GHSA-269q-hmxg-m83q: Local Information Disclosure Vulnerability in io.netty:netty-codec-http

Red Hat AMQ Streams 2.5.0 is now available from the Red Hat Customer Portal. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original. Related CVEs: * CVE-2021-37136: A flaw was found in Netty's netty-codec due to size restrictions for decompressed data in the Bzip2Decoder. By sending a specially-crafted input, a remote attacker could cause a denial of service. * CVE-2021-37137: A flaw was found in the Netty's netty-codec due to unrestricted chunk lengths in the SnappyFrameDecoder. By sending a speciall...

Red Hat AMQ Streams 2.4.0 is now available from the Red Hat Customer Portal. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original. Related CVEs: * CVE-2020-36518: A flaw was found in the Jackson Databind package. This cause of the issue is due to a Java StackOverflow exception and a denial of service via a significant depth of nested objects. * CVE-2021-0341: In verifyHostName of OkHostnameVerifier.java, there is a possible way to accept a certificate for the wrong domain due to improperly used cryp...

Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: Hotspot). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u361, 8u361-perf, 11.0.18, 17.0.6; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 20.3.9, 21.3.5 and 22.3.1. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability can also be exploited by using APIs in the specified Component, e.g., through...

Vulnerability in the Oracle Demantra Demand Management product of Oracle Supply Chain (component: E-Business Collections). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1 and 12.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Demantra Demand Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Demantra Demand Management accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N).

A vulnerability was found in pig-vector and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is the function LogisticRegression of the file src/main/java/org/apache/mahout/pig/LogisticRegression.java. The manipulation leads to insecure temporary file. The attack needs to be approached locally. The name of the patch is 1e7bd9fab5401a2df18d2eabd802adcf0dcf1f15. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216500.

Red Hat Security Advisory 2022-8652-01 - This release of Red Hat Fuse 7.11.1 serves as a replacement for Red Hat Fuse 7.11 and includes bug fixes and enhancements, which are documented in the Release Notes document linked in the References. Issues addressed include bypass, cross site scripting, denial of service, remote SQL injection, and traversal vulnerabilities.

A minor version update (from 7.11 to 7.11.1) is now available for Red Hat Fuse. The purpose of this text-only errata is to inform you about the security issues fixed in this release. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original. Related CVEs: * CVE-2019-8331: bootstrap: XSS in the tooltip or popover data-template attribute * CVE-2021-3717: wildfly: incorrect JBOSS_LOCAL_USER challenge location may lead to giving access to all the local users * CVE-2021-31684: json-smart: Denial of Service in...

An update for Red Hat Data Grid 8 is now available. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original. Related CVEs: * CVE-2022-0235: node-fetch: exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor * CVE-2022-23647: prismjs: improperly escaped output allows a XSS * CVE-2022-24823: netty: world readable temporary file containing sensitive data * CVE-2022-25857: snakeyaml: Denial of Service due to missing nested depth limitation for collections * CVE-2022-38749: snakeyaml: Uncaught exception...

A vulnerability has been found in ManyDesigns Portofino 5.3.2 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function createTempDir of the file WarFileLauncher.java. The manipulation leads to creation of temporary file in directory with insecure permissions. Upgrading to version 5.3.3 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is 94653cb357806c9cf24d8d294e6afea33f8f0775. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The identifier VDB-213457 was assigned to this vulnerability.

Vulnerability in the Oracle Web Applications Desktop Integrator product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Upload). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.11. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Web Applications Desktop Integrator. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Web Applications Desktop Integrator. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Red Hat Security Advisory 2022-6916-01 - AMQ Broker is a high-performance messaging implementation based on ActiveMQ Artemis. It uses an asynchronous journal for fast message persistence, and supports multiple languages, protocols, and platforms. This release of Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.10.1 includes security and bug fixes, and enhancements. For further information, refer to the release notes linked to in the References section. Issues addressed include a html injection vulnerability.

Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.10.1 is now available from the Red Hat Customer Portal. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original. Related CVEs: * CVE-2021-3121: gogo/protobuf: plugin/unmarshal/unmarshal.go lacks certain index validation * CVE-2022-24823: netty: world readable temporary file containing sensitive data * CVE-2022-33980: apache-commons-configuration: Apache Commons Configuration insecure interpolation defaults * CVE-2022-35278: activemq-artemis: AMQ Broker web console HTML Injection

Red Hat Security Advisory 2022-6819-01 - Red Hat AMQ Streams, based on the Apache Kafka project, offers a distributed backbone that allows microservices and other applications to share data with extremely high throughput and extremely low latency. This release of Red Hat AMQ Streams 2.2.0 serves as a replacement for Red Hat AMQ Streams 2.1.0, and includes security and bug fixes, and enhancements. Issues addressed include denial of service and deserialization vulnerabilities.

