Botble version 5.28.3 has been reported as having a default backdoor account.

    ====================================================================================================================================| # Title     : Botble 5.28.3 Backdoor Account Vulnerability                                                                       || # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          || # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro) / browser : Mozilla firefox 103.0(64-bit)                                              | | # Vendor    : hhttps://codecanyon.net/item/botble-cms-php-platform-based-on-laravel-framework/16928182                           |  | # Dork      : "Botble Technologies. All right reserved."                                                                         |====================================================================================================================================poc :[+] Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine.[+] Use Payload : user=botble  & pass=159357 [+] https://cms.botble.com/admin/loginGreetings to :=========================================================================================================================                                                                                                                                      |jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* hyp3rlinx* 9aylas * shadow_00715 * LiquidWorm* moncet                                     |                                                                                                                                              |=======================================================================================================================================

Botble 5.28.3 Backdoor Account

Active Ecommerce CMS version 6.4.0 has been reported as having a default backdoor account.

    ====================================================================================================================================| # Title     : Active ecommerce cms v6.4.0 Backdoor Account Vulnerability                                                         || # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          || # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro) / browser : Mozilla firefox 108.0(64-bit)                                              | | # Vendor    : https://codecanyon.net/item/active-ecommerce-cms/23471405?s_rank=24                                                |  | # Dork      : "category/beauty-health-hair"                                                                                      |====================================================================================================================================poc :[+] Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine.[+] Use Payload : user=admin@example.com  & pass=123456 [+] https://www.sbeshopping.com/loginGreetings to :=========================================================================================================================                                                                                                                                      |jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* hyp3rlinx* 9aylas * shadow_00715 * LiquidWorm* moncet                                     |                                                                                                                                              |=======================================================================================================================================

Active Ecommerce CMS 6.4.0 Backdoor Account

A variety of initiatives — such as memory-safe languages and software bills of materials — promise more secure applications, but sustained improvements will require that vendors do much better, researchers agree.

Can we build a defensible Internet? To improve the security of the Internet and the cloud applications it supports in 2023, we need to do better, experts say. Much better.

At the beginning of 2022, companies famously scrambled to hunt down and mitigate a critical vulnerability in a widespread component of many applications: the Log4j library. The following 12 months of Log4Shell woes highlighted that most companies do not know all the software components that make up their Internet-facing applications, do not have processes to regularly check configurations, and fail to find ways to integrate and incentivize security among their developers. 

The result? With the post-pandemic increase in remote work, many companies have lost their ability to lock down applications and remote workers and consumers are more vulnerable to cyberattacks from every corner, says Brian Fox, chief technology officer for Sonatype, a software security firm.

"Perimeter defense and legacy behavior worked when you had physical perimeter security — basically everyone was going into an office — but how do you maintain that when you have a workforce that increasingly works from home or a coffee shop?" he says. "You've stripped away those protections and defenses."

As 2022 nears its close, companies continue to struggle against insecure applications, vulnerable software components, and the large attack surface area posed by cloud services.

**The Software Supply Chain's Gaping Holes Persist

Even though software supply chain attacks grew 633% in 2021, companies still do not have the processes in place to do even simple security checks, such as weeding out known vulnerable dependencies. In March, for example, Sonatype found that 41% of downloaded Log4jcomponents were vulnerable versions.

Meanwhile, companies are increasingly moving infrastructure to the cloud and adopting more Web applications, tripling their use of APIs, with the average company using 15,600 APIs, and traffic to APIs quadrupling in the last year.

This increasingly cloudy infrastructure makes users' human fallibility the natural attack vector into enterprise infrastructure, says Tony Lauro, director of security technology and strategy at Akamai.

"The unfortunate truth is that no matter what is happening in the enterprise and how well you lock it down and secure it, there is opportunity to attack the users," he says. "With ransomware and malware, phishing and scams, even if the back end is secure, they can take advantage of the user."

****Cyberthreats Against Applications Only Loom Larger**

To see an example of how little progress cybersecurity has made in the past three decades, companies do not have to look further than phishing. The social engineering technique has been around for almost as long as email, yet the vast majority of companies (83%) have suffered a successful email-based phishing attack in 2022. Phishing easily leads to credential harvesting and then to compromises of Web applications and cloud infrastructure.

