execute the code. ### Patches 2.x versions are fixed on >= [2.48.3](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.48.3) 2.47.x versions are fixed on >= [2.47.8](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.47.8) 2.46.x versions are fixed on >= [2.46.5](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.46.5) 2.45.x versions are fixed on >= [2.45.5](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.45.5) 2.44.x versions are fixed on >= [2.44.7](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/...

### Impact Under certain circumstances an action could set [reserved claims](https://zitadel.com/docs/apis/openidoauth/claims#reserved-claims) managed by ZITADEL. For example it would be possible to set the claim `urn:zitadel:iam:user:resourceowner:name` ```json {"urn:zitadel:iam:user:resourceowner:name": "ACME"} ``` if it was not set by ZITADEL itself. To compensate for this we introduced a protection that does prevent actions from changing claims that start with `urn:zitadel:iam` ### Patches 2.x versions are fixed on >= [2.48.3](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.48.3) 2.47.x versions are fixed on >= [2.47.8](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.47.8) 2.46.x versions are fixed on >= [2.46.5](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.46.5) 2.45.x versions are fixed on >= [2.45.5](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.45.5) 2.44.x versions are fixed on >= [2.44.7](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.44.7) 2.43.x ve...

By Waqas Are you a Python developer? Here's what you need to know! This is a post from HackRead.com Read the original post: PyPI Suspends New Projects and Users Due to Malicious Packages

Ubuntu Security Notice 6715-1 - It was discovered that unixODBC incorrectly handled certain bytes. An attacker could use this issue to execute arbitrary code or cause a crash.

Ubuntu Security Notice 6719-1 - Skyler Ferrante discovered that the util-linux wall command did not filter escape sequences from command line arguments. A local attacker could possibly use this issue to obtain sensitive information.

Event Management version 1.0 suffers from a remote SQL injection vulnerability.