Red Hat AMQ Streams 2.2.0 is now available from the Red Hat Customer Portal. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original. Related CVEs: * CVE-2020-36518: jackson-databind: denial of service via a large depth of nested objects * CVE-2022-24823: netty: world readable temporary file containing sensitive data * CVE-2022-25647: com.google.code.gson-gson: Deserialization of Untrusted Data in com.google.code.gson-gson * CVE-2022-34917: Kafka: Unauthenticated clients may cause OutOfMemoryError on b...

Dell Wyse Management Suite 3.6.1 and below contains a Sensitive Data Exposure vulnerability. A low privileged malicious user could potentially exploit this vulnerability in order to obtain credentials. The attacker may be able to use the exposed credentials to access the target device and perform unauthorized actions.

Red Hat Security Advisory 2022-5928-01 - Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7 is a platform for Java applications based on the WildFly application runtime. This release of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.6 serves as a replacement for Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.5, and includes bug fixes and enhancements. Issues addressed include a deserialization vulnerability.

A security update is now available for Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Moderate. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original. Related CVEs: * CVE-2021-44906: minimist: prototype pollution * CVE-2022-24823: netty: world readable temporary file containing sensitive data * CVE-2022-25647: com.google.code.gson-gson: Deserialization of Untrusted Data in com.google.code.gson-gson

Red Hat Security Advisory 2022-5892-01 - Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7 is a platform for Java applications based on the WildFly application runtime. This release of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.6 serves as a replacement for Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.5, and includes bug fixes and enhancements. See the Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.6 Release Notes for information about the most significant bug fixes and enhancements included in this release. Issues addressed include a deserialization vulnerability.

Red Hat Security Advisory 2022-5893-01 - Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7 is a platform for Java applications based on the WildFly application runtime. This release of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.6 serves as a replacement for Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.5, and includes bug fixes and enhancements. See the Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.6 Release Notes for information about the most significant bug fixes and enhancements included in this release. Issues addressed include a deserialization vulnerability.

Red Hat Security Advisory 2022-5894-01 - Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7 is a platform for Java applications based on the WildFly application runtime. This release of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.6 is a first release for Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9, and includes bug fixes and enhancements. See the Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.6 Release Notes for information about the most significant bug fixes and enhancements included in this release. Issues addressed include a deserialization vulnerability.

Vulnerability in the Oracle Banking Trade Finance product of Oracle Financial Services Applications (component: Infrastructure). The supported version that is affected is 14.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Banking Trade Finance. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Banking Trade Finance accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Banking Trade Finance accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**What type of information could be disclosed by this vulnerability?** The type of information that could be disclosed if an attacker successfully exploited this vulnerability is unauthorized file system access - reading from the file system.

**What type of information could be disclosed by this vulnerability?** The type of information that could be disclosed if an attacker successfully exploited this vulnerability is the contents of Kernel memory. An attacker could read the contents of Kernel memory from a user mode process.

**What type of information could be disclosed by this vulnerability?** The type of information that could be disclosed if an attacker successfully exploited this vulnerability is the contents of Kernel memory. An attacker could read the contents of Kernel memory from a user mode process.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack vector is local (AV:L). Why does the CVE title indicate that this is a remote code execution?** The word **Remote** in the title refers to the location of the attacker. This type of exploit is sometimes referred to as Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE). The attack itself is carried out locally. For example, when the score indicates that the **Attack Vector** is **Local** and **User Interaction** is **Required**, this could describe an exploit in which an attacker, through social engineering, convinces a victim to download and open a specially crafted file from a website which leads to a local attack on their computer.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to prepare the target environment to improve exploit reliability.