The simple technique can bypass multiple layers of application security and give attackers access to sensitive data, systems, and networks, Daniel Cuthbert, global head of cyber security research at Banco Santander, said at this month's Black Hat Europe security conference.

"You should be able to click on something and not have it push a reverse shell out to somebody else," he lamented. "Is it that hard to ask?"

Attackers are also focusing on targeting applications in ways that get by many of the security controls that are operating at the edge of the network.

At the Black Hat Asia conference in May, researchers outlined ways to sneak attacks past web application firewalls (WAFs) to deliver malicious payloads to otherwise-protected applications and their databases. In December, cybersecurity firm Claroty demonstrated more general attacks using JSON to bypass five major WAFs, including those of Amazon Web Services and Cloudflare. In the same month, a pair of researchers used a vulnerable version of Spring Boot to bypass Akamai's WAF.

Companies have to be more tactical about how they rely on WAFs, says Akamai's Lauro. So-called "virtual patching" — when the WAF is used to block the exploit of vulnerabilities that are not yet, or cannot yet be, patched — is an important capability. Yet, too many companies use WAFs to protect poorly designed applications, he says.

"You need to identify how that vulnerability could be attacked from the Internet, and virtual patches helps there, but once you are inside the network, the first thing I'm going to do as an attacker is look for some of these zero-days and use them to move laterally," he says.

**Future AppSec Requires Innovation**

Efforts to protect the fundamental components of software by securing the software supply chain will be a key source of innovation in the near future. These advances take time to implement and are not silver bullets, but they can result in far more robust software development and end product, experts say.

Providing developers more information about the components they import into their own software through systems like Scorecard, for example, has significant security benefits. Scorecard checks a variety of software project attributes, such as whether there are binary code included in the software, have dangerous development workflows, or has signed releases. Just that information can determine whether a project is vulnerable with 78% accuracy, according to the Open Software Security Foundation (OpenSSF).

Sigstore, which allows each software component to be signed, is another technology that will help developers understand and secure their supply chains, says John Speed Meyers, principal security scientist at Chainguard, a software security firm.

"A key building block for preventing software supply chain compromises is the widespread use of digital signatures," he says. "This helps reduce the chance of software supply chain compromises and reduce the blast radius when they do happen."

**Companies Can Make Cyber-Secure Application Choices**

While those advances in the software development process can result in more secure software, the choice of language can make a significant difference as well. Memory-safe languages can all but eliminate pernicious classes of software flaws, such as buffer overflows and use-after-free vulnerabilities. 

Google, for example, found that the use of memory-safe languages, such as Java and Rust, rather than C and C++ resulted in lowering the number of vulnerabilities from 223 to 85 over three years.

Companies need to give developers more support and leeway in selecting secure tools and frameworks, not just focus on productivity and features, says Sonatype's Fox.

"There is a new reality that companies need to wake up to and deal with, and that is that the developers at the end of the day are the ones that have to make these changes, and the organizations need to recognize their problems and support them," he says. "Developers are finding their own tools, and they know that's a problem, but they are not getting the support from the company, so even in a world where developers want to do the right thing, their companies are holding them back."

At the executive level, companies also need to be using their buying power to focus on holding their vendors accountable for security of their products, Banco Santander's Cuthbert said during his Black Hat Europe keynote.

"When we look at buying product, and we look at buying software, the reality is that we have zero input to make sure that those vendors, those products are secure," he said. "We just don't have that power and we don't have meaningful influence."

Internet AppSec Remains Abysmal & Requires Sustained Action in 2023

The Login for Google Apps WordPress plugin before 3.4.5 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup).

CVE-2022-3840

The WP Google Review Slider WordPress plugin before 11.6 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup).

CVE-2022-4242

golang.org/x/text/language in golang.org/x/text before 0.3.7 can panic with an out-of-bounds read during BCP 47 language tag parsing. Index calculation is mishandled. If parsing untrusted user input, this can be used as a vector for a denial-of-service attack.