Mitigation refers to a setting, common configuration, or general best-practice, existing in a default state, that could reduce the severity of exploitation of a vulnerability. The following mitigating factors might be helpful in your situation: This vulnerability is not exploitable in NFSV4.1. Prior to updating your version of Windows that protects against this vulnerability, you can mitigate an attack by disabling NFSV2 and NFSV3. This may adversely affect your ecosystem and should only be used as a temporary mitigation. The following PowerShell command will disable those versions: PS C:\Set-NfsServerConfiguration -EnableNFSV2 $false -EnableNFSV3 $false After this, you will need to restart NFS server or reboot the machine. To restart NFS server, start a **cmd** window with **Run as Administrator**, enter the following commands: * **nfsadmin server stop** * **nfsadmin server start** To confirm that NFSv2 and NFSv3 have been turned off, run the following command in a Powershe...

**What type of information could be disclosed by this vulnerability?** The type of information that could be disclosed if an attacker successfully exploited this vulnerability is the contents of Kernel memory. An attacker could read the contents of Kernel memory from a user mode process.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**What type of information could be disclosed by this vulnerability?** The presence of specific file names and users can be confirmed over the internal network.

**How could an attacker exploit this vulnerability?** There are multiple ways an attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by either convincing a user to open a specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to visit a webpage that contains specially crafted embedded OpenType fonts. The resulting Remote Code Execution would be within the context of the authenticated local user.

**What type of information could be disclosed by this vulnerability?** Exploiting this vulnerability could allow the disclosure of certain kernel memory content.

**According to the CVSS metric, user interaction is required (UI:R). What interaction would the user have to do?** Exploitation of the vulnerability requires that a user open a specially crafted file. * In an email attack scenario, an attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending the specially crafted file to the user and convincing the user to open the file. * In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a website (or leverage a compromised website that accepts or hosts user-provided content) containing a specially crafted file designed to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker would have no way to force users to visit the website. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to click a link, typically by way of an enticement in an email or instant message, and then convince them to open the specially crafted file.

**What type of information could be disclosed by this vulnerability?** The type of information that could be disclosed if an attacker successfully exploited this vulnerability is the contents of Kernel memory. An attacker could read the contents of Kernel memory from a user mode process.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**According to the CVSS metric, user interaction is required (UI:R). What interaction would the user have to do?** The user would have to click on a specially crafted URL to be compromised by the attacker.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack vector is adjacent (AV:A). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** This vulnerability's attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This means it cannot simply be done across the internet, but instead needs something specific tied to the target. Good examples would include the same shared physical network (such as Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11), logical network (local IP subnet), or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). This is common to many attacks that require man-in-the-middle type setups or that rely on initially gaining a foothold in another environment.

**According to the CVSS metric, a successful exploitation could lead to a scope change (S:C). What does this mean for this vulnerability?** In this case, a successful attack could be performed from a low privilege AppContainer. The attacker could elevate their privileges and execute code or access resources at a higher integrity level than that of the AppContainer execution environment.

**According to the CVSS metric, user interaction is required (UI:R). What interaction would the user have to do?** Exploitation of the vulnerability requires that a user open a specially crafted file. * In an email attack scenario, an attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending the specially crafted file to the user and convincing the user to open the file. * In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a website (or leverage a compromised website that accepts or hosts user-provided content) containing a specially crafted file designed to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker would have no way to force users to visit the website. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to click a link, typically by way of an enticement in an email or instant message, and then convince them to open the specially crafted file.

**What type of information could be disclosed by this vulnerability?** The type of information that could be disclosed if an attacker successfully exploited this vulnerability is memory layout - the vulnerability allows an attacker to collect information that facilitates predicting addressing of the memory.

**How could an attacker exploit this vulnerability?** An unauthenticated attacker could call a method on the LSARPC interface and coerce the domain controller to authenticate to the attacker using NTLM. This security update detects anonymous connection attempts in LSARPC and disallows it. **Is there more information available on how to protect my system?** Yes. Please see ADV210003 Mitigating NTLM Relay Attacks on Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS). **Are there further actions I need to take to protect my system after I have applied the security update?** Yes. Please see KB5005413 for more information on the steps that you need to take to protect your system. Please note that the combined CVSS score would be 9.8 when this vulnerability is chained with the noted NTLM Relay Attacks on Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS). **Should I prioritize updating domain controllers when I apply the security updates released on May 10, 2022?** Yes. This vulnerability affect...

**What type of information could be disclosed by this vulnerability?** The type of information that could be disclosed if an attacker successfully exploited this vulnerability is the contents of Kernel memory. An attacker could read the contents of Kernel memory from a user mode process.