)\]}' { "commit": "383b2e75a7a4198c42f8f87833eefb772868a56f", "tree": "44e79b095cf43e1ed915df938a9b9fe3d387f9f4", "parents": \[ "3115f89c4b99a620c7f1a4395a2b4405e95b82b6" \], "author": { "name": "Russ Cox", "email": "rsc@golang.org", "time": "Mon Aug 09 15:09:12 2021 -0400" }, "committer": { "name": "Russ Cox", "email": "rsc@golang.org", "time": "Tue Aug 10 18:28:16 2021 +0000" }, "message": "language: turn parsing panics into ErrSyntax\\n\\nWe keep finding new panics in the language parser.\\nLimit the damage by reporting those inputs as syntax errors.\\n\\nChange-Id: I786fe127c3df7e4c8e042d15095d3acf3c4e4a50\\nReviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/text/+/340830\\nTrust: Russ Cox \\u003crsc@golang.org\\u003e\\nRun-TryBot: Russ Cox \\u003crsc@golang.org\\u003e\\nTryBot-Result: Go Bot \\u003cgobot@golang.org\\u003e\\nReviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker \\u003croland@golang.org\\u003e\\n", "tree\_diff": \[ { "type": "modify", "old\_id": "f41aedcfc8aaf1db50211c0b75bbafa157ce0f23", "old\_mode": 33188, "old\_path": "internal/language/language.go", "new\_id": "6105bc7fadc11148c74d33ed45d978b659dc69ac", "new\_mode": 33188, "new\_path": "internal/language/language.go" }, { "type": "modify", "old\_id": "c696fd0bd867dbbac347721ad862055d8f177718", "old\_mode": 33188, "old\_path": "internal/language/parse.go", "new\_id": "47ee0fed174f22d8e07542716ea146c12d894092", "new\_mode": 33188, "new\_path": "internal/language/parse.go" }, { "type": "modify", "old\_id": "11acfd885627957280da6eb58f986b6542dd9192", "old\_mode": 33188, "old\_path": "language/parse.go", "new\_id": "59b04100806a9186164d246b5f61f1f9d2f3bba7", "new\_mode": 33188, "new\_path": "language/parse.go" } \] }

CVE-2021-38561

Ever-expanding cloud storage presents more risks than you might think.

Every year, more than a billion people use the Google Photos app to upload and store billions of pictures and videos. For many, the process is likely identical: You snap some photos with your phone and they’re automatically uploaded to Google’s cloud service. You might pick the best photo and share it on WhatsApp or Instagram and then never think about the rest of them ever again. The photos join a constantly updating stream of data about life.

But it shouldn’t be this way. Uploading thousands of photos and never taking any steps to sort or manage them creates a series of privacy risks and is making it impossible to maintain your photo collection in the future. Now is the time to stop being an information hoarder, before it spirals out of control.

For the past six weeks, I’ve spent around a dozen hours deleting thousands of photos that had been uploaded to my Google Photos account in the last half-decade. In total, I erased 16,774 photos and videos. During the process—and thousands of "delete" taps—three things stood out: My photos collection unknowingly includes a lot of sensitive personal information (both about me and others); I don't need to keep so many photos; and wrestling my collection into shape frees up a lot of space in my Google account.

My photo archive goes back to the early 2000s when everything was captured using an eight-megapixel digital camera. There are tens of thousands of photos—it’s impossible to say how many exactly—and they are entirely handled by Google. The photos were initially stored on CDs, moved to Flickr before it limited collections to 1,000 images, and finally found their way onto Google Photos around 2018. When Google limited accounts to 15 gigabytes of storage, I started paying for more.

Inside the collection, family holiday shots sit alongside selfies. Food pictures and dog pictures are plentiful. As phone cameras have improved and cloud storage has become seemingly unending, it appears that I take more photos every year. I am not the only one. Google Photos holds an unfathomable amount of data about us all: In 2020, the company said it stores 4 trillion photos, with 28 billion new photos and videos uploaded each week.