**According to the CVSS metric, user interaction is required (UI:R). What interaction would the user have to do?** Exploitation of the vulnerability requires that a user open a specially crafted file. * In an email attack scenario, an attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending the specially crafted file to the user and convincing the user to open the file. * In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a website (or leverage a compromised website that accepts or hosts user-provided content) containing a specially crafted file designed to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker would have no way to force users to visit the website. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to click a link, typically by way of an enticement in an email or instant message, and then convince them to open the specially crafted file.

**According to the CVSS metric, privileges required is low (PR:L). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** The attacker must be authenticated and possess the permissions for page creation to be able to exploit this vulnerability.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack vector is adjacent (AV:A). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** This vulnerability's attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This means it cannot simply be done across the internet, but instead needs something specific tied to the target. Good examples would include the same shared physical network (such as Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11), logical network (local IP subnet), or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone). This is common to many attacks that require man-in-the-middle type setups or that rely on initially gaining a foothold in another environment.

**How could an attacker exploit the vulnerability?** To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to trick a user into executing a specially crafted script which executes an RPC call to an RPC host. This could result in remote code execution on the server side with the same permissions as the RPC service.

**How would an attacker exploit this vulnerability?** An attacker would have to convince a targeted user to connect to a malicious RDP server. Upon connecting, the malicious server could execute code on the victim's system in the context of the targeted user.

**What kind of security feature could be bypassed by exploiting this vulnerability?** This Hyper-V vulnerability relates to a Virtual Machine Switch with virtual networking in Hyper-V Network Virtualization (HNV). It might be possible to bypass extended ACLs and other Windows security feature checks. See Create Security Policies with Extended Port Access Control Lists for information about extended ACLs.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**According to the CVSS metric, a successful exploitation could lead to a scope change (S:C). What does this mean for this vulnerability?** In this case, a successful attack could be performed from a low privilege AppContainer. The attacker could elevate their privileges and execute code or access resources at a higher integrity level than that of the AppContainer execution environment.

**What type of information could be disclosed by this vulnerability?** The type of information that could be disclosed if an attacker successfully exploited this vulnerability is the contents of Kernel memory. An attacker could read the contents of Kernel memory from a user mode process.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**How could an attacker exploit this vulnerability?** An authenticated user could manipulate attributes on computer accounts they own or manage, and acquire a certificate from Active Directory Certificate Services that would allow elevation of privilege.

**According to the CVSS metric, user interaction is required (UI:R). What interaction would the user have to do?** Exploitation of the vulnerability requires that a user import a specially crafted contact record and sends it a FAX.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**Are there any special conditions necessary for this vulnerability to be exploitable?** Yes. This vulnerability is only exploitable if the MaxReceiveBuffer LDAP policy is set to a value higher than the default value. Systems with the default value of this policy would not be vulnerable. For more information, please see LDAP policies.

**How could an attacker exploit this vulnerability?** An authenticated attacker could send a specially crafted request to a vulnerable LDAP server. Successful exploitation could result in the attacker's code running in the context of the SYSTEM account.

**How could an attacker exploit this vulnerability?** This vulnerability could be exploited over the network by an authenticated normal user through a low complexity attack on a server configured as the domain controller.

**How could an attacker exploit this vulnerability?** An authenticated attacker could send a specially crafted request to a vulnerable LDAP server. Successful exploitation could result in the attacker's code running in the context of the SYSTEM account.

**How could an attacker exploit this vulnerability?** This vulnerability could be exploited over the network by an authenticated normal user through a low complexity attack on a server configured as the domain controller.

**How could an attacker exploit this vulnerability?** This vulnerability could be exploited over the network by an authenticated normal user through a low complexity attack on a server configured as the domain controller.

**How could an attacker exploit this vulnerability?** An authenticated attacker could send a specially crafted request to a vulnerable LDAP server. Successful exploitation could result in the attacker's code running in the context of the SYSTEM account.

**How could an attacker exploit this vulnerability?** An authenticated attacker could send a specially crafted request to a vulnerable LDAP server. Successful exploitation could result in the attacker's code running in the context of the SYSTEM account.

**Are there any special conditions necessary for this vulnerability to be exploitable?** Yes. This vulnerability is only exploitable if the MaxReceiveBuffer LDAP policy is set to a value higher than the default value. Systems with the default value of this policy would not be vulnerable. For more information, please see LDAP policies.