Deleting thousands of photos was a manual, tedious process. Using an iPad, I scrolled through every photo I had backed up from the past 15-plus years and tapped each one that I wanted to send to trash. In one of the longer sessions, I erased 2,211 photos in 45 minutes. The majority of photos binned were duplicates: Instead of having 16 pictures of me running through a forest, only the best two or three remain. Thousands of screenshots were culled: The moment I was verified on Twitter and the news article about a goat being arrested didn’t make it through the process unscathed.

But beneath the surface, there were plenty of images that should never have been kept in the first place. For years, I had been keeping photos of passports—my own and those of friends who had sent me the details for booking trips. I found photos of the details needed to log in to my bank account. I was storing people’s addresses and screenshots of directions to their homes. The list goes on: private email addresses, NSFW photos, screenshots of embarrassing conversations, common running routes and travel directions, pictures of notebooks from sensitive meetings. Huge swaths of my life were stored in my photos. I didn’t know they were there or had forgotten about them as soon as they weren’t useful. 

Each of these presents a risk. While Google makes the vast majority of its profits from advertising—its privacy policy says it won’t show you personalized ads based on your photos—the company has a strong data security record. Successful hacks against the company are incredibly rare. However, each piece of data that you’re unnecessarily storing adds a little extra hazard if something does go wrong. Documents could be used to assist with identity theft, while other personal details could contribute to building up a picture of who you talk to, where you live, and the places you frequent. Aside from any potential data breaches, my photos could potentially be accessed if my phone is lost or stolen. (These issues aren’t unique to Google Photos; they equally apply to any online photo storage service.)

But there are other reasons to spend some time clearing up your photos. Ever-expanding cloud storage makes it possible to keep taking photos and adding to the pile. Once sorted, it has been easier to find specific events and the best photos from them. If I had waited another few years, the task would have been too daunting to even start. In another 10 years, I may have taken an extra 20,000 to 40,000 photos. Now I plan on sorting the most recent photos once a year. 

Plus, practically speaking, there’s now more space in my Google account. Before I started deleting everything, I’d used up around 80 GB of storage; I’ve decreased this to about 60 GB. Google has some tools to help you manage your photos. You can archive photos if you don’t want to delete them or keep them in your main photo library. And pictures can be siphoned off into albums (it was too late for me). Its storage management tools allow you to delete large photos and videos in bulk and get rid of screenshots and blurry photos. It’s also possible to free up some of your account’s space by shrinking the size of photos by dropping them to “storage saver quality.”

However, my obsession with organizing my digital life—including operating a strict WhatsApp Zero policy—means that I would be fully satisfied with the job only if I did it manually. As I sifted through the tens of thousands of photos I’ve taken during two-thirds of my life, there was a satisfying glow to the process—a nostalgia vortex. Once I was done, I started taking more photos.

Everyone Is Using Google Photos Wrong

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in fredsmith utils. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file screenshot_sync of the component Filename Handler. The manipulation leads to predictable from observable state. The name of the patch is dbab1b66955eeb3d76b34612b358307f5c4e3944. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier VDB-216749 was assigned to this vulnerability.

@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@ #! /usr/bin/env bash set -x source /usr/local/Caskroom/google-cloud-sdk/latest/google-cloud-sdk/path.bash.inc  
function send\_notify { osascript -e "display notification \\"$@\\"" } cd ~/Pictures/Screenshots/  
if \`which scutil \> /dev/null\`; then @@ -12,9 +14,15 @@ fi  
for FILE in Screen\\ Shot\*.png; do if \[\[ \-f $FILE \]\]; then NEWFILENAME=$(echo $FILE | sed -e "s/Screen Shot/$SYSTEMNAME/" -e 's/at//' -e 's/ /-/g' -e 's/--/-/g'); randstring=$(cat /dev/urandom | tr -dc 'a-zA-Z0-9' | fold -w 8 | head -n 1)  
NEWFILENAME=$(echo $FILE | sed -e "s/Screen Shot/$SYSTEMNAME/" -e 's/at//' -e 's/ /-/g' -e 's/--/-/g' -e "s/\\.png/-$randstring\\.png/"); mv "$FILE" $NEWFILENAME gsutil cp $NEWFILENAME gs://files.derf.us/ echo "https://files.derf.us/$NEWFILENAME" | pbcopy if gsutil cp $NEWFILENAME gs://files.derf.us/; then echo "https://files.derf.us/$NEWFILENAME" | pbcopy send\_notify "https://files.derf.us/$NEWFILENAME" else send\_notify "upload failed" fi fi done