**How could an attacker exploit this vulnerability?** An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by convincing a user to connect a Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) client to a malicious LDAP server. When the vulnerability is successfully exploited this could allow the malicious server to gain remote code execution within the LDAP client.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**What type of information could be disclosed by this vulnerability?** The type of information that could be disclosed if an attacker successfully exploited this vulnerability is unauthorized file system access - reading from the file system.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

**According to the CVSS metric, the attack complexity is high (AC:H). What does that mean for this vulnerability?** Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition.

 **Do I need to take further steps to be protected from this vulnerability?** Because of additional security hardening work for CVE-2022-21978, the following actions should be taken in addition to application of May 2022 security updates: For customers that have Exchange Server 2016 CU22 or CU23, or Exchange Server 2019 CU11 or CU12 installed Install the May 2022 SU first and then run one of the following commands using Setup.exe in your Exchange Server installation path (e.g., …\\Program Files\\Microsoft\\Exchange Server\\v15\\Bin): * Setup.exe /IAcceptExchangeServerLicenseTerms_DiagnosticDataON /PrepareAllDomains * Setup.exe /IAcceptExchangeServerLicenseTerms_DiagnosticDataOFF /PrepareAllDomains For customers that have Exchange Server 2013 CU23 installed: Install the May 2022 SU first and then run the following command using Setup.exe in your Exchange Server installation path (e.g., …\\Program Files\\Microsoft\\Exchange Server\\v15\\Bin): * Setup.exe /IAcceptEx...

1Password for Mac 7.2.4 through 7.9.x before 7.9.3 is vulnerable to a process validation bypass. Malicious software running on the same computer can exfiltrate secrets from 1Password provided that 1Password is running and is unlocked. Affected secrets include vault items and derived values used for signing in to 1Password.

Craft CMS through 3.7.36 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker, who knows at least one valid username, to reset the account's password and take over the account by providing a crafted HTTP header to the application while using the password reset functionality. Specifically, the attacker must send X-Forwarded-Host to the /index.php?p=admin/actions/users/send-password-reset-email URI. NOTE: the vendor's position is that a customer can already work around this by adjusting the configuration (i.e., by not using the default configuration).

An argument injection vulnerability in the browser-based authentication component of the Magnitude Simba Amazon Redshift JDBC Driver 1.2.40 through 1.2.55 may allow a local user to execute code. NOTE: this is different from CVE-2022-29972.

Explore CMS v1.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via a /page.php?id= request.

Summary Microsoft recently mitigated a vulnerability in Azure Data Factory and Azure Synapse pipelines. The vulnerability was specific to the third-party Open Database Connectivity (ODBC) driver used to connect to Amazon Redshift in Azure Synapse pipelines and Azure Data Factory Integration Runtime (IR) and did not impact Azure Synapse as a whole. The vulnerability could … Vulnerability mitigated in the third-party Data Connector used in Azure Synapse pipelines and Azure Data Factory (CVE-2022-29972) Read More »

pyscriptjs (aka PyScript Demonstrator) in PyScript through 2022-05-04 allows a remote user to read Python source code.

**Is the CVSS vector different as it relates to the Microsoft services that the vulnerability affects?** The vulnerability in the Redshift driver referenced in the CVE impacts Microsoft services listed in the affected software table. The environmental score as it relates to affected Microsoft services can be different than the score assigned by the owner of the CVE. The base environmental score that Micrososft has assigned is 8.2. Environmental Vector Element Value Comment Modified Attack Vector Network Modified Attack Complexity Low Modified Privileges Required High Modified User Interaction None Modified Scope Changed The vulnerability in the redshift driver impacts the services listed in the affected software. Modified Confidentiality High Modified Integrity High Modified Availability High **Are there any special roles that enable exploitation of this vulnerability?** Exploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to have at least one of the following role...

Netty is an open-source, asynchronous event-driven network application framework. The package `io.netty:netty-codec-http` prior to version 4.1.77.Final contains an insufficient fix for CVE-2021-21290. When Netty's multipart decoders are used local information disclosure can occur via the local system temporary directory if temporary storing uploads on the disk is enabled. This only impacts applications running on Java version 6 and lower. Additionally, this vulnerability impacts code running on Unix-like systems, and very old versions of Mac OSX and Windows as they all share the system temporary directory between all users. Version 4.1.77.Final contains a patch for this vulnerability. As a workaround, specify one's own `java.io.tmpdir` when starting the JVM or use DefaultHttpDataFactory.setBaseDir(...) to set the directory to something that is only readable by the current user.