CVE-2021-4277: randomize uploaded file name to stop URL prediction attack · fredsmith/utils@dbab1b6

Hello everyone! This episode will be about Microsoft Patch Tuesday for December 2022, including vulnerabilities that were added between November and December Patch Tuesdays. As usual, I use my open source Vulristics project to analyse and prioritize vulnerabilities. Alternative video link (for Russia): https://vk.com/video-149273431_456239112 But let’s start with an older vulnerability. This will be another example why […]

Hello everyone! This episode will be about Microsoft Patch Tuesday for December 2022, including vulnerabilities that were added between November and December Patch Tuesdays. As usual, I use my open source Vulristics project to analyse and prioritize vulnerabilities.

Alternative video link (for Russia): https://vk.com/video-149273431\_456239112

But let’s start with an older vulnerability. This will be another example why vulnerability prioritization is a tricky thing and you should patch everything. In the September Microsoft Patch Tuesday there was a vulnerability **Information Disclosure** – SPNEGO Extended Negotiation (NEGOEX) Security Mechanism (CVE-2022-37958), which was completely unnoticed by everyone. Not a single VM vendor paid attention to it in their reviews. I didn’t pay attention either.

**SPNEGO** **(Simple and Protected GSSAPI Negotiation Mechanism)** is a GSSAPI “pseudo mechanism” used by client-server software to negotiate the choice of security technology. SPNEGO is used when a client application wants to authenticate to a remote server, but neither end is sure what authentication protocols the other supports. Who knows what kind of disclosure there might be. This vulnerability had CVSS 7.5 (High), not even Critical.

And then on December 13th, IBM Security X-Force researcher Valentina Palmiotti posts a video exploiting this vulnerability, which turns out to be Remote Code Execution. In this video, a Python script is executed in a Linux virtual machine, and in a Windows 10 virtual machine, the message _“Your PC will automatically restart in one minute”_ appears, which indicates that some code was executed there. The researcher is famous and it is highly unlikely that the video is fake.

It turned out that the vulnerability can be exploited during the authentication attempts. The vulnerability affects various protocols. Primarily RDP and SMB. It may be relevant for SMTP, HTTP and others with a non-standard configuration. So, this vulnerability could potentially be worse than EternalBlue.

Microsoft has made changes to the description of the vulnerability. Now it is Critical RCE. NVD hasn’t made any changes yet. IBM promises not to release details until the second quarter of 2023 to give people time to patch.

Now let’s look at the most interesting vulnerabilities of Microsoft Patch Tuesday for December 2022.

    $ cat comments_links.txt 
    Qualys|December 2022 Patch Tuesday|https://blog.qualys.com/vulnerabilities-threat-research/patch-tuesday/2022/12/13/the-december-2022-patch-tuesday-security-update-review
    ZDI|THE DECEMBER 2022 SECURITY UPDATE REVIEW|https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2022/12/13/the-december-2022-security-update-review
    
    $ python3.8 process_classify_ms_products.py  # Automated classifier for Microsoft products
    
    $ python3.8 vulristics.py --report-type "ms_patch_tuesday_extended" --mspt-year 2022 --mspt-month "December" --mspt-comments-links-path "comments_links.txt"  --rewrite-flag "True"
    ...
    Creating Patch Tuesday profile...
    MS PT Year: 2022
    MS PT Month: December
    MS PT Date: 2022-12-13
    MS PT CVEs found: 49
    Ext MS PT Date from: 2022-11-09
    Ext MS PT Date to: 2022-12-12
    Ext MS PT CVEs found: 32
    ALL MS PT CVEs: 81
    ...

*   All vulnerabilities: 80
*   Urgent: 0
*   Critical: 3
*   High: 29
*   Medium: 48
*   Low: 0

There were 2 vulnerabilities with signs of exploitation in the wild:

1.  **Security Feature Bypass** – Windows SmartScreen (CVE-2022-44698). It is a bypass of the Windows SmartScreen security feature, and has been seen exploited in the wild. It allows attackers to craft documents that won’t get tagged with Microsoft’s “Mark of the Web” despite being downloaded from untrusted sites. Exploitation in the wild is mentioned on Vulners (cisa\_kev object), AttackerKB, Microsoft websites. The existence of a public exploit is mentioned in Microsoft CVSS Temporal Score (Functional Exploit). To be honest, I do not consider these warnings from the operating system to be effective. Therefore, this vulnerability does not seem very critical to me. I think an Antivirus or EDR solution should block suspicious files from running in the first place.
2.  **Memory Corruption** – Microsoft Edge (CVE-2022-4135, CVE-2022-4262). Exploitation in the wild is mentioned on Vulners (cisa\_kev object), AttackerKB websites. CVE-2022-4135: Heap buffer overflow in GPU in Google Chrome prior to 107.0.5304.121 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High). CVE-2022-4262: Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 108.0.5359.94 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Among other vulnerabilities without public exploits and signs of exploitation in the wild, it makes sense to pay attention to the following:

1.  **Remote Code Execution** – Microsoft PowerShell (CVE-2022-41076). This critical vulnerability affects PowerShell where any authenticate user, regardless of its privilege could escape the PowerShell Remoting Session Configuration and run unapproved commands on the target system. It is worth mentioning that, typically after the initial breach, attackers use the tools available on the system to keep the preserve or advance around a network, and PowerShell is one of the more capable tools they can find. 
2.  **Remote Code Execution** – Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) (CVE-2022-44670, CVE-2022-44676). This critical vulnerability affects Windows Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP), and according to Microsoft, an attacker would need to win a race condition to successfully exploit these bugs. An unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted connection request to a RAS server, which could lead to remote code execution (RCE) on the RAS server machine. If you do not have this service, disable it. 
3.  Among the **Elevation of Privilege** vulnerabilities, I would like to highlight a vulnerability in DirectX Graphics Kernel (CVE-2022-44710) and Windows Print Spooler (CVE-2022-44678, CVE-2022-44681).

Full Vulristics report: ms\_patch\_tuesday\_december2022

Hi! My name is Alexander and I am a Vulnerability Management specialist. You can read more about me here. Currently, the best way to follow me is my Telegram channel @avleonovcom. I update it more often than this site. If you haven’t used Telegram yet, give it a try. It’s great. You can discuss my posts or ask questions at @avleonovchat.

А всех русскоязычных я приглашаю в ещё один телеграмм канал @avleonovrus, первым делом теперь пишу туда.

Microsoft Patch Tuesday December 2022: SPNEGO RCE, Mark of the Web Bypass, Edge Memory Corruptions

Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Stored in GitHub repository usememos/memos prior to 0.9.0.

**Description**

Hi there, Your project has a function of uploading files.That is the section named "Resource".But it does not filter the content of the uploaded files. If we upload an svg file containing malicious data and a user accesses it, xss will be triggered.

**Video**

Please visit my video link

https://drive.google.com/file/d/10GQODgA3evtTGYmdAivR9zYGxsarr1L0/view

**Proof of Concept**

1.Login as any user.

2.Click the module named "Resource".

3.Upload a svg file and the contents of this file are as follows.

<x:script xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">alert(document.domain)</x:script>

4.Access this svg file

**Impact**

(1) To steal the administrator account or cookie, the intruder can log in to the background as an administrator. It enables intruders to manipulate background data maliciously, including reading, changing, adding and deleting some information.

(2) Stealing users' personal information or login accounts will pose a huge threat to the user security of the website. For example, pretend to be a user for various operations.

(3) The website hangs horses. First, embed the malicious attack code into the Web application. When the user browses the hanging horse page, the user's computer will be implanted with a Trojan horse.

(4) Send advertisements or spam messages. Attackers can use XSS vulnerabilities to plant advertisements or send spam, seriously affecting the normal use of users.

**Occurrences**

resource.go L1-L278

Hello, my suggestion is that you should detect and filter the content of the svg file.

Tag

#google